Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 40 references

Field-induced shaping of sessile paramagnetic drops

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Paramagnetic sessile drops elongate linearly with the square of an applied magnetic field, and a modified Young–Laplace equation predicts their outlines.

desk verdict The experimental scaling result is real and useful, but Eq. (3) contradicts the paper's own interpretation of the magnetic stress, and the model fitting is partly circular. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05193 v2 pith:BBTQ22IV submitted 2019-08-14 physics.app-ph

Jennifer Dodoo , Adam A. Stokes This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph
keywords paramagneticdropselectromagneticstresstensorYoung–LaplaceequationmagneticBondnumberdropshapingsessilesuperhydrophobicsurfacesparticle-freeactuation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a sessile drop of paramagnetic salt solution, sitting on a superhydrophobic surface, elongates in a uniform magnetic field because of a mismatch in magnetic stress across the liquid–vapour interface. The shape change follows a modified Young–Laplace equation derived from the full electromagnetic stress tensor, and the paper confirms experimentally that the deformation grows linearly with the square of the applied field and scales with drop volume and magnetic susceptibility. The practical payoff is that magnetic fields could shape and move droplets without electrodes, contact lines, or embedded magnetic particles, complementing electrowetting and dielectrowetting for liquid lenses, liquid displays, and microfluidic mixing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the full electromagnetic stress tensor for quasi-static, non-dissipative media. Setting $D=E=0$ and using the Clausius–Mossotti approximation $\rho(\delta\chi/\delta\rho)\approx\chi$ for $\chi\ll1$ reduces its normal stress difference across the liquid–vapour interface to a term proportional to $B_n^2 - B^2$. This term is inserted into the augmented Young–Laplace equation $0 = \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{surf}}_{nn} + \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{grav}}_{nn} + \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{EM}}_{nn}$, whose numerical solution for the axisymmetric outline $r(z)$ is fitted to drop photographs; the apex radius of curvature $b$ fixes the field-independent potential difference through $2\gamma b^{-1} = a^l_0 - a^v_0$. The machinery converts a field measurement plus surface tension, density, volume, and susceptibility into a predicted drop outline.

What would settle it

Map the magnetic flux density in and around a deformed paramagnetic drop—for example with a Hall-probe scan or field imaging—and compare the interface value of $B_n$ with the uniform applied field assumed in the fits. If the measured $B_n$ deviates enough to change the magnetic stress difference by more than the reported fit error, the predicted outlines and the linear $D$ versus $B^2$ relation should fail at higher fields, higher susceptibilities, or larger volumes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the equilibrium shape of a paramagnetic sessile drop in a static uniform magnetic field is determined by the stress balance $0 = \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{surf}}_{nn} + \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{grav}}_{nn} + \Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{EM}}_{nn}$, where the magnetic term, derived from the full electromagnetic stress tensor, reduces for $\chi\ll1$ to $\Delta\sigma^{\mathrm{EM}}_{nn} = a^l_0 - a^v_0 - \xi_0\rho + \chi\mu_0^{-1}(B_n^2 - B^2)$. Numerically integrating this augmented Young–Laplace equation for the axisymmetric outline $r(z)$ and fitting it to photographed side profiles of drops made from manganese chloride and gadolinium chloride salt solutions, the authors find that the dimensionless shape parameter $D=(w-h)/(w+h)$ decreases linearly with $B^2$, that the drop elongates more when volume or magnetic susceptibility is larger, and that the normalized deformation collapses onto a single linear trend against the magnetic Bond number, $D_m/D_0 = -0.44B_m + 0.97$, with a mean fit error of $0.01$. The deformation is reversible as long as the drop volume is constant. The authors further note that the same stress-balance statement holds for ferro- and diamagnetic drops, and they propose a unified electromagnetic treatment as a route to combining electric and magnetic drop actuation.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on treating the applied magnetic field as uniform and unaffected by the drop's own magnetization; if the drop distorts the field significantly, the magnetic stress and the linear $B^2$ scaling would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any paramagnetic sessile drop with $\chi\ll1$, the field-induced change in shape is proportional to $B^2$, so once surface tension, density, volume, and susceptibility are known, the outline at any field strength is fixed by the same fitted equation.
  • Because the same stress tensor yields the modified Young–Laplace equation for para-, dia-, and ferro-magnetic liquids, the formalism unifies magnetic and electric drop actuation, and the two can in principle be combined for shaping modes neither alone provides.
  • On superhydrophobic substrates, paramagnetic salt solutions give particle-free magnetic actuation: no ferrofluid particles are needed, and the deformation is reversible provided the drop volume is constant.
  • The linear collapse of normalized shape change against the magnetic Bond number means measurements at one volume, susceptibility, and field can be rescaled to predict another drop's deformation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors do not pursue is that the same stress-balance argument predicts a field tilted relative to the drop's symmetry axis should produce both elongation and a lateral force, so the setup could be extended from shaping to field-controlled drop transport.
  • The symmetry between electric and magnetic terms in the stress tensor suggests a dielectric analogue: a dielectric liquid drop in a uniform electric field should show the same linear collapse of normalized shape against an electric Bond number, and comparing the slopes would test how universal the fitted slope is.
  • The fits treat the triple contact line as mobile, while the paper notes its motion is inhibited by surface friction; including contact-line pinning in the model would predict a field threshold below which reversible elongation is suppressed, which is testable on rougher versus smoother superhydrophobic coatings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a theory and experiments for the elongation of sessile drops of paramagnetic salt solutions in a uniform magnetic field. The authors derive an augmented Young–Laplace equation by adding an electromagnetic stress difference, obtained from the electromagnetic stress tensor (EMST) of Stierstadt and Liu, to the usual surface-tension and gravitational terms. They solve this equation numerically and fit the drop outline to side-view photographs. They report that the elongation is linear in B^2 and increases with drop volume and magnetic susceptibility, and they combine these data in a master curve against a magnetic Bond number. The paper suggests applications in drop actuation and liquid optics.

