REVIEW 1 cited by
Fixed Effects Binary Choice Models: Estimation and Inference with Long Panels
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Empirical economists are often deterred from the application of fixed effects binary choice models mainly for two reasons: the incidental parameter problem and the computational challenge even in moderately large panels. Using the example of binary choice models with individual and time fixed effects, we show how both issues can be alleviated by combining asymptotic bias corrections with computational advances. Because unbalancedness is often encountered in applied work, we investigate its consequences on the finite sample properties of various (bias corrected) estimators. In simulation experiments we find that analytical bias corrections perform particularly well, whereas split-panel jackknife estimators can be severely biased in unbalanced panels.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Inference for Fixed Effects Estimators when Panels are Unbalanced
In unbalanced panels, two-way fixed-effects M-estimators have incidental-parameter plus feedback bias, and a proposed analytical correction restores correctly centered normal inference without knowing which regressors...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.