Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Serendipitous Discovery of PSR J1431-6328 as a Highly-Polarized Point Source with the Australian SKA Pathfinder

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PSR J1431-6328 is the first pulsar discovered primarily through circularly polarized radio emission.

desk verdict A genuine first: a millisecond pulsar discovered via circularly polarized imaging, with solid confirmation and appropriately disclosed caveats. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03163 v2 pith:FZCKGFES submitted 2019-08-08 astro-ph.HE

David Kaplan , Shi Dai , Emil Lenc , Andrew Zic , Joseph Swiggum , Tara Murphy , Craig Anderson , Andrew Cameron
show 5 more authors
Dougal Dobie George Hobbs Jane Kaczmarek Christene Lynch Lawrence Toomey
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarsmillisecondcircularpolarizationStokesVimagingradiosurveysbinaryASKAPsteep-spectrumsources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of a new millisecond pulsar, PSR J1431-6328, by a route that bypasses traditional pulsar searches: it was first noticed as a point source with unusually strong circular polarization in an ASKAP image at 888 MHz, then confirmed with Parkes timing observations. The authors argue this is the first pulsar discovered primarily through circularly polarized emission, making Stokes V imaging a potential new discovery channel for pulsars, especially ones that are hard to catch with blind periodicity searches because of short periods, broad profiles, or high dispersion. The pulsar spins every 2.77 ms with a dispersion measure of 228.27 pc cm$^{-3}$, and week-to-week changes in its period point to a binary companion, though the orbit is not yet solved. If the claim holds, wide-field circular-polarization surveys could find pulsars that standard time-domain searches miss.

What carries the argument

The selection mechanism is fractional circular polarization, the ratio of Stokes V to Stokes I. Very few radio sources at frequencies below 5 GHz show more than a few percent circular polarization, whereas pulsars can emit tens of percent, so an 18 percent V/I point source is a strong pulsar candidate. ASKAP's wide-field Stokes V imaging isolated the source; rejection of a stellar origin used deep near-infrared limits and a 5.5 GHz non-detection; and Parkes folded the pulsed signal to confirm the pulsar and measure its period, dispersion measure, and polarization.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a subarcsecond-resolution image that separates the Stokes V peak from the position of PSR J1431-6328: if the 2-arcsecond I/V offset resolves into two distinct sources, or if the Parkes pulsar position falls outside the Stokes V error circle, the claimed first discovery through circular polarization would be falsified. Alternatively, an on-sky demonstration that ASKAP can produce 18 percent circular polarization from instrumental leakage in a point source would remove the basis for selection.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PSR J1431-6328 is a 2.77 ms millisecond pulsar discovered because its radio emission was 18 percent circularly polarized in ASKAP imaging at 888 MHz, with a steep spectrum (spectral index about -1.5 plus or minus 0.2) and no stellar counterpart. Follow-up observations with Parkes detected the pulsar directly, giving a dispersion measure of 228.27 plus or minus 0.02 pc cm$^{-3}$ and an integrated circular polarization fraction of 21 percent, with peak V/I about 45 percent at the pulse maximum, matching the imaging value. To the authors' knowledge it is the first case of a pulsar discovered primarily through circularly polarized emission. The broad pulse width and high dispersion measure make the pulsar relatively difficult to find with traditional blind periodicity searches, and non-monotonic changes in the barycentric period over several weeks are consistent with orbital motion in a binary, with a specific plausible solution of a 0.31 solar-mass companion in a 64.3-day orbit.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 18 percent circularly polarized point source detected by ASKAP is the same object as the pulsar found by Parkes, despite an unresolved 2-arcsecond offset between the Stokes I and Stokes V positions; if that offset is real or indicates a separate polarized source, the first-discovery claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Circular-polarization imaging can serve as a pulsar discovery channel that does not depend on the computationally expensive all-sky periodicity searches of the time domain.
  • A deep ASKAP survey at 900 MHz could detect on the order of 200 millisecond pulsars and 1,000 normal pulsars through circular polarization alone, and would be competitive with existing high-latitude surveys if the median polarized fraction is near 15 percent.
  • Pulsars discovered this way are likely to include objects that traditional searches handle poorly: high-dispersion, broad-profile, or accelerated binary pulsars, and high Galactic latitude millisecond pulsars.
  • PSR J1431-6328 is probably a binary millisecond pulsar, with current data favoring a low-mass companion, but the orbit requires confirmation with a full timing solution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the 2-arcsecond offset between the Stokes I and Stokes V positions is a real displacement rather than an astrometric artifact, the polarized emission may not be cospatial with the total-intensity source, and future circular-polarization surveys should treat such offsets as an association risk.
  • Beyond the paper: the same selection could pick out other compact sources with near-unity circular polarization, such as certain flare stars or possibly repeating fast radio bursts, making Stokes V imaging a general tool rather than a pulsar-specific one.
  • Beyond the paper: a full timing solution for the binary would turn PSR J1431-6328 into a test of companion-mass predictions and could identify the system as a black widow, redback, or white-dwarf binary, which the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the identification of a compact steep-spectrum radio source with high circular polarization (V/I = 18±2%) in ASKAP 888 MHz images of a field around Proxima Centauri. After ruling out stellar counterparts using VVV near-infrared limits, the authors obtained Parkes UWL observations and discovered PSR J1431−6328, a 2.77 ms pulsar with DM = 228.27 pc cm⁻³; the candidate was independently recovered in reprocessed HTRU-South data. Multi-epoch Parkes detections show period variations consistent with binary orbital motion, though no full timing solution is yet possible. The paper argues that this is the first pulsar discovered primarily through circularly polarized emission and uses population simulations to estimate yields of future ASKAP circular-polarization surveys.

