Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Effective Aesthetics Prediction with Multi-level Spatially Pooled Features

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.01382 v1 pith:3UXEGMJK submitted 2019-04-02 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords featuresaestheticsconvolutionaleffectiveimagesinputmulti-levelnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an effective deep learning approach to aesthetics quality assessment that relies on a new type of pre-trained features, and apply it to the AVA data set, the currently largest aesthetics database. While previous approaches miss some of the information in the original images, due to taking small crops, down-scaling or warping the originals during training, we propose the first method that efficiently supports full resolution images as an input, and can be trained on variable input sizes. This allows us to significantly improve upon the state of the art, increasing the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (SRCC) of ground-truth mean opinion scores (MOS) from the existing best reported of 0.612 to 0.756. To achieve this performance, we extract multi-level spatially pooled (MLSP) features from all convolutional blocks of a pre-trained InceptionResNet-v2 network, and train a custom shallow Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture on these new features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explaining Automatic Image Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Training separate NIMA-style models on depth, saliency, and blur versions of AVA shows saliency carries the most signal among non-RGB modalities, while the standard 5.0 threshold inflates baselines to above 70 percent.

Pith tools