Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Feature-Rich Vietnamese Named-Entity Recognition Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.04375 v1 pith:EEPK2H2R submitted 2018-03-12 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelvietnamesefeature-basedfeatureswordaccuracychunkingnamed-entity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present a feature-based named-entity recognition (NER) model that achieves the start-of-the-art accuracy for Vietnamese language. We combine word, word-shape features, PoS, chunk, Brown-cluster-based features, and word-embedding-based features in the Conditional Random Fields (CRF) model. We also explore the effects of word segmentation, PoS tagging, and chunking results of many popular Vietnamese NLP toolkits on the accuracy of the proposed feature-based NER model. Up to now, our work is the first work that systematically performs an extrinsic evaluation of basic Vietnamese NLP toolkits on the downstream NER task. Experimental results show that while automatically-generated word segmentation is useful, PoS and chunking information generated by Vietnamese NLP tools does not show their benefits for the proposed feature-based NER model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 5 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. REBot: From RAG to CatRAG with Semantic Enrichment and Graph Routing

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A category-routed hybrid of RAG and knowledge-graph retrieval answers Vietnamese university-regulation questions with F1 98.89% on the authors' own dataset — about 0.2 points above plain RAG.

Pith tools