Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Safety and Trustworthiness of Deep Neural Networks: Verification, Testing, Adversarial Attack and Defence, and Interpretability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.08342 v5 pith:HGRNTXGK submitted 2018-12-18 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords dnnssurveyadversarialattackbeenconcernsdeepdefence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the past few years, significant progress has been made on deep neural networks (DNNs) in achieving human-level performance on several long-standing tasks. With the broader deployment of DNNs on various applications, the concerns over their safety and trustworthiness have been raised in public, especially after the widely reported fatal incidents involving self-driving cars. Research to address these concerns is particularly active, with a significant number of papers released in the past few years. This survey paper conducts a review of the current research effort into making DNNs safe and trustworthy, by focusing on four aspects: verification, testing, adversarial attack and defence, and interpretability. In total, we survey 202 papers, most of which were published after 2017.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WeedNet: A Foundation Model-Based Global-to-Local AI Approach for Real-Time Weed Species Identification and Classification

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An AI model trained on citizen science images identifies over 1,500 weed species globally and fine-tunes to regional weed communities with high accuracy.

  2. Synthetic Poisoning Attacks: The Impact of Poisoned MRI Image on U-Net Brain Tumor Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Adding GAN-generated synthetic MRI to U-Net training data degrades brain tumor segmentation performance, but the paper's evidence for a monotonic, significant decline is weakened by contradictory table values and conf...

Pith tools