Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 71 references

The Distribution of Dense Cores near HII Regions

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mature HII regions sit at the centers of dense-core clusters whose volume density falls as distance cubed.

desk verdict A novel stacking of 53 HII regions shows a projected core profile and boundary excess that are robust, but the r^-3 volume-density interpretation rests on an untested spherical-symmetry assumption and should be presented as a model, not a measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05622 v1 pith:Z5V4Y77W submitted 2019-08-15 astro-ph.GA

George Bobotsis , Michel Fich This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HIIregionsdensecoresSCUBA-2submillimeterdustemissioncollectandcollapsestarformationefficiencystellarfeedbackradialdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that each mature HII region is at or near the center of an extended cluster of dense cores, and that the cluster extends far beyond the ionized gas. Stacking SCUBA-2 450 and 850 micron images of 53 HII regions yields a projected core count that falls as a power law, which the paper converts into a volume density falling as $r^{-3}$. It also finds an excess of cores just outside the HII region boundary and a near-empty interior. A sympathetic reader would care because this would make the boundary excess a general signature of collect-and-collapse triggering rather than a curiosity of a few shell-like regions, and because the same data argue against significant heating of cores by the HII regions or their OB stars.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the stacked, radius-scaled separation histogram. Each core's distance from its nearest HII region is divided by that region's radio radius to give $\Theta_{\rm scaled}$; individual systems have too few cores for a fit, but when stacked together the bins form a power law. The paper then uses Abel inversion, a standard projection-to-volume conversion, to turn the projected count per ring into a volume number density under spherical symmetry. The same histogram's departure from the power law near $\Theta=1$ supplies the boundary-excess and interior-deficit results. The scaling by radio radius is what lets heterogeneous HII regions be combined into one statistically meaningful profile.

