Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Trick Me If You Can: Human-in-the-loop Generation of Adversarial Examples for Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.02701 v4 pith:ZWIU4U4N submitted 2018-09-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords adversarialquestionsansweringgenerationquestionauthorsexampleshuman-in-the-loop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial evaluation stress tests a model's understanding of natural language. While past approaches expose superficial patterns, the resulting adversarial examples are limited in complexity and diversity. We propose human-in-the-loop adversarial generation, where human authors are guided to break models. We aid the authors with interpretations of model predictions through an interactive user interface. We apply this generation framework to a question answering task called Quizbowl, where trivia enthusiasts craft adversarial questions. The resulting questions are validated via live human--computer matches: although the questions appear ordinary to humans, they systematically stump neural and information retrieval models. The adversarial questions cover diverse phenomena from multi-hop reasoning to entity type distractors, exposing open challenges in robust question answering.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Seed to Harvest: Augmenting Human Creativity with AI for Red-teaming Text-to-Image Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Seed2Harvest expands 1,000 human adversarial prompts into 27,650 LLM-generated variants that keep roughly comparable unsafe-image trigger rates and add hundreds of new geographic contexts.

  2. SUCEA: Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval for Adversarial Fact-checking through Claim Decomposition and Editing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SUCEA improves adversarial fact-checking by decomposing claims into atomic sub-claims, editing each sub-claim toward retrieved evidence, and re-retrieving before predicting the final label.

Pith tools