Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Constraining Axion Mass through Gamma-ray Observations of Pulsars

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper uses nine years of Fermi-LAT data on 17 quiet pulsars to push the axion mass upper limit to $9.6\times10^{-3}$ eV and then shows the temperature assumption behind that limit is likely unrealistic.

desk verdict Competent Fermi-LAT reanalysis whose headline axion mass limit is conditional on a 20 MeV core temperature the paper itself shows is unrealistic; the real value is the negative temperature-sensitivity result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03413 v1 pith:CYLNPGVI submitted 2019-08-09 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords axionmasspulsarsFermi-LATgamma-rayupperlimitsnucleon-nucleonbremsstrahlungneutronstarcoretemperatureaxion-to-photonconversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to use the absence of gamma rays from 17 nearby, radio-loud pulsars to weigh the axion, a proposed dark-matter particle. Analyzing nine years of Fermi-LAT data between 60 and 500 MeV, the authors see no pulsed or unpulsed emission and convert that silence into an upper limit on the axion mass of $9.6 \times 10^{-3}$ eV at 95% confidence, eight times tighter than the previous limit. The limit, however, depends on assuming the pulsar cores sit at a high 20 MeV temperature; the paper itself computes that at the more realistic few-MeV temperatures, axion emission drops by eight orders of magnitude and the signal becomes undetectable. It therefore proposes an alternative energy-loss-rate model that could constrain axions down to $10^{-6}$ eV if the core temperature and axion-to-photon conversion in the pulsar's magnetic field were known.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin structure function $S_\sigma(\omega)$: a phase-space integral over the four nucleons participating in one-pion-exchange bremsstrahlung that fixes how many axions of energy $\omega$ are produced. Its temperature dependence enters through the Fermi-Dirac occupation factors, and the axion emissivity scales as $\int \omega^4 S_\sigma(\omega)\,d\omega$. Combining $S_\sigma$ with the axion decay rate gives the gamma-ray flux relation (the paper's Eq. 6) and hence the mass upper limit; a Monte Carlo evaluation of $S_\sigma(\omega)$ at lower temperatures is what exposes the $10^8$ suppression of the signal at 4 MeV.

What would settle it

Measure or observationally bound the core temperature of one sample pulsar, say J0108-1431, via surface temperature observations and a temperature-to-core mapping. If $T_c \lesssim 4$ MeV, the predicted axion-decay gamma-ray flux at 100 MeV drops by about $10^8$ relative to the 20 MeV model, so the non-detection can no longer support the $9.6\times10^{-3}$ eV limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the non-detection of 60–500 MeV gamma rays from 17 gamma-ray-dark pulsars, stacked in likelihood, gives an upper limit on the axion mass of $m_a \lesssim 9.6\times10^{-3}$ eV (95% CL; $9.8\times10^{-3}$ eV for the four pulsars studied previously), a factor-of-eight improvement over the earlier $7.9\times10^{-2}$ eV. The argument runs through the axion-decay photon flux relation, in which the flux scales as $m_a^5$ and the emission timescale as $m_a^{-2}$, leaving $m_a \propto \Phi^{1/3}$. The authors also show that the 20 MeV core temperature on which this model rests is unrealistically high for pulsars older than $10^5$ yr: reducing the core temperature from 20 MeV to 4 MeV lowers the axion emissivity by a factor of $10^8$, making the predicted gamma-ray signal negligible. They conclude that the 20 MeV-based flux method cannot robustly constrain axions for realistic pulsars, and that a mass-based energy-loss model can reach $m_a \sim 10^{-6}$ eV only with known core temperatures below 0.1 MeV and known axion-to-photon conversion.

