Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Contextual Bandit Bake-off

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1802.04064 v5 pith:P6KWOMMX submitted 2018-02-12 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords banditcontextualalgorithmslearningdesignevaluatemethodsoverall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Contextual bandit algorithms are essential for solving many real-world interactive machine learning problems. Despite multiple recent successes on statistically and computationally efficient methods, the practical behavior of these algorithms is still poorly understood. We leverage the availability of large numbers of supervised learning datasets to empirically evaluate contextual bandit algorithms, focusing on practical methods that learn by relying on optimization oracles from supervised learning. We find that a recent method (Foster et al., 2018) using optimism under uncertainty works the best overall. A surprisingly close second is a simple greedy baseline that only explores implicitly through the diversity of contexts, followed by a variant of Online Cover (Agarwal et al., 2014) which tends to be more conservative but robust to problem specification by design. Along the way, we also evaluate various components of contextual bandit algorithm design such as loss estimators. Overall, this is a thorough study and review of contextual bandit methodology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Quantification and Causal Considerations for Off-Policy Decision Making

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three methods for off-policy evaluation: marginal ratio variance reduction, conformal predictive intervals, and causal bounds that falsify digital twins under unmeasured confounding.

Pith tools