What would settle it

Measure the radial velocities of the dense cores around a sample of these HII regions: a spherical $r^{-3}$ cluster predicts a velocity-dispersion profile that falls with radius and no preferred streaming direction, while a filamentary arrangement predicts coherent velocity gradients along the filaments.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a mature HII region is not at the edge of its parent cloud but at the center of a cluster of dense cores: stacking 315 cores from 53 HII regions and scaling separations by the radio radius gives a projected count $N = (31.6\pm 7.3)\Theta^{-1.1\pm0.2}$ for $\Theta\ge1$, which after Abel inversion corresponds to a volume density falling as $r^{-3}$. The histogram also shows an excess of cores in the annulus $1\le\Theta\le2$, with 90 counted versus $70\pm3$ expected, and this excess survives when the two obvious shell-like regions are removed. Interior to $\Theta=1$ the counts drop to near zero, consistent with dense cores being destroyed inside the ionized region. A secondary set of results concerns temperature: cloud and core temperatures do not correlate with distance to the HII region or its OB stars, clouds are hotter at low column density, and 74 percent of cores are warmer than their surrounding cloud; the paper interprets this as strong shielding from external heating and as evidence that most cores near HII regions have begun collapse. Star formation efficiencies calculated from dust-based gas masses and a Kroupa IMF are 1 to 9 percent for the seven most reliable systems.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion of the observed projected counts into an $r^{-3}$ volume density assumes the cores are distributed spherically around each HII region; the paper acknowledges that filamentary structures with adjustable lengths and core positions could also reproduce the counts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the $r^{-3}$ profile is real, mature HII regions trace the centers of dense-core clusters, so massive-star formation in these regions need not be edge-triggered; the OB star sits inside a pre-existing or surviving cluster.
  • The excess of cores just outside the ionized boundary becomes a general observational signature of collect-and-collapse triggering, applying to most HII regions and not only the few prominent shell-like objects.
  • The near-empty interior implies dense neutral cores inside mature HII regions should be rare, because cores that start there are destroyed by ionizing radiation.
  • The lack of temperature-distance correlations implies external heating by the HII region and OB stars is largely shielded by cloud outer layers, so dust-based temperatures trace internal processes more than feedback.
  • Dust-based total gas mass budgets yield star formation efficiencies of order a few percent, lower than earlier estimates that counted only the most massive clump, so feedback-boosted star formation may be less efficient than previously claimed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper does not develop: if the extended core cluster is gravitationally bound, its velocity dispersion should fall with radius; molecular-line radial velocities of cores in a few fields would distinguish this from a filamentary arrangement.
  • The self-similar scaling assumes all HII regions share the same dimensionless environment; if larger regions have already swept up more of the cluster, the stacked $\Theta$-profile may mix different evolutionary stages, and splitting by radius or age would reveal how the profile sharpens with time.
  • The filamentary alternative noted in the paper implies the $r^{-3}$ law is not uniquely determined by the projected counts; combining the SCUBA-2 counts with core velocity or shape data would settle which geometry is real.
  • If the boundary excess is a general collect-and-collapse signature, then star formation efficiency estimates that ignore the extended core population will overstate the gas reservoir's depletion; including all cores and clumps in the mass budget lowers the efficiency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper presents a stacking analysis of 315 dense cores detected in SCUBA-2 450/850 μm images around 53 galactic HII regions. The authors scale each core's separation by the radio radius of its associated HII region and construct a stacked radial count histogram, which they fit with a power law N = (31.6±7.3) Θ^(−1.1±0.2) cores per bin for Θ≥1. Interpreting the projected counts as a spherical distribution, they argue that the surface density of cores falls as r^(−2.1) and the volume density as r^(−3.1), that there is an excess of cores near the HII region boundary, and that the interior of the HII regions is largely devoid of cores. They also report no significant heating of clouds and cores by the HII regions or their OB stars, a cloud temperature–column density anti-correlation, and star formation efficiencies of 1–9% for the most reliable systems.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the result that mature HII regions sit at the centers of extended, r^(−3) core clusters would be a novel and important constraint on feedback and star formation triggering, and the boundary excess would support collect-and-collapse as a general mechanism rather than a rare phenomenon. The paper's main strength is its large, homogeneous sample of 53 HII regions and 315 cores, which allows a stacking approach that case-by-case analyses cannot provide. The power-law count distribution is shown to be robust to binning choices, and the authors are transparent about many of the assumptions underlying their conversions, including the spherical-symmetry assumption and the alternative filamentary interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2 and §4] The conversion of the projected count histogram to a volume density profile via Abel inversion assumes that the three-dimensional distribution of cores is spherically symmetric about each HII region. The paper's own Section 4 acknowledges that "by using more complex filamentary structures, such as a distribution of the lengths of the filaments and/or a non-uniform distribution of the dense cores along the filaments, it is possible to fit these number counts" and that "with this level of freedom to choose parameters one could fit almost any number count distribution." Therefore the projected data alone do not uniquely determine a spherical geometry; the r^(−3) volume-density profile (abstract and Section 3.2) is an interpretive assumption rather than a measured result. The authors should either provide an isotropy or kinematic test (e.g., radial velocity observations, as they themselves suggest) or explicitly restate the central claim as conditional on spherical symmetry, with the filamentary alternative given equal weight in the abstract and conclusions.
  2. [§3.2] The stacking procedure divides each core's separation by the radio radius of its associated HII region, which assumes that all HII regions have self-similar core distributions. The sample, however, spans physical radii from 0.35 pc to 20.9 pc (Table 1), and the paper does not test whether the scaled profile is robust to this normalization. Without such a test—for example, splitting the sample at the median radius and comparing the stacked profiles—the fitted power-law index could partly reflect the mixing of different physical scales. The authors should demonstrate that the stacked result is insensitive to the radius distribution of the sample.
  3. [§3.2] The background/foreground contamination is estimated by fitting a toy model N = N0 π Θ^2 to the outer tail (20 ≤ Θ ≤ 25) of the same dataset used in the main analysis, under the assumption that these bins contain only background/foreground cores. This is a self-referential estimate, and although the resulting contamination of 2–6 cores is small, the paper does not demonstrate that the outer bins are uncontaminated by the extended core population described by the power-law fit. An independent estimate using control fields away from HII regions would make the claim that "the issue of background/foreground contamination [is] insignificant" more convincing.
  4. [§3.2] The significance of the boundary excess is assessed by comparing the counts in the bins 1 ≤ Θ ≤ 2 with the integral of a power law fitted to all bins Θ ≥ 1, including those same boundary bins. The paper itself notes that fitting only Θ ≥ 2 gives a lower curve and a less well-constrained index, so the quoted excess significance is optimistic because the fit absorbs some of the excess. The authors should quote the significance from a fit that excludes the boundary bins, or else correct for this circularity, when claiming "significantly more than the expected amount" in Section 3.2.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§1 and References] The citation "Sandford et al. (1982)" does not match the reference list entry "Sandford M.T., Whitaker R.W., & Klein R.I. 1984, ApJ, 282, 178"; please correct the year or the reference.
  2. [§3.4 and Abstract] The abstract states that the star formation efficiency of "the 7 HII region systems with the most reliable mass budgets ranged between 1% and 9%," while Section 3.4 and Table 2 list nine systems with SFE below 10%; please reconcile this inconsistency.
  3. [§3.3] The fitted relation N_H2 = (7.14×10^25±7.70×10^25) T^(−3.94±0.43) is given without units or a definition of the variable N_H2; the text should state that this is the average H2 column density in cm^-2 and specify the units of the prefactor.
  4. [§4 and References] The text cites "Rumble et al. (2014)" for the MCW 297 result, but the reference list contains only Rumble et al. (2015) and Rumble et al. (2016); please add the missing reference or correct the citation.
  5. [Table 1] The entry "HII Region ne (cm−3)" should read "n_e" with a subscript for clarity.
  6. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says "Two Histograms" but only one of the two panels is described in the text as excluding the shell-like HII regions; please clarify the caption to state what each panel shows.
  7. [References] In the reference list, the Kirk et al. entry incorrectly contains both "2016" and "2014" before the journal reference; please correct.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the core distribution is a direct stacked-count fit, and the r^-3 volume-density conversion is a stated geometric assumption, not a self-referential input.