Significance. If the association between the ASKAP Stokes V source and the pulsar is secure, the result is significant: it demonstrates that circular-polarization imaging can find MSPs that are difficult for blind periodicity searches, and the yield estimates provide a concrete planning basis for ASKAP survey science. The pulsar discovery itself is robust—the period and DM are measured with small uncertainties, the signal is seen in multiple Parkes epochs, and the candidate was independently recovered in HTRU-South data. The authors also carefully bound stellar interpretations with VVV limits. The central interpretive claim, however, rests on positional coincidence and on a fractional-polarization comparison that is currently limited by a factor-of-three absolute flux discrepancy and an unresolved 2 arcsecond offset between the Stokes I and V positions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2] The paper reports a 2 arcsecond offset between the Stokes I and Stokes V positions of ASKAP 143121.2−632809, which is substantially larger than the quoted statistical plus systematic errors and is left to be further investigated by the ASKAP commissioning team. Because the Parkes pointing was based on the Stokes I position, the current data do not exclude the possibility that the Stokes V source and the pulsar are separated by this offset and are not the same object. The fractional-polarization consistency check is suggestive but not conclusive: ASKAP gives V/I = 18±2% while Parkes gives an integrated V/I = 21%, yet the absolute ASKAP V flux (304±34 µJy) is about 2.4 times larger than the value inferred from the Parkes 800 MHz flux (≈0.6 mJy) at the same fractional polarization. To support the paper's central claim that this is 'the first case of a pulsar discovered primarily through circularly-polarized emission' (Section 4), the authors should either establish that the I–V offset is an instrumental or astrometric artifact (for example, through a phase-referenced or multi-epoch astrometric check) or explicitly temper the claim to reflect the unresolved association.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3 / Table 1] The text says the ATCA observation was on 2019 May 19, while Table 1 lists 2019 May 17; please reconcile the dates.
  2. [Section 4] The word 'unprecented' should be 'unprecedented'.
  3. [Table 1] The entry '2019-June 09' should be formatted consistently as '2019 June 09'.
  4. [Section 4] 'There have been a significant increase in new radio surveys' should read 'There has been a significant increase in new radio surveys'.
  5. [Section 4] The projected survey yields assume a single median circular-polarization fraction of about 10 percent applied uniformly to the simulated population; because the detectability in Stokes V depends on the full distribution of V/I rather than its median, these numbers should be labeled explicitly as order-of-magnitude estimates, especially given the acknowledged large scatter in polarized fraction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: the pulsar discovery and polarization association are empirical, with the unresolved I/V position offset an observational caveat, not a derived result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. PSR J1431-6328's existence is established by independent Parkes detections of its 2.77 ms period and dispersion measure, not derived from the ASKAP polarization measurement. The ASKAP Stokes V source motivated the follow-up, but the pulsar's folded profile, polarization fraction, and timing are measured independently. The V/I consistency between ASKAP (18%) and Parkes (21%) is a cross-check, not a fitted input. The survey yield projections assume a median circular polarization fraction of approximately 10% from external literature (Han et al. 1998; Johnston & Kerr 2018); that assumption is not fitted to this discovery and the projection is explicitly presented as a rough estimate. The 2-arcsecond offset between Stokes I and V positions is disclosed as an unresolved ASKAP commissioning issue; it is an uncertainty in the source association, not a circular step. No load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation: citations to Lenc et al. (2018), Dai et al. (2019), and Zic et al. (2019) are used for calibration procedures and general motivation, and the central discovery claim does not depend on them.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no invented entities and performs no hidden fitting of the central claim. The discovery rests on measured data and standard astrophysical assumptions. The parameters listed are conventional assumptions used in the binary-interpretation and survey-yield estimates; none are tuned to make the pulsar appear.

