Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Astrophysics and cosmology with a decihertz gravitational-wave detector: TianGO

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A decihertz space detector paired with ground observatories would localize merging compact binaries about fifty times better, enabling standard-siren cosmology and day-ahead multi-messenger warnings.

desk verdict A credible, clearly-scoped decihertz science case whose headline localization numbers rest on an unpublished noise curve and an acknowledged waveform approximation, so treat the quantitative claims as indicative rather than definitive. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06004 v2 pith:BVNZZB7J submitted 2019-08-16 gr-qc astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE

Kevin A. Kuns , Hang Yu , Yanbei Chen , Rana X Adhikari This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords decihertzgravitational-wavedetectorskylocalizationstandardsirensHubbleconstantbinaryneutronstarearlywarningwhitedwarfbinariesintermediate-massblackholesspace-basedinterferometer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a space-based gravitational-wave detector operating in the decihertz band, proposed here under the name TianGO, would transform how compact binary mergers are localized. Placed in an Earth-trailing or L2 orbit, TianGO forms a very long baseline with ground-based detectors; the paper computes that the combined network localizes sources about fifty times better than the ground network alone. That gain is the lever for the paper's main science cases: host-galaxy identification for standard-siren measurements of the Hubble constant, and early warning of neutron-star mergers days before they merge. The same detector is argued to resolve Galactic white-dwarf binaries and their tides, reach intermediate-mass black holes at high redshift, measure black-hole spins and eccentricities, and detect third-body Doppler modulation.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the long Earth-space baseline formed by TianGO's orbit, combined with the frequency-dependent Doppler phase and time-dependent antenna pattern that the orbit imprints on the gravitational-wave signal. The paper models the signal with merger-ringdown waveforms and adds the space-detector response following a standard space-detector frequency-domain formalism, then uses the Fisher information matrix of the combined network to forecast parameter errors. For the white-dwarf tidal case the machinery is a phase model in which the dynamical tide adds an energy-loss rate $\dot{E}_{\rm tide}/\dot{E}_{\rm pp}\propto f^{4/3}$, producing an excess frequency chirp that constrains the summed moment of inertia; for eccentric and tertiary systems the paper uses harmonic decomposition and a Doppler phase-modulation formula.

What would settle it

Simulate a binary neutron star signal with the full time-domain Doppler phase and time-dependent antenna pattern of the proposed orbit, inject it into a TianGO-plus-ground network, and recover parameters with full Bayesian inference; if the recovered sky areas are not roughly fifty times smaller than the ground-only network's, or if a $1.4+1.35\,M_\odot$ binary at 50 Mpc is not localized to a few $10^{-3}$ square degrees days before merger, the central localization claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is geometric: the localization power of the proposed network comes less from TianGO's sensitivity than from the length of the baseline it adds. With an Earth-space light-travel baseline between 5 and 170 seconds, coherently combining TianGO with the ground detectors shrinks the sky-area uncertainty by a factor of roughly 50, and the orbital motion of the detector breaks the distance-inclination degeneracy that limits ground-only measurements. On the paper's numbers this localizes a typical binary black hole at 600 Mpc to about $1.9\times10^{-4}$ square degrees and a binary neutron star at 50 Mpc to about $1.3\times10^{-5}$ square degrees in the best configurations, and lets the best face-on sources be matched to a single galaxy out to $z\sim0.5$. Cosmography, early-warning multi-messenger observations, and the smaller science cases all follow from these localization and distance accuracies.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative localization, early-warning, and cosmology numbers assume the nominal TianGO sensitivity curve and a waveform model whose Doppler-phase correction the authors estimate becomes of order one near 10 Hz, exactly where TianGO is most sensitive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A combined TianGO-ground network would localize a typical binary black hole at 600 Mpc to roughly $1.9\times10^{-4}$ square degrees (median), about fifty times smaller than the ground network alone.
  • TianGO alone would localize most binary neutron stars to a few $10^{-3}$ square degrees about ten days before merger, providing a target for electromagnetic follow-up before the event.
  • The best face-on binary black holes could be matched to a single galaxy out to $z\sim0.5$, making gravitational-wave standard sirens practical for measuring the Hubble constant.
  • White-dwarf binary observations would separately constrain super- and sub-Chandrasekhar merger rates, testing double-degenerate Type Ia supernova progenitors.
  • An assumed intermediate-mass-ratio inspiral rate of about one per cubic gigaparsec per year would yield nearly 1000 detections in five years, mapping the growth of intermediate-mass black holes or ruling out a light-seed channel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fiftyfold localization gain is a network-geometry effect, so a comparable gain should hold for any decihertz space mission with a similar Earth-space baseline; TianGO's particular orbit, while convenient, is not essential to the argument.
  • The day-ahead neutron-star localizations imply a concrete search strategy for pre-merger electromagnetic emission, such as precursor flares, crust shattering, and magnetospheric radio bursts, that the paper motivates but leaves to future work.
  • If the white-dwarf tidal measurements reach the claimed precision, a handful of detections could calibrate a mass-moment-of-inertia relation for white dwarfs, turning a nuisance tidal effect into a probe of degenerate-matter physics.
  • Before mission commitment, the localization forecasts should be rechecked with full time-domain waveforms because the paper's own estimate puts the neglected Doppler corrections at order one near 10 Hz.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents the astrophysical and cosmological science case for TianGO, a proposed space-based gravitational-wave detector in the decihertz band (0.01–10 Hz). The central quantitative claims are that combining TianGO with a five-detector Voyager-class ground network improves sky localization by a factor of about 50 over the ground network alone, enabling localization of binary black holes to roughly 1e-4 deg^2, binary neutron stars to roughly 1e-5 deg^2, and the best face-on sources to a single galaxy out to z~0.5; that TianGO alone can provide early warning of binary neutron star mergers days to weeks before merger; and that TianGO can address a broad set of astrophysical questions including the Hubble tension through standard sirens, type Ia supernova progenitors via white dwarf binaries, intermediate-mass black holes, black hole spins and eccentricities, and tertiary masses around merging binaries. The projections are obtained with Fisher-matrix parameter estimation using phenomenological waveforms (IMRPhenomD, and IMRPhenomPv2 for precession) together with the LISA-style treatment of orbital motion from Ref. [142], applied to the quoted TianGO sensitivity curve.

