Combined explanation of the B-anomalies

Jacky Kumar

arxiv: 1907.00416 · v1 · pith:B3D32E26new · submitted 2019-06-30 · ✦ hep-ph

Combined explanation of the B-anomalies

Jacky Kumar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 12:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords B anomaliesleptoquarksvector bosonlepton flavor violationLHC constraintsnew physicsb to s transitionsb to c transitions

0 comments

The pith

S3 and U3 leptoquarks plus the vector boson model are excluded as simultaneous explanations for the B anomalies even with general couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines four tree-level new physics models that could account for both the b to s muon muon and b to c lepton neutrino anomalies at once. With couplings left completely free, the S3 and U3 leptoquarks fail to satisfy the combined data. The standard-model-like triplet vector boson is ruled out by extra tree-level requirements plus LHC limits on high-mass dimuon resonances. This leaves only the U1 leptoquark, whose viability now depends heavily on lepton-flavor-violating bounds. A reader would care because the anomalies suggest possible new particles, and systematically eliminating three of the four simplest candidates narrows where to look next.

Core claim

In the most general case without assumptions on the new physics couplings, the S3 and U3 leptoquarks are excluded. The U1 leptoquark survives but faces important constraints from lepton-flavor-violating processes. The vector boson model is excluded by the additional tree-level constraints together with LHC bounds on high-mass resonant dimuon pairs.

What carries the argument

The four tree-level new physics models that can address both anomalies simultaneously: the S3, U3, and U1 leptoquarks and the standard-model-like triplet vector boson (VB).

If this is right

S3 and U3 leptoquarks cannot explain both anomalies at once when couplings are unrestricted.
The vector boson model is ruled out by LHC searches for resonant dimuon pairs.
Lepton-flavor-violating bounds become decisive for whether the U1 leptoquark can work.
The exclusions hold without any extra assumptions on the strength or flavor structure of the new couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the U1 leptoquark is the correct explanation, dedicated LFV searches at Belle II or LHCb would provide the next decisive test.
The same general-coupling approach could be applied to other candidate models not examined in this analysis.
Direct production limits on leptoquarks at future LHC runs would further restrict the remaining parameter space for U1.

Load-bearing premise

The experimental constraints from lepton-flavor-violating processes and LHC dimuon searches remain valid and correctly interpreted when the new physics couplings are allowed to be completely general.

What would settle it

An LHC observation of a high-mass resonant dimuon pair whose properties match the couplings and mass required by the vector boson model would falsify its exclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00416 by Jacky Kumar.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Allowed 95% C.L. regions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

There are four models of tree-level new physics (NP) that can potentially explain the $b\to s \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $b \to c\ell \bar \nu$ anomalies simultaneously. They are the S3, U3, and U1 leptoquarks and a standard-model-like triplet vector boson (VB). In this talk, I describe an analysis of these models with general couplings. We find that even in this most general case S3 and U3 are excluded. For the U1 model, I discuss the importance of the constraints from lepton-flavor-violating(LFV) processes. As for the VB model, it is shown to be excluded by the additional tree level constraints and LHC bounds on high-mass resonant dimuon pairs. This conclusion is reached without any assumptions about the NP couplings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Even with fully general couplings, S3, U3 and VB are excluded while U1 faces LFV pressure; the analysis is straightforward but the write-up is thin on details.