free parameters (2)
  • Assumed pulsar mass = 1.4 M_sun
    Used to convert the fitted Doppler amplitude into companion mass; the paper states this assumption explicitly in Section 4 and notes inferred masses scale with it.
  • Assumed orbital inclination = i = 90 degrees (edge-on)
    Used for the companion-mass versus orbital-period constraints in Figure 4; masses for i = 30 degrees are about a factor of 2 higher.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Pulsar flux density follows a steep power law (S_nu proportional to nu^-1.5)
    Used to compare the ASKAP spectral index with the pulsar population and to interpret the ATCA upper limit.
  • domain assumption NE2001 and YMW16 electron-density models give valid distances
    Both models are used to convert the dispersion measure into a distance of about 5.0 kpc.
  • domain assumption Bhat et al. scattering relation estimates the scattering timescale
    Used to argue that the broad pulse profile is mostly intrinsic rather than scatter-broadened.
  • domain assumption Berger et al. Lradio/Lbol ratio constrains stellar radio emission
    Used to rule out a low-mass stellar counterpart using VVV near-infrared limits.
  • domain assumption Tauris and Savonije relation links orbital period and companion mass
    Used to identify plausible binary companion masses and a specific example solution at Pb = 64.3 d and Mc = 0.31 M_sun.
  • domain assumption PsrPopPy2 population synthesis and assumed 10 percent median circular polarization fraction predict survey yields
    Used to project how many pulsars future ASKAP surveys might detect through circular polarization alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Serendipitous Discovery of PSR J1431-6328 as a Highly-Polarized Point Source with the Australian SKA Pathfinder." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FZCKGFES

@misc{pith2026190803163,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Serendipitous Discovery of PSR J1431-6328 as a Highly-Polarized Point Source with the Australian SKA Pathfinder},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FZCKGFES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03163}
}
read the original abstract

We identified a highly-polarized, steep-spectrum radio source in a deep image with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) telescope at 888 MHz. After considering and rejecting a stellar origin for this source, we discovered a new millisecond pulsar (MSP) using observations from the Parkes radio telescope. This pulsar has period 2.77 ms and dispersion measure 228.27 pc/cm**3. Although this pulsar does not yet appear to be particularly remarkable, the short spin period, wide profile and high dispersion measure do make it relatively hard to discover through traditional blind periodicity searches. Over the course of several weeks we see changes in the barycentric period of this pulsar that are consistent with orbital motion in a binary system, but the properties of any binary need to be confirmed by further observations. While even a deep ASKAP survey may not identify large numbers of new MSPs compared to the existing population, it would be competitive with existing all-sky surveys and could discover interesting new MSPs at high Galactic latitude without the need for computationally-expensive all-sky periodicity searches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03163 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ASKAP 888 MHz image of the field centered on Proxima Centauri, from 2019 May 1. We show the total intensity (Stokes I) image on the left, and the circular polarization (Stokes V) image in the center. Each is 2500 on a side, with north up and east to the left. The regions of the zoomed images highlighting ASKAP 143121.2−632809 (labeled as “ASKAP J1431”) are shown with boxes. On the right we show the zoomed image in S… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fractional circular polarization in our ASKAP images. We show the V /I flux density fraction against primary-beam corrected Stokes I flux density for the first three observations. All sources are detected at > 5σ signifi￾cance in the Stokes V images. Proxima Centauri is plotted as a diamond, ASKAP 143121.2−632809 as a square, and the remaining field sources (dominated by leakage) as cir￾cles. Observation date is ind… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Folded pulse profile of PSR J1431−6328, from the Parkes observation of 2019 May 27. We show the pulse intensity as a function of frequency over the whole UWL bandpass (lower left), along with the cumulative signal-to￾noise ratio as a function of frequency (lower right). The integrated pulse profile (top) is summed over frequencies < 2 GHz, where the signal-to-noise ratio is maximized, along with the best-fit Gaussia… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Companion mass Mc constraints as a function of orbital period Pb for PSR J1431−6328, based on the vari￾ations in the barycentric pulse period, colored by χ 2 (for 2 degrees of freedom). This assumes an edge-on, circular orbit and a pulsar mass of 1.4 M ; inferred masse…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sample variation of spin frequency with time over the span of observations. The top panel shows the spin￾frequency values (from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L., Stovall, K., et al