full rationale

The paper's central number-count law, N = (31.6±7.3) Θ^(−1.1±0.2), is obtained by least-squares fitting the stacked, radius-scaled core histogram, and the conversion to surface density (∝Θ^−2.1) and then to volume density (∝r^−3.1) is a standard Abel-type transformation under the explicitly stated assumption of a spherical large-scale distribution. It is not an input reused as an output. The boundary 'excess' is quantified by integrating the same power-law fit and comparing it with the observed ring counts; although this is an in-sample residual rather than an out-of-sample prediction, it is not circular because the claimed excess survives when the boundary bins are excluded from the fit, as the paper reports a larger excess for a Θ≥2 fit. The background estimate N0 is fitted to the outer tail (20≤Θ≤25) of the same histogram, but it is used only to conclude that contamination is insignificant (2–6 cores out of 315), not to subtract a correction that generates the main result; the power-law index is also reported as robust to binning and minimum-Θ choices. The paper's own Section 4 admits that 'by using more complex filamentary structures, such as a distribution of the lengths of the filaments and/or a non-uniform distribution of the dense cores along the filaments, it is possible to fit these number counts,' and it recommends radial-velocity observations to distinguish spherical from filamentary geometries. That is an acknowledged underdetermination/geometric assumption, which belongs to correctness risk rather than circularity. References to Bobotsis (2018) and to Fich/Chan catalogs are data and uncertainty sources, not load-bearing circular citations. No step reduces by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on geometric and scaling assumptions of the stacked analysis, a fitted background model, and standard assumptions about dust opacity and IMF. None of these are invented entities; they are parameter choices borrowed from prior work or fitted to the outer histogram tail. The volume-density claim requires the spherical assumption, and the SFE claim requires the IMF extrapolation; both are load-bearing.

free parameters (4)
  • Background surface density N0 = 4e-4 to 1.5e-3 (scaled units)
    Fitted to the outer tail (20≤Θ≤25) of the stacked histogram to model background/foreground cores; values from Bobotsis (2018).
  • Dust opacity spectral index beta = 1.8
    Prescribed because only two submillimeter bands are available; affects all temperature and mass estimates.
  • CO(3-2) contamination correction = 10%
    Chosen from published contamination surveys; applied to 850 um fluxes.
  • Dust-to-gas mass ratio = 1:100
    Assumed for converting dust mass to gas mass; affects cloud and core masses and SFE.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The large-scale core distribution is spherically symmetric about each HII region
    Needed to convert projected surface density (r^-2) into volume density (r^-3) via Abel inversion; acknowledged as one of two extremes in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Core distributions are self-similar when distances are scaled by each HII region's radio radius
    Basis for stacking all systems into one histogram; not directly tested in the paper.
  • domain assumption The outer histogram tail (20≤Θ≤25) is dominated by a uniform background
    Toy model N = N0 π Θ^2 fitted there; contamination estimate depends on the tail being background, not extended cluster emission.
  • domain assumption The Kroupa IMF can be extrapolated from the least massive OB star down to low masses
    Used to compute stellar masses for SFE; validated only for Sh-2 254 against Chavarria et al. (2008) and Lim et al. (2015).
  • domain assumption Electron temperature 8000 K from Rudolph et al. (2006) applies to all HII regions in the sample
    Adopted average electron temperature used to derive HII region densities and masses.
  • domain assumption Ossenkopf & Henning (1994) protostellar-core opacity model applies to these clumps
    Used with fixed beta to convert dust emission into mass and temperature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Distribution of Dense Cores near HII Regions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z5V4Y77W

