Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Spontaneous Conformal Symmetry Breaking in Fishnet CFT

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The fishnet CFT breaks conformal symmetry with zero vacuum energy and no fine-tuning.

desk verdict A genuinely new claim—first non-SUSY 4D CFT with spontaneously broken conformal symmetry and zero vacuum energy—backed by a clean one-loop calculation and plausible all-loop arguments, but the all-loop flatness for the diagonal vacua is not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04302 v5 pith:KUJ4FOOZ submitted 2019-08-12 hep-th

Georgios K. Karananas , Vladimir Kazakov , Mikhail Shaposhnikov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords conformalfieldtheoryfishnetCFTspontaneoussymmetrybreakingflatdirectionseffectivepotentiallarge-Nlimitdilatoncosmologicalconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

New here is a four-dimensional example where conformal symmetry breaks spontaneously without supersymmetry. The conformal fishnet CFT, a non-unitary but UV-finite theory of two complex matrix fields with a single chiral quartic interaction, is shown to have many classical flat directions. The paper proves at one loop, and argues at higher loops in the planar $1/N_c$ expansion, that a subclass of these directions remains flat after quantum corrections without fine-tuning. Along such vacua the effective potential is a homogeneous function of the fields, so every extremum has exactly zero vacuum energy and the dilaton stays massless. That makes the fishnet theory the first non-supersymmetric, UV-complete four-dimensional quantum field theory with natural conformal symmetry breaking.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective potential's flatness equations obtained by shifting the fields by constant vacuum expectation values. The homogeneity identity $V\propto \varphi_i\,\partial V/\partial\varphi_i$ for a CFT potential is what converts any extremum on a flat direction into a zero-energy vacuum. The one-loop tadpole equations (14) encode the cancellation between the tree-level and loop contributions, with the chirality of the fishnet vertex serving as the mechanism that forbids the dangerous diagrams (mass renormalization, coupling renormalization, and opposite-chirality vertices) that would normally lift the directions. The double-trace couplings at their conformal fixed values are what remove the renormalization-scale dependence, keeping the potential homogeneous.