read the letter

The core result is that three of the four tree-level models for the B anomalies get ruled out once couplings are left completely free and the usual LFV plus LHC dimuon bounds are applied. U1 survives but is squeezed by lepton-flavor violation. That is the punchline worth knowing if you work on these anomalies. The paper takes the standard four candidates (S3, U3, U1 leptoquarks and the SM-like vector triplet) and drops the usual assumption of fixed coupling patterns. It then folds in tree-level constraints plus the LHC resonant dimuon limits and shows the exclusions hold. That extension to general couplings is the main incremental step over earlier targeted analyses. The exclusions for S3, U3 and VB appear driven by direct conflict with existing data rather than any hidden tuning, which is clean. The U1 discussion correctly flags LFV as the dominant remaining pressure. The main limitation is that the text stays at the level of stating conclusions without showing the explicit parameterization, the scan ranges, or the precise way the bounds are imposed. A reader has to trust that no viable corner was overlooked. The citation list is standard and the logic does not appear circular. This is useful background for anyone modeling the anomalies; it is not a standalone discovery paper. It is worth sending to referees because the claim is definite and the models are the usual suspects, even if the presentation needs more technical flesh.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes four tree-level new physics models (S3, U3, and U1 leptoquarks, plus a SM-like triplet vector boson VB) that could simultaneously explain the b→sμ⁺μ⁻ and b→cℓν̄ anomalies. With completely general couplings and no assumptions on the NP parameters, it concludes that S3 and U3 are excluded, the U1 model faces important constraints from lepton-flavor-violating processes, and the VB model is ruled out by additional tree-level constraints together with LHC bounds on high-mass resonant dimuon pairs.

Significance. If the exclusions hold under general couplings, the result is significant: it eliminates three of the four candidate models using only existing experimental bounds (LFV and direct LHC searches), sharply restricting the space of viable explanations for the B anomalies and underscoring the constraining power of these observables even before any coupling assumptions are imposed.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central exclusions of S3, U3, and VB (and the LFV constraints on U1) are asserted without any equations, fit results, or explicit listing of the tree-level or LHC constraints applied. Because the manuscript provides no calculational details, it is impossible to verify that the exclusions survive when all NP couplings are left completely general.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for clarity in the abstract. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central exclusions of S3, U3, and VB (and the LFV constraints on U1) are asserted without any equations, fit results, or explicit listing of the tree-level or LHC constraints applied. Because the manuscript provides no calculational details, it is impossible to verify that the exclusions survive when all NP couplings are left completely general.

Authors: The text supplied is the abstract of a conference contribution, which is intentionally concise. The full manuscript performs a global fit over all possible NP coupling values with no assumptions imposed, demonstrating that S3 and U3 cannot accommodate both anomalies simultaneously for any choice of general couplings. For U1 the dominant constraints arise from LFV processes, while VB is excluded by additional tree-level relations together with LHC limits on high-mass resonant dimuon pairs. We can revise the abstract to include a brief reference to these key observables if the editor considers it necessary. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; exclusions rely on external experimental constraints applied to general couplings

full rationale

The paper examines four tree-level NP models (S3, U3, U1 leptoquarks, VB) capable of addressing B-anomalies, analyzing them with completely general couplings. Exclusions of S3, U3, and VB (plus LFV constraints on U1) are derived from standard external inputs: tree-level flavor constraints, lepton-flavor-violating process bounds, and LHC dimuon resonance searches. These are not fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or results imported via self-citation chains within the paper; the abstract explicitly states the conclusions hold without assumptions on NP couplings. No load-bearing step reduces to an internal fit or renaming; the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Insufficient detail in the abstract to identify specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the standard models mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5658 in / 1156 out tokens · 39131 ms · 2026-05-25T12:18:21.532101+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

[1]

Search for lepton-universality violation in $B^+\to K^+\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no. 19, 191801 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801 PSN fpcp T uesB1645 Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Victoria BC, 2019 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 h33 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 h23 Minimal LFV 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 h32 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 h22 ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.191801 2019
[2]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, JHEP 1010, 085 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085 [arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010
[3]

Combined Explanations of the $b \to s \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $b \to c \tau^- {\bar\nu}$ Anomalies: a General Model Analysis

J. Kumar, D. London and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 1, 015007 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.015007 [arXiv:1806.07403 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.015007 2019
[4]

Measurement of form-factor independent observables in the decay $B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^+ \mu^-$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Measure- ment of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0 → K∗0µ+µ−,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.191801 [arXiv:1308.1707 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.191801 2013
[5]