Significance. If the quantitative projections are robust, the paper makes a strong case for a decihertz mission as a complement to LISA and ground-based detectors. Its strengths are that the calculations are internally consistent forward-modeling forecasts with clearly stated assumptions, the waveform and astrophysical inputs are drawn from published models in most places, and the paper identifies several distinctive science goals that are not accessible to LISA or current ground detectors, notably localization by long-baseline triangulation, early warning for neutron-star mergers, and direct measurement of white-dwarf tidal interactions. The authors are also appropriately transparent about some limitations, including the approximate Doppler phase treatment and the reliance on an in-preparation sensitivity curve. The significance is nonetheless conditional: the headline localization and standard-siren claims depend on two external inputs that are not yet published or fully validated, and the size of the resulting systematic effect on the quoted numbers has not been quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, after Eq. (A12); Sections II and III] The waveform used for all localization results retains only the leading-order Doppler phase phi_D of Eq. (A12), and the paper itself states immediately afterward that higher-order corrections are of order |phi_D|(v/c) ~ 0.3(f/1 Hz), becoming O(1) at frequencies of a few Hz. Because TianGO is most sensitive in the decihertz band and extends to 10 Hz, and because sky localization is extracted from derivatives of the phase with respect to alpha and delta, this neglected correction can bias or inflate the Fisher localization precision. The statement that future work can address the correction if necessary is not sufficient, since the factor-of-50 angular-resolution improvement and the early-warning localization numbers in Table II and Figure 4 are load-bearing claims. Please add a quantitative assessment, for example by including the next-order Doppler terms, using a time-domain waveform with the full orbital motion, or checking one representative source configuration, and show that the reported Delta-Omega values and the H0/standard-siren conclusions are stable at the tens-of-percent level.
  2. [Fig. 1 and all numerical projections] The TianGO strain sensitivity curve is taken from Ref. [15], which is listed as 'In preparation.' Every SNR, angular uncertainty, distance uncertainty, detection-rate estimate, and spin/eccentricity projection in this paper scales directly with that unpublished curve, so the quantitative results cannot currently be independently checked or reproduced by readers. Please include the analytic fit or the numerical power spectral density as supplementary material, or explicitly identify a publicly available sensitivity model that the quoted curve represents.
  3. [Section II, Table II] The unqualified claim that the combined TianGO-ground network increases angular resolution by a factor of about 50 is not uniform across source types. For the black-hole case with HLVKA + 5-degree TianGO, the median ratio is indeed about 45 (8.5e-3 to 1.9e-4 deg^2), but for the neutron-star case the same rows imply a ratio of about 430 (5.6e-3 to 1.3e-5 deg^2). Since Section III uses the neutron-star localization to argue for early warning, and the abstract and introduction present the factor-of-50 as a general statement, please qualify the claim to the specific BBH configuration or state the source-dependent range explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, second paragraph] There is a typo: 'probes fo many astrophysical signals' should read 'probes of many astrophysical signals.'
  2. [Figure 4 caption and text in Section III] The text says two representative distances are DL = 50 Mpc and DL = 100 Mpc, whereas the figure legend shows DL = 50 Mpc and DL = 200 Mpc. Please make the distance values consistent.
  3. [Section V, around Eq. (5)] The sentence containing Eq. (5) appears to have a stray '3' before the equation; this is likely a footnote marker that has been typeset incorrectly.
  4. [Section X, first paragraph of Conclusion] There is a typo: 'evoloution' should read 'evolution.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: forward-modeling study computes Fisher-matrix science projections from assumed TianGO sensitivity and external waveform models.

full rationale

This paper is a forward-modeling science case: it assumes a TianGO sensitivity curve and orbit, adopts published waveform models (IMRPhenomD, IMRPhenomPv2, and the Cutler 1998 LISA treatment for Doppler phase and antenna-pattern modulation), and computes Fisher-matrix parameter-estimation uncertainties. None of the headline outputs—the ~50x angular-resolution improvement, early-warning localizations, spin or eccentricity measurements—are fitted back into the inputs, and no equation equates a derived prediction to an assumed parameter by construction. The main self-citation is Ref. [15], the in-preparation TianGO design whose noise curve sets the detector sensitivity; this is an input assumption rather than a circular derivation, since the science claims do not define or calibrate that noise curve. The acknowledged limitation after Eq. (A12)—that higher-order Doppler-phase corrections become O(1) near 10 Hz—is a correctness and robustness caveat, not circularity: the approximation is stated as an input to the calculation, and the calculation does not presuppose the accuracy of the headline localization factors. The paper is therefore self-contained as a conditional projection: given the stated detector design and waveform models, the quantitative results follow from standard Fisher-matrix algebra. No circular step meeting the evidence bar can be quoted.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a forward-modeling study: given an assumed detector noise curve and standard waveform and astrophysics models, it computes what could be measured. None of the claimed outputs are fitted back into the model inputs. The principal external input is the TianGO sensitivity curve, which is the authors' own unpublished design, and the principal methodological simplifications are the Fisher-matrix approximation and the waveform model fidelity at high frequencies.