Load-bearing premise

The whole 20 MeV flux-based limit assumes the sample pulsars actually have core temperatures near 20 MeV; if their cores are as cool as the paper argues (a few MeV), axion emission is roughly $10^8$ times weaker and the derived mass upper limit does not constrain axions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 95% upper limit on the axion mass from stacking all 17 pulsars is $4.8\times10^{-3}$ eV (at $\omega=100$ MeV), a further factor-of-two improvement over the averaged value.
  • Because the axion spectrum peaks near photon energies $\sim T_c$, a core temperature of order 1 MeV means any axion-decay signal appears below about 1 MeV, outside Fermi-LAT's band; this motivates medium-energy gamma-ray missions.
  • The alternative energy-loss model yields $m_a \sim 10^{-6}$ eV for $T_c < 0.1$ MeV, but only if the axion-to-photon conversion probability in the pulsar magnetic field is known.
  • For magnetar-strength fields, published conversion probabilities (e.g. $P_{a\to\gamma}=0.225$ at $\omega=3$ keV) would put constraints in the classic axion search range using this model.
  • No pulsar in the sample is detected as a point source; five apparent $>3\sigma$ sources coincide with extended diffuse emission and are not claimed as detections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 20 MeV assumption fails for old pulsars, the logical next target is young, hot neutron stars (ages $\lesssim 10^3$ yr) such as Cas A, where the alternative model's $m_a\sim10^{-6}$ eV reach could actually be tested with MeV-band observations.
  • The paper's own Monte Carlo integration of $S_\sigma(\omega)$ could be extended to compute predicted gamma-ray spectra for measured surface temperatures of the sample; that would turn a mass limit into a temperature-dependent exclusion plot.
  • The same silence-based method could be applied to magnetars, where high $B$-field conversion probabilities make axion-to-photon conversion a plausible signal channel, rather than relying on radiative decay alone.
  • A stacked likelihood analysis in the 0.2–10 MeV band could detect the axion-decay bump directly; a null detection there would push the constraint below the $10^{-2}$ eV scale without needing the 20 MeV assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes 9 years of Fermi-LAT Pass 8 data (60–500 MeV) for 17 radio pulsars that are not detected in gamma rays, determines 95% confidence flux upper limits, and converts these into upper limits on the QCD axion mass using a published model [12] in which axions are produced by nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung in a pulsar core at a fixed temperature Tc = 20 MeV. The authors obtain an average upper limit ma < 9.6 × 10^-3 eV at an axion energy of 100 MeV, which they describe as a factor-of-8 improvement over the previous limit. They also study the temperature dependence of the axion emissivity with a Monte Carlo evaluation of the spin structure function, showing that at Tc = 4 MeV the emissivity is suppressed by about 10^8 at ω = 100 MeV, and they propose an alternative energy-loss-rate model that gives limits in the eV range at realistic core temperatures. The paper concludes that the 20 MeV model is not applicable to the old pulsars in the sample and that future MeV missions would be needed to improve constraints.

