Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Debiasing and $t$-tests for synthetic control inference on average causal effects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.10820 v9 pith:DAZBRHEN submitted 2018-12-27 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords averageeffectsinferencerobustsynthetictestapplication-basedasymptotically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We propose a practical and robust method for making inferences on average treatment effects estimated by synthetic controls. We develop a $K$-fold cross-fitting procedure for bias correction. To avoid the difficult estimation of the long-run variance, inference is based on a self-normalized $t$-statistic, which has an asymptotically pivotal $t$-distribution. Our $t$-test is easy to implement, provably robust against misspecification, and valid with stationary and non-stationary data. It demonstrates an excellent small sample performance in application-based simulations and performs well relative to other methods. We illustrate the usefulness of the $t$-test by revisiting the effect of carbon taxes on emissions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Compositional Synthetic Controls

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For outcomes that are shares summing to one, the paper estimates counterfactuals as weighted geometric means of donor compositions in log-odds space, with weights fit before treatment.

Pith tools