Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Novel Signals from Neutron Star Mergers at 511 keV

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that neutron star mergers are a generic source of positrons sufficient to explain the 511 keV Galactic Center line, and that the same mechanism ties the line to r-process nucleosynthesis.

desk verdict A conference-summary restatement of the author's PRL that identifies a plausible 511 keV source, but the rate estimate is off by roughly an order of magnitude and the Reticulum II claim is oversold. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01100 v1 pith:GELHD6T5 submitted 2019-08-03 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

Volodymyr Takhistov This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords neutronstarmergers511keVlinepositronannihilationr-processnucleosynthesisGalacticCenterReticulumIImulti-messengerastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the hot, radioactive ejecta of neutron star mergers produces a large population of thermal positrons, enough of which leak out through the thin outer layers to account, across the Milky Way's historical merger rate, for the 511 keV annihilation line observed from the Galactic Center. The claim matters because the 511 keV line has been an open puzzle for decades, with no consensus astrophysical source and with dark-matter explanations still under debate. If the argument holds, a longstanding observational mystery would be connected to a known phenomenon, r-process nucleosynthesis, making 511 keV emission a practical tracer of past neutron-star mergers. It also gives a natural interpretation of the surprising joint observation of r-process enrichment and 511 keV emission in the dwarf galaxy Reticulum II.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the optically thin atmospheric layer of the expanding ejecta, an exponentially declining density profile at the ejecta-vacuum boundary that is unresolved in merger simulations. Using the non-relativistic Boltzmann number density $n_p(T) = 2\,(m_e T/2\pi)^{3/2} e^{-m_e/T}$ and an emitting surface $S \simeq 4\pi (v_e t_e)^2$ over the roughly one-second hot phase, the paper obtains $N_p \simeq 5\times 10^{58}$ positrons per merger. This number, rather than a detailed transport calculation, is what converts the observed 511 keV rate into a statement about the Milky Way's merger history.

What would settle it

A merger simulation that resolves the ejecta's outer density profile down to the rarefaction tail and computes the positron optical depth as a function of radius would settle it: if the escape fraction is below roughly 1%, the predicted Galactic Center 511 keV rate falls under the observed ~$10^{50}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. A deep 511 keV observation of a nearby, well-localized historical merger remnant, or of Reticulum II itself, would directly test the claimed correlation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that positron emission is a generic, previously overlooked signal of binary neutron star and neutron star-black hole mergers. Radioactive merger ejecta stays hot at roughly 0.1 to 1 MeV for about a second, so a thermal Boltzmann population of positrons exists; although the resolved ejecta are optically thick to positrons, the unresolved rarefied outer atmospheric layer is optically thin, and experience from supernova studies suggests up to about 10% of positrons escape. The paper estimates $N_p \simeq 5\times 10^{58}$ positrons per merger. Multiplying by the Milky Way merger rate $R_{\rm MW}\simeq 10^{-2}$ to $10^{2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1}$ gives an average emission rate $\Gamma_p \simeq 5\times 10^{50-54}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, which brackets the observed Galactic Center annihilation rate of about $10^{50}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. The same mechanism links 511 keV emission to r-process nucleosynthesis: Reticulum II is simultaneously rich in r-process elements and anomalously bright at 511 keV, as expected if one rare historical merger produced both.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that roughly 10% of thermal positrons escape through the unresolved, exponentially dilute outer atmospheric layer of the ejecta; if merger ejecta actually trap their positrons, the predicted 511 keV rate collapses below the observed line.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Galactic Center 511 keV line can be explained by ordinary neutron-star merger remnants, with no need for new particle physics.
  • All-sky 511 keV maps could become a census of where and when neutron star mergers have occurred in the Milky Way.
  • The observed disk component of the 511 keV signal finds a natural origin in binary kicks that displace neutron star systems from the stellar disk.
  • Dwarf galaxies that hosted a recent r-process event should show enhanced 511 keV emission, making Reticulum II's signal a testable prediction.
  • 511 keV hot spots may help distinguish old neutron-star merger remnants from supernova remnants, which are expected to be much fainter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the per-merger positron yield scales with ejecta mass, 511 keV luminosity could serve as a rough calorimeter for the total r-process mass ejected, connecting gamma-ray skies to nucleosynthetic yields.
  • The escape-fraction assumption could be tested with radiation-hydrodynamic merger simulations that resolve the density rarefaction wave; if confirmed, it would also imply that neutron star-black hole mergers, which eject less material, should be correspondingly dimmer at 511 keV.
  • Stacking 511 keV observations of many ultra-faint dwarf galaxies could constrain the local merger rate in low-mass halos, complementing gravitational-wave rate measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This ICRC2019 proceedings paper proposes that thermal positrons produced in the expanding radioactive ejecta of neutron star mergers can escape from the outermost optically thin layers and annihilate, producing 511 keV emission. The central estimate is Eq. (2.2), N_p ~ 5e58 positrons per merger, based on the thermal positron density n_p(T), an emitting surface S ~ 4π(v_e t_e)^2, and a duration t_e ~ 1 s. Multiplying by a Milky Way merger rate R_MW ~ (10^-2 to 10^2) Myr^-1 gives Eq. (3.1), Γ_p ~ 5e50-54 yr^-1, which brackets the observed Galactic Center 511 keV annihilation rate of about 1e50 yr^-1. The paper further argues that 511 keV emission should trace r-process nucleosynthesis and cites Reticulum II as a smoking gun, suggesting 511 keV hot-spots as merger tracers.

