Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Investigation of Supervised Learning Methods for Authorship Attribution in Short Hinglish Texts using Char & Word N-grams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10281 v1 pith:DQNP7E4I submitted 2018-12-26 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords featurestextsattributionmethodswordaccuracyapplicationattained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The writing style of a person can be affirmed as a unique identity indicator; the words used, and the structuring of the sentences are clear measures which can identify the author of a specific work. Stylometry and its subset - Authorship Attribution, have a long history beginning from the 19th century, and we can still find their use in modern times. The emergence of the Internet has shifted the application of attribution studies towards non-standard texts that are comparatively shorter to and different from the long texts on which most research has been done. The aim of this paper focuses on the study of short online texts, retrieved from messaging application called WhatsApp and studying the distinctive features of a macaronic language (Hinglish), using supervised learning methods and then comparing the models. Various features such as word n-gram and character n-gram are compared via methods viz., Naive Bayes Classifier, Support Vector Machine, Conditional Tree, and Random Forest, to find the best discriminator for such corpora. Our results showed that SVM attained a test accuracy of up to 95.079% while similarly, Naive Bayes attained an accuracy of up to 94.455% for the dataset. Conditional Tree & Random Forest failed to perform as well as expected. We also found that word unigram and character 3-grams features were more likely to distinguish authors accurately than other features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AIDBench: A benchmark for evaluating the authorship identification capability of large language models

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows GPT-4 and several other LLMs can attribute anonymous texts to their authors at rates well above random chance, though performance drops sharply in harder cross-topic settings.

  2. Human Variability vs. Machine Consistency: A Linguistic Analysis of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Human-written texts show higher linguistic variability, richer vocabulary and emotional content, and lower syntactic depth than texts from five LLMs.

Pith tools