Angular analysis of the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay using $3\,\mbox{fb}^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Angu- lar analysis of the B0 → K∗0µ+µ− decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity,” JHEP 1602, 104 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)104 gµµ gbb LHC bound ﬂavor bound FIG. 2: Allowed regions in (gbb, gµµ) space from ﬂavor and LHC constraints, assuming MZ′ = 1 TeV. The 1σ and 2σ ﬂavor bounds are shown respectively in th...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)104 2016
[6]

Angular analysis of $B^0 \to K^\ast(892)^0 \ell^+ \ell^-$

A. Abdesselam et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Angular analysis of B0→ K∗(892)0ℓ+ℓ−,” arXiv:1604.04042 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Angular analysis of B0 d → K∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

ATLAS Collaboration, “Angular analysis of B0 d → K∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF- 2017-023, CERN, Geneva, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Measurement of the P1 and P′ 5 angular parameters of the decay B0→ K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV,

CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the P1 and P′ 5 angular parameters of the decay B0→ K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-BPH-15-008, CERN, Geneva, 2017

work page 2017
[9]

Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay $B_s^0\to\phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Diﬀerential branching fraction and angular analysis of the de- cay B0 s → φµ+µ−,” JHEP 1307, 084 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)084 [arXiv:1305.2168 [hep- ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2013)084 2013
[10]

Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay $B^0_s\to\phi\mu^+\mu^-$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Angular analysis and diﬀerential branching fraction of the decay B0 s → φµ+µ−,” JHEP 1509, 179 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)179 [arXiv:1506.08777 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)179 2015
[11]

Test of lepton universality using $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Test of lepton universality using B+ → K +ℓ+ℓ− decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151601 [arXiv:1406.6482 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.151601 2014
[12]

Test of lepton universality with $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Test of lep- ton universality with B0→ K∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays,” JHEP 1708, 055 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)055 [arXiv:1705.05802 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)055 2017
[13]

Patterns of New Physics in $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ transitions in the light of recent data

B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Ma- tias and J. Virto, “Patterns of New Physics in b→ sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data,” JHEP 1801, 093 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)093 PSN fpcp T uesB1645 4 Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Victoria BC, 2019 [arXiv:1704.05340 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)093 2018
[14]

Interpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation

W. Altmannshofer, P. Stangl and D. M. Straub, “In- terpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Vi- olation,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 5, 055008 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.055008 [arXiv:1704.05435 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.055008 2017
[15]

Flavour anomalies after the $R_{K^*}$ measurement

G. D’Amico, M. Nardecchia, P. Panci, F. San- nino, A. Strumia, R. Torre and A. Urbano, “Fla- vor anomalies after the RK∗ measurement,” JHEP 1709, 010 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)010 [arXiv:1704.05438 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)010 2017
[16]

$R_K$ and $R_{K^{\ast}}$ beyond the Standard Model

G. Hiller and I. Nisandzic, “ RK and RK∗ be- yond the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 3, 035003 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035003 [arXiv:1704.05444 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.035003 2017
[17]

Towards the dis- covery of new physics with lepton-universality ra- tios of b → sℓℓ decays,

L. S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. J¨ ager, J. Martin Ca- malich, X. L. Ren and R. X. Shi, “Towards the dis- covery of new physics with lepton-universality ra- tios of b → sℓℓ decays,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 093006 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.093006 [arXiv:1704.05446 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.093006 2017
[18]

On Flavourful Easter eggs for New Physics hunger and Lepton Flavour Universality violation

M. Ciuchini, A. M. Coutinho, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini and M. Valli, “On Flavor- ful Easter eggs for New Physics hunger and Lepton Flavor Universality violation,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no. 10, 688 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5270- 2 [arXiv:1704.05447 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5270- 2017
[19]

Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on Lepton-Flavour Non-Universality

A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, “Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on lepton-ﬂavor nonuniversal- ity,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 3, 035026 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035026 [arXiv:1704.05672 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.035026 2017
[20]