What would settle it

Evaluate the renormalization-scale dependence of the next nontrivial planar tadpole graphs on the diagonal z-vacuum, in particular the three-loop graph shown on the left of Fig. 4, together with all same-order double-trace diagrams: any residual dependence on the renormalization scale in the effective-potential derivatives would violate the homogeneity that forces zero vacuum energy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the conformal fishnet CFT admits classical flat vacua on which conformal symmetry is spontaneously broken, and that some of these vacua survive radiative corrections in the planar limit at leading order in $1/N_c$, with no tuning. The mechanism is a cancellation inside the effective action: the one-loop tadpole equations (14) combine tree-level and loop contributions so that their renormalization-scale dependence cancels by virtue of the conformal fixed values of the double-trace couplings. For diagonal vacua the flatness conditions reduce to $\sum_k z_k^2=0$ and $\sum_k z_k^2\log z_k=0$ (and the same for $\bar z$), and the paper exhibits an explicit $4\times 4$ block solution. For "exotic" vacua with only one vev nonzero, and for nilpotent vacua, all loop corrections vanish identically in the planar limit, so the tree-level potential is exact. The authors conclude that the vacuum energy is zero along these flat directions, giving a naturally massless dilaton.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the quantum effective potential on the symmetry-breaking backgrounds has no dependence on the renormalization scale, so it remains a homogeneous function of the fields; if the vacuum-expectation-value background produced new divergences or a conformal anomaly, the flat directions would be lifted and the zero-energy conclusion would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A non-supersymmetric, UV-finite four-dimensional quantum field theory now exists in which spontaneous conformal symmetry breaking yields exactly zero vacuum energy, so the zero-cosmological-constant mechanism can be studied outside supersymmetry.
  • The dilaton remains massless on the surviving flat vacua at leading order in the planar expansion, while the $X$ excitations acquire masses proportional to $\tilde\xi^2 |v|^2 \bar z_i z_j$.
  • The "exotic" and nilpotent vacua receive no quantum corrections at any order in the planar limit, so the tree-level potential is exact on them, although their excitation spectrum is entirely massless.
  • The same flat vacua descend from the parent $\gamma$-deformed $N=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, and requiring their existence fixes one of the parent theory's double-trace coefficients.
  • All higher-loop planar contributions to the effective potential must have the homogeneous form (21), which means flat directions can in principle be preserved order by order by imposing one condition per loop order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the $1/N_c$ corrections were computed, the vacuum energy would no longer be forced to vanish, so the finiteness of the cosmological constant here is tied to the planar limit; this is a natural place to test the mechanism's fragility.
  • Editorial inference: the flatness conditions only involve traces of powers and logarithms of the vev matrices, so similar constructions could produce spontaneous conformal breaking in other chiral non-unitary CFTs, independent of fishnet integrability.
  • Editorial inference: computing the explicit three-loop tadpole graph of Fig. 4 and checking that its renormalization-scale dependence cancels against double-trace diagrams would convert the paper's perturbative survival argument into a quantitative two-loop test.
  • Editorial inference: even though the theory is non-unitary and not directly phenomenological, its zero-energy flat vacua offer a toy model for how a massless dilaton and a vanishing cosmological constant could arise naturally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies spontaneous conformal symmetry breaking in the conformal fishnet theory, a non-unitary four-dimensional CFT obtained as a double-scaling limit of strongly γ-deformed N=4 SYM. The authors identify classical flat directions for the complex matrix fields X and Z, including diagonal traceless matrices satisfying tr(z^2)=tr(\bar z^2)=0, single-vev configurations with only z or only \bar z nonzero, and nilpotent matrices. They compute the one-loop Coleman-Weinberg effective potential on diagonal z-vacua in the planar limit, show explicitly that the UV poles and renormalization-scale dependence cancel between single-trace and double-trace contributions, and provide a numerical example of a one-loop flat vacuum. They then argue, using chirality and the masslessness of the excitations, that the exotic single-vev and nilpotent vacua receive no loop corrections at any order, and that the diagonal vacua remain flat at higher loops because the unbroken phase is UV finite and the relevant multiloop diagrams cancel against double-trace counterterms. The central claim is that this yields the first non-supersymmetric four-dimensional quantum field theory with naturally spontaneously broken conformal symmetry and zero vacuum energy.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a genuinely new mechanism for spontaneous conformal symmetry breaking outside supersymmetry, in an explicitly computable four-dimensional setting with a massless dilaton and zero vacuum energy. The strengths of the paper are the explicit one-loop calculation in Appendix B, which is internally consistent and demonstrates the cancellation of the 1/ε poles and of the μ-dependence in Eqs. (B1)-(B2); the clear classification of classical flat vacua; and the structural chirality argument that excludes many higher-loop diagrams for the exotic vacua. The result is falsifiable: a two-loop computation on the diagonal background, or a proof of the scale independence of the fully dressed effective potential, would decide whether the all-loop claim holds. If that scale-independence assumption fails, the diagonal-vacuum part of the claim reduces to a one-loop statement, while the exotic vacua could still provide a valid example of all-loop flatness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Higher-loop corrections to the effective potential] The all-loop flatness of the diagonal vacua is asserted rather than derived. After the field shift (4), the propagators (A4)-(A5) acquire vev-dependent masses, so finiteness of the unbroken phase does not by itself imply finiteness or μ-independence of the effective potential evaluated on the broken background. The three-loop integral displayed after Fig. 4 is stated to have logarithmic UV divergences, and the text says that conformal symmetry guarantees their cancellation with double-trace contributions, but no divergent parts or counterterm structure are computed. Unless scale independence of the fully dressed effective potential is established, the flatness conditions (12) and (15) do not imply V=0 at the extremum, and the masslessness of the dilaton is unprotected. This is the key load-bearing step for the abstract's claim that some vacua survive quantum corrections without fine tuning.
