Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A study in $\mathbb{G}_{\mathbb{R}, \geq 0}$: from the geometric case book of Wilson loop diagrams and SYM $N=4$

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.00958 v1 pith:AYCAH4LE submitted 2018-03-02 math.CO math-phmath.MP

classification math.COmath-phmath.MP
keywords mathbbcaseloopwilsoncellscomputediagramdiagrams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study the geometry underlying the Wilson loop diagram approach to calculating scattering amplitudes in the gauge theory of Supersymmetric Yang Mills (SYM) $N=4$. By applying the tools developed to study total positivity in the real Grassmannian, we are able to systematically compute with all Wilson loop diagrams of a given size and find unexpected patterns and relationships between them. We focus on the smallest nontrivial multi-propagator case, consisting of 2 propagators on 6 vertices, and compute the positroid cells associated to each diagram and the homology of the subcomplex they generate in $\mathbb{G}_{\mathbb{R}, \geq 0}$. We also verify in this case the conjecture that the spurious singularities of the volume functional {\em do} all cancel on the codimension 1 boundaries of these cells.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Combinatorics of the geometry of Wilson loop diagrams I: equivalence classes via matroids and polytopes

    math-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two Wilson loop diagrams define the same positroid exactly when they differ by retriangulating certain exact subdiagrams, and inequivalent diagrams correspond to non-parallel faces of an associahedron.

Pith tools