Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Civic Crowdfunding for Agents with Negative Valuations and Agents with Asymmetric Beliefs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11324 v1 pith:XWY45WA7 submitted 2019-05-27 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords agentsbeliefmechanismsasymmetricnegativeprojectciviccrowdfunding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the last decade, civic crowdfunding has proved to be effective in generating funds for the provision of public projects. However, the existing literature deals only with citizen's with positive valuation and symmetric belief towards the project's provision. In this work, we present novel mechanisms which break these two barriers, i.e., mechanisms which incorporate negative valuation and asymmetric belief, independently. For negative valuation, we present a methodology for converting existing mechanisms to mechanisms that incorporate agents with negative valuations. Particularly, we adapt existing PPR and PPS mechanisms, to present novel PPRN and PPSN mechanisms which incentivize strategic agents to contribute to the project based on their true preference. With respect to asymmetric belief, we propose a reward scheme Belief Based Reward (BBR) based on Robust Bayesian Truth Serum mechanism. With BBR, we propose a general mechanism for civic crowdfunding which incorporates asymmetric agents. We leverage PPR and PPS, to present PPRx and PPSx. We prove that in PPRx and PPSx, agents with greater belief towards the project's provision contribute more than agents with lesser belief. Further, we also show that contributions are such that the project is provisioned at equilibrium.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Resourced Authority A Mechanism-Design Model for Participatory Governance of Deployed AI Agents

    cs.GT 2026-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper formalizes participatory AI governance as a compute-budget authorization game, but the central theorem's sufficiency proof fails to construct a valid equilibrium.

Pith tools