Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

The Cuntz semigroup and the radius of comparison of the crossed product by a finite group

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for a finite group action with the weak tracial Rokhlin property on a simple stably finite C*-algebra, the radius of comparison of the crossed product is at most one over the group order times that of the original…

desk verdict Solid, careful paper with genuinely new radius-of-comparison and Cuntz semigroup results under weak tracial Rokhlin actions, plus a hard sharp example; the main caveat is heavy reliance on unpublished companion papers that a referee must check. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06343 v1 pith:PS3GOL5W submitted 2019-08-17 math.OA

M. Ali Asadi-Vasfi , Nasser Golestani , N. Christopher Phillips This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OA MSC 46L5519K1446L80
keywords C*-algebrasCuntzsemigroupradiusofcomparisoncrossedproductsfinitegroupactionsRokhlinpropertytracialAHalgebras
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that for a finite group acting on an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra with the weak tracial Rokhlin property, the radius of comparison of the crossed product is at most one over the group order times the radius of comparison of the original algebra, and the fixed point algebra has radius no larger than the original. It also establishes that the inclusion of the fixed point algebra induces an isomorphism between the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup of the fixed point algebra and the fixed points of the purely positive part of the original semigroup. The paper constructs an explicit example where G = Z/2Z, the action has the Rokhlin property, the algebra is a simple unital AH algebra with stable rank one, and the bounds are equalities: rc(A^α) = rc(A) and rc(C*(G,A,α)) = (1/2)rc(A). A sympathetic reader should care because the Cuntz semigroup is usually too complicated to compute, and this result shows a tractable rigidity for a broad class of actions.

What carries the argument

The weak tracial Rokhlin property (existence of approximately equivariant orthogonal positive contractions f_g whose sum f satisfies 1-f ≼ x and ‖fxf‖ close to 1) is the engine. The paper's Lemma 3.5 averages a Cuntz subequivalence in A over the group to produce subequivalence in the fixed point algebra, and the projection p = (1/card(G))Σ u_g identifies A^α with a corner pC*(G,A,α)p. The corner estimate Theorem 2.18 then converts the constant quasitrace value τ(p)=1/card(G) (Lemma 4.4) into the factor 1/card(G) for the crossed product. For the example, a diagonal AH-system built from two copies of a system over products of spheres is merged by point evaluations, and the Bott line bundle obstruction (via Lemma 6.9) gives the lower bounds on rc.

What would settle it

Find a finite group G, an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra A, and a weak tracial Rokhlin action α for which rc(A^α) > rc(A), or for which the map Cu+(A^α) ∪ {0} → Cu+(A)^α ∪ {0} is not surjective. A more targeted check: compute the radius of comparison of the example in Section 6 using Niu's mean dimension formula and the Bott bundle obstruction; if the values differ from κ and κ/2, the construction fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for an action with the weak tracial Rokhlin property, the map Cu+(A^α) ∪ {0} → Cu+(A)^α ∪ {0} induced by the inclusion is an isomorphism of ordered semigroups, and as a consequence rc(A^α) ≤ rc(A) and rc(C*(G,A,α)) ≤ (1/card(G))rc(A). The paper proves the reverse-style equalities in an example: an action of Z/2Z with the Rokhlin property on a simple unital AH algebra A with rc(A)>0, such that rc(A^α)=rc(A) and rc(C*(Z/2Z,A,α))=(1/2)rc(A).

