Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.07374 v5 pith:JARTXXTY submitted 2019-07-17 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords medicaldifferentinterpretabilityresearchlearningmachinemanyartificial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, artificial intelligence and machine learning in general have demonstrated remarkable performances in many tasks, from image processing to natural language processing, especially with the advent of deep learning. Along with research progress, they have encroached upon many different fields and disciplines. Some of them require high level of accountability and thus transparency, for example the medical sector. Explanations for machine decisions and predictions are thus needed to justify their reliability. This requires greater interpretability, which often means we need to understand the mechanism underlying the algorithms. Unfortunately, the blackbox nature of the deep learning is still unresolved, and many machine decisions are still poorly understood. We provide a review on interpretabilities suggested by different research works and categorize them. The different categories show different dimensions in interpretability research, from approaches that provide "obviously" interpretable information to the studies of complex patterns. By applying the same categorization to interpretability in medical research, it is hoped that (1) clinicians and practitioners can subsequently approach these methods with caution, (2) insights into interpretability will be born with more considerations for medical practices, and (3) initiatives to push forward data-based, mathematically- and technically-grounded medical education are encouraged.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient computation of counterfactual explanations of LVQ models

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Counterfactual explanations for LVQ classifiers can be computed by solving closed-form linear, quadratic, or non-convex QCQP programs derived from the nearest-prototype rule, yielding faster and closer counterfactuals...

Pith tools