Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 4 cited by

Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A search for dark matter produced with a Higgs boson in five decay channels finds no excess and sets new 95% CL limits on two simplified mediator models.

desk verdict A solid, honestly-reported null search: first mono-Higgs in WW/ZZ plus a five-channel combination, with no serious flaw beyond a benchmark caveat the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01713 v2 pith:COOCKDEV submitted 2019-08-05 hep-ex

CMS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex
keywords darkmattermono-HiggsmissingtransversemomentumHiggsbosonZ'mediatortwo-Higgs-doubletmodelbaryonicLHCphysics
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper searches for dark matter particles produced together with a Higgs boson, using proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV and combining five Higgs decay channels: bottom quarks, photons, tau leptons, W bosons, and Z bosons. No significant excess over the expected standard model background is observed in any channel or in the combined analysis. The study sets upper limits at 95% confidence level on dark matter production in a Z'-extended two-Higgs-doublet model and in a baryonic Z' model, and interprets the results as limits on the spin-independent dark-matter-nucleon scattering cross section. It is the first search for dark matter with a Higgs boson decaying to W or Z pairs and the first statistical combination of all five channels.

What carries the argument

The central object is the mono-Higgs signature: a Higgs boson recoiling against a pair of invisible dark matter particles, inferred experimentally as a reconstructed Higgs candidate accompanied by large missing transverse momentum. Two simplified benchmark models carry the interpretation: the Z'-2HDM, where a Z' boson decays to a Higgs boson and a pseudoscalar mediator that decays to dark matter, and the baryonic Z' model, where a Z' mediator radiates a Higgs boson before decaying to dark matter. The analysis machinery combines per-channel discriminants—dijet and diphoton invariant masses, tau-pair transverse mass, a boosted decision tree for WW, and four-lepton mass plus missing momentum for ZZ—into a single profile-likelihood fit across all five channels.

What would settle it

Run the same five-channel combination on an independent dataset of comparable size: if the observed number of events in the high-missing-transverse-momentum signal regions exceeds the background-only prediction by a 5-sigma fluctuation consistent with a Z'->Higgs-plus-dark-matter hypothesis, the no-excess claim would be refuted. A specific place to look is the h->bb invariant-mass sidebands combined with the high-pTmiss tail, where a resonant signal would create a localized excess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that, in 35.9 inverse femtobarns of 13 TeV collision data, events containing a Higgs boson candidate plus large missing transverse momentum are consistent with standard model expectations. In the Z'-2HDM benchmark, the combined analysis excludes Z' mediator masses from roughly 500 to 3200 GeV for a pseudoscalar mass of 300 GeV; in the baryonic Z' model it excludes Z' masses from 100 to 1600 GeV for a dark matter mass of 1 GeV. These limits are interpreted as a spin-independent dark-matter-nucleon cross-section bound that is more stringent than direct-detection limits for dark matter masses between 1 and 5 GeV. The new WW and ZZ channels, while individually less sensitive, add coverage in kinematically distinct regions and are combined with the previously published bb, gamma-gamma, and tau-tau channels.

