Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Exchange Bias and Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in the MnBi2Te4-CrI3 Heterostructure

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stacking CrI3 on MnBi2Te4 creates a 40 meV exchange bias that pins surface spins, restoring the magnetic gap and enabling zero-field QAH states.

desk verdict Strong exchange-bias result, one clean new prediction (even-SL sandwich), and one untested isolated-slab claim in the gated CN=3 part. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04322 v2 pith:LITJ3FVL submitted 2019-08-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Huixia Fu , Chao-Xing Liu , Binghai Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords exchangebiasquantumanomalousHalleffectMnBi2Te4CrI3magneticproximityChernnumbervanderWaalsheterostructureelectric-fieldgating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that stacking a monolayer of the ferromagnetic insulator CrI3 on a thin film of the layered antiferromagnet MnBi2Te4 creates a roughly 40 meV ferromagnetic exchange bias at the van der Waals interface, strong enough to pin the surface Mn moments out of plane. This matters because pure MnBi2Te4 films show gapless surface states, so the predicted zero-field quantum anomalous Hall effect has only been observed under fields above 6 T. With the CrI3 cap, the paper predicts that 3- and 5-septuple-layer films become zero-field QAH insulators with Chern number $C=1$, that vertical electric fields can switch the system through $C=0$ to $C=3$, and that a CrI3/MnBi2Te4/CrI3 sandwich turns even-layer films into $C=-1$ QAH insulators. The microscopic origin is traced to long tails of Cr-$e_g$ orbitals reaching across the van der Waals gap and hybridizing with Te $p$ orbitals, so the exchange coupling is both large and short-ranged.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Cr-$e_g$ orbital tail. In the interface model, the Cr d-electron $e_g$-character localized orbital extends beyond the van der Waals gap and overlaps strongly with Te $p$ orbitals on the MnBi2Te4 side, forming a long exchange pathway from Cr-$e_g$ through I, Te, Bi, Te to Mn-$t_{2g}$ states. This orbital tail is what rationalizes a 40 meV FM coupling that is insensitive to stacking and spin-orbit coupling. The other pieces are standard topological-band tools: Berry-phase invariants give the Chern numbers, and symmetry arguments ($C_3$ rotation plus combined time-reversal/mirror symmetry $\mathcal{T}M$) dictate that gap-closing transitions at generic points occur in groups of three or six, explaining how the Chern number can jump by 3. The electric-field calculations use isolated MnBi2Te4 slabs, relying on the fact that CrI3 modifies the low-energy band structure only weakly.