@misc{pith2026190805622,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Distribution of Dense Cores near HII Regions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z5V4Y77W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05622}
}
read the original abstract

An investigation of dust emission associated with a large sample of HII regions has been carried out. Stacked results from this sample suggest that each HII region is at or near the center of a cluster of dense cores, that extends far beyond the HII region, and has volume density that decreases as r^(-3). The data also shows evidence for enhanced numbers of cores near the boundary of the HII regions. At the same time, a significant decrease in the number of cores, consistent with no cores, is observed in the interior of these HII regions. Neither these HII regions, nor their associated massive OB stars were found to have a significant heating effect on their associated dusty clumps. Clouds, or the outermost layers of the clumps in which the cores are embedded, are found to exert a strong shielding effect to external heating sources. Despite this, a large portion of the identified cores was found to be warmer than their surrounding cloud and consequently may be in the initial stages of star formation. The star formation efficiency of the 7 HII region systems with the most reliable mass budgets ranged between 1% and 9%.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05622 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A collection of 4 HII regions representing the variety of SCUBA-2 condensation morphologies encountered in this work. The images consist of SCUBA-2 850µm emission overlaid with VLA 1.46 GHz contours. The contours are color-coded based on confidence level multiples (blue/cyan/green/orange/red → 1σ,2σ, 3σ, 4σ, 5σ). The yellow ”x” ticks indicate the location of identified cores. A comprehensive list of properties was m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The core unscaled radial distribution profiles of the systems presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two Histograms of core-to-HII Region, center-to-center, separation distances, scaled against the radius of each core’s associated HII region. The power-law of best-fit is displayed in red while the black￾dashed line indicates the boundary of our HII regions. The top histogram includes the entire core sample, while the bottom histogram excludes the cores from the two “shell-like” HII regions Sh-2 104 and Sh-2 305 [P… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average temperature against physical separation distance. In order of appearance, the HII Region - Cloud (Top-Left), HII Region - Core (Top-Right), nearest OB star - Cloud (Bottom-Left) and nearest OB star - Core (Bottom-Right) comparisons are displayed [PITH_FULL_IMA…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average temperature against average H2 column density for clouds (Left) and cores (Right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average cloud temperature against average embedded core temperature. A black, dashed line is used to display cloud-core temperature equivalence. 3.4. Star Formation Efficiency The dust emission measured by the SCUBA-2 instrument provides a sensitive measure of the tota…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (RDI). \\ \\ Furthermore, older (post-Str\

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    1982

  2. [2]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 440

    Akimkin V.V., Kirsanova M.S., Pavlyuchenkov Y.N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 440

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    2017, MNRAS, 469, 630

    Akimkin V.V., Kirsanova M.S., Pavlyuchenkov Y.N., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 630

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    1993, ApJ, 406, 122

    Andre P., Ward-Thompson D., & Barsony M. 1993, ApJ, 406, 122

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    2011, ApJ, 736, 11

    Bisbas G.T., Wunsch R., Whitworth P.A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 11

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    1982, A&AS, 49, 183

    Blitz L., Fich M., & Stark A.A. 1982, A&AS, 49, 183

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    2018, Galactic Molecular Dust Clumps using SCUBA-2 - Effects of HII Regions on Star Formation, UWSpace, doi:hdl.handle.net/10012/13890

    Bobotsis G. 2018, Galactic Molecular Dust Clumps using SCUBA-2 - Effects of HII Regions on Star Formation, UWSpace, doi:hdl.handle.net/10012/13890

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    2003, AJ, 126, 1861

    Bohigas J., & Tapia M. 2003, AJ, 126, 1861

    work page 2003

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    2011, A&A, 527, 23

    Brand J., Massi F., Zavagno A., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, 23