Significance. The Fermi-LAT analysis itself is careful and useful: the flux upper limits are derived with standard tools, the stacking procedure is clearly described, and the comparison with [12] for the four overlapping pulsars provides a sanity check. The Monte Carlo recomputation of ω^4 S_σ(ω) as a function of Tc is a valuable contribution, since it quantifies how strongly the axion flux depends on the assumed core temperature. If the headline mass limit were robust, it would be a meaningful step in axion searches. However, as the authors themselves argue in Section VI.B, the Tc = 20 MeV assumption is not appropriate for their pulsar sample, and the central numerical claim therefore rests on an internal inconsistency rather than on a defensible astrophysical model. The alternative model (Eq. 11) contains a free conversion probability and an ad hoc 0.25 correction factor, so it does not provide a precise limit either. The paper is best viewed as a negative result: current Fermi-LAT observations do not robustly constrain axion masses for realistic pulsar core temperatures, and the paper's real value is in demonstrating the strong temperature sensitivity of the expected signal.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section VI.B, Eq. (8)] The headline limit ma = 9.6 × 10^-3 eV is obtained from Eq. (8) using values of S_σ(2E) that are valid only for Tc = 20 MeV (and μ/T = 10). In Section VI.B the paper itself shows that all pulsars in Table I have characteristic ages exceeding 10^5 years, and that cooling models place their core temperatures at tens of keV at most, with even the youngest plausible temperature being orders of magnitude below 20 MeV. Figure 4 then shows that lowering Tc from 20 MeV to 4 MeV reduces ω^4 S_σ(ω) by a factor of 10^8 at ω = 100 MeV. Since Eq. (8) scales as [flux / S_σ]^(1/3), the corresponding mass limit would grow by roughly (10^8)^(1/3) ≈ 460, pushing the limit to ~1 eV or above. This is an internal inconsistency: the abstract and conclusions present an improved limit, while the paper's own temperature analysis demonstrates that the underlying model is not applicable to the same pulsars. The central claim therefore needs to be reframed or dropped.
  2. [Section VI.B, Eq. (11) and Figure 5] The alternative model for UL ma relies on Eq. (9), which includes an unexplained multiplicative factor of 0.25 that is labeled as a soft-neutrino approximation correction. This factor is not derived from any calculation in the paper, and it directly changes the numerical limits by a factor of 2 in mass (since ma scales as the square root of the emissivity). Furthermore, the axion-to-photon conversion probability Pa→γ is treated as a free parameter varied from 0.001 to 1, and the paper explicitly declines to provide a preferred value. Consequently, the alternative model yields only a range of indicative limits (0.1–70 eV depending on Tc and Pa→γ), not a constraint. The paper acknowledges this, but the abstract's statement that this model yields a 'plausible UL ma of 10^-6 eV' requires assumptions about both Tc and Pa→γ that are not established; as the text itself notes, at Tc = 0.1 MeV with radiative decay the limit is 67.5 eV, and even total conversion gives only 3 eV at Tc = 1 keV.
  3. [Section V.B and Table II/III] The stacking result of ma < 4.8 × 10^-3 eV is presented as a two-fold improvement over the average limit, but the stacking procedure sums individual likelihood profiles without examining whether the 17 pulsars have independent systematic uncertainties or whether the five pulsars with >3σ residuals (Section V.C) bias the stacked flux. The five pulsars have higher UL fluxes; omitting them changes the average from 9.6 × 10^-3 to 8.9 × 10^-3 eV, which is small. The methodological concern is that the stacked limit is quoted as if it were a single-source limit, while the underlying pulsars have different distances, spectral assumptions, and background models; a more careful treatment would propagate these differences or explicitly state that the stack is only a shorthand. This does not change the qualitative conclusion, but it affects the precision of the central number.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section VII (Conclusions)] The first sentence of the Conclusions gives '0.96 and 3.21 × 10^-2 eV' for the two axion energies, but Table II and Section V.B give the average upper limits as 9.6 × 10^-3 eV and 3.21 × 10^-2 eV. The missing exponent on the first value is misleading and should be corrected.
  2. [Appendix, Eq. (A.4)] The expression for p2 · p3 appears to have typographical errors: it reads 'p2p3cosαcosθ + sinα + sinθ + cosβ', but the correct form should contain products such as sinα sinθ cosβ. Please check and correct the equation.
  3. [Section II, Eq. (6) and (8)] The numerical values of S_σ(2E) = 2.4 × 10^7 MeV^2 and 6.25 × 10^4 MeV^2 are stated as being read from a plot in [12]. These values should be reported with uncertainties or at least with a clear statement that they are extracted from a figure; a table with the Monte Carlo results would allow readers to reproduce Eq. (8) without re-digitizing the plot.
  4. [Section IV.C] The stacked likelihood procedure sums the individual ΔLog(L) profiles to obtain a combined profile, assuming independence among the pulsars. The paper does not discuss whether the ROIs overlap (they may for nearby sources) or whether correlated systematic uncertainties affect the combined limit; a brief justification of the independence assumption would be helpful.
  5. [Table I] The column headers 'B Surface' and 'B Light Cylinder' are ambiguous; it would be clearer to use 'Surface magnetic field (G)' and 'Light-cylinder magnetic field (G)'. Also the spin-down ages are listed as multiples of 10^5 yr, but the units are not explicitly stated in the header.
  6. [Section VI.B] The discussion of pulsar cooling cites several models, but the conversion from surface temperature to core temperature uses a relation Tc ≈ 12 × (ST/10^6 K)^1.82 keV without stating the range of validity or the uncertainty on the exponent; a reference to the original derivation would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the axion-mass limit follows from an external flux model and independent Fermi-LAT upper limits; the paper's own Section VI.B limitation is a robustness concern, not a circularity.

full rationale

The central chain is: Fermi-LAT pass 8 upper-limit photon fluxes (measured here, Tables II/III) are inserted into Eqn. 8, which is algebraically derived from the published [12] axion-decay flux model (Eqn. 6) with S_sigma values read from [12]'s emissivity plot. No parameter in Eqn. 8 is fitted to the flux data; the model is external and the fluxes are independent, so the mass limit does not reduce to its input by construction. The factor-of-8 improvement versus [12] is a comparison of two calculations using different data sets and methods, not a self-citation chain. The alternative model (Eqns. 9-11) is a standard energy-loss-rate mapping with an explicitly stated 0.25 SNA factor and varied P_a->gamma values; again nothing is fitted and then renamed a prediction. The paper's own Section VI.B warns that at realistic core temperatures (e.g., 4 MeV) the axion emissivity drops by ~10^8, which would destroy the 9.6e-3 eV limit. That is an internal robustness/assumption problem -- the claimed limit is not robust to the temperature assumption -- but it is not circularity: the paper does not define the prediction in terms of the flux data, nor does it import a load-bearing result from its own prior work. The authors explicitly flag the limitation and pivot to an alternative model, which is the opposite of concealing a circular step. With no self-definitional reduction, no fitted-input-called-prediction step, and no load-bearing self-citation, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or fields. Its central result depends on a set of parameters (Tc, mu/Tc, CN, S_sigma, SNA factor, Pa→γ) taken from prior literature or chosen ad hoc. The temperature Tc is the most consequential assumption, as the paper itself shows that varying it from 20 MeV to 4 MeV changes the predicted signal by a factor of 1e8. The alternative model adds no new physics but repackages a published energy-loss formula.

