REVIEW 2 cited by
Robust variance estimation and inference for causal effect estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We consider a longitudinal data structure consisting of baseline covariates, time-varying treatment variables, intermediate time-dependent covariates, and a possibly time dependent outcome. Previous studies have shown that estimating the variance of asymptotically linear estimators using empirical influence functions in this setting result in anti-conservative estimates with increasing magnitudes of positivity violations, leading to poor coverage and uncontrolled Type I errors. In this paper, we present two alternative approaches of estimating the variance of these estimators: (i) a robust approach which directly targets the variance of the influence function as a counterfactual mean outcome, and (ii) a non-parametric bootstrap based approach that is theoretically valid and lowers the computational cost, thereby increasing the feasibility in non-parametric settings using complex machine learning algorithms. The performance of these approaches are compared to that of the empirical influence function in simulations across different levels of positivity violations and treatment effect sizes.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evaluating causal indirect effects when mediators are left-censored by assay limit of quantification
Proposes a fractional imputation plus semi-parametric EM framework for estimating natural direct and indirect effects under deterministic left-censoring of the mediator by assay limit of quantification.
-
Transporting results from a trial to an external target population when trial participation impacts adherence
A method to transport trial treatment effects to a target population under user-specified assumptions about adherence differences, with double-robust estimators and an opioid use disorder application.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.