Significance. The paper's strength is the direct experimental characterization of a weakly magnetic, particle-free system: the linear B^2 scaling in Fig. 3 and the monotonic dependence on volume and susceptibility are clean, falsifiable observations, and the authors are careful to note the reversibility of the deformation and the role of contact-line friction. A correct theoretical description of this system would be of practical interest to the lab-on-a-chip community. However, the central theoretical claim is currently not supported because the magnetic-stress expression used in the shape equation is inconsistent with the EMST boundary conditions stated in the paper, and the numerical fitting does not disclose which expression was actually implemented. The manuscript therefore is not acceptable in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2)–(3)] The derivation of the magnetic stress is internally inconsistent. Starting from Eq. (1) and imposing the stated boundary conditions (H_t continuous, B_n continuous) for a linear paramagnet (χ << 1), the magnetic part of the normal stress difference (inside minus outside) is -χ/(2μ0)[B_n^2/(1+χ)+B_t^2] (with B_n and B_t evaluated on the air side) plus the thermodynamic terms, not χ/μ0 (B_n^2 - B^2). The printed Eq. (3) reduces to -χ/μ0 B_t^2, which vanishes at the apex (B_t = 0) and has its maximum at the equator. This directly contradicts the text and Fig. 2, which state that the magnetic stress is proportional to B_n^2 and is largest at the apex. The algebra connecting Eq. (2) and Eq. (3) is correct, but Eq. (2) itself is not the EMST result for the stated boundary conditions. Because the manuscript does not state whether the numerical fits actually solved Eq. (3) as printed or another expression, and because no code or data are provided, the experimental validation of Eq. (7) cannot be assessed. Moreover, if B in Eq. (3) is taken as the undisturbed uniform applied field, the correct leading-order stress is isotropic (proportional to -χ B0^2/(2μ0) with corrections of order χ^2), so the shape change would be second order in χ; the paper's O(χ) elongation from a B_t^2 term is therefore not the correct EMST prediction for a uniform applied field. This is a load-bearing issue that the revised manuscript must address by rederiving the stress and specifying exactly which field is used in the numerical solution.
  2. [§3, Fitting methodology] The quantitative validation of Eq. (7) is weakened by the fitting strategy. For the zero-field outline, γ is floated; for the field-on outlines, ξ0ρ is floated; and the triple-contact-line diameter is also optimized. Since ξ0ρ is a spatially constant term, it can absorb any constant error in the pressure balance, so the successful fit of Eq. (7) does not independently determine the absolute magnitude of the magnetic stress; it mainly tests the functional form of its dependence on the surface normal. The paper reports no goodness-of-fit statistics (e.g., residual errors, R^2, or confidence intervals on the fitted shapes), and the optimized triple-line diameter changes by 0.3 mm while the measured change is 0.05 mm, which indicates a systematic inconsistency in the boundary condition at the contact line. The independent checks in Figs. 3 and 4 (linear B^2 scaling, volume and susceptibility trends) are valuable and are not vitiated by this concern, but they cannot by themselves validate the specific stress expression in Eq. (3).
  3. [§2–3, Field evaluation] The manuscript never states how B_n (or H_n) in Eq. (3) is computed for a deformed drop. If B is the known uniform applied field, then B_n^2 + B_t^2 = B0^2 and Eq. (3) is purely tangential; if B is instead the self-consistent field including the drop's magnetization, the magnetostatic problem must be solved together with Eq. (7), but no such calculation is described. This ambiguity matters because the sign and spatial distribution of the magnetic stress depend on this choice. Please specify the field model used in the Runge-Kutta solve and, ideally, release the code or provide the numerical method in an appendix.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Experimental section] The abbreviation 'ppw' is not defined at first use; it presumably means parts per weight, but this should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Fig. 3] The labels V1,2,3 and χ1,2,3 are introduced only in the caption; please define them in the main text and include units on the axes.
  3. [Fig. 2 discussion] The text says the magnetic stress is 'directed outwards from the drop along the magnetic field lines'; since the stress in Eq. (3) is a normal traction, the wording should be revised to describe a normal stress difference rather than a force along field lines.