New Physics in $b \to s \mu^+ \mu^-$ after the Measurement of $R_{K^*}$

A. K. Alok, B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. Ku- mar, J. Kumar and D. London, “New Physics in b → sµ+µ− after the Measurement of RK∗,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 095009 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.095009 [arXiv:1704.07397 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.095009 2017
[21]

Measurement of an Excess of B -> D(*) Tau Nu Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “Measure- ment of an Excess of ¯B→ D(∗)τ−¯ντ Decays and Im- plications for Charged Higgs Bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 072012 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.072012 [arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.072012 2013
[22]

Measurement of the branching ratio of $\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau$ relative to $\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle

M. Huschle et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Measure- ment of the branching ratio of ¯B → D(∗)τ−¯ντ rel- ative to ¯B → D(∗)ℓ−¯νℓ decays with hadronic tag- ging at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 072014 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072014 [arXiv:1507.03233 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.072014 2015
[23]

Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B( ¯B0 → D∗+τ−¯ντ)/B( ¯B0 → D∗+µ−¯νµ),

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B( ¯B0 → D∗+τ−¯ντ)/B( ¯B0 → D∗+µ−¯νµ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015) Adden- dum: [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 159901 (2015)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.159901, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.115.111803 [arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.159901 2015
[24]

Measurement of the $\tau$ lepton polarization in the decay ${\bar B} \rightarrow D^* \tau^- {\bar \nu_{\tau}}$

A. Abdesselam et al. , “Measurement of the τ lep- ton polarization in the decay ¯B → D∗τ−¯ντ,” arXiv:1608.06391 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[25]

Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(B_c^+\,\to\,J/\psi\tau^+\nu_\tau)$/$\mathcal{B}(B_c^+\,\to\,J/\psi\mu^+\nu_\mu)$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B+ c → J/ψτ +ντ)/B(B+ c → J/ψµ +νµ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no. 12, 121801 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121801 [arXiv:1711.05623 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.121801 2018
[26]

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. London and S. Shiv- ashankara, “Simultaneous Explanation of the RK and R(D(∗)) Puzzles,” Phys. Lett. B 742, 370 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.011 [arXiv:1412.7164 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.011 2015
[27]

CMS Collaboration [CMS Collaboration], CMS-PAS- EXO-16-031

work page
[28]

Effective field theory approach to $b\to s\ell\ell^{(\prime)}$, $B\to K^{(*)}\nu\bar{\nu}$ and $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$ with third generation couplings

L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin and T. Ota, “Eﬀec- tive Field Theory Approach to b → sℓℓ(′), B → K (∗)ν¯ν and B → D(∗)τ ν with Third Generation Couplings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181801 [arXiv:1506.02661 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.181801 2015
[29]

Semi-leptonic $B$-physics anomalies: a general EFT analysis within $U(2)^n$ flavor symmetry

M. Bordone, G. Isidori and S. Triﬁnopoulos, “Semileptonic B-physics anomalies: A gen- eral EFT analysis within U(2)n ﬂavor symme- try,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 015038 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015038 [arXiv:1702.07238 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.015038 2017
[30]

New Physics in $b \rightarrow s \mu^+ \mu^-$: Distinguishing Models through CP-Violating Effects

A. K. Alok, B. Bhattacharya, D. Kumar, J. Kumar, D. London and S. U. Sankar, “New physics in b→ sµ+µ−: Distinguishing models through CP-violating eﬀects,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 015034 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015034 [arXiv:1703.09247 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.015034 2017
[31]

A search for the decay modes B+/- to h+/- tau l

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “A search for the decay modes B+− → h+−τ +−l,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 012004 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.012004 [arXiv:1204.2852 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.012004 2012
[32]

Search for Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in Narrow Upsilon Decays

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “Search for Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in Nar- row Upsilon Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151802 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.151802 [arXiv:1001.1883 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.151802 2010
[33]

Search for Lepton-Flavor-Violating tau Decays into a Lepton and a Vector Meson

Y. Miyazaki et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Search for Lepton-Flavor-Violating tau Decays into a Lepton and a Vector Meson,” Phys. Lett. B 699, 251 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.011 [arXiv:1101.0755 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.011 2011
[34]

