Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Sub-millimetric ultra-low-field MRI detected in situ by a dressed atomic magnetometer

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper demonstrates that an inhomogeneous magnetic dressing field restores the operability of an optical atomic magnetometer inside the field gradient required for MRI frequency encoding, and shows sub-millimetric ultra-low-field MRI…

desk verdict Genuine in-situ ULF-MRI detection with a dressed atomic magnetometer, but the sub-millimetric resolution claim overshoots the stated linewidth-gradient budget. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01283 v2 pith:BTZJOSWH submitted 2019-08-04 physics.app-ph physics.atom-phphysics.ins-det

Giuseppe Bevilacqua , Valerio Biancalana , Yordanka Dancheva , Antonio Vigilante This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phphysics.atom-phphysics.ins-det PACS 87.61.-c07.55.Ge
keywords ultra-low-fieldMRIatomicmagnetometermagneticdressinginsitudetectiongradientcompensationopticalmagnetometryBell-Bloominhomogeneous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultra-low-field MRI promises simpler scanners, but the optical atomic magnetometers best suited to detect its weak signals are blinded by the very field gradients used to encode position. This paper shows that a strong, position-dependent "dressing" field, oscillating far above the atomic Larmor frequency, can cancel the gradient-induced broadening and restore the magnetometer's sensitivity even while it sits inside the encoding field. Using two caesium cells, the authors record one-dimensional magnetic resonance images of a structured water sample with sub-millimetre resolution, in an unshielded environment. If the approach holds, it would allow cryogen-free, in-situ ULF-MRI without flux transformers or remote detection, and could scale to multi-sensor arrays.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is inhomogeneous magnetic dressing (the IDEA method). A strong radio-frequency field $B_D$, oscillating at frequency $f$ along a transverse direction, slows the precession of the atomic magnetization: the measured $x$-component still oscillates harmonically, but at the reduced frequency $\nu_D = J_0(\gamma_{\mathrm{Cs}}B_D/2\pi f)\nu_0$, where $J_0$ is the zeroth-order Bessel function. Because the dressing field from a nearby dipole falls as $1/(x_0+x)^3$, its Bessel-factor suppression varies with position along the optical axis. Choosing the dressing strength so that Eq. (4) holds makes the first-order spatial dependence of the dressed atomic frequency vanish, cancelling the gradient that would otherwise broaden the atomic resonance from about 25 Hz to hundreds of hertz. A dual-sensor arrangement with common-mode subtraction removes environmental disturbances in the unshielded laboratory.

What would settle it

Measure the dressed atomic-resonance linewidth as a function of dressing-field amplitude for a fixed static-field gradient $G$: the compensation condition predicts the minimum linewidth at a specific $\alpha$ satisfying $-3 B_0 \alpha J_1(\alpha)/x_0 J_0(\alpha)=G$. If the linewidth minimum occurs at a measurably different amplitude, or if the minimum width remains hundreds of hertz above the undressed value at that setting, the claimed restoration fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the "IDEA" method—inhomogeneous magnetic dressing—makes an optical atomic magnetometer fully operational inside the static-field gradient used for MRI frequency encoding, enabling in situ detection rather than remote ex-situ coupling. The dressing field, a dipole oscillating at about 40 kHz, reduces the caesium precession frequency by a Bessel-function factor $J_0(\gamma_{\mathrm{Cs}}B_D/2\pi f)$; because that factor depends on position, it can be tuned so that its first-order spatial variation exactly cancels the frequency spread produced by the gradient $G$ (Eq. 4: $-3 B_0 \, \alpha J_1(\alpha)/x_0 J_0(\alpha) = G$). With two dressed caesium cells operated in a Bell-Bloom configuration and combined in common-mode/difference-mode, the authors reconstruct one-dimensional profiles of four hydrogel disks separated by about 5 mm, locating the sample's position with sub-millimetre accuracy over more than 2000 shots. The proton signal is essentially unaffected by the dressing because of the much smaller proton gyromagnetic ratio.