  2. [Higher-loop corrections to the effective potential] The 'no fine tuning' claim is stronger than what is demonstrated for the diagonal family. The authors acknowledge that higher-loop corrections may require imposing additional conditions such as tr(z^2 log^2 z)=0 and that more constraints may appear at each loop order. Unless the existence of solutions to this infinite system of constraints is proved, or the perturbative ansatz (18)-(20) is shown to be iterable to all orders, the abstract's statement that some vacua survive 'without any fine tuning' is not supported for the diagonal vacua. At minimum, the claim should be restricted to the classes for which the all-loop argument is complete, such as the exotic single-vev and nilpotent vacua.
  3. [Flat vacua] The definition of a vacuum as an extremum of the complex effective action is a modeling assumption that should be defended more carefully. In this non-unitary logarithmic CFT the effective action is complex, and an extremum of a complex function is a saddle of the formal functional integral; it is not automatic that it has the standard vacuum properties assumed in the subsequent argument, such as a meaningful dilaton as a Goldstone mode and a real vacuum energy. The paper explicitly acknowledges non-unitarity, but the physical interpretation of the broken phase would be clarified if the results were framed as properties of saddles of the complex effective action and if any additional assumptions about vacuum stability were stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Equations (14) and (B3)] The notation 'log z√Q' is ambiguous; it should be typeset as log(z/√Q) or with an explicit division to avoid being read as (log z)√Q.
  2. [Higher-loop corrections to the effective potential] In the three-loop integral after Fig. 4, p_1^4 appears in the numerator as typeset; please check whether it belongs in the denominator, since this affects the degree of divergence and the stated logarithmic behavior.
  3. [Equation (2)] The notation α_1^2 and α_2^2 for the double-trace couplings is potentially confusing, because the text later refers to α_2^2=ξ^2; please clarify whether the square is part of the coupling name or denotes the square of a quantity α_i.
  4. [Classical flat vacua, footnote [48]] The statement that a complex matrix rotation can reduce only one of the four vev matrices to diagonal form would benefit from a one-sentence explanation, since the simultaneous transformation U^{-1}(X,X,Z,Z)U acts on all four fields.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the fishnet flat-vacuum analysis solves the effective-action equations from the defined action; the unproven mu-independence assumption is a correctness risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained relative to the fishnet action (1)+(2) and the previously computed conformal fixed lines for the double-trace couplings. The classical flat directions are obtained by solving the tree-level equations of motion, equations (9)-(12); no target quantity is inserted. The one-loop analysis solves the effective-action extremum conditions, equations (14), and exhibits explicit numerical solutions (16)-(17) and (19)-(20); condition (15) is an extremum condition, not a fit of the desired zero vacuum energy. The zero vacuum energy follows from the homogeneity argument for the effective potential, which is a general property of a scale-invariant theory, provided the potential is mu-independent. The mu-independence is argued from the UV finiteness of the unbroken phase; this is a substantive assumption, and a possible correctness risk at higher loops since the authors leave the multiloop integrals uncomputed, but it is not a circular reduction: the unbroken-phase finiteness does not by itself define the broken-phase effective potential. Self-citations to the fishnet construction, integrability, and correlation functions supply background and fixed-point values; the fixed-point beta functions are cited from prior computations, including an external one, and are not invoked as an unverified uniqueness theorem. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no equation is made equivalent to its input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the established properties of the fishnet CFT, namely UV finiteness and conformality at the fixed points of the double-trace couplings, and on the paper's assumption that these properties persist on the shifted vacuum. No new free parameters are fitted; the flat directions are solutions to the equations of motion. No new particles, forces, or other entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The fishnet CFT with Lagrangian (1) plus double-trace terms at the conformal fixed points is UV finite and quantum scale invariant.
    The paper takes this from refs. [15], [20], [25], [44], and [45] as the starting point for the vacuum analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum effective potential on the symmetry-breaking vacuums has no explicit renormalization-scale dependence, so it is homogeneous in the fields.
    Argued from the UV finiteness of the unbroken phase just before eq. (14); it is load-bearing for the vacuum energy equals zero conclusion and is not proven separately on the shifted vacuum.
  • ad hoc to paper An extremum of the complex effective action defines the vacuum in the non-unitary fishnet CFT.
    Stated explicitly in the 'Flat vacua' section: 'we model this vacuum state by an extremum of the (complex) effective action.'
  • domain assumption The planar large-N_c limit is taken and non-planar 1/N_c squared corrections are neglected.
    The quantum claims are restricted to this limit; non-planar graphs such as Fig. 3(b) are explicitly excluded.
  • standard math Massless tadpole integrals vanish in dimensional regularization.
    Used to argue that loop corrections vanish for the exotic and nilpotent vacua, for example in the discussion after eq. (20).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spontaneous Conformal Symmetry Breaking in Fishnet CFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KUJ4FOOZ