Significance. The proposal is potentially interesting: it connects a known compact-object merger population to a long-standing astrophysical line and makes a falsifiable prediction that 511 keV emission should be spatially correlated with recent r-process-enriched systems, with an extended disk component from natal kicks. The order-of-magnitude method is transparent, and the merger-rate input is anchored to LIGO estimates rather than fitted to the 511 keV observation, so the central comparison is not circular. However, the quantitative case is not self-consistent as written. The escape fraction is an unvalidated extrapolation from supernova studies, Eq. (2.2) appears to use the positron velocity rather than the ejecta expansion velocity for the emitting surface and to omit the paper's own 10% escape fraction, and the Reticulum II 'smoking gun' misstates the status of the cited INTEGRAL/SPI search. These issues do not invalidate the idea, but they prevent the quantitative claim from being accepted as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.2)] The emitting surface area is set by the ejecta boundary, not by the positron velocity. The simulation snapshot in Fig. 1 gives an ejecta radius of about 1000 km at 10 ms, implying an expansion speed of roughly 0.1-0.3c, whereas Eq. (2.2) sets S = 4π(v_e t_e)^2 with v_e = 0.82c. This overestimates the geometric factor by about (0.82/0.3)^2 ≈ 7.5. More importantly, the text states that only up to O(10)% of the produced positrons escape, yet Eq. (2.2) counts the full thermal positron content. Applying the 10% escape fraction and the correct ejecta-area factor lowers N_p by roughly an order of magnitude or more, shifting the lower end of the bracket in Eq. (3.1) below the observed 511 keV rate. The estimate should be revised to a self-consistent central value with an explicit escape fraction, or the current numbers must be justified.
  2. [Section 2, paragraph beginning 'For positrons to escape'] The escape fraction is load-bearing for the entire prediction, but the optically thin 'atmospheric layer' is asserted to exist below simulation resolution, and the 10% escape fraction is extrapolated from supernova ejecta studies without an optical-depth or transport calculation for merger ejecta. No equation for the optical depth or a quantitative argument from merger simulation data is provided. Since all of the predicted 511 keV signal depends on this escape fraction, the paper should either supply a concrete transport estimate or state clearly that the signal is conditional on an unverified assumption. If positrons remain trapped in the dense ejecta, the predicted signal disappears.
  3. [Section 3, paragraph beginning 'Recent observations of ultra-faint dwarf spheroidals'] The claimed Reticulum II 'smoking gun' misstates the cited reference. Reference [12], Siegert et al. 2016, is a search for 511 keV emission in satellite galaxies with INTEGRAL/SPI and reports upper limits rather than a strong detection of 511 keV emission from Reticulum II. As written, the abstract and Section 4 repeat this unsupported claim. The paper should either cite the correct detection literature, if it exists, or substantially weaken the smoking-gun language to reflect the actual observational status.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1, abstract and headers] There are formatting artifacts such as 'V olodymyr' in the running headers and 'definitively' in the abstract; these should be cleaned up before publication.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (2.2)] The units in Eq. (2.2) should be stated explicitly: t_e is in seconds, v_e is in units of c, and the resulting N_p is a dimensionless count only after converting c to physical units. The current text is implicit.
  3. [Section 1, paragraph 2] The claim that 'similar type of emission is also expected of a neutron star-black hole merger' is not supported by a specific calculation or reference at that point; please add a citation or a sentence explaining the assumption.
