REVIEW 2 cited by
Structured3D: A Large Photo-realistic Dataset for Structured 3D Modeling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recently, there has been growing interest in developing learning-based methods to detect and utilize salient semi-global or global structures, such as junctions, lines, planes, cuboids, smooth surfaces, and all types of symmetries, for 3D scene modeling and understanding. However, the ground truth annotations are often obtained via human labor, which is particularly challenging and inefficient for such tasks due to the large number of 3D structure instances (e.g., line segments) and other factors such as viewpoints and occlusions. In this paper, we present a new synthetic dataset, Structured3D, with the aim of providing large-scale photo-realistic images with rich 3D structure annotations for a wide spectrum of structured 3D modeling tasks. We take advantage of the availability of professional interior designs and automatically extract 3D structures from them. We generate high-quality images with an industry-leading rendering engine. We use our synthetic dataset in combination with real images to train deep networks for room layout estimation and demonstrate improved performance on benchmark datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
D3D-GEN: Robot-Aware Domain-Grounded Interactive 3D World Generation for Social Robotics
D3D-GEN automatically builds a domain knowledge base from web research and uses it to generate interactive 3D robot simulation worlds for residential, office, and hospital settings.
-
FloorplanQA: A Benchmark for Spatial Reasoning in LLMs using Structured Representations
A new benchmark with 2,000 floorplans and 16,000 symbolic spatial questions shows LLMs are strong at simple metrics but weak at geometric unions and collision-free planning.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.