Load-bearing premise

The weak tracial Rokhlin results depend on unpublished results from the preprint [14] coauthored by the second author: the equivalence of the definition, permanence under matrix amplification, and simplicity of the crossed product; if any of these is wrong, the central theorems for the weak tracial Rokhlin case would need re-examination.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the weak tracial Rokhlin property holds, the crossed product's radius of comparison is at most a fraction 1/|G| of the original algebra's, so taking a crossed product by a finite group makes the algebra more comparable in a precise trace sense.
  • The fixed point algebra's radius of comparison never exceeds that of the ambient algebra, so passing to fixed points cannot increase the obstruction to strict comparison.
  • The purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup of the fixed point algebra is isomorphic to the fixed-point sub-semigroup of the original, giving a complete invariant for this part when the action is weak tracial Rokhlin.
  • The constructed example with G = Z/2Z shows both inequalities can be equalities: rc(A^α) = rc(A) and rc(C*(G,A,α)) = (1/2) rc(A), with the action even having the Rokhlin property.
  • In the stable rank one case, the isomorphisms pass to the W-semigroup, so W+(A^α) ∪ {0} ≅ W+(A)^α ∪ {0}, making the invariant computable via traces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The merging construction of two copies of a diagonal AH system, with point evaluations connecting them, seems generalizable: presumably any finite group G can be made to act with the Rokhlin property on a simple AH algebra whose radius of comparison is divided exactly by |G| in the crossed product, and possibly any prescribed value can be realized.
  • If the unpublished framework results of the second author's preprint are correct, the weak tracial Rokhlin property should force the same Cuntz semigroup rigidity for the crossed product even when the action is not Rokhlin; the paper's Example 6.22 shows pointwise outerness alone is far from sufficient.
  • A natural testable extension: for actions where every tracial state is invariant (Question 7.2), one might expect rc(A^α) = rc(A) to force equality in the crossed product bound, since the trace space is unchanged; the paper leaves this open.
  • The corner estimate Theorem 2.18 relating rc of a full corner to rc of the algebra is likely of independent use in other crossed product problems, since it converts the projection p = (1/|G|)Σ u_g into a sharp factor of |G|.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies finite group actions with the weak tracial Rokhlin property on infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebras. The main results are the radius-of-comparison bounds rc(A^α) ≤ rc(A) (Theorem 4.1) and rc(C*(G,A,α)) ≤ (1/|G|) rc(A), together with the stronger identity rc(C*(G,A,α)) = (1/|G|) rc(A^α) (Theorem 4.5), and the ordered-semigroup isomorphism Cu+(A^α)∪{0} ≅ Cu+(A)^α∪{0} (Theorem 5.5), with stable-rank-one W-semigroup variants. The proof strategy is to establish injectivity and surjectivity of the natural map on purely positive Cuntz classes, using a substantial amount of Cuntz-semigroup machinery, and then to relate radii of comparison via traces and corners. Section 6 constructs a Z/2-action with the Rokhlin property on a simple unital AH algebra for which rc(A)=κ>0, rc(A^α)=κ, and rc(C*(Z/2,A,α))=κ/2, so the inequalities are sharp in this example. The arguments are detailed and internally coherent, but the central weak-tracial-Rokhlin results and the example's lower bounds depend on results imported from unpublished preprints, and one step in Lemma 4.4 appears to assert an unjustified commutativity.