Load-bearing premise

The limits assume that the simulated signal acceptance and background predictions, together with the control-region transfer factors used to normalize data, are unbiased within the quoted systematic uncertainties; in the new WW and ZZ channels this rests on data-driven nonprompt-lepton background estimates that carry uncertainties of 30% and 36-43% respectively.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the limits are correct, dark matter particles lighter than about 5 GeV with spin-independent scattering cross sections above roughly 10^-40 cm^2 are excluded by collider data alone.
  • The h->WW and h->ZZ channels, newly exploited here, provide a route to probe mono-Higgs signals with soft missing-transverse-momentum spectra where the bb channel is less sensitive.
  • The five-channel combination demonstrates a reusable statistical strategy for Higgs-associated dark matter searches that can be applied to future datasets with higher luminosity.
  • For the chosen benchmark parameters, the excluded Z' mass ranges overlap with regions probed by dijet resonance searches, so the two search strategies jointly constrain the model parameter space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the large uncertainties in the data-driven nonprompt-lepton background estimates in the WW and ZZ channels (about 30% and 36-43%, respectively) mean these new channels currently add more breadth than raw precision; with more data or better background control they could become substantially more powerful.
  • Editorial inference: the same combined-analysis framework could be adapted to other invisible-Higgs topologies, such as Higgs production with a Z boson decaying invisibly, by exchanging the signal model while keeping the per-channel discriminants and likelihood structure.
  • Editorial inference: a natural testable extension is to rerun this analysis on the full Run 2 dataset (about 140 inverse femtobarns), which would roughly double the sensitivity to the mediator masses and sharpen the low-mass dark matter exclusion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports a CMS search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson (mono-Higgs) using 35.9 fb^-1 of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions. The analysis covers five Higgs decay channels (bb, gamma gamma, tau tau, WW, and ZZ); the WW and ZZ channels are new to this search, and the five channels are statistically combined. The central result is a null observation: data agree with the SM background expectation in all channels and in the combination, and 95% CL upper limits are set on the Z'-2HDM and baryonic Z' simplified models, including an interpretation as a spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering cross section. The paper claims the first mono-Higgs search in the WW and ZZ final states and the first five-channel mono-Higgs combination.

Significance. The result, if correct, is a valid upper-limit measurement with a modest but real extension of the mono-Higgs program: the WW and ZZ channels are new, and the five-channel combination improves coverage at low and high mZ'. I was unable to find a load-bearing technical flaw. The analysis uses standard CMS object reconstruction, data-driven control regions for the dominant backgrounds, and a detailed systematic budget; the observed yields agree with the expected background within uncertainties. The paper is also commendable for explicitly stating in Section 1 that the Z'-2HDM benchmark points within sensitivity reach are already excluded by dijet searches; this limits the phenomenological priority of the Z'-2HDM limits but does not make the null result or the derived limits incorrect. The large nonprompt-lepton uncertainties in the new WW and ZZ channels (30% and 36-43%, Tables 3 and 4) are real but not decisive: the skeptic's stress-test concern does not land, because those channels contribute only a small fraction of the combined expected signal and background, and the combination is dominated by h->bb.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 8, text before Tables 6 and 7] The text says the baryonic Z' signal benchmark is normalized to mZ' = 500 GeV and mchi = 1000 GeV, but Table 6, Table 7, and all the figures and limits in the paper use mchi = 1 GeV for this benchmark; this is an obvious typo and should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The axis labels and legend entries in Fig. 2 are garbled in the manuscript (for example, entries like ' = 300 GeV A = 600 GeV, mZ'm = 400 GeV' should read something like 'mA = 300 GeV, mZ' = 400 GeV'); please restore the full parameter notation and verify every legend entry.
  3. [Section 1 and Section 9] The caveat that the chosen Z'-2HDM benchmark has mZ' values within sensitivity reach already excluded by dijet searches is stated clearly in the introduction; I recommend repeating this caveat in the summary section so that the final conclusions do not overstate the reach of the Z'-2HDM limits.
  4. [Section 5.4.1] The description of the BDT training is ambiguous: the sentence 'simulated signal samples with mA = 300 GeV (mchi = 1 GeV) with various values of mZ' have been used for training' could mean either a single training sample per model or an ensemble of samples; please clarify which signal points enter the training and whether the same BDT is applied to all scan points.
  5. [Section 8.1, Tables 6 and 7] The observed yields in the WW and ZZ channels are close to the predicted backgrounds (11,172 vs. 11,030 and 112 vs. 117.8, respectively); a sentence reporting the local p-value or significance of the largest deviation would make the 'no significant excess' statement more quantitative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the limit extraction is a direct data fit against external benchmark signal models, with backgrounds from simulation and data control regions.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain from event selection through background estimation, signal extraction, and limit setting, and found no step where a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation that is itself load-bearing. The signal hypotheses are the ATLAS-CMS Dark Matter Forum benchmark models (Z'-2HDM and baryonic Z'), with parameters fixed externally to this analysis; no signal parameter is fitted to data to produce a predicted signal. The h->bb, h->gamma-gamma, and h->tau-tau channels are taken from previously published CMS analyses (Refs. [30-32]); those are independent published results with their own data and fits, not assumptions whose validity is imported from this paper. In the new h->WW and h->ZZ channels, backgrounds are estimated from simulation with normalizations constrained by dedicated control regions included in the likelihood fit, and the nonprompt-lepton background is determined from data with explicitly quoted 30% and 36-43% uncertainties (Sections 5.4.1, 5.5.1, Tables 3-4); this is a conventional data-driven background estimate, not a fitted quantity being renamed as a prediction. The conversion to a spin-independent DM-nucleon cross section uses the standard analytic formula of Ref. [37], Eq. (1), and is an external mapping rather than a circular definition. The paper itself honestly flags that the Z'-2HDM benchmark masses within sensitivity reach are already excluded by dijet searches, and the m_chi text inconsistency in Section 8 is a typographical error that does not affect the analysis. I therefore find no circular step, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles are introduced in this paper. The signal hypotheses are standard simplified models from the ATLAS-CMS Dark Matter Forum. The central claim rests on the benchmark model parameters and on the fidelity of simulation and control-region transfers.

