Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

The emission and scintillation properties of RRAT J2325-0530 at 154 MHz and 1.4 GHz

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the sporadic pulses of RRAT J2325−0530 carry measurable interstellar scintillation, yielding at 1.4 GHz a decorrelation bandwidth of 102±72 MHz and timescale of 3478±2550 s—the first scintillation measurement for…

desk verdict Solid single-object study with genuine firsts, but the headline scintillation parameters are lower-limit estimates, not measurements, and the abstract overstates them. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02911 v1 pith:YSV7G6TG submitted 2019-08-08 astro-ph.HE

B. W. Meyers , S. E. Tremblay , N. D. R. Bhat , R. M. Shannon , S. M. Ord , C. Sobey , M. Johnston-Hollitt , M. Walker
show 1 more author
R. B. Wayth
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords rotatingradiotransientspulsarsinterstellarscintillationsingle-pulseastronomypolarimetryspectralindexMurchisonWidefieldArrayPoissonprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

RRAT J2325−0530 is a rotating radio transient—a neutron star that emits single pulses sporadically, with minutes to hours of silence between bursts. This paper reports the first simultaneous observation of such an object at 154 MHz (MWA) and 1.4 GHz (Parkes), and uses the 89 and 70 detected pulses to measure a mean single-pulse spectral index α=−2.2±0.1, the first polarimetric profile of this pulsar, pulse rates of 73±7 and 43±5 per hour, and wait times consistent with a Poisson process. Its central new claim is that the scintillation properties of a RRAT can be measured despite irregular sampling: at 1.4 GHz the diffractive scintillation bandwidth is ν_diss=102±72 MHz and the timescale is τ_diss=3478±2550 s, the first such measurement for any RRAT. If correct, this opens a route to measuring space velocities and interstellar turbulence for the whole RRAT class, connecting these objects to the normal pulsar population.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a modified version of the standard diffractive scintillation analysis, adapted to irregularly sampled single pulses. For each bright pulse the intensity autocorrelation function A(δν)=⟨I(t,ν)I(t,ν+δν)⟩ is computed across frequency channels; a Gaussian fit yields the scintillation bandwidth ν_diss=(2 ln 2)^(1/2)σ, the half-width at half-maximum. To get the timescale, the mean-subtracted spectra of every pair of pulses are cross-correlated and the coefficients are binned by the number of rotations between pulses; the 1/e half-width of a Gaussian fit gives τ_diss=√2σ. A filling-factor estimate (N_scint≈2 at 1.4 GHz) supplies the ~70% statistical error, and the same machinery gives the velocity via V_iss=A_iss(Dx ν_diss)^(1/2)/(ν τ_diss) and the turbulence strength via $C_n^{2}$∝ν^(11/3)D^(-11/6)ν_diss^(-5/6).

What would settle it

Observe RRAT J2325−0530 at ~500 MHz with a bandwidth wide enough to resolve the expected ν_diss≈1.4 MHz (from the γ≈−4.2 scaling) over at least two hours; if the autocorrelation half-width is unresolved or the recovered ν_diss and τ_diss are inconsistent with the 1.4 GHz values under the quoted scaling, the central scintillation claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a RRAT's sporadic single pulses carry enough information to characterise both the broadband emission and the intervening interstellar medium. Combining absolutely aligned simultaneous pulses, the authors find a mean single-pulse spectral index α=−2.2±0.1 (steeper than the average pulsar value of about −1.6), pulse energy distributions best described by log-normal or truncated exponential models, no evidence of pulse clustering beyond a Poisson process, and the first polarimetric profile of this pulsar with an interstellar rotation measure of 3.85±0.12 rad $m^{-2}$. The headline result is the first measurement of scintillation for any RRAT: at 1.4 GHz, ν_diss=102±72 MHz (a lower limit, since the 256 MHz band does not fully cover one scintle) and τ_diss=3478±2550 s, implying a scintillation velocity of 44±36 km/s at 0.7 kpc (or 64±52 km/s at 1.49 kpc), a turbulence strength $C_n^{2}$≲2.8×$10^{-4}$ $m^{-20}$/3, and a Kolmogorov-like frequency scaling index γ≈−4.2.