Significance. The results, if fully supported, are a substantial contribution: they give the first general comparison-theoretic bounds for fixed-point algebras and crossed products by finite group actions with the weak tracial Rokhlin property, and they identify the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup of the fixed-point algebra with the fixed-point subsemigroup. The paper also contains useful new tools, notably the corner radius-of-comparison estimates in Theorem 2.18 and the quasitrace computation in Lemma 4.4, and it constructs an explicit example with positive radius of comparison and sharp bounds. The authors are honest about limitations and open problems, and the main internal derivation is plausible. The main caveats are external: several load-bearing statements are taken from unpublished preprints, and one local proof step in Lemma 4.4 needs repair.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Definition 3.2; §4, Theorems 4.1 and 4.5; §5, Theorem 5.5] The weak tracial Rokhlin half of the paper is not self-contained. The equivalence in Definition 3.2 is imported from [14, Proposition 3.10]; the permanence of the weak tracial Rokhlin property under matrix amplification, used in Lemma 3.11, Theorem 4.1, and Lemma 5.4, is [14, Corollary 4.6]; and simplicity of C*(G,A,α), used in Theorem 4.5 and Corollary 5.8, is [14, Corollary 3.3]. Since [14] is an unpublished arXiv preprint, the main claims of Sections 3–5 are conditional on an external source whose correctness the referee cannot verify from the manuscript. Please provide complete proofs of these specific facts, or state and prove precise versions of them, or replace [14] with published references.
  2. [§4, Lemma 4.4, equation (4.9)] The proof of Lemma 4.4 asserts that τ(∑_{h∈G} f_h p f_h) = ∑_{h∈G} τ(f_h p f_h) 'since the elements f_h p f_h, for h ∈ G, commute with each other.' This commutativity is not justified by the stated hypotheses: f_h p f_h = (1/|G|)∑_g f_h α_g(f_h) u_g, and the group-unit terms u_g prevent the operators f_h p f_h from commuting without additional structure. This step is load-bearing because it is used to identify ∑_h τ(f_h p f_h) with τ((1/|G|)f^2), which in turn supplies the key estimate τ(p)=1/|G| used in Theorem 4.5. The gap is likely reparable using the already proved approximation ‖f_h p f_h − (1/|G|)f_h^2‖ and the fact that the elements f_h^2 commute as elements of A, but the proof as written is incomplete.
  3. [§6, Lemma 6.9 and Corollaries 6.13 and 6.20] The exact lower bounds in Theorems 6.15 and 6.21, namely rc(A)=κ and rc(C*(Z/2,A,α))=κ/2, depend on Lemma 6.9, which is quoted from [22, Lemma 1.9], an unpublished preprint listed as 'in preparation.' The nonembedding statement L×k not embedding in a trivial bundle of rank less than 2k is used essentially in Corollaries 6.13 and 6.20 to force rank inequalities. This is a central feature of the paper, not a peripheral remark, so the authors should provide a proof of Lemma 6.9 or cite a published source.
  4. [§2–§5, references to [38]] A large amount of the Cuntz-semigroup machinery is imported from [38], which is also an unpublished arXiv preprint. In particular, Lemma 3.9 relies on [38, Lemma 3.2 and Corollary 3.3], Lemma 3.10 uses [38, Lemma 2.1], Lemma 4.4 uses [38, Corollary 2.5], and Lemma 5.4 and Proposition 5.7 use [38, Theorem 1.16 and Lemma 1.25]. Since these facts are load-bearing for Theorem 5.5 and for the quasitrace arguments, the authors should either include the relevant proofs, state the exact results with sufficient context, or replace [38] with a published reference.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The notation Cu+(A)^α is used in the abstract before Notation 3.1 is introduced; a one-line definition in the introduction would improve readability.
  2. [Theorem 4.1] In the sentence after equation (4.1), 'also has the weak tracial property' should read 'also has the weak tracial Rokhlin property.'
  3. [Lemma 3.7] The phrase 'This result holds when α has the Rokhlin property, without the requirement that 0 be a limit point of sp(b)' is helpful, but the reader must infer that the cited Theorem 4.1(ii) of [16] also requires no simplicity or stable finiteness; please state the hypotheses explicitly.
  4. [Section 6, Construction 6.1(5)] The density condition on the points x_m is stated in a compact but difficult way; a short explanatory sentence about the role of the condition would help the reader verify that such a choice is possible.
  5. [Example 4.7] When introducing the UHF algebra D and the action α via Example 2.8 of [37], the authors should explicitly note that the Cuntz-semigroup non-injectivity phenomenon concerns projections and therefore does not contradict Lemma 3.11; the paragraph does this, but the connection could be made earlier.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Weak tracial Rokhlin results rest on unpublished [14] for matrix-amplification permanence and crossed-product simplicity; no by-construction circularity, but the load-bearing self-citation raises the score.

  1. self citation load bearing [Lemma 3.11, proof (Section 3); used in Theorems 4.1, 4.5, 5.5]
    "By Corollary 4.6 of [14], for every n ∈ Z>0 the action g ↦→ idMn ⊗ αg of G on Mn(A) has the weak tracial Rokhlin property."

    This permanence under matrix amplification is the exact step that allows the injectivity proof for W+(Aα)→W+(A) and Cu+(Aα)→Cu(A) to pass from A to Mn(A). The paper supplies no proof and cites [14], an unpublished arXiv preprint coauthored by the second author of the present paper. The central weak-tracial-Rokhlin Cuntz-semigroup injectivity result therefore depends on a same-author citation whose content is not established inside the manuscript. If [14, Cor. 4.6] were wrong, the central claim would not be proved. This is load-bearing self-citation, though not a by-construction equivalence.

  2. self citation load bearing [Theorem 4.5, proof; also Lemma 3.10 and Corollary 5.8]
    "The algebra C∗(G,A,α) is simple by Corollary 3.3 of [14]. So p is full."