  4. [Section 3, paragraph 2] The statement that disk 511 keV emission 'favors binary mergers over some of the alternative explanations, such as dark matter' is a qualitative argument and should be flagged as such, rather than presented as a firm discrimination.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the predicted 511 keV rate is the product of independently sourced merger-rate and thermal-positron inputs, not a fit to the observed line.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external inputs. Eq. (3.1), Gamma_p = N_p R_MW, multiplies a per-merger positron yield N_p (Eq. 2.2) by a Milky Way merger rate R_MW taken from LIGO-based estimates; neither input is adjusted to match the observed Galactic Center 511 keV rate of roughly 1e50 yr^-1. The thermal positron density in Eq. (2.1) is a standard Boltzmann expression, and the ejecta temperature/density profiles behind Eq. (2.2) are numerical-relativity simulation results reproduced from the author's prior PRL [28]. That citation is self-referential but qualifies as real evidence under the stated rules: the simulation inputs do not assume the 511 keV outcome, and the rate estimate is not fitted to the line. The escape-fraction and rarefied-layer assumptions may make N_p numerically optimistic, but they are physical assumptions rather than definitions that would make the conclusion equal to its input. The Reticulum II discussion is a consistency check, not a term in the rate calculation. No equation reduces to its own input and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result depends on two ad hoc assumptions: the unresolved optically thin 'atmospheric layer' and the supernova-derived escape fraction. These, together with an approximate ejecta temperature and an externally bounded merger rate, carry the calculation. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Positron escape fraction = up to 10%
    Not computed for NS merger ejecta; extrapolated from supernova studies. Multiplies N_p in Eq. (2.2) and scales the predicted 511 keV rate. If the true fraction is much lower, the explanation fails.
  • Ejecta temperature T over emission duration t_e = T ~ 0.1 MeV, t_e ~ 1 s
    Used in Eq. (2.1) to compute positron density np and in Eq. (2.2) for N_p. The exponential factor e^{-me/T} makes N_p highly sensitive to this adopted temperature.
  • Milky Way merger rate R_MW = 10^-2 to 10^2 Myr^-1
    Treated as an external input from LIGO rate estimates (Refs [31-33]). The four-order-of-magnitude range brackets the observation, so the explanation is not a sharp prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Thermal positrons in the ejecta follow a non-relativistic Boltzmann distribution at the ejecta temperature (Eq. 2.1).
    Standard kinetic theory, but requires the positron gas to be thermalized in the expanding ejecta.
  • ad hoc to paper The outermost ejecta layers form an unresolved, exponentially declining atmospheric layer that is optically thin to positrons, allowing escape at any given moment.
    This is the load-bearing escape mechanism, introduced to circumvent the simulation result that the ejecta is dense and optically thick (Fig. 1).
  • ad hoc to paper The escape fraction inferred from supernova ejecta (up to ~10%) applies to neutron star merger ejecta.
    Extrapolation across different explosion geometries and compositions; no merger-specific calculation is provided.
  • domain assumption The 511 keV flux from Reticulum II reported by Siegert et al. (Ref [12]) is real and traces recent r-process enrichment.
    The 'smoking gun' argument depends on this external detection; the paper does not quantify its significance or consider non-detections.
  • domain assumption Positrons from past mergers diffuse over ~0.1 kpc and annihilate on ~10^7-8 yr timescales, populating the observed bulge morphology.
    Taken from ISM positron transport literature (Ref [34]); the qualitative morphology argument depends on these timescales.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Novel Signals from Neutron Star Mergers at 511 keV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GELHD6T5