Load-bearing premise

The headline scintillation numbers assume that Gaussian fits to intensity autocorrelations and cross-correlations recover the true decorrelation widths even though the data cover only part of one brightness patch in frequency and time (about two scintles, ~70% statistical error) and the timescale fit depends on how the correlation points are binned.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scintillation analysis is now applicable to RRATs, so space-velocity estimates can be obtained for other sporadic emitters without long-term timing arrays.
  • The measured 1.4 GHz bandwidth is a lower limit; wider-band observations should resolve more of the scintle and sharpen ν_diss, τ_diss, V_iss, and C_n^2.
  • The steep scaling γ≈−4.2, near the Kolmogorov limit, implies the sightline is simple, with little additional scattering structure, consistent with the pulsar's high Galactic latitude (b=−60.2°).
  • Interpreting the measured spectral index requires care: because the 1.4 GHz pulses are scintillation-modulated, the mean α=−2.2±0.1 may be biased steeper than the intrinsic value.
  • The Poisson-compatible wait times suggest that, at least in this 1.5-hour window, single-pulse emission from J2325−0530 behaves like a random rate process rather than a clustered or periodic nulling process.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • [Editorial inference] If the method survives a multi-scintle test, the same single-pulse autocorrelation route could be applied to other sporadic transients, such as fast radio bursts, to constrain the plasma environment along their lines of sight.
  • [Editorial inference] The steep spectral index and Poisson wait times together suggest that RRAT J2325−0530's intermittency may be intrinsic to the emission process rather than caused by external eclipsing or asteroidal occultation, though larger samples are needed to test this.
  • [Editorial inference] A multi-epoch 300–700 MHz campaign could separate scintillation-induced variability from intrinsic spectral-index variability, a distinction this single epoch cannot make.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents simultaneous MWA (154 MHz) and Parkes (1.4 GHz) observations of the rotating radio transient RRAT J2325-0530. The authors detect 89 and 70 single pulses in the two bands, respectively, and report a first polarimetric profile of this pulsar, a mean single-pulse spectral index α = -2.2 ± 0.1, fluence distributions fitted by log-normal or truncated-exponential models, pulse rates of 73 ± 7 and 43 ± 5 per hour, and wait times consistent with a Poisson process. The central novelty is the claim that these observations yield the first measurement of scintillation properties for any RRAT, specifically ν_diss = 102 ± 72 MHz and τ_diss = 3478 ± 2550 s at 1.4 GHz, along with a frequency scaling index γ ≈ -4.2, a scintillation velocity V_iss, and a turbulence strength C_n^2.