What would settle it

Measure the zero-field Hall resistance of a 3-SL MnBi2Te4 film capped with monolayer CrI3 below 10 K. Seeing no quantized plateau at $h/e^2$ with vanishing longitudinal resistance, or no surface magnetic gap in spin-resolved photoemission, would contradict the central prediction; likewise, observing no exchange-bias shift of the magnetization loop would rule out the 40 meV coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the authors' own terms: the MnBi2Te4/CrI3 interface is ferromagnetic, with an energy difference between FM and AFM alignments of about 40 meV that barely changes with stacking, with or without spin-orbit coupling, and persists in a larger supercell. CrI3 couples only to the neighboring MnBi2Te4 septuple layer, leaving the AFM order between MnBi2Te4 layers intact, and its magnitude exceeds the 3-4 meV MnBi2Te4 interlayer coupling and the roughly 10 meV CrI3 interlayer coupling. Because the coupling is so strong relative to the magnetic ordering temperatures, the surface moments of MnBi2Te4 are pinned out of plane, restoring the magnetic surface gap that ARPES experiments found missing. The resulting heterostructure remains an insulator with no charge transfer, the MnBi2Te4 band topology is preserved, and Berry-phase calculations give $C=1$ for 3- and 5-SL films (gaps of 49 and 14 meV). Applying a vertical electric field to the isolated MnBi2Te4 film drives gap closings at $\Gamma$ and along $\Gamma$--$K$, producing first a trivial $C=0$ state and then a high-Chern-number $C=3$ QAH state; in the symmetric sandwich, an even 4-SL film becomes a $C=-1$ QAH insulator with a 34 meV gap.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation stretches the CrI3 monolayer by about 7% to match the MnBi2Te4 lattice and assumes the density-functional model captures the strained interface; if that strain eliminates CrI3's out-of-plane ferromagnetism, or if the isolated-slab electric-field model misses CrI3's response to gating, the 40 meV bias and the predicted topological phase boundaries do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A monolayer CrI3 cap should make 3- and 5-SL MnBi2Te4 films zero-field QAH insulators with Chern number $C=1$ and gaps of 49 and 14 meV, respectively.
  • A vertical electric field around 0.015 V/Å on a 3-SL film should drive a topological transition into a $C=3$ QAH state; fields near 0.03 V/Å can put a 2-SL film into $C=3$.
  • Sandwiching an even-SL MnBi2Te4 film between two CrI3 layers should force all septuple-layer magnetizations into a net out-of-plane arrangement, giving a $C=-1$ QAH insulator, for example a 34 meV gap for 4 SL.
  • Because the exchange bias is stronger than MnBi2Te4 interlayer coupling but does not transfer charge, the same capping approach should work for pinning surface order of bulk MnBi2Te4, enabling ARPES observation of the axion-insulator surface gap.
  • Other magnetic insulators with out-of-plane magnetization could replace CrI3 and produce the same exchange bias, as long as their $e_g$-like orbitals couple across the van der Waals gap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A cheap first experimental check is magnetometry: if the 40 meV bias is real, the heterostructure's magnetic hysteresis loop should shift below the CrI3 Curie temperature, before any transport measurement is attempted.
  • Inserting a monolayer hexagonal boron nitride spacer between CrI3 and MnBi2Te4 should exponentially suppress the Cr-$e_g$/Te-$p$ overlap; measuring the coupling decay with spacer thickness would separate the orbital-tail mechanism from strain-induced effects.
  • The symmetry argument that gap closings occur in triples along $\Gamma$--$K$ is not specific to MnBi2Te4; any threefold-symmetric magnetic topological film under a perpendicular field should show Chern-number jumps of $\pm 3$, so the high-Chern-number route could be tested in other van der Waals magnets.
  • If the strained CrI3 monolayer turns out to lose its out-of-plane ferromagnetism, the same exchange-bias function might be achievable with a different magnetic insulator or with CrI3 under less strain, which would make the prediction robust but shift the material of choice.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using a monolayer of the ferromagnetic insulator CrI3 as a magnetic proximity layer on MnBi2Te4 thin films to restore the out-of-plane surface magnetism needed for the quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) effect. First-principles DFT calculations on MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructures find an interfacial ferromagnetic exchange coupling of about 40 meV, attributed to the long tails of Cr-eg Wannier orbitals hybridizing with Te-p states. The authors show that the heterostructure remains insulating, that 3- and 5-SL MnBi2Te4/CrI3 host a QAH state with Chern number 1, and that a CrI3/MnBi2Te4/CrI3 sandwich can drive even-SL films into a QAH state with Chern number -1. They further claim that an applied electric field can produce a high-Chern-number QAH state with CN=3, based on calculations performed on isolated MnBi2Te4 slabs. The central exchange-bias and zero-field QAH results are supported by calculations on the full heterostructure for multiple stackings and supercells, whereas the gated high-CN claim rests on an explicitly stated but untested isolated-slab approximation.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the work provides a concrete route to zero-field QAH effect in an intrinsic magnetic topological insulator by solving the surface-magnetism problem that currently limits MnBi2Te4 films. The reported exchange energy of ~40 meV is large compared with the relevant magnetic ordering temperatures, and the orbital-overlap mechanism (Cr-eg tails penetrating through the van der Waals gap) is a physically appealing and testable explanation. The paper also delivers a symmetry-based scenario for electric-field-induced Chern-number jumps of 3, which is of independent interest. Strength of the manuscript includes explicit testing of multiple stacking geometries and supercell sizes, SOC-scaling analysis showing topological phase transitions, and Wilson-loop Berry-phase calculations for the Chern numbers in the heterostructure.

