REVIEW 1 cited by
KPZ formulas for the Liouville quantum gravity metric
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Let $\gamma\in (0,2)$, let $h$ be the planar Gaussian free field, and let $D_h$ be the associated $\gamma$-Liouville quantum gravity (LQG) metric. We prove that for any random Borel set $X \subset \mathbb{C}$ which is independent from $h$, the Hausdorff dimensions of $X$ with respect to the Euclidean metric and with respect to the $\gamma$-LQG metric $D_h$ are a.s. related by the (geometric) KPZ formula. As a corollary, we deduce that the Hausdorff dimension of the continuum $\gamma$-LQG metric is equal to the exponent $d_\gamma > 2$ studied by Ding and Gwynne (2018), which describes distances in discrete approximations of $\gamma$-LQG such as random planar maps. We also derive "worst-case" bounds relating the Euclidean and $\gamma$-LQG dimensions of $X$ when $X$ and $h$ are not necessarily independent, which answers a question posed by Aru (2015). Using these bounds, we obtain an upper bound for the Euclidean Hausdorff dimension of a $\gamma$-LQG geodesic which equals $1.312\dots$ when $\gamma = \sqrt{8/3}$; and an upper bound of $1.9428\dots$ for the Euclidean Hausdorff dimension of a connected component of the boundary of a $\sqrt{8/3}$-LQG metric ball. We use the axiomatic definition of the $\gamma$-LQG metric, so the paper can be understood by readers with minimal background knowledge beyond a basic level of familiarity with the Gaussian free field.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Random surfaces and Liouville quantum gravity
An expository overview of the definition of Liouville quantum gravity surfaces, the three senses in which random planar maps converge to them, and the major open problems.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.