Significance. If the scintillation measurement were secure, it would be a genuinely new result: the first characterization of diffractive scintillation for an RRAT, demonstrating that such measurements are feasible despite irregular single-pulse sampling, and opening a path to RRAT space velocities and ISM studies. The paper also contains valuable contributions in simultaneous low/high-frequency single-pulse polarimetry, spectral-index measurement, and pulse statistics. The authors are careful about calibration, RFI excision, and selection effects, and they explicitly caution in Section 3.3 that the scintillation parameters should be treated with caution. However, the headline scintillation parameters are not as secure as the abstract and Section 5 imply; the analysis samples fewer than one full scintle, the quoted 70% statistical uncertainty is computed from the same lower-limit values, and the derived scaling index and velocity inherit these limitations. The central claim is defensible only if reframed as constraints or limits, not as measured values.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3.1, Eq. (2), Table 2] The value ν_diss = 102 ± 72 MHz is not a measured scintillation bandwidth but a lower limit. The ACFs in Figure 4 do not fall to zero within the ±128 MHz lag range, so the Gaussian half-width is an extrapolation beyond the sampled lags; the paper itself labels it a lower limit. The statistical error of ~70% is then computed from Eq. (2) using this same measured value, so N_scint ≈ 2 is an upper bound rather than a reliable estimate. Presenting ν_diss = 102 ± 72 MHz as a measured property in the abstract, Table 2, and Section 5 is therefore not supported. The authors should reframe all statements as lower limits or constraints.
  2. [Section 3.3.2, Figure 5] The scintillation timescale τ_diss = 3478 ± 2550 s is not securely determined. The fitted 1/e point is comparable to the 5867 s observation duration, placing it near the edge of the sampled lag range. The authors state that the fit quality changes drastically depending on how the correlation coefficients are averaged and that the estimate is often unconstrained. Under these conditions, the derived scintillation velocity V_iss from Eq. (4) and the turbulence strength from Eq. (6) are not reliable; they should either be removed or reported as order-of-magnitude illustrations with expanded caveats.
  3. [Section 3.3.1 and Section 5] The frequency scaling index γ ≈ -4.2 is derived by combining a lower limit on ν_diss at 1.4 GHz with an upper limit (ν_diss < 10 kHz) at 154 MHz. Limits bracket a range of possible scaling indices; they do not determine γ to the precision implied by the statement 'we also measure a scintillation frequency scaling index of γ = -4.2'. The additional use of the Bhat et al. (2004) γ = -3.9 scaling to extrapolate ν_diss to 154 MHz and then the same framework to infer a steeper index is not circular in a damaging way, but the inferred value should be presented as a constraint (e.g., γ ≲ -4) rather than a measurement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3.2] The text quotes τ_diss = 3478 ± 761 s and then τ_diss = 3478 ± 2550 s without clearly distinguishing the fitting uncertainty from the sampling uncertainty; please clarify which error budget is being quoted at each point.
  2. [Section 3.3.1] The restriction of the Parkes ACF analysis to 12/70 pulses with S/N > 40 is not justified; please state why this threshold was chosen and whether the measured ν_diss changes if the threshold is varied.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Abstract] The MWA polarisation calibration is described as 'currently undergoing self-consistency and cross-validation tests'; the abstract's claim of a 'first polarimetric profile' should be explicitly qualified to avoid overstatement, since the MWA polarisation position angle is not absolutely calibrated.
  4. [Section 5] The sentence 'This is the first time scintillation properties have been measured for a RRAT' conflicts with the earlier caveats in Section 3.3; consider rewording to 'first constraints on' or 'first characterisation attempt' to match the actual precision.
  5. [Acknowledgements] There is a typo in the Acknowledgements: 'Karako-Argamann' should be 'Karako-Argaman'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claims are measurements and fits to the data, not predictions derived from the model being tested.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—the polarimetric profile, spectral index, pulse rates, wait-time distribution, and scintillation bandwidth/timescale—are obtained by direct measurement and fitting of the observed single pulses, not by deriving a quantity from an assumption that already contains it. The scintillation bandwidth and timescale are fitted to the autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions of the data themselves, so they are empirical estimates, not predictions from a model. The only step that invokes an external scaling relation is the comparison of the 154 MHz upper limit with the 1.4 GHz lower limit using the Bhat et al. (2004) frequency-scaling index. That relation is an independent empirical result from the wider pulsar population, and the paper uses it as a benchmark to infer that the scaling is steeper than the nominal value; it is a comparison against an external result, not a self-referential fit. Even if the scaling were wrong, the primary claim that scintillation properties can be characterized for a RRAT would remain a data-based measurement, albeit with the caveats the authors themselves emphasize. The paper explicitly labels the scintillation values as limits and cautions against overinterpretation, so there is no circularity by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis is observational; the numerical results are fitted measurements rather than predictions from a new theory. The main free parameters are the fitted spectral index, scintillation bandwidth and timescale, plus hand-chosen cutoffs and an assumed filling fraction. The derived scintillation velocity and turbulence strength further depend on assumed distances, screen geometry, and Kolmogorov scaling. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • mean single-pulse spectral index alpha = -2.2 ± 0.1
    Fitted to 45 cross-matched simultaneous pulses. Acknowledged to be biased by scintillation and MWA detectability in Section 4.2.
  • scintillation bandwidth nu_diss at 1.4 GHz = 102 ± 12 MHz (102 ± 72 MHz after statistical error)
    From Gaussian fit to ACFs of 12 pulses with S/N greater than 40. A lower limit because fewer than one scintle is sampled over the 256 MHz band.
  • scintillation timescale tau_diss at 1.4 GHz = 3478 ± 761 s (3478 ± 2550 s after statistical error)
    From Gaussian fit to binned cross-correlation of pulse spectra. Strongly dependent on binning and dominated by roughly 70 percent sampling error.
  • fluence power-law cutoff for MWA = 0.8 Jy s
    Chosen by hand to coincide with the peak of the MWA fluence distribution. The power law does not fit below this cutoff, as noted in Section 3.5.
  • fluence power-law cutoff for Parkes = 0.006 Jy s
    Chosen by hand for the Parkes data. Arbitrary and acknowledged as a caveat in Section 4.3.
  • scintillation filling fraction f_d = 0.5
    Assumed from the Parkes dynamic spectrum to compute N_scint and the statistical error in Section 3.3.1.
  • rotation measure RM_ISM = 3.85 ± 0.12 rad m^-2
    Determined from RM synthesis on the MWA pseudo-profile after ionospheric correction. The Parkes value is consistent but less constraining.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Kolmogorov turbulence and frequency scaling nu_diss proportional to nu^gamma with gamma = -3.9 for initial extrapolation.
    Used in Section 3.3.1 to predict the 154 MHz scintillation bandwidth. The later gamma about -4.2 is inferred by comparing this scaling with the MWA upper limit.
  • domain assumption The scattering screen lies halfway between observer and pulsar, x = 1.
    Assumed in Equation 4 to convert nu_diss and tau_diss into a scintillation velocity. There is no independent constraint on the screen location.
  • domain assumption Distances D = 0.7 kpc from NE2001 and D = 1.49 kpc from YMW16, each with 25 percent uncertainty.
    Used for scintillation velocity and turbulence strength. The factor-of-two distance discrepancy is noted but not resolved in Section 3.3.3.
  • domain assumption Pulse wait times are generated by a Poisson process with a constant average rate.
    Assumed to fit exponential distributions in Section 3.6 and to compare pulse rates across epochs in Section 4.4.
  • domain assumption Detections above S/N greater than or equal to 6 after visual RFI excision form an unbiased pulse sample.
    Used for all pulse rates and distributions. The authors acknowledge that scintillation, threshold effects, and RFI can bias the sample in Sections 3.1 and 4.4.
  • domain assumption The MWA tied-array beam flux scale can be corrected by comparing the brightest pulse to the incoherent sum.
    Section 2.1.2 relies on the incoherent sum being unaffected by coherence errors and on the bright pulse ratio being representative.
  • domain assumption The ISM along this line of sight follows Kolmogorov turbulence for the C_n^2 estimate.
    Equation 6 uses Kolmogorov scaling. The measured gamma near -4.2 supports this, but it is not an independent check.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The emission and scintillation properties of RRAT J2325-0530 at 154 MHz and 1.4 GHz." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YSV7G6TG

