Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.08158 v2 pith:4N73GLIK submitted 2019-06-19 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords acquisitionbatchbatchbalddatapointsactiveapproachbayesian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We develop BatchBALD, a tractable approximation to the mutual information between a batch of points and model parameters, which we use as an acquisition function to select multiple informative points jointly for the task of deep Bayesian active learning. BatchBALD is a greedy linear-time $1 - \frac{1}{e}$-approximate algorithm amenable to dynamic programming and efficient caching. We compare BatchBALD to the commonly used approach for batch data acquisition and find that the current approach acquires similar and redundant points, sometimes performing worse than randomly acquiring data. We finish by showing that, using BatchBALD to consider dependencies within an acquisition batch, we achieve new state of the art performance on standard benchmarks, providing substantial data efficiency improvements in batch acquisition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep Active Learning for Lung Disease Severity Classification from Chest X-rays: Learning with Less Data in the Presence of Class Imbalance

    eess.IV 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Simple uncertainty-based active learning with a weighted loss matched full-data COVID-19 CXR severity classifiers using 15.4% (binary) and 23.1% (multi-class) of training labels.

Pith tools