free parameters (6)
  • Pulsar core temperature Tc = 20 MeV
    Chosen from [12] as a representative high temperature; the paper later argues realistic old pulsars have Tc well below this, reducing emissivity by 1e8 at 4 MeV.
  • mu/Tc (degeneracy parameter) = 10
    Taken from [12] for the Fermi-Dirac distribution; variations 9-11 change emissivity by an order of magnitude.
  • Axion-nucleon coupling CN = 0.1
    Coupling model parameter taken from [12], within the range 0 < CN < 2.93; the mass limit scales inversely with CN.
  • Spin structure function S_sigma = 2.4e7 MeV^2 at 100 MeV; 6.25e4 MeV^2 at 200 MeV
    Read off the emissivity plot of [12] for Tc=20 MeV; these values determine the gamma-ray flux normalization in Eqn 6.
  • Soft-neutrino approximation factor = 0.25
    Ad hoc multiplicative factor in Eqn 9 to account for the soft-neutrino approximation, based on [15]; not derived from the paper's own calculation.
  • Axion-to-photon conversion probability Pa→γ = varied 0.001 to 1.0 (and radiative decay case)
    Unknown in the alternative model; the resulting UL ma ranges over orders of magnitude depending on this parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The axion decays radiatively to two photons with a rate proportional to ma^5.
    Used in Eqn 6 and Eqn 11; the decay rate is taken from [20].
  • domain assumption Nucleon-nucleon Bremsstrahlung via one-pion exchange produces axions, with the spin structure function S_sigma as given by [16].
    The emissivity and flux model rely on this external calculation; the paper reproduces its features but does not derive it.
  • domain assumption Pulsars emit axions continuously and isotropically, unaffected by rotation.
    Stated in Section III; a rotating, beamed emission would change the interpretation of the flux upper limits.
  • domain assumption All of the gamma-ray upper limit is attributed to axion decay; no contribution from the pulsar magnetosphere.
    The selection criteria in Section III assume these pulsars have no magnetospheric gamma-ray emission, so the UL is a clean probe of axions.
  • domain assumption The distances and other pulsar parameters in the ATNF catalogue are correct.
    Distances enter Eqn 8 and Eqn 11 quadratically; distance errors directly scale the mass limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining Axion Mass through Gamma-ray Observations of Pulsars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CYLNPGVI

@misc{pith2026190803413,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining Axion Mass through Gamma-ray Observations of Pulsars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CYLNPGVI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03413}
}
abstract

We analyze 9 years of PASS 8 $\textit{Fermi}$-LAT data in the 60$-$500 MeV range and determine flux upper limits (UL) for 17 gamma-ray dark pulsars as a probe of axions produced by nucleon-nucleon Bremsstrahlung in the pulsar core. Using a previously published axion decay gamma-ray photon flux model for pulsars which relies on a high core temperature of 20 MeV, we improve the determination of the UL axion mass ($m_a$), at 95 percent confidence level, to 9.6 $\times$ 10$^{-3}$ eV, which is a factor of 8 improvement on previous results. We show that the axion emissivity (energy loss rate per volume) at realistic lower pulsar core temperatures of 4 MeV or less is reduced to such an extent that axion emissivity and the gamma-ray signal becomes negligible. We consider an alternative emission model based on energy loss rate per mass to allow $m_a$ to be constrained with $Fermi$-LAT observations. This model yields a plausible UL $m_a$ of 10$^{-6}$ eV for pulsar core temperature $<$ 0.1 MeV but knowledge of the extent of axion to photon conversion in the pulsar $B$ field would be required to make a precise UL axion mass determination. The peak of axion flux is likely to produce gamma-rays in the $\leq$ 1 MeV energy range and so future observations with medium energy gamma-ray missions, such as AMEGO and e-ASTROGAM, will be vital to further constrain UL $m_a$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [12]

    Sedrakian ,\ title title Axion cooling of neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.065044 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Sedrakian ,\ title title Axion cooling of neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.065044 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 93 ,\ pages 065044 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  2. [1]

    aapmrev4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of aapmrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aapmrev4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of aapmrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title tran...