@misc{pith2026190801100,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Novel Signals from Neutron Star Mergers at 511 keV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GELHD6T5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01100}
}
abstract

Synergetic observations of multi-band coincidence signals from merging neutron stars have definitively marked the significance of multi-messenger astronomy. We present a new generic signature of neutron star mergers, positron emission and the associated 511 keV radiation, produced from ejected neutron-rich radioactive merger material. Accounting for historical neutron star mergers within the Milky Way allows to readily explain the origin of the long-observed 511 keV emission line from the Galactic Center. Further, we draw a direct link between heavy element production ($r$-process nucleosynthesis) and 511 keV emission, which signifies the surprising recent observations of Reticulum II ultra-faint dwarf spheroidal galaxy as a smoking gun of our proposal. This novel tracer of neutron star mergers provides a distinct handle for exploring binary merger history.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01100 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Density ρ (left), temperature T (center) and electron fraction Ye (right) profiles of the ejected material at t = 10 ms after a typical neutron star merger. Simulation results reproduced from Ref. [28]. For positrons to escape, the outer layers of expanding ejecta must be “optically thin” (i.e. optical depth τe . 1). Based on general physical arguments (e.g. [29]), the boundary between the outskirts of the ejecta ga… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Emission of positrons from the “optically thin” outer layers of expanding merger ejecta. 3. 511 keV radiation Produced positrons will annihilate, resulting in emission of 511 keV radiation. Assuming neutron star binary merger rate of RMW ' (10−2 −102 ) Myr−1 in the Milky Way, consistent with LIGO observations [31, 32, 33], the average positron emission rate is approximately Γp = NpRMW ' 5×1050−54 yr−1 . (3.1) Hence,… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    G. M. Fuller, A. Kusenko, D. Radice and V . Takhistov,Positrons and 511 keV Radiation as Tracers of Recent Binary Neutron Star Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121101 [1811.00133]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [12]

    Siegert, R

    T. Siegert, R. Diehl, A. C. Vincent, F. Guglielmetti, M. G. H. Krause and C. Boehm, Search for 511 keV Emission in Satellite Galaxies of the Milky Way with INTEGRAL/SPI, Astron. Astrophys. 595 (2016) A25 [1608.00393]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [1]

    GROND, SALT G ROUP, O ZGRAV, DFN, INTEGRAL, V IRGO , INSIGHT -H XMT, MAXI T EAM , FERMI -LAT, J-GEM, RATIR, I CECUBE , CAASTRO, LWA, EPESSTO, GRAWITA, RIMAS, SKA S OUTH AFRICA /M EER KAT, H.E.S.S., 1M2H T EAM , IKI-GW F OLLOW -UP, F ERMI GBM, PI OF SKY, DWF (D EEPER WIDER FASTER PROGRAM ), D ARK ENERGY SURVEY, MASTER, ASTRO SAT CADMIUM ZINC TELLURIDE IMAG...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [2]

    Kasen, B

    D. Kasen, B. Metzger, J. Barnes, E. Quataert and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational wave event, Nature (2017) [1710.05463]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [3]

    Pian et al., Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron star merger, Nature 551 (2017) 67 [1710.05858]

    E. Pian et al., Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron star merger, Nature 551 (2017) 67 [1710.05858]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [4]

    M. R. Drout et al., Light Curves of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for R-Process Nucleosynthesis, Science 358 (2017) 1570 [1710.05443]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [5]

    Li and B

    L.-X. Li and B. Paczynski, Transient events from neutron star mergers, Astrophys. J. 507 (1998) L59 [astro-ph/9807272]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [6]

    B. D. Metzger, Kilonovae, Living Rev. Rel. 20 (2017) 3 [1610.09381]. 4 Novel Tracers of Neutron Star Mergers V olodymyr Takhistov

    arXiv 2017

Show all 35 references
  1. [7]

    C. J. Horowitz et al., r-Process Nucleosynthesis: Connecting Rare-Isotope Beam Facilities with the Cosmos, J. Phys. G46 (2019) 083001 [1805.04637]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Kawaguchi, K

    K. Kawaguchi, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata and M. Tanaka, Models of Kilonova/macronova Emission From Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers, Astrophys. J. 825 (2016) 52 [1601.07711]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [9]

    W. N. Johnson, III, F. R. Harnden, Jr. and R. C. Haymes, The Spectrum of Low-Energy Gamma Radiation from the Galactic-Center Region., Astrophys. J. 172 (1972) L1

    1972

  4. [10]

    Leventhal, C

    M. Leventhal, C. J. MacCallum and P. D. Stang, Detection of 511 keV positron annihilation radiation from the galactic center direction, Astrophys. J. 225 (1978) L11

    1978

  5. [11]

    Knodlseder et al., The All-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission, Astron

    J. Knodlseder et al., The All-sky distribution of 511 keV electron-positron annihilation emission, Astron. Astrophys. 441 (2005) 513 [astro-ph/0506026]