Search for the Lepton Flavor Violation Processes $J/\psi \to$ $\mu\tau$ and $e\tau$

M. Ablikim et al. [BES Collaboration], “Search for the lepton ﬂavor violation processes J/ψ → µτ and eτ,” Phys. Lett. B 598, 172 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.005 [hep-ex/0406018]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.005 2004
[35]

Precise determination of the CKM matrix element $\left| V_{cb}\right|$ with $\bar B^0 \to D^{*\,+} \, \ell^- \, \bar \nu_\ell$ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle

A. Abdesselam et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Precise determination of the CKM matrix element |Vcb| with ¯B0 → D∗ + ℓ− ¯νℓ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle,” arXiv:1702.01521 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[36]

PSN fpcp T uesB1645

Although after the Moriond 2019 update of RK measurement[1] this picture has slightly changed. PSN fpcp T uesB1645

work page 2019

[1] [1]

Search for lepton-universality violation in $B^+\to K^+\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, no. 19, 191801 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.191801 PSN fpcp T uesB1645 Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Victoria BC, 2019 3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 h33 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 h23 Minimal LFV 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 h32 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 h22 ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.191801 2019

[2] [2]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, JHEP 1010, 085 (2010) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2010)085 [arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2010)085 2010

[3] [3]

Combined Explanations of the $b \to s \mu^+ \mu^-$ and $b \to c \tau^- {\bar\nu}$ Anomalies: a General Model Analysis

J. Kumar, D. London and R. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. D 99, no. 1, 015007 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.015007 [arXiv:1806.07403 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.015007 2019

[4] [4]

Measurement of form-factor independent observables in the decay $B^{0} \to K^{*0} \mu^+ \mu^-$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Measure- ment of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0 → K∗0µ+µ−,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.191801 [arXiv:1308.1707 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.191801 2013

[5] [5]

Angular analysis of the $B^{0}\rightarrow K^{*0}\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay using $3\,\mbox{fb}^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Angu- lar analysis of the B0 → K∗0µ+µ− decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity,” JHEP 1602, 104 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)104 gµµ gbb LHC bound ﬂavor bound FIG. 2: Allowed regions in (gbb, gµµ) space from ﬂavor and LHC constraints, assuming MZ′ = 1 TeV. The 1σ and 2σ ﬂavor bounds are shown respectively in th...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)104 2016

[6] [6]

Angular analysis of $B^0 \to K^\ast(892)^0 \ell^+ \ell^-$

A. Abdesselam et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Angular analysis of B0→ K∗(892)0ℓ+ℓ−,” arXiv:1604.04042 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[7] [7]

Angular analysis of B0 d → K∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

ATLAS Collaboration, “Angular analysis of B0 d → K∗µ+µ− decays in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF- 2017-023, CERN, Geneva, 2017

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Measurement of the P1 and P′ 5 angular parameters of the decay B0→ K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV,

CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the P1 and P′ 5 angular parameters of the decay B0→ K∗0µ+µ− in proton-proton collisions at √s = 8 TeV,” Tech. Rep. CMS-PAS-BPH-15-008, CERN, Geneva, 2017

work page 2017

[9] [9]

Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay $B_s^0\to\phi\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Diﬀerential branching fraction and angular analysis of the de- cay B0 s → φµ+µ−,” JHEP 1307, 084 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)084 [arXiv:1305.2168 [hep- ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2013)084 2013

[10] [10]

Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay $B^0_s\to\phi\mu^+\mu^-$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Angular analysis and diﬀerential branching fraction of the decay B0 s → φµ+µ−,” JHEP 1509, 179 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)179 [arXiv:1506.08777 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)179 2015

[11] [11]

Test of lepton universality using $B^{+}\rightarrow K^{+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Test of lepton universality using B+ → K +ℓ+ℓ− decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.151601 [arXiv:1406.6482 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.151601 2014

[12] [12]

Test of lepton universality with $B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ decays