    Antoniadis, J., Kaplan, D. L., Stovall, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 36 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    D., Lorimer, D

    Bates, S. D., Lorimer, D. R., Rane, A., & Swiggum, J. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2893

    2014

  3. [3]

    D., Lorimer, D

    Bates, S. D., Lorimer, D. R., & Verbiest, J. P. W. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1352 8 Kaplan et al

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    A., et al

    Berger, E., Basri, G., Fleming, T. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 332

    2010

  5. [5]

    Lorimer, D. R. 2004, ApJ, 605, 759

    2004

  6. [6]

    2008, MNRAS, 387, 273

    Bhattacharyya, B., & Nityananda, R. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 273

    2008

  7. [7]

    D., Champion, D

    Cameron, A. D., Champion, D. J., Kramer, M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L57

    2018

  8. [8]

    G., Manchester, R

    Camilo, F., Lyne, A. G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2001, ApJL, 548, L187

    2001

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv Astrophysics e-prints, astro-ph/0207156

    2002 arXiv

  2. [10]

    E., et al

    Dai, S., Johnston, S., Bell, M. E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 3115

    2016

  3. [11]

    2018, in IAU

    Dai, S., Johnston, S., & Hobbs, G. 2018, in IAU

    2018

  4. [12]

    E., Bailes, M., et al

    Dai, S., Lower, M. E., Bailes, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, L14

    2019

  5. [13]

    Ducati, J. R. 2002, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2237

    2002

  6. [14]

    1980, in BAAS, Vol

    Erickson, W. 1980, in BAAS, Vol. 12, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 799

    1980

  7. [15]

    A., Mooley, K

    Frail, D. A., Mooley, K. P., Jagannathan, P., & Intema, H. T. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1062

    2016

  8. [16]

    A., Ray, P

    Frail, D. A., Ray, P. S., Mooley, K. P., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 942 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1

    2018

  9. [17]

    M., & Lyne, A

    Gould, D. M., & Lyne, A. G. 1998, MNRAS, 301, 235 G¨ udel, M. 1994, ApJS, 90, 743 —. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 217

    1998

  10. [18]

    L., Manchester, R

    Han, J. L., Manchester, R. N., Xu, R. X., & Qiao, G. J. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 373

    1998

  11. [19]

    J., Trott, C

    Hancock, P. J., Trott, C. M., & Hurley-Walker, N. 2018, PASA, 35, e011

    2018

  12. [20]

    M., Patruno, A., Chakrabarty, D., et al

    Hartman, J. M., Patruno, A., Chakrabarty, D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1468

    2008

  13. [21]

    2019, MNRAS, submitted

    Hobbs, G., Manchester, R., Dunning, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, submitted

    2019

  14. [22]

    W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R

    Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W., & Manchester, R. N. 2004, PASA, 21, 302

    2004

  15. [23]

    W., Bunton, J

    Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Harvey-Smith, L., et al. 2014, PASA, 31, e041

    2014

  16. [24]