major comments (3)
  1. [Electrically tunable high-Chern-number QAH effect (Fig. 3)] The CN=3 claim is computed for isolated MnBi2Te4 slabs, not for the MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure. The text states explicitly that "we only consider isolated MnBi2Te4 models when applying an electric field," yet the abstract and conclusion present the high-CN state as a property of the proposed heterostructure platform. Since Fig. 1(b) shows that an electric field shifts the Cr-eg bands and Fig. 2 shows Cr-eg bands forming the lowest conduction bands for 1-4 SL films, a full heterostructure calculation under field is needed to verify that the Cr-eg states do not cross the relevant band gap and that the topological transitions occur at the quoted fields. Without such a calculation, the headline claim of "electrically tunable zero-field QAH effect" is not supported.
  2. [Electrically tunable high-Chern-number QAH effect (symmetry argument)] The symmetry argument for a Chern-number jump by 3 relies on the C3 and combined time-reversal-mirror (TM) symmetries of the isolated MnBi2Te4 slab. The actual CrI3/MnBi2Te4 heterostructure, especially under an electric field, may not preserve the TM symmetry because the magnetic CrI3 layer breaks time reversal and the interface has reduced symmetry. If the TM symmetry is broken, the three gapless points along the Gamma-K lines are no longer symmetry-protected, and the CN=3 plateau may be absent. The manuscript does not analyze the symmetry of the full heterostructure under an electric field, so the relevance of the isolated-slab result to the heterostructure remains unestablished.
  3. [Appendix 1: Calculation Methods] The methods section does not identify the van der Waals functional used in the VASP calculations, referring only to "van der Waals interactions in DFT calculations" with a citation to the VASP code. Since the central quantitative result is the ~40 meV exchange coupling and the interlayer distance directly controls the Cr-eg/Te-p overlap, the choice of vdW functional (e.g., DFT-D3, optB88, vdW-DF) could affect the reported energies. In addition, the methods describe only Wannier functions of bulk MnBi2Te4 and do not explain how the heterostructure band structures and Wilson-loop Berry phases (including CrI3 states) were computed. This hampers reproducibility of both the exchange energy and the Chern numbers.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction and throughout] The term "exchange bias" is used for a large interfacial exchange coupling that pins the adjacent Mn layer's magnetization. In the strict magnetism literature, exchange bias denotes a shift of the hysteresis loop, which is not directly computed here. Consider using "interfacial exchange coupling" or "proximity exchange" to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [QAH effect (band gaps)] The statement that the QAH gaps are 49 and 14 meV for 3 and 5 SLs should clarify that these are the gaps of the MnBi2Te4 bands (as listed in Table S1), not necessarily the fundamental charge gap of the heterostructure, because Cr-eg bands appear as the lowest conduction bands for thin films. The Chern number is evaluated for the full occupied manifold, so the distinction matters for interpreting the gap values.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states the transitions occur at epsilon = 0.002 V/A and 0.0141 V/A, while the subpanels are labeled epsilon = 0.004 (CN=0) and 0.015 (CN=3). This is consistent with the transitions being below the labeled values, but the relation should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sandwiched MnBi2Te4 structures] The sentence "For instance, epsilon = 0.03 V/A induces a TPT with three gapless points along the Gamma-K lines in the 2-SL-thick MnBi2Te4 film at epsilon = 0.023 V/A" is confusingly worded; it should be rephrased to indicate that the transition occurs at 0.023 V/A and that the CN=3 state is realized at 0.03 V/A.
  5. [Appendix 1] The kinetic energy cutoff of 270 eV is rather low for first-row elements and heavy elements; a convergence test with respect to the cutoff would strengthen confidence in the quantitative energy differences.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the 40 meV exchange bias and Chern numbers are direct DFT and Wilson-loop outputs, not fitted inputs or self-citation-dependent conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central results are first-principles outputs. The 40 meV FM-AFM energy difference is obtained by DFT total-energy comparisons on constructed MnBi2Te4/CrI3 interfaces, and the bands in Fig. 2 are direct DFT band structures, not quantities fitted to reproduce a target. The Chern numbers are computed by Wilson-loop Berry phases, and the topological character is cross-checked by an independent SOC-strength scaling that shows gap closings and reopenings. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed a prediction. The paper does cite prior theoretical studies for the clean-film QAH classification, but those citations are external prior work and are not the load-bearing basis for the new interface claim; the heterostructure topology is verified in the present calculations. The one methodological choice that could look like an unsupported step is the gated high-Chern-number calculation, which is performed on isolated MnBi2Te4 slabs rather than on the full heterostructure. This is stated explicitly in the text: 'Since the CrI3 brings little modifications to the low-energy band structure of MnBi2Te4, we only consider isolated MnBi2Te4 models when applying an electric field in following discussions.' That is a physical approximation and a limitation of the predictive reach, not a circular derivation: the isolated-slab band inversion and the symmetry-based jump of Chern number by 3 are computed independently of the heterostructure input. A false or unvalidated approximation is a correctness risk, not circularity. No equation in the paper defines one claimed result in terms of another claimed result, and no self-citation is invoked to forbid alternatives or to supply a uniqueness theorem. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced and no target-result parameter is fitted. The central outputs (40 meV exchange coupling, Chern numbers) are first-principles DFT results; the free parameters are methodological choices such as lattice strain and magnetic order input. The strongest assumption is that the DFT model, including the strained CrI3 layer and the isolated-slab gating approximation, captures the real heterostructure behavior.