@misc{pith2026190804302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spontaneous Conformal Symmetry Breaking in Fishnet CFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KUJ4FOOZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04302}
}
abstract

Quantum field theories with exact but spontaneously broken conformal invariance have an intriguing feature: their vacuum energy (cosmological constant) is equal to zero. Up to now, the only known ultraviolet complete theories where conformal symmetry can be spontaneously broken were associated with supersymmetry (SUSY), with the most prominent example being the $\mathcal N$=4 SUSY Yang-Mills. In this Letter we show that the recently proposed conformal "fishnet" theory supports at the classical level a rich set of flat directions (moduli) along which conformal symmetry is spontaneously broken. We demonstrate that, at least perturbatively, some of these vacua survive in the full quantum theory (in the planar limit, at the leading order of $1/N_c$ expansion) without any fine tuning. The vacuum energy is equal to zero along these flat directions, providing the first non-SUSY example of a four-dimensional quantum field theory with "natural" breaking of conformal symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04302 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The one-loop tadpole diagrams stemming from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) with two quartic vertices is absent from FCFT, even on top of vacua breaking conformal symmetry, due to the opposite chirality of the single-trace vertices there. Note that many more kinds of graphs exist, like the one given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Exemplary multiloop tadpole diagrams of the fishnet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Typical planar graph that feeds into the (derivatives [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Twistor fishnets

    hep-th 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Fishnet theory is recast on twistor space with an abelian gauge symmetry, yielding manifestly conformal cohomological amplitude formulae.

  2. Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity with a heavy ALP: Higgs Inflation and $\alpha$-attractors

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity theory with the SM Higgs and a heavy gravitational ALP, tuning two nonminimal couplings reproduces metric Higgs inflation and α-attractor-like inflation with ns≈1−2/N and r≈12/N^2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Fine Tuning Problem and the Renormalization Group,

    C. Wetterich, “Fine Tuning Problem and the Renormalization Group,” Phys. Lett. 140B (1984) 215–222

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    On naturalness in the standard model,

    W. A. Bardeen, “On naturalness in the standard model,” in Ontake Summer Institute on Particle Physics Ontake Mountain, Japan, August 27-September 2, 1995. 1995. http://lss.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/find_ paper.pl?conf-95-391

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Breaking of Scale Invariance inφ6 Theory: Tricriticality and Critical End Points,

    D. J. Amit and E. Rabinovici, “Breaking of Scale Invariance inφ6 Theory: Tricriticality and Critical End Points,” Nucl. Phys. B257 (1985) 371–382

    work page 1985

  4. [4]

    Quasirenormalizable Models,

    M. B. Einhorn, G. Goldberg, and E. Rabinovici, “Quasirenormalizable Models,” Nucl. Phys. B256 9 (1985) 499–508

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    Critical Surfaces and Flat Directions in a Finite Theory,