    2011

  2. [10]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 2472

    Buckle J.V., Drabek-Maunder E., Greaves J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2472

    2015

  3. [11]

    1995, AJ, 109, 2611

    Chan G., & Fich M. 1995, AJ, 109, 2611

    1995

  4. [12]

    2008, ApJ, 682, 445

    Chavarria A.L., Allen E.L., Hora L.J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 445

    2008

  5. [13]

    2008, A&A, 482, 585

    Deharveng L., Lefloch B., Kurtz S., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 585

    2008

  6. [14]

    2006, A&A, 458, 191

    Deharveng L., Lefloch B., Massi F., et al. 2006, A&A, 458, 191

    2006

  7. [15]

    2003, A&A, 408, L25

    Deharveng L., Lefloch B., Zavagno A., et al. 2003, A&A, 408, L25

    2003

  8. [16]

    2000, MNRAS, 311, 329

    Deharveng L., Pena M., Caplan J., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 329

    2000

  9. [17]

    2004, PASP, 322, 375

    Deharveng L., Zavagno A., & Caplan J. 2004, PASP, 322, 375

    2004

  10. [18]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 2534

    Dempsey J.T., Friberg P., Jenness T., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2534

    2013

  11. [19]

    2017, ApJ, 845, 14

    Dewangan L.K., Baug T., Ojha D.K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 14

    2017

  12. [20]

    2016, ApJ, 819, 21

    Dewangan L.K., Ojha D.K., Luna A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 21

    2016

  13. [21]

    2012, MNRAS, 426, 23

    Drabek E., Hatchell J., Friberg P., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 23

    2012

  14. [22]

    2017, A&A, 606, 14

    Duronea N.U., Cappa C.E., Bronfman L., et al. 2017, A&A, 606, 14

    2017

  15. [23]

    1977, ApJ, 214, 725

    Elmegreen B.G, & Lada C.J. 1977, ApJ, 214, 725

    1977

  16. [24]

    1987, A&A, 182, 313

    Felli M., Hjellming R.M., & Cesaroni R. 1987, A&A, 182, 313

    1987

  17. [25]

    1986, AJ, 92, 787

    Fich M. 1986, AJ, 92, 787

    1986

  18. [26]

    1993, ApJS, 86, 475

    Fich M. 1993, ApJS, 86, 475

    1993

  19. [27]

    & Silkey M

    Fich M. & Silkey M. 1991, ApJ, 366, 107

    1991

  20. [28]

    2015, AJ, 150, 13

    Foster T., & Brunt C.M. 2015, AJ, 150, 13

    2015

  21. [29]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 5001

    Guillard N., Emsellem E., & Renaud F. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 5001

    2018

  22. [30]

    1979, Ann

    Habing H.J., & Israel F.P. 1979, Ann. Rev. A&A, 17, 345

    1979

  23. [31]

    1997, IAU, 178, 343

    Henning T. 1997, IAU, 178, 343

    1997

  24. [32]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 2513

    Holland W.S., Bintley D., Chapin E.L., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2513

    2013

  25. [33]

    2014, Starlink Cookbook

    Holly T.S., & Currie M.J. 2014, Starlink Cookbook

    2014

  26. [34]

    2001, ApJ, 563, 853

    Juvela M., Padoan P., & Nordlund A. 2001, ApJ, 563, 853

    2001

  27. [35]

    2016, 2014, ApJ, 821, 18

    Kirk H., Johnstone D., Di Francesco J., et al. 2016, 2014, ApJ, 821, 18

    2016

  28. [36]

    2015, A&A, 584, 33

    Konyves V., Andre Ph., Men'shchikov A., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, 33

    2015

  29. [37]

    1992, A&AT, 1, 129

    Kovalenko I., & Shchekinov Y. 1992, A&AT, 1, 129

    1992

  30. [38]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    Kroupa P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  31. [39]

    1987, IAU, 1, 1

    Lada C.J. 1987, IAU, 1, 1

    1987

  32. [40]

    Lim B., Sung H., Hur H., et al. 2015, J. Kor. Astron. Soc., 48, 343

    2015

  33. [41]

    1967, ApJ, 147, 471

    Mezger P.G., & Henderson A.P. 1967, ApJ, 147, 471

    1967

  34. [42]

