REVIEW 2 cited by
Unsupervised Learning of Goal Spaces for Intrinsically Motivated Goal Exploration
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Intrinsically motivated goal exploration algorithms enable machines to discover repertoires of policies that produce a diversity of effects in complex environments. These exploration algorithms have been shown to allow real world robots to acquire skills such as tool use in high-dimensional continuous state and action spaces. However, they have so far assumed that self-generated goals are sampled in a specifically engineered feature space, limiting their autonomy. In this work, we propose to use deep representation learning algorithms to learn an adequate goal space. This is a developmental 2-stage approach: first, in a perceptual learning stage, deep learning algorithms use passive raw sensor observations of world changes to learn a corresponding latent space; then goal exploration happens in a second stage by sampling goals in this latent space. We present experiments where a simulated robot arm interacts with an object, and we show that exploration algorithms using such learned representations can match the performance obtained using engineered representations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Expedition & Expansion: Leveraging Semantic Representations for Goal-Directed Exploration in Continuous Cellular Automata
A hybrid exploration algorithm that alternates semantic novelty search with VLM-generated linguistic goals discovers more diverse Flow Lenia behaviors than novelty search alone.
-
A Deep Learning Based Method for Fast Registration of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images
FLIR is a cascade of lightweight U-Nets for cardiac MRI registration; it beats VoxelMorph dice scores only with 3 to 5 cascades, which run slower than VoxelMorph, so the speed claim is not supported.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.