REVIEW 1 cited by
Feasible Path Identification in Optimal Power Flow with Sequential Convex Restriction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Nonconvexity induced by the nonlinear AC power flow equations challenges solution algorithms for AC optimal power flow (OPF) problems. While significant research efforts have focused on reliably computing high-quality OPF solutions, it is not always clear that there exists a feasible path to reach the desired operating point. Transitioning between operating points while avoiding constraint violations can be challenging since the feasible space of the OPF problem is nonconvex and potentially disconnected. To address this problem, we propose an algorithm that computes a provably feasible path from an initial operating point to a desired operating point. Given an initial feasible point, the algorithm solves a sequence of convex quadratically constrained optimization problems over conservative convex inner approximations of the OPF feasible space. In each iteration, we obtain a new, improved operating point and a feasible transition from the operating point in the previous iteration. In addition to computing a feasible path to a known desired operating point, this algorithm can also be used to improve the operating point locally. Extensive numerical studies on a variety of test cases demonstrate the algorithm and the ability to arrive at a high-quality solution in few iterations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Sequential Convex Restriction and its Applications in Robust Optimization
A nonlinear feasibility condition built from concave envelopes and Brouwer's fixed point theorem yields a sequential convex optimization method with robust feasibility guarantees.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.