free parameters (2)
  • Galaxy number density for volume-to-host conversion = 0.01 galaxies/Mpc^3
    Used in Section II to convert comoving volume uncertainty Delta V_C into expected number of candidate host galaxies; chosen as a notional value, not measured, and directly affects the claim that the network can localize to a single galaxy out to z~0.5.
  • IMRI merger rate = 1 per Gpc^3 per year
    Adopted from Ref [16] in Section IV to project roughly 1000 IMRI detections over 5 years; the detection-count projection scales linearly with this assumed rate.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper TianGO strain sensitivity curve as shown in Fig. 1 (from Ref [15], 'In preparation').
    Every science projection in Sections II-IX uses this assumed noise curve; the reference is not publicly available, so the input cannot be independently checked.
  • standard math Fisher information matrix with stationary Gaussian noise gives reliable parameter uncertainties for these signals.
    Appendix A uses the Fisher formalism, noting the usual large-SNR caveat; the paper argues that including merger and ringdown avoids abrupt waveform termination, but does not validate against full posterior sampling.
  • domain assumption Frequency-domain waveform models IMRPhenomD and IMRPhenomPv2 capture the relevant signal for TianGO.
    Used in Appendix A and Section VII for BBH parameter estimation; these models are calibrated for ground-based detectors and may be less accurate at long inspiral durations.
  • domain assumption Dynamical tides keep the spins of white dwarfs nearly synchronized with the orbit, Eq. (5).
    Section VI's tidal dephasing and moment-of-inertia measurement predictions rest on the tidal synchronization and dissipation model from Refs [29-31, 95-97].
  • domain assumption White dwarf mass-radius and moment-of-inertia relations, Eqs. (3) and (7).
    Used in Sections V and VI to map observed frequencies and tidal dephasing to total masses and component masses; deviations in these relations would alter the inferred constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Astrophysics and cosmology with a decihertz gravitational-wave detector: TianGO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVNZZB7J

@misc{pith2026190806004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Astrophysics and cosmology with a decihertz gravitational-wave detector: TianGO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVNZZB7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06004}
}
read the original abstract

We present the astrophysical science case for a space-based, decihertz gravitational-wave (GW) detector. We particularly highlight an ability to infer a source's sky location, both when combined with a network of ground-based detectors to form a long triangulation baseline, and by itself for the early warning of merger events. Such an accurate location measurement is the key for using GW signals as standard sirens for constraining the Hubble constant. This kind of detector also opens up the possibility to test type Ia supernovae progenitor hypotheses by constraining the merger rates of white dwarf binaries with both super- and sub-Chandrasekhar masses separately. We will discuss other scientific outcomes that can be delivered, including the constraint of structure formation in the early Universe, the search for intermediate-mass black holes, the precise determination of black hole spins, the probe of binary systems' orbital eccentricity evolution, and the detection of tertiary masses around merging binaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06004 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Horizons for equal mass compact binaries oriented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Sky localization, luminosity distance, and volume lo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Angular uncertainty as determined by TianGO alone [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Upper panel: the GW frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In the plot we show the increase in system’s GW frequency over an observation period of 5 years with (the orange trace) and without (the blue trace) the tidal effect 3 Here we ignore the rotational modification of the WD structure, as the Coriolis force only mildly mod…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Uncertainties in inferring the mass ratio, ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Similar to Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Evolution of the characteristic strain amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Fractional uncertainties in the linear velocity (top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inspiral tests of general relativity and waveform geometry

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The power of ppE-style GR tests comes from waveform geometry: GR parameter biases absorb most of any smooth phase deviation, and SVD finds the few orthogonal directions that remain.

  2. The Missing Link in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy: Discoveries waiting in the decihertz range

    gr-qc 2019-08 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A Decihertz Observatory would fill the gap between LISA and ground detectors, enabling early-warning multimessenger astronomy and measurements of intermediate-mass black hole populations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [15]

    NANOGrav Collaboration, The NANOGrav 11 Year Data Set: Pulsar-timing Constraints on the Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, ApJ 859, 47 (2018), arXiv:1801.02617 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [142]

    Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher informa- tion matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys

    M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher informa- tion matrix in the assessment of gravitational-wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D 77, 042001 (2008)

    2008

  3. [1]

    [142] necessary to complete TianGO’s waveform Eq

    Explicit expressions for time-dependent waveforms We collect here the important expressions from Ref. [142] necessary to complete TianGO’s waveform Eq. (A13). The post-Newtonian expansion of Ref. [142] is done in the parameter x = (G c3πM⊙ )2/3Mc µ [(Mc M⊙ )( f 1 Hz )]2/3 (A14) where µ =Mc [q/(1 +q)2]2/5 is the reduced mass. The time as a function of freq...

  4. [2]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Advanced LIGO, Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [3]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Allemandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P. Astone, and et al., Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interfero- metric gravitational wave detector, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [4]

    Akutsu, M

    T. Akutsu, M. Ando, K. Arai, Y. Arai, S. Araki, A. Araya, N. Aritomi, H. Asada, and et al., KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1811.08079 (2018), arXiv:1811.08079 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [5]

    The LIGO Scientific collaboration, Gravitational wave astronomy with LIGO and similar detectors in the next decade, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1904.03187 (2019), arXiv:1904.03187 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [6]

    R. X. Adhikari, N. Smith, A. Brooks, L. Barsotti, B. Shapiro, B. Lantz, D. McClelland, E. K. Gustafson, D. V. Martynov, V. Mitrofanov, D. Coyne, K. Arai, C. Torrie, and C. Wipf, LIGO Voyager Upgrade: De- sign Concept , Tech. Rep. LIGO-T1400226 (2018)

    2018

Show all 148 references
  1. [7]

    S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, A. Freise, J. Franc, N. Mor- gado, R. Flaminio, and R. DeSalvo, A xylophone config- uration for a third-generation gravitational wave detec- tor, Classical and Quantum Gravity 27, 015003 (2010), arXiv:0906.2655 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Sathyaprakash, M

    B. Sathyaprakash, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Ajith, 16 B. Allen, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, S. Aoudia, K. Arun, P. Astone, and et al., Scientific objectives of Einstein Telescope, Classical and Quantum Gravity 29, 124013 (2012), arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [9]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Ad- hikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, and et al., Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detec- tors, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1...