Load-bearing premise

The compensation condition assumes the dressing field varies as a point dipole and that only the first-order term in its spatial expansion matters across the cell; if the real coil's field differs from that, or higher-order terms are significant, the atomic linewidth is not fully restored and the MRI signal would distort.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In situ detection removes the need for flux transformers or remote-detection schemes, simplifying ULF-MRI hardware.
  • Multiple dressed sensors can be arrayed with negligible cross-talk, offering a path to larger samples, faster acquisition, and higher sensitivity.
  • Because the magnetometer tolerates strong fields, a fully static design with in-loco premagnetization becomes feasible, eliminating pneumatic shuttling.
  • Unshielded operation with active common-mode compensation reduces cost and broadens placement options for the scanner.
  • Sub-millimetre spatial resolution is achieved with a compact, cryogen-free sensor whose sensitivity is about one order of magnitude below SQUIDs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same first-order compensation could be extended to two- or three-dimensional encoding by tailoring the dressing field's spatial profile with multiple coils, something the paper mentions only as a future multi-sensor direction.
  • Because the compensation condition is derived from a truncated Taylor expansion around the cell centre, residual higher-order dressing inhomogeneity will set a practical floor on resolution; a numerical optimisation of the dressing coil geometry could push that floor lower.
  • The dressing technique might transfer to other atomic sensors, such as SERF magnetometers, if the RF dressing does not disrupt their spin-exchange relaxation suppression—an untested but plausible extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a proof-of-concept ultra-low-field MRI experiment in which the NMR signal is detected in situ by a dual-channel Cs optical atomic magnetometer while a static field gradient is applied for frequency encoding. The authors show that an inhomogeneous magnetic dressing field can restore the atomic magnetometer linewidth in the presence of the gradient (Eqs. (1)-(4)), and they present one-dimensional profiles of a structured water phantom showing four peaks attributed to hydrogel disks. They also track the displacement of these profiles against camera-based sample position measurements and claim sub-millimetric resolution. The supplementary material describes the setup, the common-mode/difference-mode signal processing, and the windowing procedure used to produce the profiles.

