Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Models in Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.06796 v3 pith:GKDWIWNK submitted 2019-01-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dnnsadversarialexamplesapplicationsarticledeepeffortshowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the development of high computational devices, deep neural networks (DNNs), in recent years, have gained significant popularity in many Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. However, previous efforts have shown that DNNs were vulnerable to strategically modified samples, named adversarial examples. These samples are generated with some imperceptible perturbations but can fool the DNNs to give false predictions. Inspired by the popularity of generating adversarial examples for image DNNs, research efforts on attacking DNNs for textual applications emerges in recent years. However, existing perturbation methods for images cannotbe directly applied to texts as text data is discrete. In this article, we review research works that address this difference and generatetextual adversarial examples on DNNs. We collect, select, summarize, discuss and analyze these works in a comprehensive way andcover all the related information to make the article self-contained. Finally, drawing on the reviewed literature, we provide further discussions and suggestions on this topic.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TrustGLM: Evaluating the Robustness of GraphLLMs Against Prompt, Text, and Structure Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GraphLLMs are broadly vulnerable to text, graph structure, and prompt label attacks, but the severity depends heavily on the model and dataset.

Pith tools