free parameters (1)
  • CrI3 in-plane lattice strain = about 7%, elongated (small model) or compressed (large model) to match MnBi2Te4
    The interface model forces lattice matching by straining CrI3; the authors report similar ~40 meV coupling for both the sqrt3xsqrt3/1x1 and 3x3/2x2 models, so the strain choice does not appear to determine the qualitative result, but its effect on CrI3's magnetic anisotropy is not quantified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GGA+vdW DFT reliably describes the magnetic exchange energies of the CrI3/MnBi2Te4 interface and the relevant band gaps.
    The magnetic coupling, topological gaps, and band structures all come from this approximation; no Hubbard U or hybrid functional is used for the main quantitative claims.
  • domain assumption Monolayer CrI3 remains a ferromagnetic insulator when stretched to match the MnBi2Te4 lattice.
    CrI3's FM order is taken from prior experiments, and the calculation assumes it survives the ~7% strain used in the small model; the larger supercell test gives similar coupling but does not directly prove the magnetic anisotropy survives.
  • domain assumption MnBi2Te4 films adopt the ideal A-type AFM order with out-of-plane Mn moments.
    The proposed exchange bias is designed to pin this ideal order; the authors cite experimental evidence for the bulk A-type AFM state, but the surface magnetic disorder they aim to fix is a known complication.
  • ad hoc to paper Electric-field-induced topological transitions computed for isolated MnBi2Te4 slabs carry over to the full CrI3/MnBi2Te4 heterostructure.
    Stated as "CrI3 brings little modifications to the low-energy band structure of MnBi2Te4"; the gated high-CN results are not recalculated for the interface, so this assumption is load-bearing for the CN=3 and even-SL QAH claims.
  • standard math Wilson-loop and Chern-number methods correctly classify the band topology of the computed slabs.
    The paper uses established Wilson-loop techniques (refs 47, 48) to extract Chern numbers; this is standard and not in dispute.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exchange Bias and Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in the MnBi2Te4-CrI3 Heterostructure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LITJ3FVL

@misc{pith2026190804322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exchange Bias and Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in the MnBi2Te4-CrI3 Heterostructure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LITJ3FVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04322}
}
read the original abstract