    2017 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, and et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1702.00786 (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Luo, L.-S

    J. Luo, L.-S. Chen, H.-Z. Duan, Y.-G. Gong, S. Hu, J. Ji, Q. Liu, J. Mei, and et al., TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 035010 (2016), arXiv:1512.02076 [astro- ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [12]

    H.-T. Wang, Z. Jiang, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, S.-J. Huang, Y.-F. Wang, W.-F. Feng, Y. Wang, and et al., Science with TianQin: Preliminary Results on Massive Black Hole Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1902.04423 (2019), arXiv:1902.04423 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [13]

    R. M. Shannon, V. Ravi, L. T. Lentati, P. D. Lasky, G. Hobbs, M. Kerr, R. N. Manchester, W. A. Coles, Y. Levin, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, S. Burke-Spolaor, S. Dai, M. J. Keith, S. Os lowski, D. J. Reardon, W. van Straten, L. Toomey, J. B. Wang, L. Wen, J. S. B. Wyithe, and X. ...

    2015 arXiv

  8. [14]

    J. P. W. Verbiest, L. Lentati, G. Hobbs, R. van Haasteren, P. B. Demorest, G. H. Janssen, J.-B. Wang, G. Desvignes, and et al., The International Pulsar Tim- ing Array: First data release, MNRAS 458, 1267 (2016), arXiv:1602.03640 [astro-ph.IM]

    2016 arXiv

  9. [16]

    K. A. Kuns, R. X. Adhikari, Y. Chen, H. Yu, and G. Lovelace, A quantum-enhanced space interferometer for cosmography, In preparation (2019)

    2019

  10. [17]

    Mandel, A

    I. Mandel, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, The astrophysi- cal science case for a decihertz gravitational-wave detec- tor, Classical and Quantum Gravity 35, 054004 (2018), arXiv:1710.11187 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    S. Sato, S. Kawamura, M. Ando, T. Nakamura, K. Tsubono, A. Araya, I. Funaki, K. Ioka, and et al., The status of DECIGO, in Journal of Physics Confer- ence Series , Vol. 840 (2017) p. 012010

    2017

  12. [19]

    G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, Laser interferometry for the Big Bang Observer, Classical and Quantum Gravity 23, 4887 (2006)

    2006

  13. [20]

    Schutz Bernard F., Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations, Nature 323, 310 (1986)

    1986

  14. [21]

    B. S. Sathyaprakash, B. F. Schutz, and C. V. D. Broeck, Cosmography with the einstein telescope, Classical and Quantum Gravity 27, 215006 (2010)

    2010

  15. [22]

    Kyutoku and N

    K. Kyutoku and N. Seto, Gravitational-wave cosmogra- phy with lisa and the hubble tension, Phys. Rev. D 95, 083525 (2017)

    2017

  16. [23]

    Burns, A

    E. Burns, A. Tohuvavohu, J. Buckley, T. D. Canton, B. Cenko, J. Conklin, F. D’ammand o, D. Eichler, C. Fryer, A. van der Horst, M. Kamionkowski, M. Kasli- wal, R. Margutti, B. Metzger, K. Murase, S. Nissanke, D. Radice, J. Tomsick, C. Wilson-Hodge, and B. Zhang, A Summary of M...

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    S. A. Hughes, Untangling the merger history of mas- sive black holes with LISA, MNRAS 331, 805 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108483 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Sesana, M

    A. Sesana, M. Volonteri, and F. Haardt, The imprint of massive black hole formation models on the LISA data stream, MNRAS 377, 1711 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0701556 [astro-ph]

    2007

  19. [26]

    Sesana, J

    A. Sesana, J. Gair, I. Mandel, and A. Vecchio, Observ- ing Gravitational Waves from the First Generation of Black Holes, ApJ 698, L129 (2009), arXiv:0903.4177 [astro-ph.CO]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [27]

    T. R. Marsh, Double white dwarfs and LISA, Classical and Quantum Gravity 28, 094019 (2011), arXiv:1101.4970 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Maoz and F

    D. Maoz and F. Mannucci, Type-Ia Supernova Rates and the Progenitor Problem: A Review, PASA 29, 447 (2012), arXiv:1111.4492 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [29]

    D. Maoz, F. Mannucci, and G. Nelemans, Observa- tional Clues to the Progenitors of Type Ia Supernovae, ARA&A 52, 107 (2014), arXiv:1312.0628 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Fuller and D

    J. Fuller and D. Lai, Dynamical tides in compact white dwarf binaries: tidal synchronization and dissipa- tion, MNRAS 421, 426 (2012), arXiv:1108.4910 [astro- ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Burkart, E

    J. Burkart, E. Quataert, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Tidal resonance locks in inspiraling white dwarf bina- ries, MNRAS 433, 332 (2013), arXiv:1211.1393 [astro- ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [32]

    H. Yu, N. N. Weinberg, and J. Fuller, Nonlinear dy- namical tides in white dwarf binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2005.03058 (2020), arXiv:2005.03058 [astro- ph.SR]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [33]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Zevin, C. Pankow, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Illuminating Black Hole Binary Formation Channels with Spins in Advanced LIGO, ApJ 832, L2 (2016), arXiv:1609.05916 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Fuller and L

    J. Fuller and L. Ma, Most Black Holes Are Born Very Slowly Rotating, ApJ 881, L1 (2019), arXiv:1907.03714 [astro-ph.SR]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Barack and C

    L. Barack and C. Cutler, LISA capture sources: Ap- proximate waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, and pa- rameter estimation accuracy, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082005 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310125 [gr-qc]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Chen and P

    X. Chen and P. Amaro-Seoane, Revealing the Formation of Stellar-mass Black Hole Binaries: The Need for Deci- Hertz Gravitational-wave Observatories, ApJ 842, L2 (2017), arXiv:1702.08479 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, A Direct Probe of Mass Density near Inspiraling Binary Black Holes, ApJ 878, 75 (2019), arXiv:1805.05335 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [38]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collabora- tion), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary 17 black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  32. [39]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, and D. Scolnic, Large magellanic cloud cepheid standards provide a 1% foundation for the determination of the hubble constant and stronger evidence for physics be- yond ΛCDM, The Astrophysical Journal876, 85 (2019)

    2019

  33. [40]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, and et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, A&A 594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchi- atti, A. Diercks, P. M. Garnavich, R. L. Gilliland, C. J. Hogan, S. Jha, R. P. Kirshner, and et al., Observa- tional Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant, AJ 116, 1009 (1998), a...

