Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Leveraging Uncertainty Estimates for Predicting Segmentation Quality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.00502 v1 pith:FTA3H3WD submitted 2018-07-02 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords uncertaintysegmentationdeepmedicalcasescommunityfirstimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of deep learning for medical imaging has seen tremendous growth in the research community. One reason for the slow uptake of these systems in the clinical setting is that they are complex, opaque and tend to fail silently. Outside of the medical imaging domain, the machine learning community has recently proposed several techniques for quantifying model uncertainty (i.e.~a model knowing when it has failed). This is important in practical settings, as we can refer such cases to manual inspection or correction by humans. In this paper, we aim to bring these recent results on estimating uncertainty to bear on two important outputs in deep learning-based segmentation. The first is producing spatial uncertainty maps, from which a clinician can observe where and why a system thinks it is failing. The second is quantifying an image-level prediction of failure, which is useful for isolating specific cases and removing them from automated pipelines. We also show that reasoning about spatial uncertainty, the first output, is a useful intermediate representation for generating segmentation quality predictions, the second output. We propose a two-stage architecture for producing these measures of uncertainty, which can accommodate any deep learning-based medical segmentation pipeline.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quality-Guided Semi-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new quality-guided approach for semi-supervised medical image segmentation that trains a predictor on synthetic errors to enhance pseudolabel handling.

  2. Uncertainty-Aware Segmentation Quality Prediction via Deep Learning Bayesian Modeling: Comprehensive Evaluation and Interpretation on Skin Cancer and Liver Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A deep learning framework predicts segmentation quality from uncertainty maps and image features, achieving high Dice correlation on skin and liver segmentation without test-time ground truth.

Pith tools