@misc{pith2026190802911,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The emission and scintillation properties of RRAT J2325-0530 at 154 MHz and 1.4 GHz},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YSV7G6TG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02911}
}
abstract

Rotating Radio Transients (RRATs) represent a relatively new class of pulsar, primarily characterised by their sporadic bursting emission of single pulses on time scales of minutes to hours. In addition to the difficulty involved in detecting these objects, low-frequency ($<$300 MHz) observations of RRATs are sparse, which makes understanding their broadband emission properties in the context of the normal pulsar population problematic. Here, we present the simultaneous detection of RRAT J2325-0530 using the Murchison Widefield Array (154 MHz) and Parkes radio telescope (1.4 GHz). On a single-pulse basis, we produce the first polarimetric profile of this pulsar, measure the spectral index ($\alpha=-2.2\pm 0.1$), pulse energy distributions, and present the pulse rates in the context of detections in previous epochs. We find that the distribution of time between subsequent pulses is consistent with a Poisson process and find no evidence of clustering over the $\sim$1.5 hr observations. Finally, we are able to quantify the scintillation properties of RRAT J2325-0530 at 1.4 GHz, where the single pulses are modulated substantially across the observing bandwidth, and show that this characterisation is feasible even with irregular time sampling as a consequence of the sporadic emission behaviour.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02911 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of coincident single pulses from RRAT J2325−0530 at 1.4 GHz (Parkes; top row) and 154 MHz (MWA; bottom row). The pulses have been absolutely aligned, in that the same ephemeris was used to reduce the data sets. The number of rotations since the first simultaneously observed rotation of the pulsar are also given for each pair. Pulse 527 is the brightest pulse in the Parkes band of the coincident pulses, whil… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A pseudo-integrated profile, combining all single pulses with a S/N ≥ 6. The profiles were produced using the same ephemeris and then rotated by 0.5 phase turns. Total intensity (Stokes I) is drawn in black, with linear (L = p Q2 + U2) and circular (V ) polarisation in red and blue, respectively. Above each profile is the linear polarisation position angle in degrees. Both profiles have been corrected for rotation m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A dynamic spectrum of the brightest single pulses from RRAT J2325−0530 at 154 MHz (MWA; left) and 1.4 GHz (Parkes; right). The colour scale units are different for each dynamic spectrum (kJy for the MWA data, Jy for the Parkes data), and the x-axis represents the order in which the pulses were detected, with the total time spanned by these pulses given for context in the label. Note that this means the time axis is … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The set of ACFs (grey) for the brightest pulses, and their best-fitting Gaussian model (black), from: a) the MWA (15 pulses), and b) Parkes (12 pulses). The MWA autocorrelations drop to zero by the first frequency lag bin and thus we are not able to even partially reso…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Mean correlation coefficients of individual pulse spectra, binned into: a) 10-second intervals for MWA data, and b) 150-second intervals for Parkes data. The Gaussian fit to the data (red, solid line) is weighted based on the standard error of each of the points, where…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral index distribution for detected simultaneous pulses between the MWA and Parkes. The red solid line is a Gaussian fit to the distribution, and the pink envelope represents the 1-σ confidence interval of the model. Error bars on the points are Poisson uncertaint…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pulse fluence (energy) distributions for single pulses detected with the MWA (left) and Parkes (right). We fitted a power law (blue), truncated exponential (orange) and log-normal (green) distribution model to the binned single-pulse fluences. The error bars represent …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Histogram of the number of rotations between subse￾quent pulses (i.e. wait times) for the MWA pulses (top) and Parkes pulses (bottom). The blue solid lines are a fit to an exponential distribution, and the light blue shaded regions represent the 99% confidence interval…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Lorimer D

