REVIEW 2 cited by
Privacy and Utility Tradeoff in Approximate Differential Privacy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We characterize the minimum noise amplitude and power for noise-adding mechanisms in $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy for single real-valued query function. We derive new lower bounds using the duality of linear programming, and new upper bounds by proposing a new class of $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differentially private mechanisms, the \emph{truncated Laplacian} mechanisms. We show that the multiplicative gap of the lower bounds and upper bounds goes to zero in various high privacy regimes, proving the tightness of the lower and upper bounds and thus establishing the optimality of the truncated Laplacian mechanism. In particular, our results close the previous constant multiplicative gap in the discrete setting. Numeric experiments show the improvement of the truncated Laplacian mechanism over the optimal Gaussian mechanism in all privacy regimes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diffprivlib: The IBM Differential Privacy Library
The paper presents Diffprivlib as the first unifying open-source Python library implementing differential privacy mechanisms and applications for data analytics and machine learning.
-
Meeting Utility Constraints in Differential Privacy: A Privacy-Boosting Approach
A privacy-boosting mechanism reweights DP noise to meet utility constraints, with new cases for relative error, fixed regions, and local randomized response.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.