    2007, A&A, 467, 657

    Motoyama K., Umemoto T., & Shang H. 2007, A&A, 467, 657

    2007

  35. [43]

    2007, A&A, 533, A121

    Mucciarelli P., Preibisch T., & Zinnecker H. 2007, A&A, 533, A121

    2007

  36. [44]

    1990, BAAS, 22 , 1256

    Noh H., Vishniac E.T., & Cochran W.D. 1990, BAAS, 22 , 1256

    1990

  37. [45]

    2010, ASI, 1, 19

    Ogura K. 2010, ASI, 1, 19

    2010

  38. [46]

    1994, A&A, 291, 943

    Ossenkopf V., & Henning T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943

    1994

  39. [47]

    1973, AJ, 625, 891

    Panagia N. 1973, AJ, 625, 891

    1973

  40. [48]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 4255

    Pattle K., Ward-Thompson D., Kirk J.M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4255

    2017

  41. [49]

    2003, AJ, 125, 2531

    Reed B.C. 2003, AJ, 125, 2531

    2003

  42. [50]

    2005, ApJ, 625, 891

    Reid A.M., & Wilson C.D. 2005, ApJ, 625, 891

    2005

  43. [51]

    2006, ApJ, 644, 990

    Reid A.M., & Wilson C.D. 2006, ApJ, 644, 990

    2006

  44. [52]

    2005, A&A, 439, L23

    Ritzerveld J. 2005, A&A, 439, L23

    2005

  45. [53]

    2006, ApAJ, 162, 346

    Rudolph A.L., Fich M., Gwendolyn B.R., et al. 2006, ApAJ, 162, 346

    2006

  46. [54]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 1551

    Rumble D., Hatchell J., Gutermuth R.A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1551

    2015

  47. [55]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 4150

    Rumble D., Hatchell J., Pattle K., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4150

    2016

  48. [56]

    2007, A&A, 470, 161

    Russeil D., Adami C., & Georgelin Y.M. 2007, A&A, 470, 161

    2007

  49. [57]

    2015, A&A, 581, 14

    Samal M.R., Ojha D.K., Jose J., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, 14

    2015

  50. [58]

    2014, A&A, 566, 22

    Samal M.R., Zavagno A., Deharveng L., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, 22

    2014

  51. [59]

    1984, ApJ, 282, 178

    Sandford M.T., Whitaker R.W., & Klein R.I. 1984, ApJ, 282, 178

    1984

  52. [60]

    1979, ARA&A, 17, 73

    Savage B.D., & Mathis J.S. 1979, ARA&A, 17, 73

    1979

  53. [61]

    1959, ApJS, vol

    Sharpless S. 1959, ApJS, vol. 4, 257

    1959

  54. [62]

    2011, AJ, 142, 15

    Shreenilayam G., & Fich M. 2011, AJ, 142, 15

    2011

  55. [63]

    2014, AJ, 147, 40, 16

    Sreenilayam G., Fich M., Ade P., et al. 2014, AJ, 147, 40, 16

    2014

  56. [64]

    2003, ApJ, 599, 1333

    Sternberg A., Hoffmann T.L., & Pauldrach A.W.A. 2003, ApJ, 599, 1333

    2003

  57. [65]

    & Smirnov-Pinchukov G.V

    Topchieva A.P., Akimkin V.V. & Smirnov-Pinchukov G.V. 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, in press https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11077

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    2018, A.Rep., 62, 764

    Topchieva, A.P., Kirsanova, M.S., & Sobolev, A.M. 2018, A.Rep., 62, 764

    2018

  59. [67]

    1989, PASP, 101, 229

    Wilking B.A. 1989, PASP, 101, 229

    1989

  60. [68]

    2014, A&A, 14, 47

    Xu J.-L., Wang J.-J., Ning C.-C., et al. 2014, A&A, 14, 47

    2014

  61. [69]

    2017, AJ, 849, 12

    Xu J.-L., Xu Y., Yu N., et al. 2017, AJ, 849, 12

    2017

  62. [70]

    2005, IAU, 227, 346

    Zavagno A., Deharveng L., Brand J., et al. 2005, IAU, 227, 346

    2005

  63. [71]

    2007, A&A, 472, 835

    Zavagno A., Pomares M., Deharveng L., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, 835

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.