The layered antiferromagnetic MnBi2Te4 films have been proposed to be an intrinsic quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) insulator with a large gap. To realize this proposal, it is crucial to open a magnetic gap of surface states. However, recent experiments have observed gapless surface states, indicating the absence of out-of-plane surface magnetism, and thus the quantized Hall resistance can only be achieved at the magnetic field above 6 T. In this work, we propose to induce out-of-plane surface magnetism of MnBi2Te4 films via the magnetic proximity with magnetic insulator CrI3. Our calculations have revealed a strong exchange bias ~ 40 meV, originating from the long Cr-eg orbital tails that hybridize strongly with Te p-orbitals. By stabilizing surface magnetism, the QAH effect can be realized in the MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure. Our calculations also demonstrate the high Chern number QAH state can be achieved by controlling external electric gates. Thus, the MnBi2Te4/CrI3 heterostructure provides a promising platform to realize the electrically tunable zero-field QAH effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.04322 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The atomic structure of the MnBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Band structure evolution of a 3-SL-thick as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Band structure of a 4-SL-thick MnBi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y.-J. Hao, P. Liu, Y. Feng, X.-M. Ma, E. F. Schwier, M. Arita, S. Kumar, C. Hu, R. Lu, M. Zeng, Y. Wang, Z. Hao, H. Sun, K. Zhang, J. Mei, N. Ni, L. Wu, K. Shi- mada, C. Chen, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, (2019), 1907.03722

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    Y. J. Chen, L. X. Xu, J. H. Li, Y. W. Li, C. F. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Wu, A. J. Liang, C. Chen, S. W. Jung, C. Ca- cho, H. Y. Wang, Y. H. Mao, S. Liu, M. X. Wang, Y. F. Guo, Y. Xu, Z. K. Liu, L. X. Yang, and Y. L. Chen, (2019), 1907.05119

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Dirac surface states in intrinsic magnetic topological insulators EuSn2As2 and MnBi2nTe3n+1

    H. Li, S.-Y. Gao, S.-F. Duan, Y.-F. Xu, K.-J. Zhu, S.-J. Tian, W.-H. Fan, Z.-C. Rao, J.-R. Huang, J.-J. Li, Z.- T. Liu, W.-L. Liu, Y.-B. Huang, Y.-L. Li, Y. Liu, G.-B. Zhang, H.-C. Lei, Y.-G. Shi, W.-T. Zhang, H.-M. Weng, T. Qian, and H. Ding, (2019), 1907.06491

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Gapless Dirac surface states in the antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4

    P. Swatek, Y. Wu, L.-L. Wang, K. Lee, B. Schrunk, J. Yan, and A. Kaminski, (2019), 1907.09596

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, (2019), 1904.11468

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    C. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Li, K. He, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Wang, (2019), 1905.00715

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    J. Ge, Y. Liu, J. Li, H. Li, T. Luo, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, and J. Wang, (2019), 1907.09947

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Liu, S.-C

    C.-X. Liu, S.-C. Zhang, and X.-L. Qi, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 301 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Chang and M

    C.-Z. Chang and M. Li, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 123002 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Physica Scripta 2015, 014003 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Zutic, J

    I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    J. E. Moore, Nature 464, 194 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    ˇSmejkal, Y

    L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, B. Yan, and A. H. MacDon- ald, Nature Physics 14, 242 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Qi, Y.-S

    X.-L. Qi, Y.-S. Wu, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085308 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Liu, X.-L

    C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, Physical review letters 101 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H. J. Zhang, S. C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Science 329, 61 (2010)

    2010

  11. [19]

    Chang, J

    C. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L. Wang, Z. Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S. C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X. C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Science 340, 167 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    J. G. Checkelsky, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. S. Takahashi, Y. Kozuka, J. Falson, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Nature Physics 10, 731 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Kou, S.-T