  4. [References] Reference [31] is to the authors' previous diamagnetic study; a brief comparison of the two results would help readers assess the generality of the EMST description.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper's main scaling claims rest on direct measurements, not on the fitted model.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims—linear decrease of the dimensionless shape parameter with B^2 and the monotonic dependence on drop volume and magnetic susceptibility—are based on direct image measurements of drop width and height (Figs. 3 and 4), not on outputs of the fitted Young-Laplace model. Eq. (7) is used as a fitting model with free parameters (surface tension, field-independent chemical-potential term, and contact-line diameter); the statement that numerical solutions 'run smoothly along the outline' is a goodness-of-fit observation rather than an independent prediction. The fit is therefore not a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. The self-citation to the authors' earlier diamagnetic-drop paper is motivational and not load-bearing. There is a potentially serious algebraic/form issue in Eq. (3) as printed: with the stated boundary conditions it reduces to a term proportional to -B_t^2, whereas the text and Fig. 2 describe the magnetic stress as proportional to B_n^2 and largest at the apex. That inconsistency is a correctness concern, not an instance of circular reasoning, because it does not make the claimed result equivalent to its inputs by construction. No circular step is exhibited in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a prior stress tensor, several domain assumptions about the magnetization and thermodynamic state, and five parameters fitted or estimated during the outline analysis. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Surface tension gamma = 66.7 mN/m for 51.4% GdCl3; 72.3, 71.3, 69.8 mN/m for the other solutions
    Allowed to freely change in the numerical fit to the drop outline to account for errors in the initial estimates of density and surface tension.
  • Field-independent chemical potential term xi0 rho_alpha = -(1.6 +/- 0.2) x 10^-3 J/kg
    Allowed to freely change in the presence of magnetic fields to account for errors in the field-independent chemical potential and the difference of the field-independent thermodynamic potentials.
  • Apex radius of curvature b = Not reported; obtained by parabolic fit to r(z) near apex
    Needed as a boundary condition for Eq. (7); fitted from the measured outline rather than measured independently.
  • Triple contact line diameter = Optimized to 0.3 mm change, while real change is 0.05 mm
    The fit routine optimizes the change in diameter because contact line friction is omitted, leading to a mismatch between the real and optimized values.
  • Solution density rho = rho_w = 997 kg/m^3 for MnCl2 solutions; 1.1 rho_w for GdCl3 solution
    Estimated by hand rather than measured, used in the gravitational stress term.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The full electromagnetic stress tensor of Stierstadt and Liu (Eq. 1) is valid for all quasi-static, non-dissipative media.
    Invoked in the derivation of Eq. (2) without independent verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption The system is a closed thermodynamic system at constant temperature and volume, described by the Helmholtz potential.
    Used to split the free energy into field-independent and field-dependent parts; stated at the top of page 2.
  • domain assumption The magnetic susceptibility is independent of the applied field, so B = mu0(1+chi)H and M = chi H.
    This linear relation is used to express the magnetic stress in terms of B^2; reasonable for these dilute solutions but not derived.
  • domain assumption Air is approximated as vacuum in its magnetic properties and chemical potential.
    Used to simplify the stress balance across the liquid-vapour interface; stated in the derivation.
  • domain assumption The Clausius-Mossotti relation gives rho(d chi/d rho) = chi(1 + chi/3) approximately equal to chi for chi << 1.
    Used to convert Eq. (2) into Eq. (3); valid in the low-susceptibility limit but an approximation.
  • domain assumption The drop remains axisymmetric and the applied magnetic field is homogeneous and aligned with the symmetry axis.
    Required for the one-dimensional Young-Laplace equation in Eq. (6); the paper notes field and substrate inhomogeneities cause non-axisymmetric deformation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Field-induced shaping of sessile paramagnetic drops." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BBTQ22IV