  3. [2]

    author author R. D. \ Peccei and\ author H. R. \ Quinn ,\ title title CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 1440--1443 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

  4. [3]

    Weinberg ,\ title title A new light boson? \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223 journal journal Phys

    author author S. Weinberg ,\ title title A new light boson? \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 223--226 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

  5. [4]

    Dine , author W

    author author M. Dine , author W. Fischler , and\ author M. Srednicki ,\ title title A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90590-6 journal journal Phys. Lett. \ volume 104B ,\ pages 199--202 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

  6. [5]

    Keil , author H.-T

    author author W. Keil , author H.-T. \ Janka , author D. N. \ Schramm , author G. Sigl , author M. S. \ Turner , and\ author J. Ellis ,\ title title Fresh look at axions and sn 1987a , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2419 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 56 ,\ pages 2419--2432 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  7. [6]

    author author G. Rybka ,\ title title Direct detection searches for axion dark matter , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2014.05.003 journal journal Physics of the Dark Universe \ volume 4 ,\ pages 14 -- 16 ( year 2014 ) ,\ note dARK TAUP2013 NoStop

  8. [7]

    author author S. J. \ Asztalos , author G. Carosi , author C. Hagmann , author D. Kinion , author K. van Bibber , author M. Hotz , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author G. Rybka , author J. Hoskins , author J. Hwang , author P. Sikivie , author D. B. \ Tanner , author R. Bradley , and\ author J. Clarke ,\ title title Squid-based microwave cavity search for da...

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    author author L. D. \ Duffy , author P. Sikivie , author D. B. \ Tanner , author S. J. \ Asztalos , author C. Hagmann , author D. Kinion , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author K. van Bibber , author D. B. \ Yu , and\ author R. F. \ Bradley ,\ title title High resolution search fo...

  2. [9]

    Hagmann , author D

    author author C. Hagmann , author D. Kinion , author W. Stoeffl , author K. van Bibber , author E. Daw , author H. Peng , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author J. LaVeigne , author P. Sikivie , author N. S. \ Sullivan , author D. B. \ Tanner , author F. Nezrick , author M. S. \ Tu...

  3. [10]

    Hoskins , author J

    author author J. Hoskins , author J. Hwang , author C. Martin , author P. Sikivie , author N. S. \ Sullivan , author D. B. \ Tanner , author M. Hotz , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author G. Rybka , author A. Wagner , author S. J. \ Asztalos , author G. Carosi , author C. Hagmann...

  4. [11]

    Du , author N

    author author N. Du , author N. Force , author R. Khatiwada , author E. Lentz , author R. Ottens , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author G. Rybka , author G. Carosi , author N. Woollett , author D. Bowring , author A. S. \ Chou , author A. Sonnenschein , author W. Wester , author ...

  5. [13]

    Berenji , author J

    author author B. Berenji , author J. Gaskins , and\ author M. Meyer ,\ title title Constraints on axions and axionlike particles from Fermi large area telescope observations of neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.045019 journal journal Physical Review D \ vol...

  6. [14]

    author author N. Iwamoto ,\ title title Axion emission from neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1198 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 53 ,\ pages 1198--1201 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

  7. [15]

    author author N. Iwamoto ,\ title title Nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung of axions and pseudoscalar particles from neutron-star matter , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043002 journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 64 ,\ pages 10 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

  8. [16]

    Hanhart , author D

    author author C. Hanhart , author D. R. \ Phillips , and\ author S. Reddy ,\ title title Neutrino and axion emissivities of neutron stars from nucleon-nucleon scattering data , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(00)01382-4 journal journal Physics Letters B \ volume 499 ,\ pa...

  9. [17]

    Hannestad and\ author G

    author author S. Hannestad and\ author G. Raffelt ,\ title title Supernova neutrino opacity from nucleon-nucleon bremsstrahlung and related processes , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/306303 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 507 ,\ pages 339--352 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

  10. [18]

    author author R. P. \ Brinkmann and\ author M. S. \ Turner ,\ title title Numerical rates for nucleon-nucleon, axion bremsstrahlung , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2338 journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 38 ,\ pages 2338--2348 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

  11. [19]

    Mayle , author J

    author author R. Mayle , author J. R. \ Wilson , author J. Ellis , author K. Olive , author D. N. \ Schramm , and\ author G. Steigman ,\ title title Constraints on axions from sn 1987a , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)91595-X journal journal Physics Let...