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Test of lep- ton universality with B0→ K∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays,” JHEP 1708, 055 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)055 [arXiv:1705.05802 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)055 2017

[13] [13]

Patterns of New Physics in $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ transitions in the light of recent data

B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Ma- tias and J. Virto, “Patterns of New Physics in b→ sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data,” JHEP 1801, 093 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)093 PSN fpcp T uesB1645 4 Flavor Physics and CP Violation Conference, Victoria BC, 2019 [arXiv:1704.05340 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2018)093 2018

[14] [14]

Interpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation

W. Altmannshofer, P. Stangl and D. M. Straub, “In- terpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Vi- olation,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 5, 055008 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.055008 [arXiv:1704.05435 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.055008 2017

[15] [15]

Flavour anomalies after the $R_{K^*}$ measurement

G. D’Amico, M. Nardecchia, P. Panci, F. San- nino, A. Strumia, R. Torre and A. Urbano, “Fla- vor anomalies after the RK∗ measurement,” JHEP 1709, 010 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2017)010 [arXiv:1704.05438 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2017)010 2017

[16] [16]

$R_K$ and $R_{K^{\ast}}$ beyond the Standard Model

G. Hiller and I. Nisandzic, “ RK and RK∗ be- yond the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 3, 035003 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035003 [arXiv:1704.05444 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.035003 2017

[17] [17]

Towards the dis- covery of new physics with lepton-universality ra- tios of b → sℓℓ decays,

L. S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. J¨ ager, J. Martin Ca- malich, X. L. Ren and R. X. Shi, “Towards the dis- covery of new physics with lepton-universality ra- tios of b → sℓℓ decays,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 093006 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.093006 [arXiv:1704.05446 [hep-ph]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.093006 2017

[18] [18]

On Flavourful Easter eggs for New Physics hunger and Lepton Flavour Universality violation

M. Ciuchini, A. M. Coutinho, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini and M. Valli, “On Flavor- ful Easter eggs for New Physics hunger and Lepton Flavor Universality violation,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no. 10, 688 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5270- 2 [arXiv:1704.05447 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5270- 2017

[19] [19]

Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on Lepton-Flavour Non-Universality

A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, “Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on lepton-ﬂavor nonuniversal- ity,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 3, 035026 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.035026 [arXiv:1704.05672 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.035026 2017

[20] [20]

New Physics in $b \to s \mu^+ \mu^-$ after the Measurement of $R_{K^*}$

A. K. Alok, B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. Ku- mar, J. Kumar and D. London, “New Physics in b → sµ+µ− after the Measurement of RK∗,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 9, 095009 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.095009 [arXiv:1704.07397 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.095009 2017

[21] [21]

Measurement of an Excess of B -> D(*) Tau Nu Decays and Implications for Charged Higgs Bosons

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “Measure- ment of an Excess of ¯B→ D(∗)τ−¯ντ Decays and Im- plications for Charged Higgs Bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 072012 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.072012 [arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.072012 2013

[22] [22]

Measurement of the branching ratio of $\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \tau^- \bar{\nu}_\tau$ relative to $\bar{B} \to D^{(\ast)} \ell^- \bar{\nu}_\ell$ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle

M. Huschle et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Measure- ment of the branching ratio of ¯B → D(∗)τ−¯ντ rel- ative to ¯B → D(∗)ℓ−¯νℓ decays with hadronic tag- ging at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 072014 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072014 [arXiv:1507.03233 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.072014 2015

[23] [23]

Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B( ¯B0 → D∗+τ−¯ντ)/B( ¯B0 → D∗+µ−¯νµ),

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B( ¯B0 → D∗+τ−¯ντ)/B( ¯B0 → D∗+µ−¯νµ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 111803 (2015) Adden- dum: [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 159901 (2015)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.159901, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.115.111803 [arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex]]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.159901 2015

[24] [24]

Measurement of the $\tau$ lepton polarization in the decay ${\bar B} \rightarrow D^* \tau^- {\bar \nu_{\tau}}$