@misc{pith2026190805193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Field-induced shaping of sessile paramagnetic drops},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BBTQ22IV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05193}
}
read the original abstract

We use the electromagnetic stress tensor to describe the elongation of paramagnetic drops in uniform magnetic fields. This approach implies a linear relationship between the shape of the drops and the square of the applied field which we confirm experimentally. We show that this effect scales with the volume and susceptibility of the drops. By using this unified electromagnetic approach, we highlight the potential applications of combining electric and magnetic techniques for controlled shaping of drops in liquid displays, liquid lenses, and chemical mixing of drops in microfluidics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05193 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Images of a 60 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The outlines (black dashed) of the drop in Fig. 1, and the corresponding numerical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dimensionless shape parameter D (see text) of drops with different volumes and magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized dimensionless shape parameter in an applied field of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mishra , author D

    author author K. Mishra , author D. van den Ende , \ and\ author F. Mugele ,\ title title Recent developments in optofluidic lens technology , \ 10.3390/mi7060102 journal journal Micromachines \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1--24 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.3390/mi7060102

  2. [2]

    Seemann , author M

    author author R. Seemann , author M. Brinkmann , author T. Pfohl , \ and\ author S. Herminghaus ,\ title title Droplet based microfluidics , \ 10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 75 ,\ pages 016601--1 -- 016601--41 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601

  3. [3]

    Samiei , author M

    author author E. Samiei , author M. Tabrizian , \ and\ author M. Hoorfar ,\ title title A review of digital microfluidics as portable platforms for lab-on a-chip applications , \ 10.1039/c6lc00387g journal journal Lab on a Chip \ volume 16 ,\ pages 2376--2396 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c6lc00387g

  4. [4]

    author author S. L. S. \ Freire ,\ title title Perspectives on digital microfluidics , \ 10.1016/j.sna.2016.08.007 journal journal Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical \ volume 250 ,\ pages 15--28 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2016.08.007 2016

  5. [5]

    Ding , author P

    author author Y. Ding , author P. D. \ Howes , \ and\ author A. J. \ Demello ,\ title title Recent Advances in Droplet Microfluidics , \ 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05047 journal journal Analytical Chemistry \ volume 92 ,\ pages 132--149 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05047

  6. [6]

    Chen , author B

    author author G. Chen , author B. Ji , author Y. Gao , author C. Wang , author J. Wu , author B. Zhou , \ and\ author W. Wen ,\ title title Towards the rapid and efficient mixing on ‘open-surface' droplet-based microfluidics via magnetic actuation , \ 10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.126 journal journal Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical \ volume 286 ,\ pages 181--1...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.126

  7. [7]

    Mugele \ and\ author J.-C

    author author F. Mugele \ and\ author J.-C. \ Baret ,\ title title Electrowetting: from basics to applications , \ 10.1088/0953-8984/17/28/R01 journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages R705--R774 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/17/28/r01

  8. [8]

    Teng , author D

    author author P. Teng , author D. Tian , author H. Fu , \ and\ author S. Wang ,\ title title Recent progress of electrowetting for droplet manipulation: From wetting to superwetting systems , \ 10.1039/c9qm00458k journal journal Materials Chemistry Frontiers \ volume 4 ,\ pages 140--154 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c9qm00458k

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    McHale , author C

    author author G. McHale , author C. V. \ Brown , author M. I. \ Newton , author G. G. \ Wells , \ and\ author N. Sampara ,\ title title Dielectrowetting driven spreading of droplets , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.186101 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 107 ,\ page...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author C. V. \ Brown , author G. G. \ Wells , author M. I. \ Newton , \ and\ author G. McHale ,\ title title Voltage-programmable liquid optical interface , \ 10.1038/nphoton.2009.99 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 403--405 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    Geng , author J

    author author H. Geng , author J. Feng , author L. M. \ Stabryla , \ and\ author S. K. \ Cho ,\ title title Dielectrowetting manipulation for digital microfluidics: creating, transporting, splitting, and merging of droplets , \ 10.1039/c7lc00006e journal journal Lab on a Chip ...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Li , author N

