REVIEW 3 cited by
Testing general relativity with supermassive black holes using X-ray reflection spectroscopy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we review our current efforts to test General Relativity in the strong field regime by studying the reflection spectrum of supermassive black holes. So far we have analyzed 11 sources with observations of NuSTAR, Suzaku, Swift, and XMM-Newton. Our results are consistent with general relativity, according to which the spacetime metric around astrophysical black holes should be well approximated by the Kerr solution. We discuss the systematic uncertainties in our model and we present a preliminary study on the impact of some of them on the measurement of the spacetime metric.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Reflection spectra of thick accretion disks
Reflection spectra from thick (Polish donut) accretion disks, when analyzed with thin-disk models, bias black hole spin upward and can create or mask apparent deviations from the Kerr metric.
-
Relativistic reflection spectra of super-spinning black holes
Fitting Suzaku reflection spectra with a super-spinning spacetime model finds apparent deviations from Kerr in Ark 120 and Swift J0501.9, but the 3-sigma claim is not consistently supported for Swift.
-
RELXILL_NK: A Black Hole Relativistic Reflection Model for Testing General Relativity
RELXILL_NK, a publicly available X-ray reflection model that includes non-Kerr black hole spacetimes, is presented and three of its flavors are compared using the Johannsen metric.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.