    Fullness of the projection p is required to apply Theorem 2.18, from which the equality rc(C*(G,A,α)) = card(G)^{-1} rc(Aα) is obtained, and the same simplicity citation is used in Lemma 3.10 to make Aα simple. The manuscript does not prove simplicity of the crossed product for weak tracial Rokhlin actions; it imports it from [14], an unpublished preprint with overlapping authorship. Thus the main radius-of-comparison equality for weak tracial Rokhlin actions is not derived from first principles in this paper but depends on a same-author citation not verified within the manuscript.

full rationale

There is no fitted parameter masquerading as a prediction, and no displayed equation reduces to its own input by construction. The Cuntz-semigroup injectivity and surjectivity arguments, the radius-of-comparison estimate for corners, and the Rokhlin-property variant are proved by direct estimates from the definitions and standard Cuntz-semigroup results. The example is constructed explicitly and its radius of comparison is computed from vector-bundle obstructions and Niu's independent mean-dimension theorem. The main concern is that the weak tracial Rokhlin part of the paper leans on two load-bearing facts imported from [14], an unpublished preprint coauthored by one of the present authors: matrix-amplification permanence of the weak tracial Rokhlin property ([14, Cor. 4.6]) and simplicity of the crossed product ([14, Cor. 3.3]). These are used in Lemma 3.11, Theorems 4.1 and 4.5, Lemma 5.3, Theorem 5.5, and Corollary 5.8; they are not proved here and are not independently machine-checked or externally validated in the text. This raises the circularity score to 4: significant same-author dependency on unverified prior work, but the central statements still have substantial independent mathematical content and do not reduce to their inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the constants in the construction (r(n), s(n), u(n), κ) are explicit limits of defined sequences, not adjusted to fit a result. The main axioms are standard operator algebra background plus two unpublished dependencies ([14] and [22]) and Niu's mean-dimension theorem. No new entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Weak tracial Rokhlin property framework results of [14]: Definition 3.2 equivalence (Prop 3.10), permanence under matrix amplification (Cor 4.6), simplicity of the crossed product (Cor 3.3).
    Used throughout Sections 3 to 5; [14] is an arXiv preprint by Forough and Golestani, and the second author of the present paper is a co-author. These axioms are not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Lemma 6.9: the Cartesian product L^{×k} does not embed in a trivial bundle over (S^2)^k of rank less than 2k.
    Quoted from [22], listed as in preparation, and used in Corollary 6.13 and Corollary 6.20 to prove the lower bounds rc(A) ≥ κ and rc(B) ≥ κ/2.
  • domain assumption Niu's theorem [26, Theorem 6.2]: the radius of comparison of a diagonal AH algebra is at most half its mean dimension.
    Used in Remark 6.14 to get upper bounds rc(A) ≤ κ and rc(B) ≤ κ/2.
  • domain assumption Gardella and Santiago [16, Theorem 4.1(ii)]: for a Rokhlin action, Cu(A^α) → Cu(A)^α is an isomorphism.
    Used in Theorem 4.2, Proposition 5.9, and Corollary 6.6; published result.
  • standard math Haagerup's theorem [19]: quasitraces on unital exact C*-algebras are traces.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 and used where tracial states are identified with quasitraces; published theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Cuntz semigroup and the radius of comparison of the crossed product by a finite group." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PS3GOL5W

@misc{pith2026190806343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Cuntz semigroup and the radius of comparison of the crossed product by a finite group},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PS3GOL5W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06343}
}
read the original abstract

Let G be a finite group, let A be an infinite-dimensional stably finite simple unital C*-algebra, and let \alpha \colon G \to Aut (A) be an action of G on A which has the weak tracial Rokhlin property. Let A^{\alpha} be the fixed point algebra. Then the radius of comparison satisfies rc (A^{\alpha}) \leq rc (A) and rc ( C* (G, A, \alpha) ) \leq ( 1 / card (G) ) rc (A). The inclusion of A^{\alpha} in A induces an isomorphism from the purely positive part of the Cuntz semigroup Cu (A^{\alpha}) to the fixed points of the purely positive part of Cu (A), and the purely positive part of Cu ( C* (G, A, \alpha) ) is isomorphic to this semigroup. We construct an example in which G is the two element group, A is a simple unital AH algebra, \alpha has the Rokhlin property, rc (A) > 0, rc (A^{\alpha}) = rc (A), and rc (C* (G, A, \alpha)) = (1/2) rc (A).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    The weak tracial Rokhlin property for finite group actions on simple C*-algebras