free parameters (5)
  • Z'-2HDM DM mass mChi = 100 GeV (fixed benchmark)
    The DM mass is fixed to 100 GeV. The paper argues the limits also apply to lighter DM because the A to DM branching fraction changes by less than 7% for mChi from 1 to 100 GeV.
  • Z'-2HDM couplings and tanBeta = gChi=1, gZ'=0.8, tanBeta=1 (tanBeta varied 0.4 to 10 in interpretation)
    Fixed benchmark values recommended by the ATLAS-CMS Dark Matter Forum; these define the signal model and are not fitted to data.
  • Baryonic Z' couplings and mixing = gChi=1, gq=0.25, sinTheta=0.3
    Fixed benchmark values that define the baryonic Z' signal model and the coupling between Z' and the Higgs boson.
  • Z'-2HDM scan masses mA and mZ' = mA 300-1000 GeV, mZ' 450-4000 GeV
    Scanned grid of signal generation. The kinematic distributions depend on these masses when the pseudoscalar A is produced on-shell.
  • Baryonic Z' scan masses mZ' and mChi = mZ' 100-2500 GeV, mChi 1-700 GeV
    Scanned grid of signal generation. The pT spectrum depends most strongly on mZ' and only weakly on mChi.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard model background predictions from Monte Carlo generators and their normalizations are accurate within quoted uncertainties.
    Section 3. If the background shapes or yields are mis-modeled, the observed agreement with expectation would be misleading.
  • domain assumption The GEANT4 detector simulation accurately models the CMS response.
    Section 3. Signal acceptance and selection efficiencies are derived from simulation and cannot be fully verified from the text.
  • domain assumption The two simplified models, Z'-2HDM and baryonic Z', are valid benchmarks for interpreting the search.
    Section 1. The limits are model-dependent and do not constrain all possible dark matter models.
  • domain assumption The five channels are statistically independent with zero signal-region overlap and negligible control-region overlap.
    Section 6. If overlap or correlations are larger than stated, the combined limit would overestimate sensitivity.
  • domain assumption Control regions transfer to the signal region without unmodeled bias.
    Sections 5.4.1 and 5.5.1. This is the weakest experimental premise, especially for the data-driven nonprompt-lepton background estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/COOCKDEV

@misc{pith2026190801713,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts =$ 13 TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/COOCKDEV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01713}
}
abstract