    author author J. Li , author N. S. \ Ha , author T. L. \ Liu , author R. M. \ van Dam , \ and\ author C.-J. \ ‘CJ' Kim ,\ title title Ionic-surfactant-mediated electro-dewetting for digital microfluidics , \ 10.1038/s41586-019-1491-x journal journal Nature \ volume 572 ,\ page...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Zhao , author Z

    author author Y. Zhao , author Z. Xu , author M. Parhizkar , author J. Fang , author X. Wang , \ and\ author T. Lin ,\ title title Magnetic liquid marbles, their manipulation and application in optical probing , \ 10.1007/s10404-012-0976-9 journal journal Microfluidics and Nan...

    doi

  6. [14]

    Bormashenko , author R

    author author E. Bormashenko , author R. Pogreb , author Y. Bormashenko , author A. Musin , \ and\ author T. Stein ,\ title title New investigations on ferrofluidics: Ferrofluidic marbles and magnetic-field-driven drops on superhydrophobic surfaces , \ 10.1021/la802355y journa...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author M. K. \ Khaw , author C. H. \ Ooi , author F. Mohd-Yasin , author R. Vadivelu , author J. S. \ John , \ and\ author N. T. \ Nguyen ,\ title title Digital microfluidics with a magnetically actuated floating liquid marble , \ 10.1039/c6lc00378h journal journal Lab ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Pamme ,\ title title Magnetism and microfluidics , \ 10.1039/B513005K journal journal Lab Chip \ volume 6 ,\ pages 24--38 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    author author N. Pamme ,\ title title Magnetism and microfluidics , \ 10.1039/B513005K journal journal Lab Chip \ volume 6 ,\ pages 24--38 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  9. [17]

    Zhang \ and\ author N.-T

    author author Y. Zhang \ and\ author N.-T. \ Nguyen ,\ title title Magnetic digital microfluidics – a review , \ 10.1039/C7LC00025A journal journal Lab Chip \ volume 17 ,\ pages 994--1008 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Afkhami , author A

    author author S. Afkhami , author A. J. \ Tyler , author Y. Renardy , author M. Renardy , author T. G. \ St. Pierre , author R. C. \ Woodward , \ and\ author J. S. \ Riffle ,\ title title Deformation of a hydrophobic ferrofluid droplet suspended in a viscous medium under unifo...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author G. P. \ Zhu , author N. T. \ Nguyen , author R. V. \ Ramanujan , \ and\ author X. Y. \ Huang ,\ title title Nonlinear deformation of a ferrofluid droplet in a uniform magnetic field , \ 10.1021/la203931q journal journal Langmuir \ volume 27 ,\ pages 14834--14841 ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Stierstadt \ and\ author M

    author author K. Stierstadt \ and\ author M. Liu ,\ title title Maxwell's stress tensor and the forces in magnetic liquids , \ 10.1002/zamm.201300192 journal journal ZAMM Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik \ volume 95 ,\ pages 4--37 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  13. [21]

    Latikka , author M

    author author M. Latikka , author M. Backholm , author J. V. \ Timonen , \ and\ author R. H. \ Ras ,\ title title Wetting of ferrofluids: Phenomena and control , \ 10.1016/j.cocis.2018.04.003 journal journal Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 36 ,\ pages...

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Egatz-G \' o mez , author S

    author author A. Egatz-G \' o mez , author S. Melle , author A. A. \ Garc \' i a , author S. A. \ Lindsay , author M. M \' a rquez , author P. Dom \' i nguez-Garc \' i a , author M. A. \ Rubio , author S. T. \ Picraux , author J. L. \ Taraci , author T. Clement , author D. Yan...

    doi

  15. [23]

    particle-Free

    author author L. Mats , author F. Logue , \ and\ author R. D. \ Oleschuk ,\ title title "particle-Free" Magnetic Actuation of Droplets on Superhydrophobic Surfaces Using Dissolved Paramagnetic Salts , \ 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01917 journal journal Analytical Chemistry \ volume...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Lindsay , author T

    author author S. Lindsay , author T. V \' a zquez , author A. Egatz-G \' o mez , author S. Loyprasert , author A. A. \ Garcia , \ and\ author J. Wang ,\ title title Discrete microfluidics with electrochemical detection , \ 10.1039/b617631c journal journal Analyst \ volume 132 ...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author J. D. \ Sherwood ,\ title title Breakup of fluid droplets in electric and magnetic fields , \ 10.1017/S0022112088000667 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 188 ,\ pages 133--146 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988 doi

  18. [26]

    author author O. A. \ Basaran \ and\ author F. K. \ Wohlhuter ,\ title title Effect of nonlinear polarization on shapes and stability of pendant and sessile drops in an electric (magnetic) field , \ 10.1017/S0022112092002945 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume ...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author H. A. \ Stone , author J. R. \ Lister , \ and\ author M. P. \ Brenner ,\ title title Drops with conical ends in electric and magnetic fields , \ 10.1098/rspa.1999.0316 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Scie...