    1998 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop, P. Nugent, P. G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goo- bar, D. E. Groom, I. M. Hook, A. G. Kim, M. Y. Kim, J. C. Lee, N. J. Nunes, R. Pain, C. R. Pennypacker, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R. S. Ellis, M. Irwin, R. G. McMahon, P. ...

    1999

  36. [43]

    D. E. Holz and S. A. Hughes, Using gravitational-wave standard sirens, The Astrophysical Journal 629, 15 (2005)

    2005

  37. [44]

    Cutler and D

    C. Cutler and D. E. Holz, Ultrahigh precision cosmol- ogy from gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104009 (2009)

    2009

  38. [45]

    Gupta, D

    A. Gupta, D. Fox, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and B. F. Schutz, Calibrating the cosmic distance ladder us- ing gravitational-wave observations, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1907.09897 (2019), arXiv:1907.09897 [astro- ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [46]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [47]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acer- nese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, and et al., A gravitational-wave standard siren measure- ment of the Hubble constant, Nature 551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [48]

    B. F. Schutz, Networks of gravitational wave detectors and three figures of merit, Classical and Quantum Grav- ity 28, 125023 (2011)

    2011

  42. [49]

    Del Pozzo, Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second gener- ation interferometers, Phys

    W. Del Pozzo, Inference of cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: Applications to second gener- ation interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043011 (2012)

    2012

  43. [50]

    C. L. MacLeod and C. J. Hogan, Precision of hubble constant derived using black hole binary absolute dis- tances and statistical redshift information, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043512 (2008)

    2008

  44. [51]

    R. Nair, S. Bose, and T. D. Saini, Measuring the hubble constant: Gravitational wave observations meet galaxy clustering, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023502 (2018)

    2018

  45. [52]

    Arabsalmani, V

    M. Arabsalmani, V. Sahni, and T. D. Saini, Recon- structing the properties of dark energy using standard sirens, Phys. Rev. D 87, 083001 (2013)

    2013

  46. [53]

    Fishbach, R

    M. Fishbach, R. Gray, I. M. Hernandez, H. Qi, A. Sur, F. Acernese, L. Aiello, A. Allocca, and et al., A stan- dard siren measurement of the hubble constant from GW170817 without the electromagnetic counterpart, The Astrophysical Journal 871, L13 (2019)

    2019

  47. [54]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, C. Affeldt, and et al., A gravitational-wave mea- surement of the Hubble constant following the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo, arXiv e- prints (201...

    2019 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Goldstein, P

    A. Goldstein, P. Veres, E. Burns, M. S. Briggs, R. Ham- burg, D. Kocevski, C. A. Wilson-Hodge, R. D. Preece, and et al., An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A, ApJ 848, L14 (2017), arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  49. [56]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Ad- hikari, V. B. Adya, and et al., Multi-messenger Obser- vations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Fern´ andez and B

    R. Fern´ andez and B. D. Metzger, Electromagnetic Sig- natures of Neutron Star Mergers in the Advanced LIGO Era, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 23 (2016), arXiv:1512.05435 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Tsang, J

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro, and R. Bondarescu, Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011102 (2012), arXiv:1110.0467 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Troja, S

    E. Troja, S. Rosswog, and N. Gehrels, Precursors of Short Gamma-ray Bursts, ApJ 723, 1711 (2010), arXiv:1009.1385 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  53. [60]

    B. D. Metzger and C. Zivancev, Pair fireball precur- sors of neutron star mergers, MNRAS 461, 4435 (2016), arXiv:1605.01060 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [61]

    B. M. S. Hansen and M. Lyutikov, Radio and X-ray signatures of merging neutron stars, MNRAS 322, 695 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0003218 [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Thornton, B

    D. Thornton, B. Stappers, M. Bailes, B. Barsdell, S. Bates, N. D. R. Bhat, M. Burgay, S. Burke-Spolaor, D. J. Champion, P. Coster, N. D’Amico, A. Jameson, S. Johnston, M. Keith, M. Kramer, L. Levin, S. Milia, C. Ng, A. Possenti, and W. van Straten, A Population of Fast Radio B...

    2013 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Beifiori, S

    A. Beifiori, S. Courteau, E. M. Corsini, and Y. Zhu, On the correlations between galaxy properties and su- permassive black hole mass, MNRAS 419, 2497 (2012), arXiv:1109.6265 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Kormendy and L

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, ARA&A 51, 511 (2013), arXiv:1304.7762

    2013 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Volonteri, Formation of supermassive black holes, A&A Rev

    M. Volonteri, Formation of supermassive black holes, A&A Rev. 18, 279 (2010), arXiv:1003.4404 [astro- ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Madau and M

    P. Madau and M. J. Rees, Massive Black Holes as Popu- lation III Remnants, ApJ 551, L27 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0101223 [astro-ph]

    2001

  60. [67]

    Volonteri, P

    M. Volonteri, P. Madau, and F. Haardt, The Forma- tion of Galaxy Stellar Cores by the Hierarchical Merg- ing of Supermassive Black Holes, ApJ 593, 661 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0304389 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  61. [68]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasi-Normal 18 Modes of Stars and Black Holes, Living Reviews in Rel- ativity 2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058 [gr-qc]

