REVIEW 3 cited by
On Finding Dense Common Subgraphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We study the recently introduced problem of finding dense common subgraphs: Given a sequence of graphs that share the same vertex set, the goal is to find a subset of vertices $S$ that maximizes some aggregate measure of the density of the subgraphs induced by $S$ in each of the given graphs. Different choices for the aggregation function give rise to variants of the problem that were studied recently. We settle many of the questions left open by previous works, showing NP-hardness, hardness of approximation, non-trivial approximation algorithms, and an integrality gap for a natural relaxation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fundamental Limits of Query-Based Subgraph Detection
For non-adaptive edge-query detection of arbitrary planted subgraphs, the minimum query count is governed by whether the planted graph has dense local witnesses, high-degree hubs, or just many edges.
-
Recovery of Planted Subgraphs
Sharp conditions for exact recovery of general planted subgraphs in ER graphs are given by the minimal maximum subgraph density, with matching bounds, a spectral algorithm, and computational hardness results via low-d...
-
Fair densest subgraph across multiple graphs
The authors prove that two fairness-constrained variants of the densest subgraph problem over graph snapshots are NP-hard and give integer-programming and greedy algorithms.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.