    E. Rabinovici, B. Saering, and W. A. Bardeen, “Critical Surfaces and Flat Directions in a Finite Theory,” Phys. Rev. D36 (1987) 562

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Quantum scale invariance, cosmological constant and hierarchy problem,

    M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, “Quantum scale invariance, cosmological constant and hierarchy problem,” Phys. Lett. B671 (2009) 162–166, arXiv:0809.3406 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Conformal Invariance in Quantum Gravity,

    F. Englert, C. Truffin, and R. Gastmans, “Conformal Invariance in Quantum Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B117 (1976) 407–432

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,

    C. Wetterich, “Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B302 (1988) 668–696, arXiv:1711.03844 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1988

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Perturbative conformal symmetry and dilaton,

    F. Gretsch and A. Monin, “Perturbative conformal symmetry and dilaton,” Phys. Rev. D92 no. 4, (2015) 045036, arXiv:1308.3863 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Manifestly scale-invariant regularization and quantum effective operators,

    D. M. Ghilencea, “Manifestly scale-invariant regularization and quantum effective operators,” Phys. Rev. D93 no. 10, (2016) 105006, arXiv:1508.00595 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hidden and explicit quantum scale invariance,

    S. Mooij, M. Shaposhnikov, and T. Voumard, “Hidden and explicit quantum scale invariance,” Phys. Rev. D99 no. 8, (2019) 085013, arXiv:1812.07946 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Quantum scale symmetry,

    C. Wetterich, “Quantum scale symmetry,” arXiv:1901.04741 [hep-th]

    1901 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy,

    M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, “Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy,” Phys. Lett. B671 (2009) 187–192, arXiv:0809.3395 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    No fifth force in a scale invariant universe,

    P. G. Ferreira, C. T. Hill, and G. G. Ross, “No fifth force in a scale invariant universe,” Phys. Rev. D95 no. 6, (2017) 064038, arXiv:1612.03157 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,

    O. Gurdogan and V. Kazakov, “New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed PlanarN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 no. 20, (2016) 201602, arXiv:1512.06704 [hep-th] . [Addendum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117,no.25,259903(2016)]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    The name of the theory stems from the characteristic regular square lattice form of its planar Feynman graphs

  9. [17]

    To our best knowledge, this is a unique behavior for a four-dimensional theory, though a three-dimensional CFT with flat directions that persist at the quantum level was presented in [5]

  10. [18]

    Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,

    S. R. Coleman and E. J. Weinberg, “Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1888–1910

    1973

  11. [19]

    Caetano Unpublished (2017)

    J. Caetano Unpublished (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, G. Korchemsky, S. Negro, and G. Sizov, “Integrability of Conformal Fishnet Theory,” JHEP 01 (2018) 095, arXiv:1706.04167 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Quantum Spectral Curve of γ-twisted N = 4 SYM theory and fishnet CFT,

    V. Kazakov, “Quantum Spectral Curve of γ-twisted N = 4 SYM theory and fishnet CFT,” arXiv:1802.02160 [hep-th] . [Rev. Math. Phys. 30, no. 07, 1840010 (2018)]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    In this theory, the SO(6) R-symmetry is broken down to U(1)3, with γ1,γ 2,γ 3 being the parameters (twists) of the deformation

  15. [23]

    Yangian Symmetry for Fishnet Feynman Graphs,

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller, and D.-l. Zhong, “Yangian Symmetry for Fishnet Feynman Graphs,” Phys. Rev. D96 no. 12, (2017) 121901, arXiv:1708.00007 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Yangian Symmetry for Bi-Scalar Loop Amplitudes,

    D. Chicherin, V. Kazakov, F. Loebbert, D. M¨ uller, and D.-l. Zhong, “Yangian Symmetry for Bi-Scalar Loop Amplitudes,” JHEP 05 (2018) 003, arXiv:1704.01967 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Strongly γ-DeformedN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory as an Integrable Conformal Field Theory,