    1999 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Rydberg, E

    C.-E. Rydberg, E. Zackrisson, P. Lundqvist, and P. Scott, Detection of isolated Population III stars with the James Webb Space Telescope, MNRAS 429, 3658 (2013), arXiv:1206.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Koliopanos, Intermediate Mass Black Holes: A Re- view, in Proceedings of the XII Multifrequency Be- haviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources Workshop

    F. Koliopanos, Intermediate Mass Black Holes: A Re- view, in Proceedings of the XII Multifrequency Be- haviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources Workshop. 12- 17 June (2017) p. 51, arXiv:1801.01095 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Mezcua, Observational evidence for intermediate- mass black holes, International Journal of Modern Physics D 26, 1730021 (2017), arXiv:1705.09667 [astro- ph.GA]

    M. Mezcua, Observational evidence for intermediate- mass black holes, International Journal of Modern Physics D 26, 1730021 (2017), arXiv:1705.09667 [astro- ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [72]

    A. V. Filippenko and L. C. Ho, A Low-Mass Central Black Hole in the Bulgeless Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 4395, ApJ 588, L13 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0303429 [astro- ph]

    2003 arXiv

  66. [73]

    S. A. Farrell, N. A. Webb, D. Barret, O. Godet, and J. M. Rodrigues, An intermediate-mass black hole of over 500 solar masses in the galaxy ESO243-49, Nature 460, 73 (2009), arXiv:1001.0567 [astro-ph.HE]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Kızıltan, H

    B. Kızıltan, H. Baumgardt, and A. Loeb, An intermediate-mass black hole in the centre of the glob- ular cluster 47 Tucanae, Nature 542, 203 (2017), arXiv:1702.02149 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Haster, Z

    C.-J. Haster, Z. Wang, C. P. L. Berry, S. Stevenson, J. Veitch, and I. Mandel, Inference on gravitational waves from coalescences of stellar-mass compact objects and intermediate-mass black holes, MNRAS 457, 4499 (2016), arXiv:1511.01431 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Haster, F

    C.-J. Haster, F. Antonini, V. Kalogera, and I. Mand el, N-Body Dynamics of Intermediate Mass-ratio Inspirals in Star Clusters, ApJ 832, 192 (2016), arXiv:1606.07097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [77]

    S. A. Hughes, (Sort of) Testing relativity with extreme mass ratio inspirals, in Laser Interferometer Space An- tenna: 6th International LISA Symposium , American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 873, edited by S. M. Merkovitz and J. C. Livas (2006) pp. 233–240, gr...

    2006 arXiv

  71. [78]

    D. A. Howell, Type Ia supernovae as stellar endpoints and cosmological tools, Nature Communications 2, 350 (2011), arXiv:1011.0441 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [79]

    P. P. Eggleton, Approximations to the radii of Roche lobes, ApJ 268, 368 (1983)

    1983

  73. [80]

    J. R. Hurley, C. A. Tout, and O. R. Pols, Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary popula- tions, MNRAS 329, 897 (2002), astro-ph/0201220

    2002 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Toonen, G

    S. Toonen, G. Nelemans, and S. Portegies Zwart, Su- pernova Type Ia progenitors from merging double white dwarfs. Using a new population synthesis model, A&A 546, A70 (2012), arXiv:1208.6446 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [82]

    S. A. Sim, F. K. R¨ opke, W. Hillebrandt, M. Kromer, R. Pakmor, M. Fink, A. J. Ruiter, and I. R. Seitenzahl, Detonations in Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass C+O White Dwarfs, ApJ 714, L52 (2010), arXiv:1003.2917 [astro- ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  76. [83]

    M. H. van Kerkwijk, P. Chang, and S. Justham, Sub- Chandrasekhar White Dwarf Mergers as the Progen- itors of Type Ia Supernovae, ApJ 722, L157 (2010), arXiv:1006.4391 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  77. [84]

    S. E. Woosley and D. Kasen, Sub-Chandrasekhar Mass Models for Supernovae, ApJ 734, 38 (2011), arXiv:1010.5292 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Polin, P

    A. Polin, P. Nugent, and D. Kasen, Observational Pre- dictions for Sub-Chandrasekhar Mass Explosions: Fur- ther Evidence for Multiple Progenitor Systems for Type Ia Supernovae, ApJ 873, 84 (2019), arXiv:1811.07127 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [86]

    T. R. Marsh, G. Nelemans, and D. Steeghs, Mass trans- fer between double white dwarfs, MNRAS 350, 113 (2004), astro-ph/0312577

    2004 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Gokhale, X

    V. Gokhale, X. M. Peng, and J. Frank, Evolution of Close White Dwarf Binaries, ApJ 655, 1010 (2007), astro-ph/0610919

    2007 arXiv

  81. [88]

    M. Dan, S. Rosswog, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez- Ruiz, Prelude to A Double Degenerate Merger: The Onset of Mass Transfer and Its Impact on Gravitational Waves and Surface Detonations, ApJ 737, 89 (2011), arXiv:1101.5132 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Kremer, J

    K. Kremer, J. Sepinsky, and V. Kalogera, Long- term Evolution of Double White Dwarf Binaries Ac- creting through Direct Impact, ApJ 806, 76 (2015), arXiv:1502.06147 [astro-ph.SR]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Kremer, K

    K. Kremer, K. Breivik, S. L. Larson, and V. Kalogera, Accreting Double White Dwarf Binaries: Implications for LISA, ApJ 846, 95 (2017), arXiv:1707.01104 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Nelemans, AM CVn stars, in The Astrophysics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects , Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    G. Nelemans, AM CVn stars, in The Astrophysics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects , Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 330, edited by J. M. Hameury and J. P. Lasota (2005) p. 27, arXiv:astro-ph/0409676 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  85. [92]

    G. H. A. Roelofs, G. Nelemans, and P. J. Groot, The population of AM CVn stars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS 382, 685 (2007), arXiv:0709.2951