Significance. If the resolution claim held, the work would be an important step toward cryogen-free, in-situ ULF-MRI with atomic magnetometers, potentially enabling multi-sensor arrays and static premagnetization. The compensation condition is derived cleanly, and the dual-sensor common-mode rejection is a sound and well-executed element. The demonstration that a dressed OAM can operate inside the imaging gradient and produce structured 1D images is valuable. However, as detailed below, the headline 'sub-millimetric resolution' is not supported by the reported linewidth and gradient values; what is demonstrated is sub-millimetric positional tracking precision. With a corrected claim, the paper's contribution is still relevant, but its significance is substantially reduced.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and main text (paragraph following Fig. 2); Supplement I.A] The abstract and conclusion claim 'sub-millimetric resolution MRI', but the reported linewidth and gradient imply a linewidth-limited resolution of about 9 mm. Supplement I.A gives G = 30-100 nT/cm (typical 40 nT/cm), and the main text states the intrinsic/instrumental NMR linewidth in the absence of gradient is 1.5 Hz. For protons, the frequency-to-position scale at G = 40 nT/cm is (gamma_p/2pi)G ≈ 0.17 Hz/mm, so Δν = 1.5 Hz corresponds to Δx ≈ 8.8 mm; even at 100 nT/cm it is ≈ 3.5 mm. These numbers are inconsistent with resolving four peaks separated by roughly 5-7 mm in Fig. 2(b) unless the effective linewidth after the windowing of Eq. (8) is much smaller than 1.5 Hz. The actual G used for Figs. 2 and 3 is not stated. The sub-millimetric agreement in Fig. 3 is a demonstration of positional tracking precision against the camera data, not of image resolution. Please report an explicit resolution measurement (point-spread function or edge response) together with the operating G, or revise all 'resolution' wording to 'precision'.
  2. [Supplement I.G, Eq. (8)] The windowing in Eq. (8) is load-bearing for the resolution claim, but its parameters T, tcut, and β are not reported, and the text says the linewidth effect is 'only partially compensated.' The exponential factor exp(t/T) can narrow the apparent spectral line by amplifying late-time signal, but if the 1.5 Hz linewidth corresponds to a Lorentzian decay with T2* ≈ 0.21 s, the FID would be negligible within about 1 s, so a 6 s acquisition and this window cannot recover the lost coherence. Please specify the window parameters, report the effective linewidth after processing, and state the signal-to-noise ratio of the averaged profiles; this is necessary to assess whether the four peaks in Fig. 2(b) are genuinely resolved.
  3. [Eqs. (2)-(4)] The compensation condition assumes a point-dipole dressing field and a first-order Taylor expansion of ν_D(x), but the manuscript does not quantify the residual second-order terms over the 2-cm cell length or the deviation of the actual ferrite-cored coil field from a pure dipole. Since the compensation condition is the basis for restoring OAM operability across the whole cell, please report a measurement of the restored AMR linewidth at several positions along x, or equivalently the residual gradient seen by the atoms, during MRI operation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] There are typographical errors: 'Noble Prize' should be 'Nobel Prize', and 'brougth' should be 'brought'.
  2. [Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), μ0 is the vacuum permeability, not the vacuum permittivity as stated in the text.
  3. [Main text and Supplement I.H] The phantom geometry is described inconsistently: the main text says the cartridge contains three disks 2 mm thick separated by 5 mm, while the supplement says the water regions are 5 mm thick; please provide a consistent dimensioned drawing.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says 'an uni-dimensional image'; it should say 'a one-dimensional image'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the IDEA compensation condition is derived analytically from the dressing model, and the in-situ MRI demonstration is an independent measurement.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the physics claimed. Eq. (1) is the standard Bessel-function dressing reduction, cited both to the authors' earlier work (Ref. 31) and to Haroche et al. (Ref. 32); the inhomogeneous-dressing compensation is taken from Ref. 27, but it is used as a previously published tool rather than as an input that redefines the outcome. Eq. (3) expands the dressed Larmor frequency to first order in x, and Eq. (4) is the explicit algebraic condition that makes the O(x) term vanish: -3 B0/x0 * alpha J1(alpha)/J0(alpha) = G. No quantity in that condition is fitted to the reconstructed images; it depends only on experimental settings (B0, G, x0, alpha) and is a genuine prescription, not a regression or a renamed prediction. The MRI profiles are then obtained from the Fourier transform of the differential-mode signal, with only a time-domain window (Eq. 8) and phase correction; the comparison in Fig. 3 uses independent camera-determined positions xC as an external consistency check. Thus the central demonstration does not reduce, by construction, to its inputs. The only concerns are evidential: the stated 1.5 Hz linewidth and 40 nT/cm gradient would imply roughly 9 mm linewidth-limited resolution, so the 'sub-millimetric resolution' wording appears stronger than the quoted numbers support, and the Fig. 3 'submillimetric precision' refers to positional tracking agreement rather than image resolution. Those are correctness or interpretation issues, not circularity. Self-citations are present (Refs. 27, 28, 30, 31) but they provide prior experimental/theoretical support, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the IDEA compensation condition, which is derived from established dressed-atom theory rather than new fitted parameters. The reconstruction pipeline introduces a few hand-tuned windowing parameters and a selection interval, which are listed as free parameters because they affect the displayed images. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • T (window time constant) = not specified (kept lower than measured T1)
    In Eq. (8), T is chosen to partially compensate the exponential decay of the NMR signal; its value is not stated, so the reconstruction is not fully reproducible.
  • tcut (window cutoff time) = not specified
    Position of the transition to zero in Eq. (8), chosen by hand.
  • beta (window slope) = not specified
    Slope of the transition in Eq. (8), chosen by hand.
  • xC selection interval width = 0.08 mm
    Traces are selected into subsets based on camera-measured position xC with a 0.08 mm interval; this choice affects the averaged profiles and is a post-hoc analysis parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption First-order Taylor expansion of ν_D(x) is valid over the sensor/cell region.
    Used to derive the compensation condition Eq. (4); higher-order terms are neglected without quantitative justification.
  • domain assumption The dressing field is well approximated as a point-dipole field BD(x) = µ0 m(t)/(2π(x0+x)^3) over the cell volume.
    Eq. (2); the actual coil is a finite solenoidal winding on a ferrite core, and the dipole approximation is asserted.
  • domain assumption The dressing field does not affect proton precession because γ_H ≪ γ_Cs, so J0(γ_H BD / 2πf) ≈ 1.
    Stated after Eq. (4); reasonable given the gyromagnetic ratios, but this is what allows the same gradient to encode proton positions while the Cs AMR is compensated.
  • domain assumption The scalar magnetometer response is first-order sensitive only to δB_parallel (Eq. 5).
    Supplemental Eq. (5); standard for scalar OAMs in the small-field limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sub-millimetric ultra-low-field MRI detected in situ by a dressed atomic magnetometer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTZJOSWH

@misc{pith2026190801283,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sub-millimetric ultra-low-field MRI detected in situ by a dressed atomic magnetometer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTZJOSWH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01283}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is universally acknowledged as an excellent tool to extract detailed spatial information with minimally invasive measurements. Efforts toward ultra-low-field (ULF) MRI are made to simplify the scanners and to reduce artefacts and incompatibilities. Optical Atomic Magnetometers (OAMs) are among the sensitive magnetic detectors eligible for ULF operation, however they are not compatible with the strong field gradients used in MRI. We show that a magnetic-dressing technique restores the OAMs operability despite the gradient, and we demonstrate sub-millimetric resolution MRI with a compact experimental setup based on an in situ detection. The proof-of-concept experiment produces unidimensional imaging of remotely magnetized samples with a dual sensor, but the approach is suited to be adapted for 3-D imaging of samples magnetized in loco. An extension to multi-sensor architectures is also possible.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01283 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The laser beams (in red) propagate along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The panel (a) shows a photograph of the open cartridge with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The histogram (b) shows the distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author I. I. \ Rabi , author J. R. \ Zacharias , author S. Millman , \ and\ author P. Kusch ,\ title title A new method of measuring nuclear magnetic moment , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.53.318 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 53 ,\ pages 318--318 ( year 1938 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.53.318

  2. [2]

    Bloch , author W

    author author F. Bloch , author W. W. \ Hansen , \ and\ author M. Packard ,\ title title Nuclear induction , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.69.127 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 127--127 ( year 1946 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.69.127 1946

  3. [3]

    author author E. M. \ Purcell , author H. C. \ Torrey , \ and\ author R. V. \ Pound ,\ title title Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid , \ 10.1103/PhysRev.69.37 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 37--38 ( year 1946 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.69.37

  4. [4]

    author author R. Damadian ,\ title title Tumor detection by nuclear magnetic resonance , \ 10.1126/science.171.3976.1151 journal journal Science \ volume 171 ,\ pages 1151--1153 ( year 1971 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://science.sciencemag.org/content/171/3976/1151 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/171/3976/1151 NoStop

    work page arXiv 1971

  5. [5]

    author author P. C. \ Lauterbur ,\ title title Image formation by induced local interactions: Examples employing nuclear magnetic resonance , \ 10.1038/242190a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 242 ( year 1973 ),\ 10.1038/242190a0 NoStop

    doi:10.1038/242190a0 1973

  6. [6]

    author author C. R. \ Merritt ,\ title title Ultrasound safety: what are the issues? \ 10.1148/radiology.173.2.2678243 journal journal Radiology \ volume 173 ,\ pages 304--306 ( year 1989 ) ,\ note pMID: 2678243 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.173.2.2678243 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.173.2.2678243 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1148/radiology.173.2.2678243 1989

  7. [7]

    Kraus , author M

    author author R. Kraus , author M. Espy , author P. Magnelind , \ and\ author P. Volegov ,\ https://oxfordmedicine.com/view/10.1093/med/9780199796434.001.0001/med-9780199796434 title Ultra-Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance A New MRI Regime \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ address Oxford, UK ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    author author R. E. \ Sepponen , author J. T. \ Sipponen , \ and\ author A. Sivula ,\ title title Low field (0.02 T ) nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the brain , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography \ ( year 19859 ) NoStop

    work page

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    McDermott , author S

    author author R. McDermott , author S. Lee , author B. t. \ Haken , author A. H. \ Trabesinger , author A. Pines , \ and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title Micro- T esla MRI with a superconducting quantum interference device , \ 10.1073/pnas.0402382101 journal journal Proceeding...

    doi

  2. [10]

    M\"ossle , author W

    author author M. M\"ossle , author W. R. \ Myers , author Seung-Kyun Lee , author N. Kelso , author M. Hatridge , author A. Pines , \ and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title SQUID -detected in vivo MRI at microtesla magnetic fields , \ 10.1109/TASC.2005.850043 journal journal IEE...

