Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-task dialog act and sentiment recognition on Mastodon

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.05013 v1 pith:K3E524PU submitted 2018-07-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords corpussocialdialogdialogueslicensemastodonmediamulti-task
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Because of license restrictions, it often becomes impossible to strictly reproduce most research results on Twitter data already a few months after the creation of the corpus. This situation worsened gradually as time passes and tweets become inaccessible. This is a critical issue for reproducible and accountable research on social media. We partly solve this challenge by annotating a new Twitter-like corpus from an alternative large social medium with licenses that are compatible with reproducible experiments: Mastodon. We manually annotate both dialogues and sentiments on this corpus, and train a multi-task hierarchical recurrent network on joint sentiment and dialog act recognition. We experimentally demonstrate that transfer learning may be efficiently achieved between both tasks, and further analyze some specific correlations between sentiments and dialogues on social media. Both the annotated corpus and deep network are released with an open-source license.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data Ethics in the Fediverse: Analyzing the Role of Instance Policies in Mastodon Research

    cs.SI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 29 Mastodon studies finds that researchers rarely engage with instance-level data policies, prompting calls for structural fixes to research ethics on the Fediverse.

Pith tools