    D. Grabner, N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, and G. Korchemsky, “Strongly γ-DeformedN = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory as an Integrable Conformal Field Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 11, (2018) 111601, arXiv:1711.04786 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Biscalar Integrable Conformal Field Theories in Any Dimension,

    V. Kazakov and E. Olivucci, “Biscalar Integrable Conformal Field Theories in Any Dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 13, (2018) 131601, arXiv:1801.09844 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Exact Correlation Functions in Conformal Fishnet Theory,

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, and G. Korchemsky, “Exact Correlation Functions in Conformal Fishnet Theory,” arXiv:1808.02688 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gluing Ladder Feynman Diagrams into Fishnets,

    B. Basso and L. J. Dixon, “Gluing Ladder Feynman Diagrams into Fishnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 no. 7, (2017) 071601, arXiv:1705.03545 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Continuum limit of fishnet graphs and AdS sigma model,

    B. Basso and D.-l. Zhong, “Continuum limit of fishnet graphs and AdS sigma model,” JHEP 01 (2019) 002, arXiv:1806.04105 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Basso-Dixon Correlators in Two-Dimensional Fishnet CFT,

    S. Derkachov, V. Kazakov, and E. Olivucci, “Basso-Dixon Correlators in Two-Dimensional Fishnet CFT,” JHEP 04 (2019) 032, arXiv:1811.10623 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Exact scattering amplitudes in conformal fishnet theory,

    G. P. Korchemsky, “Exact scattering amplitudes in conformal fishnet theory,” arXiv:1812.06997 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    The one-loop spectral problem of strongly twisted N = 4 Super Yang-Mills theory,

    A. C. Ipsen, M. Staudacher, and L. Zippelius, “The one-loop spectral problem of strongly twisted N = 4 Super Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 04 (2019) 044, arXiv:1812.08794 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Hexagons and Correlators in the Fishnet Theory,

    B. Basso, J. Caetano, and T. Fleury, “Hexagons and Correlators in the Fishnet Theory,” arXiv:1812.09794 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Generalized Fishnets and Exact Four-Point Correlators in Chiral CFT4,

    V. Kazakov, E. Olivucci, and M. Preti, “Generalized Fishnets and Exact Four-Point Correlators in Chiral CFT4,” JHEP 06 (2019) 078, arXiv:1901.00011 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Chaos in the Fishnet,

    R. de Mello Koch, W. LiMing, H. J. R. Van Zyl, and J. P. Rodrigues, “Chaos in the Fishnet,” Phys. Lett. B793 (2019) 169–174, arXiv:1902.06409 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    The Holographic Fishchain,

    N. Gromov and A. Sever, “The Holographic Fishchain,” arXiv:1903.10508 [hep-th]

    1903 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Quantum Fishchain in AdS5,

    N. Gromov and A. Sever, “Quantum Fishchain in AdS5,” arXiv:1907.01001 [hep-th]

    1907 arXiv

  30. [38]

    On the Regge limit of Fishnet correlators,

    S. D. Chowdhury, P. Haldar, and K. Sen, “On the Regge limit of Fishnet correlators,” arXiv:1908.01123 [hep-th]

    1908 arXiv

  31. [39]

    “Fishnet” graphs represent a regular square lattice of massless propagators with vertices representing φ4-type interactions

  32. [40]

    Chiral limit ofN = 4 SYM and ABJM and integrable Feynman graphs,

    J. Caetano, O. Gurdogan, and V. Kazakov, “Chiral limit ofN = 4 SYM and ABJM and integrable Feynman graphs,” JHEP 03 (2018) 077, arXiv:1612.05895 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    “Fishing-net

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, ““Fishing-net” diagrams as a completely integrable system,” Phys. Lett. 97B (1980) 63–66

    1980

  34. [42]

