REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparison of post-Newtonian mode amplitudes with numerical relativity simulations of binary black holes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Gravitational waves from the coalescence of two black holes carry the signature of the strong field dynamics of binary black holes. In this work we have used numerical relativity simulations and post-Newtonian theory to investigate this dynamics. Post-Newtonian theory is a low-velocity expansion that assumes the companion bodies to be point-particles, while numerical relativity treats black holes as extended objects with horizons and fully captures their dynamics. There is a priori no reason for the waveforms computed using these disparate methods to agree with each other, especially at late times when the black holes move close to the speed of light. We find, remarkably, that the leading order amplitudes in post-Newtonian theory agree well with the full general relativity solution for a large set of spherical harmonic modes, even in the most dynamical part of the binary evolution, with only some modes showing distinctly different behavior than that found by numerical relativity simulations. In particular, modes with spherical harmonic indices l = m as well as l = 2, m = 1 are least modified from their dominant post-Newtonian behavior. Understanding the nature of these modes in terms of the post-Newtonian description will aid in formulating better models of the emitted waveforms in the strong field regime of the dynamics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Prospects for characterizing Population III remnants with next-generation gravitational-wave observatories
For an ET+CE network, loud Population III BBH mergers at z>15 can be confidently placed above z~12, masses measured to about 12 percent, but spin constraints remain weak.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.