  12. [20]

    author author G. G. Raffelt ,\ title title Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles , \ @noop journal journal Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press \ ( year 1996 ) NoStop

  13. [21]

    author author G. G. \ Raffelt ,\ title title Astrophysical axion bounds , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73518-2-3 journal journal Axions: Theory, Cosmology, and Experimental Searches \ volume 741 ,\ pages 51--71 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

  14. [22]

    author author R. N. \ Manchester , author G. B. \ Hobbs , author A. Teoh , and\ author M. Hobbs ,\ title title The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/428488 journal journal The Astronomical Journal \ volume 129 ,\ pages 1993--200...

  15. [23]

    note Http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat/ NoStop

  16. [24]

    note Https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/GLAMCOG/ \\ Public+List+of+LAT-Detected+Gamma-Ray+Pulsars, list last updated 19 th Oct 2018, accessed on 14 th Feb 2019 NoStop

  17. [25]

    author author A. A. \ Abdo , author M. Ajello , author A. Allafort , author L. Baldini , author J. Ballet , author G. Barbiellini , author M. G. \ Baring , author D. Bastieri , author A. Belfiore , author R. Bellazzini , author B. Bhattacharyya , author E. Bissaldi , author E....

  18. [26]

    Burke-Spolaor and\ author M

    author author S. Burke-Spolaor and\ author M. Bailes ,\ title title The millisecond radio sky: transients from a blind single-pulse search , \ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15965.x journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 402 ,\ pag...

  19. [27]

    Jiang , author B

    author author M. Jiang , author B. Y. \ Cui , author N. A. \ Schmid , author M. A. \ McLaughlin , and\ author Z. C. \ Cao ,\ title title Wavelet denoising of radio observations of rotating radio transients (rrats): Improved timing parameters for eight rrats , \ https://doi.org...

  20. [28]

    Bailes , author S

    author author M. Bailes , author S. Johnston , author J. F. \ Bell , author D. R. \ Lorimer , author B. W. \ Stappers , author R. N. \ Manchester , author A. G. \ Lyne , author L. Nicastro , author N. Damico , and\ author B. M. \ Gaensler ,\ title title Discovery of four isola...

  21. [29]

    author author D. J. \ Reardon , author G. Hobbs , author W. Coles , author Y. Levin , author M. J. \ Keith , author M. Bailes , author N. D. R. \ Bhat , author S. Burke-Spolaor , author S. Dai , author M. Kerr , author P. D. \ Lasky , author R. N. \ Manchester , author S. Oslo...

  22. [30]

    author author R. N. \ Manchester , author A. G. \ Lyne , author J. H. \ Taylor , author J. M. \ Durdin , author M. I. \ Large , and\ author A. G. \ Little ,\ title title 2nd Molonglo pulsar survey - discovery of 155 pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/185.2.409 journal j...

  23. [31]

    author author B. C. \ Siegman , author R. N. \ Manchester , and\ author J. M. \ Durdin ,\ title title Timing parameters for 59 pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/262.2.449 journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 262 ,\ pages 449--455 (...

  24. [32]

    author author R. N. \ Manchester , author A. G. \ Lyne , author N. Damico , author M. Bailes , author S. Johnston , author D. R. \ Lorimer , author P. A. \ Harrison , author L. Nicastro , and\ author J. F. \ Bell ,\ title title The Parkes southern pulsar survey .1. observing a...

  25. [33]

    Hobbs , author A

    author author G. Hobbs , author A. G. \ Lyne , author M. Kramer , author C. E. \ Martin , and\ author C. Jordan ,\ title title Long-term timing observations of 374 pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08157.x journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astrono...

  26. [34]

    author author J. D. \ Pilkington , author A. Hewish , author S. J. \ Bell , and\ author T. W. \ Cole ,\ title title Observations of some further pulsed radio sources , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/218126a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 218 ,\ pages 126--+ ( year 1968 ) NoStop

  27. [35]

    author author T. M. \ Tauris , author L. Nicastro , author S. Johnston , author R. N. \ Manchester , author M. Bailes , author A. G. \ Lyne , author J. Glowacki , author D. R. \ Lorimer , and\ author N. Damico ,\ title title Discovery of psr j0108-1431 - the closest known neut...