    D., Frail, D

    Hyman, S. D., Frail, D. A., Deneva, J. S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 20

    2019

  17. [25]

    T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K

    Intema, H. T., Jagannathan, P., Mooley, K. P., & Frail, D. A. 2017, A&A, 598, A78

    2017

  18. [26]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 4629

    Johnston, S., & Kerr, M. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4629

    2018

  19. [27]

    J., Jameson, A., van Straten, W., et al

    Keith, M. J., Jameson, A., van Straten, W., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 409, 619

    2010

  20. [28]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2019, AAS Journals, submitted, arXiv:1907.01981

    2019

  21. [29]

    Lam, M. T. 2017, PyPulse: PSRFITS handler, , , ascl:1706.011

    2017

  22. [30]

    Zhang, S. N. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2835

    2018

  23. [31]

    R., et al

    Levin, L., Bailes, M., Barsdell, B. R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 1387

    2013

  24. [32]

    R., & Kramer, M

    Lorimer, D. R., & Kramer, M. 2012, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)

    2012

  25. [33]

    R., Esposito, P., Manchester, R

    Lorimer, D. R., Esposito, P., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2185

    2015

  26. [34]

    N., Hobbs, G

    Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2016, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1

    2016

  27. [35]

    N., & Peters, W

    Manchester, R. N., & Peters, W. L. 1972, ApJ, 173, 221

    1972

  28. [36]

    R., Bannister, K., et al

    McConnell, D., Allison, J. R., Bannister, K., et al. 2016, PASA, 33, e042

    2016

  29. [37]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    2007

  30. [38]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, NewA, 15, 433

    2010

  31. [39]

    M., Ekers, R

    Murphy, T., Sadler, E. M., Ekers, R. D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2403

    2010

  32. [40]

    L., et al

    Murphy, T., Chatterjee, S., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e006

    2013

  33. [41]

    L., Morris, D

    Mutel, R. L., Morris, D. H., Doiron, D. J., & Lestrade, J. F. 1987, AJ, 93, 1220

    1987

  34. [42]

    G., Frail, D

    Navarro, J., de Bruyn, A. G., Frail, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., & Lyne, A. G. 1995, ApJL, 455, L55

    1995

  35. [43]

    J., Bailes, M., et al

    Ng, C., Champion, D. J., Bailes, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2922

    2015

  36. [44]

    P., Hopkins, A

    Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., et al. 2011, PASA, 28, 215

    2011

  37. [45]

    Phinney, E. S. 1992, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 341, 39

    1992

  38. [46]

    Ransom, S. M. 2001, PhD thesis, Harvard University

    2001

  39. [47]

    N., & Hobbs, G

    Ravi, V., Manchester, R. N., & Hobbs, G. 2010, ApJ, 716, L85

    2010

  40. [48]

    N., Cruz, K

    Reid, I. N., Cruz, K. L., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 1290

    2008

  41. [49]

    J., & Cronyn, W

    Rickard, J. J., & Cronyn, W. M. 1979, ApJ, 228, 755

    1979

  42. [50]

    Roberts, M. S. E. 2013, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 291, Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 years, ed. J. van Leeuwen, 127–132 Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103 Serendipitous Discovery of PSR J1431 −6328 9

    2013

  43. [51]

    W., R¨ ottgering, H

    Shimwell, T. W., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Best, P. N., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A104

    2017

  44. [52]

    S., Ransom, S

    Stovall, K., Lynch, R. S., Ransom, S. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 67

    2014

  45. [53]

    Strom, R. G. 1987, ApJL, 319, L103

    1987

  46. [54]

    M., & Savonije, G

    Tauris, T. M., & Savonije, G. J. 1999, A&A, 350, 928 The Fermi-LAT collaboration. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.10045 van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. 2011, PASA, 28, 1

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 214

    Villadsen, J., & Hallinan, G. 2019, ApJ, 871, 214

    2019

  48. [56]

    B., Lenc, E., Bell, M

    Wayth, R. B., Lenc, E., Bell, M. E., et al. 2015, PASA, 32, e025

    2015

  49. [57]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29

    2017

  50. [58]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 559

    Zic, A., Stewart, A., Lenc, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 559

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.