  3. [11]

    McDermott , author A

    author author R. McDermott , author A. H. \ Trabesinger , author M. M \"u ck , author E. L. \ Hahn , author A. Pines , \ and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title Liquid-state NMR and scalar couplings in micro- T esla magnetic fields , \ 10.1126/science.1069280 journal journal Scie...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author A. N. \ Matlachov , author P. L. \ Volegov , author M. A. \ Espy , author J. S. \ George , \ and\ author R. H. \ Kraus ,\ title title SQUID detected NMR in micro- T esla magnetic fields , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2004.05.015 journal journal Journal of Magn...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Burghoff , author S

    author author M. Burghoff , author S. Hartwig , author L. Trahms , \ and\ author J. Bernarding ,\ title title Nuclear magnetic resonance in the nano- T esla range , \ 10.1063/1.2006981 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 87 ,\ pages 054103 ( year 2005 ) ,\ http://...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author V. S. \ Zotev , author A. N. \ Matlachov , author P. L. \ Volegov , author H. J. \ Sandin , author M. A. \ Espy , author J. C. \ Mosher , author A. V. \ Urbaitis , author S. G. \ Newman , \ and\ author R. H. \ Kraus , Jr ,\ title title Multi-channel SQUID system ...

    2006

  7. [15]

    author author S. K. \ Lee , author M. M\" o le , author W. Myers , author N. Kelso , author A. H. \ Trabesinger , author A. Pines , \ and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title SQUID -detected MRI at 132 T with T 1-weighted contrast established at 10 T -300 m T , \ 10.1002/mrm.20316...

    doi

  8. [16]

    M \" o le , author S.-I

    author author M. M \" o le , author S.-I. \ Han , author W. R. \ Myers , author S.-K. \ Lee , author N. Kelso , author M. Hatridge , author A. Pines , \ and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title SQUID -detected micro- T esla MRI in the presence of metal , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    doi

  9. [17]

    a , author J. Simola , author A. I. \ Ahonen , author J. P. \ M\

    author author P. T. \ Vesanen , author J. O. \ Nieminen , author K. C. J. \ Zevenhoven , author J. Dabek , author L. T. \ Parkkonen , author A. V. \ Zhdanov , author J. Luomahaara , author J. Hassel , author J. Penttil\"a , author J. Simola , author A. I. \ Ahonen , author J. ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author A. N. \ Matlachov , author P. L. \ Volegov , author M. A. \ Espy , author R. Stolz , author L. Fritzsch , author V. Zakosarenko , author H. . \ Meyer , \ and\ author R. H. \ Kraus ,\ title title Instrumentation for simultaneous detection of low field nmr and biom...

  11. [19]

    Theis , author P

    author author T. Theis , author P. Ganssle , author G. Kervern , author S. Knappe , author J. Kitching , author M. P. \ Ledbetter , author D. Budker , \ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Parahydrogen-enhanced zero-field nuclear magnetic resonance , \ 10.1038/nphys1986 journa...

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    author author R. H. \ Koch , author J. Z. \ Sun , author V. Foglietti , \ and\ author W. J. \ Gallagher ,\ title title Flux dam, a method to reduce extra low frequency noise when a superconducting magnetometer is exposed to a magnetic field , \ 10.1063/1.115282 journal journal...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author M. C. D. \ Tayler , author T. Theis , author T. F. \ Sjolander , author J. W. \ Blanchard , author A. Kentner , author S. Pustelny , author A. Pines , \ and\ author D. Budker ,\ title title Invited review article: Instrumentation for nuclear magnetic resonance in...

    doi

  14. [22]

    author author V. S. \ Zotev , author A. N. \ Matlashov , author P. L. \ Volegov , author A. V. \ Urbaitis , author M. A. \ Espy , \ and\ author R. H. K. \ Jr ,\ title title SQUID -based instrumentation for ultralow-field MRI , \ http://stacks.iop.org/0953-2048/20/i=11/a=S13 jo...