    Bates S. D., Lorimer D. R., Verbiest J. P. W., 2013, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013MNRAS.431.1352B 431, 1352

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt257 2013

  2. [2]

    Bhat N. D. R., Rao A. P., Gupta Y., 1999, [ ] 10.1086/313198 , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1999ApJS..121..483B 121, 483

    doi:10.1086/313198 1999

  3. [3]

    Bhat N. D. R., Cordes J. M., Camilo F., Nice D. J., Lorimer D. R., 2004, [ ] 10.1086/382680 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2004ApJ...605..759B 605, 759

    doi:10.1086/382680 2004

  4. [4]

    Bhat N. D. R., Tingay S. J., Knight H. S., 2008, [ ] 10.1086/528735 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008ApJ...676.1200B 676, 1200

    doi:10.1086/528735 2008

  5. [5]

    Bhat N. D. R., Ord S. M., Tremblay S. E., McSweeney S. J., Tingay S. J., 2016, [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/86 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818...86B 818, 86

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/86 2016

  6. [6]

    Bhat N. D. R., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aad37c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJS..238....1B 238, 1

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aad37c 2018

  7. [7]

    Bhattacharyya B., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.477.4090B 477, 4090

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty923 2018

  8. [8]

    Boyles J., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/80 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...763...80B 763, 80

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/763/2/80 2013

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    A., de Bruyn A

    Brentjens M. A., de Bruyn A. G., 2005, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A

    2005 doi

  2. [12]

    Caleb M., et al., 2019, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1352 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.tmp.1287C p. 1287

    2019 doi

  3. [13]

    M., 1986, [ ] 10.1086/164764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1986ApJ...311..183C 311, 183

    Cordes J. M., 1986, [ ] 10.1086/164764 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1986ApJ...311..183C 311, 183

    1986 doi

  4. [14]

    M., Lazio T

    Cordes J. M., Lazio T. J. W., 2002, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2002astro.ph..7156C ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0207156 )

    2002 arXiv

  5. [15]

    M., Lazio T

    Cordes J. M., Lazio T. J. W., 2003, preprint, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2003astro.ph..1598C ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0301598 )

    2003 arXiv

  6. [16]

    M., Rickett B

    Cordes J. M., Rickett B. J., 1998, [ ] 10.1086/306358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1998ApJ...507..846C 507, 846

    1998 doi

  7. [17]

    M., Shannon R

    Cordes J. M., Shannon R. M., 2008, [ ] 10.1086/589425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2008ApJ...682.1152C 682, 1152

    2008 doi

  8. [18]

    M., Wolszczan A., Dewey R

    Cordes J. M., Wolszczan A., Dewey R. J., Blaskiewicz M., Stinebring D. R., 1990, [ ] 10.1086/168310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1990ApJ...349..245C 349, 245

    1990 doi

  9. [19]

    M., Bhat N

    Cordes J. M., Bhat N. D. R., Hankins T. H., McLaughlin M. A., Kern J., 2004, [ ] 10.1086/422495 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2004ApJ...612..375C 612, 375

    2004 doi

  10. [20]

    Y., Boyles J., McLaughlin M

    Cui B. Y., Boyles J., McLaughlin M. A., Palliyaguru N., 2017, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6aa9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2017ApJ...840....5C 840, 5

    2017 doi

  11. [21]

    Dai S., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.3223D 449, 3223

    2015 doi

  12. [22]

    T., Weisberg J

    Deller A. T., Weisberg J. M., Nice D. J., Chatterjee S., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacf95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ApJ...862..139D 862, 139

    2018 doi

  13. [23]

    E., Weisberg J

    Everett J. E., Weisberg J. M., 2001, [ ] 10.1086/320652 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553..341E 553, 341