    M. Forough and N. Golestani, Weak tracial Rokhlin property for finite group actions on simple C*-algebras , preprint (arXiv: 1711.10818v2 [math.OA])

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [38]

    N. C. Phillips, Large subalgebras, preprint (arXiv: 1408.5546v2 [math.OA])

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    C. A. Akemann and F. Shultz, Perfect C*-algebras , Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 55 no. 326(1985)

    work page 1985

  4. [2]

    Amini, N

    M. Amini, N. Golestani, S. Jamali, N. C. Phillips, Simple tracially Z-absorbing C*-algebras , in preparation

    work page

  5. [3]

    P. Ara, F. Perera, and A. S. Toms, K-theory for operator algebras. Classification of C*- algebras, pages 1–71 in: Aspects of Operator Algebras and Applications , P. Ara, F Lled´ o, and F. Perera (eds.), Contemporary Mathematics vol. 534, Am er. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [4]

    Archey and N

    D. Archey and N. C. Phillips, Permanence of stable rank one for centrally large subalgebr as and crossed products by minimal homeomorphisms , J. Operator Theory, to appear

    work page

  7. [5]

    M. A. Asadi-Vasfi, The Cuntz semigroup of the crossed product of a nonunital C*- algebra by a finite group , in preparation

    work page

  8. [6]

    Blackadar and D

    B. Blackadar and D. Handelman, Dimension functions and traces on C*-algebras , J. Funct. Anal. 45(1982), 297–340

    work page 1982

Show all 47 references
  1. [7]

    L. G. Brown, Stable isomorphism of hereditary subalgebras of C*-algebr as, Pacific J. Math. 71(1977), 335–348

    1977

  2. [8]

    Cuntz, Dimension functions on simple C*-algebras , Math

    J. Cuntz, Dimension functions on simple C*-algebras , Math. Ann. 233(1978), 145–153

    1978

  3. [9]

    Dˇ adˇ arlat, G

    M. Dˇ adˇ arlat, G. Nagy, A. N´ emethi, and C. Pasnicu,Reduction of topological stable rank in inductive limits of C*-algebras , Pacific J. Math. 153(1992), 267–276

    1992

  4. [10]

    G. A. Elliott, T. M. Ho, and A. S. Toms, A class of simple C*-algebras with stable rank one , J. Funct. Anal. 256(2009), 307–322

    2009

  5. [11]

    G. A. Elliott and Z. Niu, On the radius of comparison of a commutative C*-algebra , Canad. Math. Bull. 56(2013), 737–744

    2013

  6. [12]

    G. A. Elliott, L. Robert, and L. Santiago, The cone of lower semicontinuous traces on a C*-algebra, Amer. J. Math. 133(2011), 969–1005. RADIUS OF COMPARISON OF THE CROSSED PRODUCT 47

    2011

  7. [13]

    Fan and X

    Q. Fan and X. Fang, Stable rank one and real rank zero for crossed products by fini te group actions with the tracial Rokhlin property , Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 30(2009), 179–186

    2009

  8. [15]

    Gardella, I

    E. Gardella, I. Hirshberg, and L. Santiago, Rokhlin dimension: duality, tracial properties, and crossed products , preprint (arXiv: 1709.00222v1 [math.OA])

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Gardella and L

    E. Gardella and L. Santiago, Equivariant *-homomorphisms, Rokhlin constraints and equ i- variant UHF-absorption , J. Funct. Anal. 270(2016), 2543–2590

    2016

  10. [17]

    Giordano, D

    T. Giordano, D. Kerr, N. C. Phillips, and A. Toms, Crossed Products of C*-Algebras, Topo- logical Dynamics, and Classification , edited by Francesc Perera, Advanced Courses in Math- ematics, CRM Barcelona, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2018

    2018

  11. [18]

    Golestani, in preparation

    N. Golestani, in preparation

  12. [19]

    Haagerup, Quasitraces on exact C*-algebras are traces , C

    U. Haagerup, Quasitraces on exact C*-algebras are traces , C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. Canada 36(2014), 67–92

    2014

  13. [20]

    Hirshberg and J

    I. Hirshberg and J. Orovitz, Tracially Z-absorbing C*-algebras , J. Funct. Anal. 265(2013), 765–785

    2013

  14. [21]

