REVIEW 3 cited by
Overview of CAIL2018: Legal Judgment Prediction Competition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we give an overview of the Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) competition at Chinese AI and Law challenge (CAIL2018). This competition focuses on LJP which aims to predict the judgment results according to the given facts. Specifically, in CAIL2018 , we proposed three subtasks of LJP for the contestants, i.e., predicting relevant law articles, charges and prison terms given the fact descriptions. CAIL2018 has attracted several hundreds participants (601 teams, 1, 144 contestants from 269 organizations). In this paper, we provide a detailed overview of the task definition, related works, outstanding methods and competition results in CAIL2018.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LegalWorld: A Life-Cycle Interactive Environment for Legal Agents
LegalWorld is a life-cycle interactive environment modeling Chinese civil litigation as five causally connected stages grounded in 75,309 judgments, paired with LongJud-Bench for cross-stage agent evaluation.
-
Charge-Based Prison Term Prediction with Deep Gating Network
Charge-based prison term prediction with a Deep Gating Network improves accuracy over existing total-term baselines on a newly collected dataset of 238,749 Chinese criminal cases.
-
Bilingual BSARD: Extending Statutory Article Retrieval to Dutch
The authors extend the French BSARD legal retrieval dataset to Dutch (bBSARD) and benchmark retrieval models, showing small fine-tuned language-specific models can outperform zero-shot proprietary embeddings.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.