    Conformal group: R-matrix and star-triangle relation,

    D. Chicherin, S. Derkachov, and A. P. Isaev, “Conformal group: R-matrix and star-triangle relation,” JHEP 04 (2013) 020, arXiv:1206.4150 [math-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  35. [43]

    It is not clear whether much of this integrability stays intact in the spontaneously broken phase considered 10 throughout this paper; nevertheless, it can be certainly useful in some particular calculations

  36. [44]

    Non-conformality of γi-deformed N = 4 SYM theory,

    J. Fokken, C. Sieg, and M. Wilhelm, “Non-conformality of γi-deformed N = 4 SYM theory,” J. Phys. A47 (2014) 455401, arXiv:1308.4420 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    On a CFT limit of planar γi-deformedN = 4 SYM theory,

    C. Sieg and M. Wilhelm, “On a CFT limit of planar γi-deformedN = 4 SYM theory,” Phys. Lett. B756 (2016) 118–120, arXiv:1602.05817 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    This considerably enlarges the set of possible flat vacua

    We can also relax the requirement that xtree = 0 and require that both fields have nonzero vev. This considerably enlarges the set of possible flat vacua. For instance, field configurations such that xtree∝ztree, may provide yet another set of acceptable vacua along which CI is no...

  39. [47]

    Additional flat directions open up at isolated values of ξ

  40. [48]

    arbitrary complex matrix rotations (X,X,Z, Z)→U−1(X,X,Z, Z)U

    The measure of the functional integral (and the original unbroken action) is invariant w.r.t. arbitrary complex matrix rotations (X,X,Z, Z)→U−1(X,X,Z, Z)U. Using it we can reduce, in general, only one of the four vev matrices (z, ¯z,x, ¯x) to diagonal form

  41. [49]

    For the diagonal ansatz, condition (10) translates into ΣNc k=1zk = ΣNc k=1¯zk = 0

  42. [50]

    Higgs sector of the minimal left-right symmetric theory,

    A. Maiezza, G. Senjanovi´ c, and J. C. Vasquez, “Higgs sector of the minimal left-right symmetric theory,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 9, (2017) 095004, arXiv:1612.09146 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  43. [51]

    A New Approach to Conformal Invariant Field Theories,

    S. Fubini, “A New Approach to Conformal Invariant Field Theories,” Nuovo Cim. A34 (1976) 521

    1976

  44. [52]

    A naturally light dilaton,

    F. Coradeschi, P. Lodone, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi, and L. Vitale, “A naturally light dilaton,” JHEP 11 (2013) 057, arXiv:1306.4601 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Note that z, ¯z are still arbitrary matrices, so that the order should be respected

  46. [54]

    matrix fields Z, ¯Z,X, ¯X

    The masses generated on top of this vacuum can be calculated from the quadratic variation of the full effective potential Veff w.r.t. matrix fields Z, ¯Z,X, ¯X. The spectrum of the theory in the leading order at this limit comprises: i) N2 c− 1 complex massive excitations of the ...

  47. [55]

    We thank the referee of the earlier version of this paper for pointing us on some of these graphs

  48. [56]

    A piece of cake: the ground-state energies in γi -deformedN = 4 SYM theory at leading wrapping order,

    J. Fokken, C. Sieg, and M. Wilhelm, “A piece of cake: the ground-state energies in γi -deformedN = 4 SYM theory at leading wrapping order,” JHEP 09 (2014) 078, arXiv:1405.6712 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    CFT data and spontaneously broken conformal invariance,

    G. K. Karananas and M. Shaposhnikov, “CFT data and spontaneously broken conformal invariance,” Phys. Rev. D97 no. 4, (2018) 045009, arXiv:1708.02220 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  50. [58]

    compensating

    This means that we are actually computing the derivative of the one-loop correction w.r.t. z. Appendix A Once we shift the fields as in (4), the relevant parts of the Lagrangian for the excitations read L′ = L + Ld.t. + L(2) + L(3) , (A1) where L and Ld.t. have the same form as...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.