  28. [36]

    Arzoumanian , author D

    author author Z. Arzoumanian , author D. J. \ Nice , author J. H. \ Taylor , and\ author S. E. \ Thorsett ,\ title title Timing behavior of 96 radio pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/173760 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 422 ,\ pages 671--680 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

  29. [37]

    author author M. I. \ Large , author A. E. \ Vaughan , and\ author R. Wielebinski ,\ title title Highly dispersed pulsar and 3 others , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/2231249a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 223 ,\ pages 1249--+ ( year 1969 ) NoStop

  30. [38]

    Craft , author R

    author author H. Craft , author R. Lovelace , and\ author J. Sutton ,\ title title New pulsar. iau circ., 2100 , \ http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968IAUC.2100....1C \ volume 2100 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

  31. [39]

    author author B. A. \ Jacoby , author M. Bailes , author S. M. \ Ord , author R. T. \ Edwards , and\ author S. R. \ Kulkarni ,\ title title A large-area survey for radio pulsars at high Galactic latitudes , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/2009 journal journal Astroph...

  32. [40]

    Burgay , author B

    author author M. Burgay , author B. C. \ Joshi , author N. D'Amico , author A. Possenti , author A. G. \ Lyne , author R. N. \ Manchester , author M. A. \ McLaughlin , author M. Kramer , author F. Camilo , and\ author P. C. C. \ Freire ,\ title title The Parkes high-latitude p...

  33. [41]

    author author L. M. I. . W. R. \ Vaughan , A. E. ,\ title title Three new pulsars. \ https://doi.org/10.1038/222963a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 222 ,\ pages 963 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

  34. [42]

    author author T. W. \ Cole and\ author J. D. \ Pilkington ,\ title title Search for pulsating radio sources in declination range + 44 degrees delta + 90 degrees , \ https://doi.org/10.1038/219574a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 219 ,\ pages 574--+ ( year 1968 ) NoStop

  35. [43]

    Camilo , author D

    author author F. Camilo , author D. J. \ Nice , and\ author J. H. \ Taylor ,\ title title A search for millisecond pulsars at Galactic latitudes -50 degrees b -20 degrees , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/177103 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 461 ,\ pages 812--819 ( ...

  36. [44]

    Camilo and\ author D

    author author F. Camilo and\ author D. J. \ Nice ,\ title title Timing parameters of 29 pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/175737 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 445 ,\ pages 756--761 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

  37. [45]

    This does not change the determined m a significantly considering all 17 PSRs

    note black We have repeated the same analysis using the PSF3 event class which is the best quartile direction reconstruction. This does not change the determined m a significantly considering all 17 PSRs. We therefore retain the FRONT analysis to allow direct comparison with [...

  38. [46]

    note Fermipy change log version 0.12.0 NoStop

  39. [47]

    Wood , author R

    author author M. Wood , author R. Caputo , author E. Charles , author M. Di Mauro , author J. Magill , and\ author Jeremy Perkins for the Fermi-LAT Collaboration ,\ title title Fermipy: An open-source Python package for analysis of Fermi-LAT Data , \ @noop journal journal ArXi...

  40. [48]

    note As described in the Fermi Science Support Centre link https + .2222em //fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/analysis/scitools/source \_models.html NoStop

  41. [49]

    author author L. B. \ Leinson ,\ title title Axion mass limit from observations of the neutron star in cassiopeia a , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/031 journal journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics \ ,\ pages 11 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  42. [50]

    author author S. B. \ Ruster , author V. Werth , author M. Buballa , author I. A. \ Shovkovy , and\ author D. H. \ Rischke ,\ title title Phase diagram of neutral quark matter: Self-consistent treatment of quark masses , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.034004 journal jou...

  43. [51]

    Shen , author H

    author author H. Shen , author H. Toki , author K. Oyamatsu , and\ author K. Sumiyoshi ,\ title title Relativistic equation of state of nuclear matter for supernova and neutron star , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9474(98)00236-x journal journal Nuclear Physics A \ volume 63...

  44. [52]

    Akmal , author V

    author author A. Akmal , author V. R. \ Pandharipande , and\ author D. G. \ Ravenhall ,\ title title Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1804 journal journal Physical Review C \ volume 58 ,\ pages 1804--1828 ( ...