A search for dark matter (DM) particles is performed using events with a Higgs boson candidate and large missing transverse momentum. The analysis is based on proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC in 2016, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb$^{-1}$. The search is performed in five Higgs boson decay channels: h $\to \mathrm{b\bar{b}}$, $\gamma\gamma$, $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$, W$^{+}$W$^{-}$, and ZZ. The results from the individual channels are combined to maximize the sensitivity of the analysis. No significant excess over the expected standard model background is observed in any of the five channels or in their combination. Limits are set on DM production in the context of two simplified models. The results are also interpreted in terms of a spin-independent DM-nucleon scattering cross section and compared to those from direct-detection DM experiments. This is the first search for DM particles produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, and the first statistical combination based on five Higgs boson decay channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.01713 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative Feynman diagrams for the two benchmark signal models considered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The distribution of p miss T at the generator level for the Z0 -2HDM (left), showing the dependence on the two main model parameters varied in the analysis, mZ0 and mA, and for the baryonic Z0 model (right), showing the variation of p miss T as a function of mZ0 and mχ . All other parameters of the models are fixed to the values specified in the text. The distributions are normalized to unit area. Although the signa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The first requirement exploits the fact that the invariant mass of the leptons coming [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The distribution of the BDT discriminants expected from MC simulation before and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The p miss T distribution for the expected background and observed events in data in the h → ZZ analysis. Two signal benchmarks, corresponding to the Z0 -2HDM (dotted orange line, left) and baryonic Z0 (solid black line, right) model are superimposed. The signal is nor…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The upper limits at 95% CL on the observed and expected DM production cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The upper limits at 95% CL on the observed and expected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The upper limits at 95% CL on the observed and expected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The upper limits at 95% CL on the observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The upper limits at 90% CL on the DM-nucleon spin-independent scattering cross [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Results obtained in this analysis are compared with those from the CMS dijet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Search for resonant production of lepton-enriched semivisible jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A CMS search with 138 fb^-1 of 13 TeV data finds no lepton-enriched semivisible jet resonance and excludes Z' masses up to 4.7 TeV (SVJ l) and 1.8-3.5 TeV (SVJ tau) at 95% CL.

  2. Search for dark matter production in association with bottom quarks and a lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    First dedicated CMS search for bb + dilepton + missing transverse momentum in the 2HDM+a model finds no signal and sets 95% CL cross-section limits of 10^-2 to 10^-3 pb for mH = 400-2000 GeV.

  3. Unveiling the inert Triplet desert region with a pNGB Dark Matter and its Gravitational Wave signatures

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-component dark matter model combining an inert scalar triplet with a pseudo-Goldstone singlet revives the sub-TeV triplet desert region and predicts gravitational waves detectable by LISA, BBO, and DECIGO.

  4. Prospecting bipartite Dark Matter through Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-component dark matter model with an inert triplet scalar and a singlet fermion can explain the relic abundance while producing a strong electroweak phase transition and gravitational wave signals detectable by L...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Direct detection of dark matter

    R. J. Gaitskell, “Direct detection of dark matter”, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54 (2004) 315, doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.54.070103.181244

    arXiv 2004

  2. [2]

    Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe

    V . Trimble, “Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 25 (1987) 425, doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.002233

    arXiv 1987

  3. [3]

    Dark Matter searches with astroparticle data

    T. A. Porter, R. P . Johnson, and P . W. Graham, “Dark Matter searches with astroparticle data”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49 (2011) 155, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102528 , arXiv:1104.2836

    arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints”, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031, arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck”, (2018). arXiv:1807.06205

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection

    J. L. Feng, “Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 (2010) 495, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 , arXiv:1003.0904

    arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable weakly interacting massive particles

    R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, “On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable weakly interacting massive particles”, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1585, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.33.1585. [Erratum: doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3263]

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.33.1585 1986

  8. [8]

    Cosmological constraints on the properties of weakly interacting massive particles

    G. Steigman and M. S. Turner, “Cosmological constraints on the properties of weakly interacting massive particles”, Nucl. Phys. B 253 (1985) 375, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90537-1. References 27

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90537-1 1985

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Maverick dark matter at colliders

    M. Beltran et al., “Maverick dark matter at colliders”, JHEP 09 (2010) 037, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)037, arXiv:1002.4137

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the ATLAS detector”, JHEP 01 (2018) 126, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)126, arXiv:1711.03301