    2007 arXiv

  86. [93]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron- star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D 77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Hinderer, B

    T. Hinderer, B. D. Lackey, R. N. Lang, and J. S. Read, Tidal deformability of neutron stars with realistic equa- tions of state and their gravitational wave signatures in binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123016 (2010), arXiv:0911.3535 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  88. [95]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, and et al., GW170817: Measure- ments of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  89. [96]

    A. L. Piro, Tidal Interactions in Merging White Dwarf Binaries, ApJ 740, L53 (2011), arXiv:1108.3110 [astro- ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Fuller and D

    J. Fuller and D. Lai, Tidal Novae in Compact Binary White Dwarfs, ApJ 756, L17 (2012), arXiv:1206.0470 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  91. [98]

    A. L. Piro, Inferring the Presence of Tides in Detached White Dwarf Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1908.04896 (2019), arXiv:1908.04896 [astro-ph.SR]

    2019 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Fuller and D

    J. Fuller and D. Lai, Dynamical tides in compact white dwarf binaries: influence of rotation, MNRAS 444, 3488 (2014), arXiv:1406.2717 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Belczynski, D

    K. Belczynski, D. E. Holz, T. Bulik, and R. O’Shaughnessy, The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 19 40-100 solar mass range, Nature 534, 512 (2016), arXiv:1602.04531 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Mandel and S

    I. Mandel and S. E. de Mink, Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries, MNRAS 458, 2634 (2016), arXiv:1601.00007 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  95. [102]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, S. Chatterjee, C.-J. Haster, and F. A. Rasio, Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implica- tions for Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 051101 (2015), arXiv:1505.00792 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  96. [103]

    W. M. Farr, S. Stevenson, M. C. Miller, I. Mand el, B. Farr, and A. Vecchio, Distinguishing spin-aligned and isotropic black hole populations with gravitational waves, Nature 548, 426 (2017), arXiv:1706.01385 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Stevenson, C

    S. Stevenson, C. P. L. Berry, and I. Mandel, Hierarchical analysis of gravitational-wave measurements of binary black hole spin-orbit misalignments, MNRAS 471, 2801 (2017), arXiv:1703.06873 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [105]

    B. Farr, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, Using Spin to Understand the Formation of LIGO and Virgo’s Black Holes, ApJ 854, L9 (2018), arXiv:1709.07896 [astro- ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Liu and D

    B. Liu and D. Lai, Black Hole and Neutron Star Binary Mergers in Triple Systems: Merger Fraction and Spin-Orbit Misalignment, ApJ 863, 68 (2018), arXiv:1805.03202 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Hannam, P

    M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Boh´ e, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. P¨ urrer, Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravita- tional Waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151101 (2014), arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Schmidt, F

    P. Schmidt, F. Ohme, and M. Hannam, Towards mod- els of gravitational waveforms from generic binaries: II. Modelling precession effects with a single effective pre- cession parameter, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024043 (2015), arXiv:1408.1810 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  102. [109]

    H. Yu, D. Martynov, S. Vitale, M. Evans, D. Shoemaker, B. Barr, G. Hammond, S. Hild, J. Hough, S. Huttner, S. Rowan, B. Sorazu, L. Carbone, A. Freise, C. Mow- Lowry, K. L. Dooley, P. Fulda, H. Grote, and D. Sigg, Prospects for Detecting Gravitational Waves at 5 Hz with Ground-...

    2018 arXiv

  103. [110]

    M. C. Miller and J. M. Miller, The masses and spins of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes, Phys. Rep. 548, 1 (2015), arXiv:1408.4145 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  104. [111]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abra- ham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Ad- hikari, and et al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo...

    2018 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Zackay, T

    B. Zackay, T. Venumadhav, L. Dai, J. Roulet, and M. Zaldarriaga, Highly spinning and aligned binary black hole merger in the Advanced LIGO first observing run, Phys. Rev. D100, 023007 (2019), arXiv:1902.10331 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [113]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abra- ham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. X. Ad- hikari, and et al., Binary Black Hole Population Prop- erties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Adva...

    2018 arXiv

  107. [114]

    C. L. Rodriguez, P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Chatterjee, K. Kremer, F. A. Rasio, J. Samsing, C. S. Ye, and M. Zevin, Post-Newtonian dynamics in dense star clus- ters: Formation, masses, and merger rates of highly- eccentric black hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123005 (2018), arXiv:18...

    2018 arXiv

  108. [115]

    H. C. Spruit, Dynamo action by differential rotation in a stably stratified stellar interior, A&A 381, 923 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108207 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Heger, S

    A. Heger, S. E. Woosley, and H. C. Spruit, Presu- pernova Evolution of Differentially Rotating Massive Stars Including Magnetic Fields, ApJ 626, 350 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409422 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Y. Qin, T. Fragos, G. Meynet, J. Andrews, M. Sørensen, and H. F. Song, The spin of the second-born black hole in coalescing binary black holes, A&A 616, A28 (2018), arXiv:1802.05738 [astro-ph.SR]

    2018 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Fuller, A

    J. Fuller, A. L. Piro, and A. S. Jermyn, Slowing the spins of stellar cores, MNRAS 485, 3661 (2019), arXiv:1902.08227 [astro-ph.SR]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [119]

    S. S. Bavera, T. Fragos, Y. Qin, E. Zapartas, C. J. Neijs- sel, I. Mandel, A. Batta, S. M. Gaebel, C. Kimball, and S. Stevenson, The origin of spin in binary black holes: Predicting the distributions of the main observables of Advanced LIGO, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1906.12257 (...