    2001 doi

  14. [24]

    C., Kramer M., 2012, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21296.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012MNRAS.424.1197G 424, 1197

    Gajjar V., Joshi B. C., Kramer M., 2012, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21296.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012MNRAS.424.1197G 424, 1197

    2012

  15. [25]

    E., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011ApJ...743..102G 743, 102

    Gonzalez M. E., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2011ApJ...743..102G 743, 102

    2011 doi

  16. [27]

    J., Lyne A

    Gupta Y., Rickett B. J., Lyne A. G., 1994, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/269.4.1035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1994MNRAS.269.1035G 269, 1035

    1994 doi

  17. [28]

    L., Manchester R

    Han J. L., Manchester R. N., van Straten W., Demorest P., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa9c45 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJS..234...11H 234, 11

    2018 doi

  18. [29]

    Hern \'a ndez-Pajares M., et al., 2009, [Journal of Geodesy] 10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2009JGeod..83..263H 83, 263

    2009 doi

  19. [30]

    W., van Straten W., Manchester R

    Hotan A. W., van Straten W., Manchester R. N., 2004, [ ] 10.1071/AS04022 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASA...21..302H 21, 302

    2004 doi

  20. [31]

    D., 2007, [Computing In Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, [Computing In Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  21. [32]

    F., Bailes M., Barr E

    Jankowski F., van Straten W., Keane E. F., Bailes M., Barr E. D., Johnston S., Kerr M., 2018, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2476 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.4436J 473, 4436

    2018 doi

  22. [33]

    H., Stappers B

    Janssen G. H., Stappers B. W., Bassa C. G., Cognard I., Kramer M., Theureau G., 2010, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2010A&A...514A..74J 514, A74

    2010 doi

  23. [34]

    J., Kaplan D

    Jennings R. J., Kaplan D. L., Chatterjee S., Cordes J. M., Deller A. T., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad084 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ApJ...864...26J 864, 26

    2018 doi

  24. [35]

    Johnston S., Kerr M., 2018, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx3095 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018MNRAS.474.4629J 474, 4629

    2018 doi

  25. [37]

    Jones E., Oliphant T., Peterson P., Others 2001, SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python , https://www.scipy.org/

    2001

  26. [38]

    Karako-Argaman C., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...809...67K 809, 67

    2015 doi

  27. [39]

    W., van Straten W., McLaughlin M

    Karastergiou A., Hotan A. W., van Straten W., McLaughlin M. A., Ord S. M., 2009, [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00671.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009MNRAS.396L..95K 396, L95

    2009

  28. [40]

    W., van Straten W., 2010, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010A&A...515A..36K 515, A36

    Karuppusamy R., Stappers B. W., van Straten W., 2010, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010A&A...515A..36K 515, A36

    2010 doi

  29. [41]

    F., 2016, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016MNRAS.459.1360K 459, 1360

    Keane E. F., 2016, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016MNRAS.459.1360K 459, 1360

    2016 doi

  30. [43]

    Kramer M., Karastergiou A., Gupta Y., Johnston S., Bhat N. D. R., Lyne A. G., 2003, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030842 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2003A&A...407..655K 407, 655

    2003 doi

  31. [44]

    Levin L., et al., 2016, [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016ApJ...818..166L 818, 166

    2016 doi

  32. [45]

    Li X.-D., 2006, [ ] 10.1086/506962 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2006ApJ...646L.139L 646, L139

    2006 doi

  33. [46]

    Li J., Spitkovsky A., Tchekhovskoy A., 2012, [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/746/2/L24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...746L..24L 746, L24

    2012 doi

  34. [48]

    S., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...763...81L 763, 81

    Lynch R. S., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013ApJ...763...81L 763, 81

    2013 doi

  35. [49]

    G., Smith F

    Lyne A. G., Smith F. G., 1982, [ ] 10.1038/298825a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1982Natur.298..825L 298, 825

    1982 doi

  36. [50]

    N., Han J

    Manchester R. N., Han J. L., Qiao G. J., 1998, [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01204.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1998MNRAS.295..280M 295, 280

    1998

  37. [51]

    N., et al., 2013, [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2012.017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013PASA...30...17M 30, e017

    Manchester R. N., et al., 2013, [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2012.017 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013PASA...30...17M 30, e017

    2013 doi

  38. [52]

    Maron O., Kijak J., Kramer M., Wielebinski R., 2000, [ ] 10.1051/aas:2000298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2000A&AS..147..195M 147, 195

    2000 doi

  39. [53]