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and transverse momentum imbalance at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet or a hadronically decaying W or Z boson and transverse momentum imbalance at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 092005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.092005, arXiv:1712.02345

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with bottom or top quarks in√s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with bottom or top quarks in√s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 18, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5486-1 , arXiv:1710.11412

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Search for dark matter in events with energetic, hadronically decaying top quarks and missing transverse momentum at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in events with energetic, hadronically decaying top quarks and missing transverse momentum at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2018) 027, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)027, arXiv:1801.08427

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Search for dark matter at√s = 13 TeV in final states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter at√s = 13 TeV in final states containing an energetic photon and large missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 393, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4965-8 , arXiv:1704.03848

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Search for new physics in the monophoton final state in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in the monophoton final state in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 10 (2017) 073, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)073, arXiv:1706.03794

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Search for an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates produced in association with a Z boson in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates produced in association with a Z boson in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 318, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.049, arXiv:1708.09624

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Search for new physics in events with a leptonically decaying Z boson and a large transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in events with a leptonically decaying Z boson and a large transverse momentum imbalance in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 291, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5740-1 , arXiv:1711.00431

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying vector boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in events with a hadronically decaying vector boson and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, JHEP 10 (2018) 180, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)180, arXiv:1807.11471

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235

    2012 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at√s = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at√s = 7 and 8 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571. 28

    2013 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Mono-Higgs-boson: a new collider probe of dark matter

    L. Carpenter et al., “Mono-Higgs-boson: a new collider probe of dark matter”, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 075017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.075017, arXiv:1312.2592

    2014 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: novel mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC

    J. M. No, “Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: novel mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 031701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.031701, arXiv:1509.01110

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a higgs boson decaying to two photons in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a higgs boson decaying to two photons in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 131801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.131801, arXiv:1506.01081

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two bottom quarks in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two bottom quarks in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 072007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.072007, arXiv:1510.06218

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to b-quarks in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to b-quarks in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 11, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.035, arXiv:1609.04572

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Search for associated production of dark matter with a Higgs boson decaying to bb or γγ at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for associated production of dark matter with a Higgs boson decaying to bb or γγ at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 10 (2017) 180, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)180, arXiv:1703.05236

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to two photons at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 112004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.112004, arXiv:1706.03948

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to b¯b using 36 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to b¯b using 36 fb−1 of pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181804, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181804, arXiv:1707.01302

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Search for heavy resonances decaying into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in final states with charged leptons, neutrinos and b quarks at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in final states with charged leptons, neutrinos and b quarks at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 11 (2018) 172, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)172, arXiv:1807.02826

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 280, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6730-7 , arXiv:1811.06562

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to γγ or τ+τ− at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to γγ or τ+τ− at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 09 (2018) 046, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)046, arXiv:1806.04771

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum

    D. Abercrombie et al., “Dark matter benchmark models for early LHC Run-2 searches: report of the ATLAS/CMS Dark Matter Forum”, (2015). arXiv:1507.00966

    2015 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002, arXiv:1106.0034. References 29

    2012 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet

    N. Craig, J. Galloway, and S. Thomas, “Searching for signs of the second Higgs doublet”, (2013). arXiv:1305.2424

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mono-Higgs detection of dark matter at the LHC

    A. Berlin, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, “Mono-Higgs detection of dark matter at the LHC”, JHEP 06 (2014) 078, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)078, arXiv:1402.7074

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified s-channel models of dark matter

    A. Boveia et al., “Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplified s-channel models of dark matter”, (2016). arXiv:1603.04156

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Search for new phenomena in dijet events using 37 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in dijet events using 37 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at√s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 052004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.052004, arXiv:1703.09127

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Search for low mass vector resonances decaying into quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for low mass vector resonances decaying into quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 01 (2018) 097, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2018)097, arXiv:1710.00159

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Search for low-mass dijet resonances using trigger-level jets with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for low-mass dijet resonances using trigger-level jets with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 081801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.081801, arXiv:1804.03496

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter mediators and other new particles

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter mediators and other new particles”, JHEP 08 (2018) 130, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)130, arXiv:1806.00843