  45. [53]

    Negreiros , author V

    author author R. Negreiros , author V. A. \ Dexheimer , and\ author S. Schramm ,\ title title Quark core impact on hybrid star cooling , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035805 journal journal Physical Review C \ volume 85 ,\ pages 7 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  46. [54]

    author author M. B. \ Larson and\ author B. Link ,\ title title Superfluid friction and late-time thermal evolution of neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/307532 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 521 ,\ pages 271--280 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

  47. [55]

    author author G. G. \ Pavlov , author G. S. \ Stringfellow , and\ author F. A. \ Cordova ,\ title title Hubble space telescope observations of isolated pulsars , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/177612 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 467 ,\ pages 370--+ ( year 1996 ) NoStop

  48. [56]

    author author G. G. \ Pavlov , author B. Rangelov , author O. Kargaltsev , author A. Reisenegger , author S. Guillot , and\ author C. Reyes ,\ title title Old but still warm: Far-uv detection of psr b0950+08 , \ https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa947c journal journal Astrophy...

  49. [57]

    author author E. H. \ Gudmundsson , author C. J. \ Pethick , and\ author R. I. \ Epstein ,\ title title Neutron star envelopes , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/183840 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 259 ,\ pages L19--L23 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

  50. [58]

    Nomoto and\ author S

    author author K. Nomoto and\ author S. Tsuruta ,\ title title Cooling of neutron-stars - effects of the finite-time scale of thermal conduction , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/164914 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 312 ,\ pages 711--726 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

  51. [59]

    Yakovlev and\ author C

    author author D. Yakovlev and\ author C. Pethick ,\ title title Neutron star cooling , \ @noop journal journal Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics \ volume 42 ,\ pages 169--210 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

  52. [60]

    author author C. O. \ Heinke and\ author W. C. G. \ Ho ,\ title title Direct observation of the cooling of the cassiopeia a neutron star , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/l167 journal journal Astrophysical Journal Letters \ volume 719 ,\ pages L167--L171 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

  53. [61]

    Sumiyoshi , author S

    author author K. Sumiyoshi , author S. Yamada , author H. Suzuki , author H. Shen , author S. Chiba , and\ author H. Toki ,\ title title Postbounce evolution of core-collapse supernovae: Long-term effects of the equation of state , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/431788 journal jour...

  54. [62]

    author author J. A. \ Pons , author S. Reddy , author M. Prakash , author J. M. \ Lattimer , and\ author J. A. \ Miralles ,\ title title Evolution of proto-neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1086/306889 journal journal Astrophysical Journal \ volume 513 ,\ pages 780--804 ( y...

  55. [63]

    Nakazato , author H

    author author K. Nakazato , author H. Suzuki , and\ author H. Togashi ,\ title title Heavy nuclei as thermal insulation for protoneutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.035804 journal journal Phys. Rev. C \ volume 97 ,\ pages 035804 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  56. [64]

    author author L. G. \ Zhu , author J. L. \ Lu , and\ author L. Wang ,\ title title Effects of temperature on the structure of neutron stars at high temperature , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-017-2327-3 journal journal General Relativity and Gravitation \ volume 50 ,\ pages...

  57. [65]

    Perna , author W

    author author R. Perna , author W. C. G. \ Ho , author L. Verde , author M. van Adelsberg , and\ author R. Jimenez ,\ title title Signatures of photon-axion conversion in the thermal spectra and polarization of neutron stars , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/748/2/116 jour...

  58. [66]

    author author J. F. \ Fortin and\ author K. Sinha ,\ title title Constraining axion-like-particles with hard x-ray emission from magnetars , \ https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2018)048 journal journal Journal of High Energy Physics \ ,\ pages 22 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  59. [67]

    author author R. Rando ,\ title title The all-sky medium energy gamma-ray observatory , \ http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/12/i=11/a=C11024 journal journal Journal of Instrumentation \ volume 12 ,\ pages C11024 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  60. [68]

    author author A. D. \ Angelis , author V. Tatischeff , author I. Grenier , author J. McEnery , author M. Mallamaci , author M. Tavani , author U. Oberlack , author L. Hanlon , author R. Walter , author A. Argan , author P. V. \ Ballmoos , author A. Bulgarelli , author A. Bykov...

  61. [69]

    Wenger , author F

    author author M. Wenger , author F. Ochsenbein , author D. Egret , author P. Dubois , author F. Bonnarel , author S. Borde , author F. Genova , author G. Jasniewicz , author S. Lalo \"e , author S. Lesteven , and\ author R. Monier ,\ title title The SIMBAD astronomical databas...

  62. [70]

    aipnauth4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsauth4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aipnauth4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsauth4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note numbe...

  63. [71]

    aipnum4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aipnum4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number o...

  64. [72]

    apsrev4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "apsrev4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number o...

  65. [73]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number orga...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.