    A., et al., 2006, [ ] 10.1038/nature04440 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.439..817M 439, 817

    McLaughlin M. A., et al., 2006, [ ] 10.1038/nature04440 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.439..817M 439, 817

    2006 doi

  40. [55]

    B., Yuen R., 2014, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2014MNRAS.437..262M 437, 262

    Melrose D. B., Yuen R., 2014, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2014MNRAS.437..262M 437, 262

    2014 doi

  41. [56]

    W., et al., 2017, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bba , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851...20M 851, 20

    Meyers B. W., et al., 2017, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bba , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851...20M 851, 20

    2017 doi

  42. [57]

    W., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee7b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ApJ...869..134M 869, 134

    Meyers B. W., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee7b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018ApJ...869..134M 869, 134

    2018 doi

  43. [58]

    C., Dessler A

    Michel F. C., Dessler A. J., 1981, [ ] 10.1086/159511 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1981ApJ...251..654M 251, 654

    1981 doi

  44. [59]

    B., et al., 2012, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...760...64M 760, 64

    Mickaliger M. B., et al., 2012, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012ApJ...760...64M 760, 64

    2012 doi

  45. [60]

    B., McEwen A

    Mickaliger M. B., McEwen A. E., McLaughlin M. A., Lorimer D. R., 2018, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1785 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.479.5413M 479, 5413

    2018 doi

  46. [61]

    A., Greenhill L

    Mitchell D. A., Greenhill L. J., Wayth R. B., Sault R. J., Lonsdale C. J., Cappallo R. J., Morales M. F., Ord S. M., 2008, [IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing] 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2005327 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ISTSP...2..707M 2, 707

    2008

  47. [62]

    Mitra D., Wielebinski R., Kramer M., Jessner A., 2003, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021702 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2003A&A...398..993M 398, 993

    2003 doi

  48. [63]

    I., Szary A., Krzeszowski K., 2016, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016ApJ...833...28M 833, 28

    Mitra D., Basu R., Maciesiak K., Skrzypczak A., Melikidze G. I., Szary A., Krzeszowski K., 2016, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016ApJ...833...28M 833, 28

    2016 doi

  49. [64]

    B., Ingargiola A., 2014, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , 10.5281/zenodo.11813 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11813

    Newville M., Stensitzki T., Allen D. B., Ingargiola A., 2014, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python , 10.5281/zenodo.11813 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11813

    2014 doi

  50. [66]

    R., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013A&A...549A..11O 549, A11

    Offringa A. R., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013A&A...549A..11O 549, A11

    2013 doi

  51. [67]

    R., et al., 2015, [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2015.7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015PASA...32....8O 32, e008

    Offringa A. R., et al., 2015, [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2015.7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015PASA...32....8O 32, e008

    2015 doi

  52. [68]

    M., van Straten W., Hotan A

    Ord S. M., van Straten W., Hotan A. W., Bailes M., 2004, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07963.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2004MNRAS.352..804O 352, 804

    2004

  53. [69]

    M., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015PASA...32....6O 32, e006

    Ord S. M., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015PASA...32....6O 32, e006

    2015 doi

  54. [70]

    M., Tremblay S

    Ord S. M., Tremblay S. E., McSweeney S. J., Bhat N. D. R., Sobey C., Mitchell D. A., Hancock P. J., Kirsten F., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190501826O p. arXiv:1905.01826

    2019 arXiv

  55. [71]

    T., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19388.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011MNRAS.417.1871P 417, 1871

    Palliyaguru N. T., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19388.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011MNRAS.417.1871P 417, 1871

    2011

  56. [72]

    A., Clegg A

    Phillips J. A., Clegg A. W., 1992, [ ] 10.1038/360137a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1992Natur.360..137P 360, 137

    1992 doi

  57. [73]

    L., Rankin J

    Redman S. L., Rankin J. M., 2009, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14632.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009MNRAS.395.1529R 395, 1529

    2009

  58. [74]

    J., 1990, [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.003021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1990ARA&A..28..561R 28, 561

    Rickett B. J., 1990, [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190.003021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1990ARA&A..28..561R 28, 561

    1990

  59. [75]

    M., et al., 2014, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.1463S 443, 1463

    Shannon R. M., et al., 2014, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443.1463S 443, 1463

    2014 doi

  60. [76]

    J., McLaughlin M

    Shapiro-Albert B. J., McLaughlin M. A., Keane E. F., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae2b2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018ApJ...866..152S 866, 152

    2018 doi

  61. [77]