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying into the four-lepton final state in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 11 (2017) 047, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)047, arXiv:1706.09936

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”, JINST 12 (2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020, arXiv:1609.02366

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3 (2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 07 (2018) 161, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161, arXiv:1802.02613

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    MadGraph 5: going beyond

    J. Alwall et al., “MadGraph 5: going beyond”, JHEP 06 (2011) 128, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2011)128, arXiv:1106.0522

    2011 arXiv

  39. [47]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”, JHEP 07 (2014) 079, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024, arXiv:1410.3012

    2015 arXiv

  41. [49]

    A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”, JHEP 11 (2004) 040, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146. 30

    2004 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”, JHEP 11 (2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092

    2007 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”, JHEP 06 (2010) 043, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:1002.2581

    2010 arXiv

  44. [52]

    W+W−, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX

    T. Melia, P . Nason, R. R¨ontsch, and G. Zanderighi, “W+W−, WZ and ZZ production in the POWHEG BOX”, JHEP 11 (2011) 078, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2011)078, arXiv:1107.5051

    2011 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O(α2 s )

    K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, “Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through O(α2 s )”, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 114017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.114017, arXiv:hep-ph/0609070

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Vector boson pair production at the LHC

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, “Vector boson pair production at the LHC”, JHEP 07 (2011) 018, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)018, arXiv:1105.0020

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    A multi-threaded version of MCFM

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and W. T. Giele, “A multi-threaded version of MCFM”, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 246, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3461-2 , arXiv:1503.06182

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Transverse momentum resummation effects in W+W− measurements

    P . Meade, H. Ramani, and M. Zeng, “Transverse momentum resummation effects in W+W− measurements”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 114006, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.114006, arXiv:1407.4481

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Explanation of the WW excess at the LHC by jet-veto resummation

    P . Jaiswal and T. Okui, “Explanation of the WW excess at the LHC by jet-veto resummation”, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 073009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.073009, arXiv:1407.4537

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    QCD corrections to W+W− production through gluon fusion

    F. Caola, K. Melnikov, R. R ¨ontsch, and L. Tancredi, “QCD corrections to W+W− production through gluon fusion”, Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016) 275, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.046, arXiv:1511.08617

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Measurement of the t ¯t production cross section in the eµ channel in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the t ¯t production cross section in the eµ channel in proton-proton collisions at√s = 7 and 8 TeV”, JHEP 08 (2016) 029, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)029, arXiv:1603.02303

    2016 arXiv

  52. [60]

    NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG”, JHEP 07 (2008) 060, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060, arXiv:0805.4802

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM

    E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P . Slavich, and A. Vicini, “Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM”, JHEP 02 (2012) 088, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)088, arXiv:1111.2854

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    P . Nason and C. Oleari, “NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG”, JHEP 02 (2010) 037, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)037, arXiv:0911.5299

    2010 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX

    H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth, “Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX”, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 094003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094003, arXiv:1501.04498. References 31

    2015 arXiv

  56. [64]

    HW±/HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO

    G. Luisoni, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and F. Tramontano, “HW±/HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO”, JHEP 10 (2013) 083, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)083, arXiv:1306.2542

    2013 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders

    Y. Gao et al., “Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.075022, arXiv:1001.3396. [Erratum: doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.079905]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC

    S. Bolognesi et al., “On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.095031, arXiv:1208.4018

    2012 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN (2016) doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, arXiv:1610.07922

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Parton distributions for the LHC Run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 155, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x , arXiv:1512.00815

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    GEANT 4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “ GEANT 4—a simulation toolkit”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  63. [71]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”, JINST 12 (2017) P10003, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV”, JINST 10 (2015) P06005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/10/06/P06005, arXiv:1502.02701

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dispelling the n3 myth for the kT jet-finder

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Dispelling the n3 myth for the kT jet-finder”, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037, arXiv:hep-ph/0512210

    2006 arXiv

  66. [74]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2 , arXiv:1111.6097

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Pileup subtraction using jet areas

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Pileup subtraction using jet areas”, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 119, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077, arXiv:0707.1378