    2007

  15. [23]

    Savukov \ and\ author T

    author author I. Savukov \ and\ author T. Karaulanov ,\ title title Anatomical MRI with an atomic magnetometer , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2013.02.020 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance \ volume 231 ,\ pages 39--45 ( year 2013 a ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    Budker \ and\ author M

    author author D. Budker \ and\ author M. Romalis ,\ title title Optical magnetometry , \ 10.1038/nphys566 journal journal Nature Physics \ ,\ pages 227--234 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  17. [25]

    Savukov \ and\ author T

    author author I. Savukov \ and\ author T. Karaulanov ,\ title title Magnetic-resonance imaging of the human brain with an atomic magnetometer , \ 10.1063/1.4816433 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 103 ,\ pages 043703 ( year 2013 b ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Xu , author V

    author author S. Xu , author V. V. \ Yashchuk , author M. H. \ Donaldson , author S. M. \ Rochester , author D. Budker , \ and\ author A. Pines ,\ title title Magnetic resonance imaging with an optical atomic magnetometer , \ 10.1073/pnas.0605396103 journal journal Proceedings...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , \ and\ author A. Vigilante ,\ title title Restoring narrow linewidth to a gradient-broadened magnetic resonance by inhomogeneous dressing , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024049 journal journal Phys. Rev. A...

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author P. Chessa , \ and\ author Y. Dancheva ,\ title title Multichannel optical atomic magnetometer operating in unshielded environment , \ 10.1007/s00340-016-6375-2 journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 122 ,\ pages 1...

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Biancalana , author G

    author author V. Biancalana , author G. Bevilacqua , author P. Chessa , author Y. Dancheva , author R. Cecchi , \ and\ author L. Stiaccini ,\ title title A low noise modular current source for stable magnetic field control , \ 10.1063/1.4977931 journal journal Review of Scient...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , \ and\ author A. Vigilante ,\ title title Self-adaptive loop for external-disturbance reduction in a differential measurement setup , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014029 journal journal Phys. Rev. Applied...

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , \ and\ author L. Moi ,\ title title Larmor frequency dressing by a nonharmonic transverse magnetic field , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042510 journal journal \ volume 85 ,\ eid 042510 ( year 2012 ) ,\ http://a...

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Haroche , author C

    author author S. Haroche , author C. Cohen-Tannoudji , author C. Audoin , \ and\ author J. P. \ Schermann ,\ title title Modified Z eeman hyperfine spectra observed in ^1 H and ^ 87 Rb ground states interacting with a nonresonant RF field , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. L...

    1970

  25. [33]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , author L. Stiaccini , \ and\ author A. Vigilante ,\ title title Spurious ferromagnetic remanence detected by hybrid magnetometer , \ 10.1063/1.5094623 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ v...

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Biancalana , author Y

    author author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , \ and\ author L. Stiaccini ,\ title title Note: A fast pneumatic sample-shuttle with attenuated shocks , \ http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4868092 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 85 ,\ eid 036104 ( year 2...

    arXiv

  27. [36]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , author Y. Dancheva , author A. Vigilante , author A. Donati , \ and\ author C. Rossi ,\ title title Simultaneous detection of H and D NMR signals in a micro- T esla field , \ 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02854 journal journal The J...

    arXiv

  28. [37]

    author author W. E. \ Bell \ and\ author A. L. \ Bloom ,\ title title Optically driven spin precession , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.280 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 280--281 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    1961 doi

  29. [38]

    Scholtes , author V

    author author T. Scholtes , author V. Schultze , author R. IJsselsteijn , author S. Woetzel , \ and\ author H.-G. \ Meyer ,\ title title Light-narrowed optically pumped M _ x magnetometer with a miniaturized Cs cell , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043416 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \...

    doi

  30. [39]

    Bevilacqua , author V

    author author G. Bevilacqua , author V. Biancalana , \ and\ author Y. Dancheva ,\ title title Atomic orientation driven by broadly-frequency-modulated radiation: Theory and experiment , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012501 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 94 ,\ pages 012501 ( yea...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.