A. Abdesselam et al. , “Measurement of the τ lep- ton polarization in the decay ¯B → D∗τ−¯ντ,” arXiv:1608.06391 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[25] [25]

Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(B_c^+\,\to\,J/\psi\tau^+\nu_\tau)$/$\mathcal{B}(B_c^+\,\to\,J/\psi\mu^+\nu_\mu)$

R. Aaij et al. [LHCb Collaboration], “Mea- surement of the ratio of branching fractions B(B+ c → J/ψτ +ντ)/B(B+ c → J/ψµ +νµ),” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no. 12, 121801 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121801 [arXiv:1711.05623 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.121801 2018

[26] [26]

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. London and S. Shiv- ashankara, “Simultaneous Explanation of the RK and R(D(∗)) Puzzles,” Phys. Lett. B 742, 370 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.011 [arXiv:1412.7164 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.011 2015

[27] [27]

CMS Collaboration [CMS Collaboration], CMS-PAS- EXO-16-031

work page

[28] [28]

Effective field theory approach to $b\to s\ell\ell^{(\prime)}$, $B\to K^{(*)}\nu\bar{\nu}$ and $B\to D^{(*)}\tau\nu$ with third generation couplings

L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin and T. Ota, “Eﬀec- tive Field Theory Approach to b → sℓℓ(′), B → K (∗)ν¯ν and B → D(∗)τ ν with Third Generation Couplings,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181801 [arXiv:1506.02661 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.181801 2015

[29] [29]

Semi-leptonic $B$-physics anomalies: a general EFT analysis within $U(2)^n$ flavor symmetry

M. Bordone, G. Isidori and S. Triﬁnopoulos, “Semileptonic B-physics anomalies: A gen- eral EFT analysis within U(2)n ﬂavor symme- try,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 015038 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015038 [arXiv:1702.07238 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.015038 2017

[30] [30]

New Physics in $b \rightarrow s \mu^+ \mu^-$: Distinguishing Models through CP-Violating Effects

A. K. Alok, B. Bhattacharya, D. Kumar, J. Kumar, D. London and S. U. Sankar, “New physics in b→ sµ+µ−: Distinguishing models through CP-violating eﬀects,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no. 1, 015034 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.015034 [arXiv:1703.09247 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.015034 2017

[31] [31]

A search for the decay modes B+/- to h+/- tau l

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “A search for the decay modes B+− → h+−τ +−l,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 012004 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.012004 [arXiv:1204.2852 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.012004 2012

[32] [32]

Search for Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in Narrow Upsilon Decays

J. P. Lees et al. [BaBar Collaboration], “Search for Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in Nar- row Upsilon Decays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151802 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.151802 [arXiv:1001.1883 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.151802 2010

[33] [33]

Search for Lepton-Flavor-Violating tau Decays into a Lepton and a Vector Meson

Y. Miyazaki et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Search for Lepton-Flavor-Violating tau Decays into a Lepton and a Vector Meson,” Phys. Lett. B 699, 251 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.011 [arXiv:1101.0755 [hep-ex]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.011 2011

[34] [34]

Search for the Lepton Flavor Violation Processes $J/\psi \to$ $\mu\tau$ and $e\tau$

M. Ablikim et al. [BES Collaboration], “Search for the lepton ﬂavor violation processes J/ψ → µτ and eτ,” Phys. Lett. B 598, 172 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.005 [hep-ex/0406018]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.005 2004

[35] [35]

Precise determination of the CKM matrix element $\left| V_{cb}\right|$ with $\bar B^0 \to D^{*\,+} \, \ell^- \, \bar \nu_\ell$ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle

A. Abdesselam et al. [Belle Collaboration], “Precise determination of the CKM matrix element |Vcb| with ¯B0 → D∗ + ℓ− ¯νℓ decays with hadronic tagging at Belle,” arXiv:1702.01521 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

[36] [36]

PSN fpcp T uesB1645

Although after the Moriond 2019 update of RK measurement[1] this picture has slightly changed. PSN fpcp T uesB1645

work page 2019