    Sobey C., et al., 2019, [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz214 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019MNRAS.484.3646S 484, 3646

    2019 doi

  62. [78]

    Sotomayor-Beltran C., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220728 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  63. [79]

    W., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011A&A...530A..80S 530, A80

    Stappers B. W., et al., 2011, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2011A&A...530A..80S 530, A80

    2011 doi

  64. [80]

    Stovall K., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015ApJ...808..156S 808, 156

    2015 doi

  65. [81]

    B., Padhi S., Hall P., Tingay S

    Sutinjo A., O'Sullivan J., Lenc E., Wayth R. B., Padhi S., Hall P., Tingay S. J., 2015, [Radio Science] 10.1002/2014RS005517 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015RaSc...50...52S 50, 52

    2015 doi

  66. [82]

    B., 2006, in Gabriel C., Arviset C., Ponz D., Enrique S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Taylor M. B., 2006, in Gabriel C., Arviset C., Ponz D., Enrique S., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV. p. 666

    2006

  67. [83]

    B., et al., 2012, [Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation] 10.1142/S2251171712500043 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012JAI.....150004T 1, 1250004

    Taylor G. B., et al., 2012, [Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation] 10.1142/S2251171712500043 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012JAI.....150004T 1, 1250004

    2012 doi

  68. [84]

    B., Stovall K., McCrackan M., McLaughlin M

    Taylor G. B., Stovall K., McCrackan M., McLaughlin M. A., Miller R., Karako-Argaman C., Dowell J., Schinzel F. K., 2016, [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2016ApJ...831..140T 831, 140

    2016 doi

  69. [85]

    The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  70. [86]

    The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123T 156, 123

    2018 doi

  71. [87]

    Th \'e bault E., et al., 2015, [Earth, Planets, and Space] 10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2015EP&S...67...79T 67, 79

    2015 doi

  72. [88]

    N., 2010, [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00924.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010MNRAS.408L..41T 408, L41

    Timokhin A. N., 2010, [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00924.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2010MNRAS.408L..41T 408, L41

    2010

  73. [89]

    J., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASA...30....7T 30, e007

    Tingay S. J., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASA...30....7T 30, e007

    2013 doi

  74. [90]

    E., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASA...32....5T 32, e005

    Tremblay S. E., et al., 2015, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2015.6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASA...32....5T 32, e005

    2015 doi

  75. [91]

    N., Johnston S., 2007, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11703.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377.1383W 377, 1383

    Wang N., Manchester R. N., Johnston S., 2007, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11703.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377.1383W 377, 1383

    2007

  76. [92]

    B., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018PASA...35...33W 35, 33

    Wayth R. B., et al., 2018, [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2018.37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018PASA...35...33W 35, 33

    2018 doi

  77. [93]

    M., et al., 1999, [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/313189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1999ApJS..121..171W 121, 171

    Weisberg J. M., et al., 1999, [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/313189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1999ApJS..121..171W 121, 171

    1999 doi

  78. [94]

    M., Tremblay S

    Xue M., Ord S. M., Tremblay S. E., Bhat N. D. R., Sobey C., Meyers B. W., McSweeney S. J., Swainston N. A., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190500598X p. arXiv:1905.00598

    2019 arXiv

  79. [95]

    M., Manchester R

    Yao J. M., Manchester R. N., Wang N., 2017, [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...29Y 835, 29

    2017 doi

  80. [96]

    M., Jonas J., Landecker T

    de Oliveira-Costa A., Tegmark M., Gaensler B. M., Jonas J., Landecker T. L., Reich P., 2008, [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13376.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388..247D 388, 247

    2008

  81. [97]

    P., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    van Haarlem M. P., et al., 2013, [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2013A&A...556A...2V 556, A2

    2013 doi

  82. [98]

    van Straten W., Bailes M., 2011, [ ] 10.1071/AS10021 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASA...28....1V 28, 1

    2011 doi

  83. [99]

    N., Johnston S., Reynolds J

    van Straten W., Manchester R. N., Johnston S., Reynolds J. E., 2010, [ ] 10.1071/AS09084 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASA...27..104V 27, 104

    2010 doi

  84. [100]

    van Straten W., Demorest P., Oslowski S., 2012, Astronomical Research and Technology, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2012AR&T....9..237V 9, 237

    2012

  85. [101]

    C., Varoquaux G., 2011, [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 , 13, 22

    van der Walt S., Colbert S. C., Varoquaux G., 2011, [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 , 13, 22

    2011 doi

  86. [102]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.