    X. Kou, S.-T. Guo, Y. Fan, L. Pan, M. Lang, Y. Jiang, Q. Shao, T. Nie, K. Murata, J. Tang, Y. Wang, L. He, T.-K. Lee, W.-L. Lee, and K. L. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 137201 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Chang, W

    C.-Z. Chang, W. Zhao, D. Y. Kim, H. Zhang, B. A. Assaf, D. Heiman, S.-C. Zhang, C. Liu, M. H. W. Chan, and J. S. Moodera, Nature Materials 14, 473 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Y. Gong, J. Guo, J. Li, K. Zhu, M. Liao, X. Liu, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, L. Tang, X. Feng, D. Zhang, W. Li, C. Song, L. Wang, P. Yu, X. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Yao, W. Duan, Y. Xu, S.-C. Zhang, X. Ma, Q.-K. Xue, and K. He, Chinese Phys. Lett. 36, 076801 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    J. Li, Y. Li, S. Du, Z. Wang, B.-L. Gu, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Science Advances 5, eaaw5685 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. Shi, T. Zhu, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 206401 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. I. Klimovskikh, H. Bentmann, A. Zeugner, Z. S. Aliev, S. Gass, A. U. Wolter, A. V. Koroleva, D. Estyunin, A. M. Shikin, et al. , arXiv:1809.07389 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 78, 195424 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    R. S. K. Mong, A. M. Essin, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B 81, 245209 (2010)

    2010

  21. [29]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. P. Rusinov, M. Blanco-Rey, M. Hoff- mann, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, S. V. Eremeev, A. Ernst, P. M. Echenique, A. Arnau, and E. V. Chulkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 107202 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    S. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, Y. Wang, L. Miao, T. Pills- bury, S. Kempinger, D. Graf, N. Alem, C.-Z. Chang, N. Samarth, and Z. Mao, (2018), 1812.00339

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. Q. Yan, S. Okamoto, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, R. J. McQueeney, and B. C. Sales, (2019), 1905.00400

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. Wu, F. Liu, M. Sasase, K. Ienaga, Y. Obata, R. Yukawa, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, S. Okuma, T. In- oshita, and H. Hosono, (2019), 1905.02385

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    K. Y. Chen, B. S. Wang, J. Q. Yan, D. S. Parker, J. S. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. G. Cheng, (2019), 1907.01760

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Vidal, H

    R. Vidal, H. Bentmann, T. Peixoto, A. Zeugner, S. Moser, C. Min, S. Schatz, K. Kissner, M. ¨Unzelmann, C. Fornari, et al. , arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11826 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    B. Chen, F. Fei, D. Zhang, B. Zhang, W. Liu, S. Zhang, P. Wang, B. Wei, Y. Zhang, J. Guo,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09934 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    M. A. McGuire, H. Dixit, V. R. Cooper, and B. C. Sales, Chem. Mater. 27, 612 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Nature 546, 270 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Y. Hou, J. Kim, and R. Wu, Science Advances 5, eaaw1874 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Zhang, M

    D. Zhang, M. Shi, K. He, D. Xing, H. Zhang, and J. Wang, arXiv:1808.08014 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  35. [43]

    More information can be found in the Appendice (Sup- plementary Materials)

  36. [44]

    Sivadas, S

    N. Sivadas, S. Okamoto, X. Xu, C. J. Fennie, and D. Xiao, Nano Lett. 18, 7658 (2018). 6

    2018

  37. [45]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    Zhang, Q

    W.-B. Zhang, Q. Qu, P. Zhu, and C.-H. Lam, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 3, 12457 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Yu, X.-L

    R. Yu, X.-L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075119 (2011)

    2011

  40. [48]

    A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035108 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    C. O. Avci, A. Quindeau, C.-F. Pai, M. Mann, L. Caretta, A. S. Tang, M. C. Onbasli, C. A. Ross, and G. S. D. Beach, Nature Materials 16, 309 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Nature 546, 265 (2017). 7 Appendix 1: Calculation Methods Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were per- formed using the Vienna ...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.