    2005 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Siegert, R

    T. Siegert, R. Diehl, G. Khachatryan, M. G. H. Krause, F. Guglielmetti, J. Greiner et al., Gamma-ray spectroscopy of Positron Annihilation in the Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 586 (2016) A84 [1512.00325]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    J. F. Beacom and H. Yuksel, Stringent constraint on galactic positron production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 071102 [astro-ph/0512411]

    2006 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Prantzos et al., The 511 keV emission from positron annihilation in the Galaxy, Rev

    N. Prantzos et al., The 511 keV emission from positron annihilation in the Galaxy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 1001 [1009.4620]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [16]

    W. Wang, C. S. J. Pun and K. S. Cheng, Could electron-positron annihilation lines in the galactic center result from pulsar winds?, Astron. Astrophys. 446 (2006) 943 [astro-ph/0509760]

    2006 arXiv

  10. [17]

    H. B. Perets, Origin of the Galactic 511 keV emission from positrons produced in irregular supernovae, 1407.2254

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Alexis, P

    A. Alexis, P. Jean, P. Martin and K. Ferriere, Monte Carlo modelling of the propagation and annihilation of nucleosynthesis positrons in the Galaxy, Astron. Astrophys. 564 (2014) A108 [1402.6110]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [19]

    P. A. Milne, J. D. Kurfess, R. L. Kinzer and M. D. Leising, Supernovae and positron annihilation, New Astron. Rev. 46 (2002) 553 [astro-ph/0110442]

    2002 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Bertone, A

    G. Bertone, A. Kusenko, S. Palomares-Ruiz, S. Pascoli and D. Semikoz, Gamma ray bursts and the origin of galactic positrons, Phys. Lett. B636 (2006) 20 [astro-ph/0405005]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    DeRocco and P

    W. DeRocco and P. W. Graham, Constraining primordial black hole abundance with the Galactic 511 keV line, 1906.07740

    1906 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Laha, Primordial black holes as dark matter candidate are severely constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV gamma-ray line, 1906.09994

    R. Laha, Primordial black holes as dark matter candidate are severely constrained by the Galactic Center 511 keV gamma-ray line, 1906.09994

    1906 arXiv

  16. [23]

    G. M. Fuller, A. Kusenko and V . Takhistov,Primordial Black Holes and r-Process Nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 061101 [1704.01129]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Boehm, D

    C. Boehm, D. Hooper, J. Silk, M. Casse and J. Paul, MeV dark matter: Has it been detected?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 101301 [astro-ph/0309686]

    2004 arXiv

  18. [25]

    D. P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, Exciting Dark Matter and the INTEGRAL/SPI 511 keV signal, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 083519 [astro-ph/0702587]

    2007 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Pearce, K

    L. Pearce, K. Petraki and A. Kusenko, Signals from dark atom formation in halos, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 083532 [1502.01755]. 5 Novel Tracers of Neutron Star Mergers V olodymyr Takhistov

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    A. P. Ji, A. Frebel, A. Chiti and J. D. Simon, R-process enrichment from a single event in an ancient dwarf galaxy, Nature 531 (2016) 610 [1512.01558]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Y .-Z. Qian, G. M. Fuller, G. J. Mathews, R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson and S. E. Woosley,A Connection between flavor mixing of cosmologically significant neutrinos and heavy element nucleosynthesis in supernovae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1965

    1993

  22. [30]

    Rosswog, O

    S. Rosswog, O. Korobkin, A. Arcones, F. K. Thielemann and T. Piran, The long-term evolution of neutron star merger remnants - I. The impact of r-process nucleosynthesis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 439 (2014) 744 [1307.2939]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    V IRGO , LIGO S CIENTIFIC collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Upper Limits on the Rates of Binary Neutron Star and Neutron Star-Black Hole Mergers From Advanced Ligo’s First Observing run, Astrophys. J. 832 (2016) L21 [1607.07456]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mapelli and N

    M. Mapelli and N. Giacobbo, The cosmic merger rate of neutron stars and black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 479 (2018) 4391 [1806.04866]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Chruslinska, K

    M. Chruslinska, K. Belczynski, J. Klencki and M. Benacquista, Double neutron stars: merger rates revisited, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474 (2018) 2937 [1708.07885]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    P. Jean, W. Gillard, A. Marcowith and K. Ferriere, Positron transport in the interstellar medium, Astron. Astrophys. 508 (2009) 1099 [0909.4022]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Berger, Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts, Ann

    E. Berger, Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52 (2014) 43 [1311.2603]. 6

    2014 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.