    1999

  20. [28]

    author author L. T. \ Corson , author C. Tsakonas , author B. R. \ Duffy , author N. J. \ Mottram , author I. C. \ Sage , author C. V. \ Brown , \ and\ author S. K. \ Wilson ,\ title title Deformation of a nearly hemispherical conducting drop due to an electric field: Theory a...

    doi

  21. [29]

    author author J. C. \ Bacri \ and\ author D. Salin ,\ title title Instability of ferrofluid magnetic drops under magnetic field , \ @noop journal journal Journal de Physique Lettres \ volume 43 ,\ pages 649--654 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  22. [30]

    Rowghanian , author C

    author author P. Rowghanian , author C. D. \ Meinhart , \ and\ author O. Camp \` a s ,\ title title Dynamics of ferrofluid drop deformations under spatially uniform magnetic fields , \ 10.1017/jfm.2016.447 journal journal Journal of Fluid Mechanics \ volume 802 ,\ pages 245--2...

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Dodoo \ and\ author A

    author author J. Dodoo \ and\ author A. A. \ Stokes ,\ title title Shaping and transporting diamagnetic sessile drops , \ 10.1063/1.5124805 journal journal Biomicrofluidics \ volume 064110 ( year 2019 ),\ 10.1063/1.5124805 NoStop

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    author author C. A. \ Miller \ and\ author P. Neogi ,\ @noop title Interfacial phenomena : equilibrium and dynamic effects ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.,\ Surfactant science series ; v. 139\ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ address London ,\ year 2008 )\ pp.\ pages 1--29 NoStop

    2008

  25. [33]

    author author A. W. \ Adamson ,\ @noop title Physical chemistry of surfaces ,\ edition 5th \ ed.\ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ,\ address New York ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  26. [34]

    author author V. A. \ Lubarda \ and\ author K. A. \ Talke ,\ title title Analysis of the equilibrium droplet shape based on an ellipsoidal droplet model , \ 10.1021/la202077w journal journal Langmuir \ volume 27 ,\ pages 10705--10713 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author I. S. \ Bayer , author V. Caramia , author D. Fragouli , author F. Spano , author R. Cingolani , \ and\ author A. Athanassiou ,\ title title Electrically conductive and high temperature resistant superhydrophobic composite films from colloidal graphite , \ 10.103...

    doi

  28. [36]

    C_ s and are the weight concentration of the salt in the solution and the density of the solution respectively

    note We calculate for the salt solution using: = ( _s^m C_s M_s^ -1 + _w^m (1-C_s) M_w^ -1 ) , where M_s=197.9 g mol ^ -1 for MnCl_2 4H_2O , and M_s=371.7 g mol ^ -1 for GdCl_3 6H_2O , and M_w=18.02 g mol ^ -1 are the molecular masses, and _s^m=14350 10^ -6 cm ^3 mol ^ -1 for ...

  29. [37]

    Bateni , author S

    author author A. Bateni , author S. S. \ Susnar , author A. Amirfazli , \ and\ author A. W. \ Neumann ,\ title title Development of a new methodology to study drop shape and surface tension in electric fields , \ 10.1021/la0494167 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 20 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  30. [38]

    author author S. M. \ Saad \ and\ author A. W. \ Neumann ,\ title title Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis (ADSA): An Outline , \ 10.1016/j.cis.2016.11.001 journal journal Advances in Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 238 ,\ pages 62--87 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    author author N. T. \ Nguyen ,\ title title Deformation of ferrofluid marbles in the presence of a permanent magnet , \ 10.1021/la4032859 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 29 ,\ pages 13982--13989 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    author author J. R. \ Rumble ,\ title title Physical constants of inorganic compounds , \ in\ @noop booktitle CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 99th Edition (Internet Version 2018) \ ( publisher CRC Press/Taylor & Francis ,\ address Boca Raton, FL ) NoStop

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.