    2019 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Breivik, C

    K. Breivik, C. L. Rodriguez, S. L. Larson, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Distinguishing between Formation Channels for Binary Black Holes with LISA, ApJ 830, L18 (2016), arXiv:1606.09558

    2016 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Nishizawa, E

    A. Nishizawa, E. Berti, A. Klein, and A. Sesana, eLISA eccentricity measurements as tracers of binary black hole formation, Phys. Rev. D 94, 064020 (2016), arXiv:1605.01341 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Samsing, M

    J. Samsing, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The Formation of Eccentric Compact Binary Inspi- rals and the Role of Gravitational Wave Emission in Binary-Single Stellar Encounters, ApJ 784, 71 (2014), arXiv:1308.2964 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  116. [123]

    Amaro-Seoane and X

    P. Amaro-Seoane and X. Chen, Relativistic mergers of black hole binaries have large, similar masses, low spins and are circular, MNRAS 458, 3075 (2016), arXiv:1512.04897

    2016 arXiv

  117. [124]

    Antonini, N

    F. Antonini, N. Murray, and S. Mikkola, Black Hole Triple Dynamics: A Breakdown of the Orbit Average Approximation and Implications for Gravitational Wave Detections, ApJ 781, 45 (2014), arXiv:1308.3674 [astro- ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Naoz, The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Ap- plications, ARA&A 54, 441 (2016), arXiv:1601.07175 [astro-ph.EP]

    S. Naoz, The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Ap- plications, ARA&A 54, 441 (2016), arXiv:1601.07175 [astro-ph.EP]

    2016 arXiv

  119. [126]

    B. Liu, D. Lai, and Y.-H. Wang, Black Hole and Neu- tron Star Binary Mergers in Triple Systems. II. Merger Eccentricity and Spin-Orbit Misalignment, ApJ 881, 41 (2019), arXiv:1905.00427 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [127]

    R. M. O’Leary, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Gravi- tational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei, MNRAS 395, 2127 (2009), arXiv:0807.2638. 20

    2009 arXiv

  121. [128]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational Radiation from Point Masses in a Keplerian Orbit, Physical Re- view 131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  122. [129]

    Konstantinidis, P

    S. Konstantinidis, P. Amaro-Seoane, and K. D. Kokko- tas, Investigating the retention of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters using N-body simulations, A&A 557, A135 (2013), arXiv:1108.5175 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  123. [130]

    N. W. C. Leigh, N. L¨ utzgendorf, A. M. Geller, T. J. Maccarone, C. Heinke, and A. Sesana, On the co- existence of stellar-mass and intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters, MNRAS 444, 29 (2014), arXiv:1407.4459 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014 arXiv

  124. [131]

    Amaro-Seoane, Detecting intermediate-mass ratio in- spirals from the ground and space, Phys

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Detecting intermediate-mass ratio in- spirals from the ground and space, Phys. Rev. D 98, 063018 (2018), arXiv:1807.03824 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  125. [132]

    Bartos, B

    I. Bartos, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and S. M´ arka, Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Merg- ers in Active Galactic Nuclei, ApJ 835, 165 (2017), arXiv:1602.03831 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Seto, Detecting Planets around Compact Binaries with Gravitational Wave Detectors in Space, ApJ 677, L55 (2008), arXiv:0802.3411 [astro-ph]

    N. Seto, Detecting Planets around Compact Binaries with Gravitational Wave Detectors in Space, ApJ 677, L55 (2008), arXiv:0802.3411 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  127. [134]

    Tamanini and C

    N. Tamanini and C. Danielski, The gravitational-wave detection of exoplanets orbiting white dwarf binaries us- ing LISA, Nature Astronomy , 381 (2019)

    2019

  128. [135]

    Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys

    D. Christodoulou, Nonlinear nature of gravitation and gravitational-wave experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1486 (1991)

    1991

  129. [136]

    Favata, Nonlinear Gravitational-Wave Memory from Binary Black Hole Mergers, Astrophys

    M. Favata, Nonlinear Gravitational-Wave Memory from Binary Black Hole Mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett. 696, L159 (2009), arXiv:0902.3660 [astro-ph.SR]

    2009 arXiv

  130. [137]

    Yang and D

    H. Yang and D. Martynov, Testing Gravitational Memory Generation with Compact Binary Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 071102 (2018), arXiv:1803.02429 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  131. [138]

    W. E. East and F. Pretorius, Superradiant instability and backreaction of massive vector fields around kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 041101 (2017)

    2017

  132. [139]

    Brito, S

    R. Brito, S. Ghosh, E. Barausse, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, A. Klein, and P. Pani, Gravitational wave searches for ultralight bosons with LIGO and LISA, Phys. Rev. D 96, 064050 (2017), arXiv:1706.06311 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  133. [140]

    L. S. Finn, Detection, measurement, and gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5236 (1992)

    1992

  134. [141]

    Cutler and E

    C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one ex- tract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral wave- form?, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994)

    1994

  135. [143]

    Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys

    C. Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D 57, 7089 (1998)

    1998

  136. [144]

    Veitch, V

    J. Veitch, V. Raymond, B. Farr, W. Farr, P. Graff, S. Vitale, B. Aylott, K. Blackburn, N. Christensen, M. Coughlin, W. Del Pozzo, F. Feroz, J. Gair, C.- J. Haster, V. Kalogera, T. Littenberg, I. Mandel, R. O’Shaughnessy, M. Pitkin, C. Rodriguez, C. R¨ over, T. Sidery, R. Smith,...

    2015

  137. [145]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Li- brary - LALSuite, free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  138. [146]

    S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. J. Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Frequency-domain gravi- tational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. ii. a phenomenological model for the advanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044007 (2016)

    2016

  139. [147]

    W. G. Anderson, P. R. Brady, J. D. E. Creighton, and E. E. Flanagan, Excess power statistic for detection of burst sources of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 63, 042003 (2001)

    2001

  140. [148]

    Mandel, C

    I. Mandel, C. P. L. Berry, F. Ohme, S. Fairhurst, and W. M. Farr, Parameter estimation on compact binary coalescences with abruptly terminating gravitational waveforms, Classical and Quantum Gravity 31, 155005 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.