Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evidence Sentence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.08852 v2 pith:NNRUXG6R submitted 2019-02-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords evidencelabelsmodelsmultiple-choicesentencesentencesapplycomprehension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Remarkable success has been achieved in the last few years on some limited machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks. However, it is still difficult to interpret the predictions of existing MRC models. In this paper, we focus on extracting evidence sentences that can explain or support the answers of multiple-choice MRC tasks, where the majority of answer options cannot be directly extracted from reference documents. Due to the lack of ground truth evidence sentence labels in most cases, we apply distant supervision to generate imperfect labels and then use them to train an evidence sentence extractor. To denoise the noisy labels, we apply a recently proposed deep probabilistic logic learning framework to incorporate both sentence-level and cross-sentence linguistic indicators for indirect supervision. We feed the extracted evidence sentences into existing MRC models and evaluate the end-to-end performance on three challenging multiple-choice MRC datasets: MultiRC, RACE, and DREAM, achieving comparable or better performance than the same models that take as input the full reference document. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work extracting evidence sentences for multiple-choice MRC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DCMN+: Dual Co-Matching Network for Multi-choice Reading Comprehension

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DCMN+ combines bidirectional passage-question-option matching with passage sentence selection and answer option interaction to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on five multiple-choice reading comprehension datasets.

  2. Reasoning-Driven Question-Answering for Natural Language Understanding

    cs.CL 2019-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The thesis presents a synthesis of previously published work on abductive reasoning for QA, essential-term detection, multi-sentence and temporal commonsense datasets, and a formal framework for reasoning limitations.

Pith tools