    2008 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”, JINST 12 (2017) 02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014, arXiv:1607.03663

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Jet performance in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet performance in pp collisions at√s = 7 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-10-003, 2010

    2010

  70. [78]

    Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering

    M. Wobisch and T. Wengler, “Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering”, (1998). arXiv:hep-ph/9907280. 32

    1998 arXiv

  71. [79]

    A Cambridge-Aachen (C-A) based jet algorithm for boosted top-jet tagging

    CMS Collaboration, “A Cambridge-Aachen (C-A) based jet algorithm for boosted top-jet tagging”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-JME-09-001, 2009

    2009

  72. [80]

    Pileup per particle identification

    D. Berteloni, P . Harris, M. Low, and N. Tran, “Pileup per particle identification”, JHEP 59 (2014) 059, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)059, arXiv:1407.6013

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Soft Drop

    A. J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, and J. Thaler, “Soft Drop”, JHEP 05 (2014) 146, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2014)146, arXiv:1402.2657

    2014 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011, arXiv:1712.07158

    2018 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Performance of reconstruction and identification of τ leptons decaying to hadrons and ντ in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of reconstruction and identification of τ leptons decaying to hadrons and ντ in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, JINST 13 (2018) P10005, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10005, arXiv:1809.02816

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV using the CMS detector”, JINST 14 (2019), no. 07, P07004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004, arXiv:1903.06078

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of properties of the Higgs boson decaying to a W boson pair in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, Phys. Lett. B 791 (2019) 96, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.073, arXiv:1806.05246

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Review of particle physics

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, “Review of particle physics”, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001

    2018 doi

  79. [87]

    Measurement of Higgs boson production and properties in the WW decay channel with leptonic final states

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of Higgs boson production and properties in the WW decay channel with leptonic final states”, JHEP 01 (2014) 096, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)096, arXiv:1312.1129

    2014 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of differential cross sections of top quark pair production as a function of kinematic event variables in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV”, JHEP 06 (2018) 002, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)002, arXiv:1803.03991

    2018 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Higgs CAT

    G. Passarino, “Higgs CAT”, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2866, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2866-7 , arXiv:1312.2397

    2014 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Electroweak and QCD corrections to top-pair hadroproduction in association with heavy bosons

    S. Frixione et al., “Electroweak and QCD corrections to top-pair hadroproduction in association with heavy bosons”, JHEP 06 (2015) 184, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)184, arXiv:1504.03446

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001, 2017

    2016

  84. [92]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001, arXiv:1510.03865

    2016 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 , arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z . References 33

    2011 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 (1999) 435, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    1999 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Presentation of search results: the CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CL s technique”, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    2002 doi

  88. [96]

    Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011

    ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and the LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011

    2011

  89. [97]

    Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector

    CRESST-II Collaboration, “Results on light dark matter particles with a low-threshold CRESST-II detector”, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 25, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3877-3 , arXiv:1509.01515

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    New results from the search for low-mass weakly interacting massive particles with the CDMS low ionization threshold experiment

    SuperCDMS Collaboration, “New results from the search for low-mass weakly interacting massive particles with the CDMS low ionization threshold experiment”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 071301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.071301, arXiv:1509.02448

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Dark matter results from 54-ton-day exposure of PandaX-II experiment

    PandaX-II Collaboration, “Dark matter results from 54-ton-day exposure of PandaX-II experiment”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181302, arXiv:1708.06917

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure

    LUX Collaboration, “Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.021303, arXiv:1608.07648

    2017 arXiv

  93. [101]

    First dark matter search results from the XENON1T experiment

    XENON Collaboration, “First dark matter search results from the XENON1T experiment”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181301, arXiv:1705.06655

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Limits on light weakly interacting massive particles from the first 102.8 kg× day data of the CDEX-10 experiment

    CDEX Collaboration, “Limits on light weakly interacting massive particles from the first 102.8 kg× day data of the CDEX-10 experiment”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 241301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.241301, arXiv:1802.09016. 34 35 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Instit...

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.