    Hirshberg and N

    I. Hirshberg and N. C. Phillips, Rokhlin dimension: obstructions and permanence propertie s, Doc. Math. 20(2015), 199–236

    2015

  15. [22]

    Hirshberg and N

    I. Hirshberg and N. C. Phillips, Internal asymmetry , in preparation

  16. [23]

    Husemoller, Fibre Bundles (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Lon- don, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest, 1994

    D. Husemoller, Fibre Bundles (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Lon- don, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest, 1994

    1994

  17. [24]

    Izumi, Finite group actions on C*-algebras with the Rohlin propert y

    M. Izumi, Finite group actions on C*-algebras with the Rohlin propert y. II , Adv. Math. 184(2004), 119–160

    2004

  18. [25]

    Lin, An Introduction to the Classification of Amenable C*-Algebr as, W orld Scientific, River Edge NJ, 2001

    H. Lin, An Introduction to the Classification of Amenable C*-Algebr as, W orld Scientific, River Edge NJ, 2001

    2001

  19. [26]

    Niu, Mean dimension and AH-algebras with diagonal maps , J

    Z. Niu, Mean dimension and AH-algebras with diagonal maps , J. Funct. Anal. 266(2014), 4938–4994

    2014

  20. [27]

    Kirchberg and M

    E. Kirchberg and M. Rørdam, Non-simple purely infinite C*-algebras , Amer. J. Math. 122(2000), 637–666

    2000

  21. [28]

    Kirchberg and M

    E. Kirchberg and M. Rørdam, Infinite non-simple C*-algebras: absorbing the Cuntz algeb ra O∞ , Adv. Math. 167(2002), 195–264

    2002

  22. [29]

    Kirchberg and M

    E. Kirchberg and M. Rørdam, Central sequence C*-algebras and tensorial absorption of t he Jiang-Su algebra , J. reine angew. Math. 695(2014), 175–214; erratum, J. reine angew. Math. 695(2014), 215–216

    2014

  23. [30]

    Orovitz, N

    J. Orovitz, N. C. Phillips, and Q. W ang, Strict comparison and crossed products , in prepa- ration

  24. [31]

    Osaka, Stable rank for crossed products by actions of finite groups o n C*-algebras , preprint (arXiv: 1708.02665v1 [math.OA])

    H. Osaka, Stable rank for crossed products by actions of finite groups o n C*-algebras , preprint (arXiv: 1708.02665v1 [math.OA])

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Osaka and N

    H. Osaka and N. C. Phillips, Crossed products by finite group actions with the Rokhlin pro p- erty , Math. Z. 270(2012), 19–42

    2012

  26. [33]

    Osaka and T

    H. Osaka and T. Teruya, The Jiang-Su absorption for inclusions of unital C*-algebr as, Canad. J. Math. 70(2018), 400–425

    2018

  27. [34]

    Perera and A

    F. Perera and A. S. Toms, Recasting the Elliott conjecture , Math. Ann. 338(2007), 669–702

    2007

  28. [35]

    N. C. Phillips, The tracial Rokhlin property for actions of finite groups on C *-algebras, Amer. J. Math. 133(2011), 581–636

    2011

  29. [36]

    N. C. Phillips, Freeness of actions of finite groups on C*-algebras , pages 217–257 in: Operator structures and dynamical systems , M. de Jeu, S. Silvestrov, C. Skau, and J. Tomiyama (eds.), Contemporary Mathematics vol. 503, Amer. Math. Soc., Provi dence RI, 2009

    2009

  30. [37]

    N. C. Phillips, Finite cyclic group actions with the tracial Rokhlin proper ty , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367(2015), 5271–5300

    2015

  31. [39]

    M. A. Rieffel, Actions of finite groups on C*-algebras , Math. Scand. 47(1980), 157–176

    1980

  32. [40]

    Rørdam, On the structure of simple C*-algebras tensored with a UHF-a lgebra

    M. Rørdam, On the structure of simple C*-algebras tensored with a UHF-a lgebra. II , J. Funct. Anal. 107(1992), 255–269

    1992

  33. [41]

    Rørdam, The stable and the real rank of Z-absorbing C*-algebras , Internat

    M. Rørdam, The stable and the real rank of Z-absorbing C*-algebras , Internat. J. Math. 15(2004), 1065–1084

    2004

  34. [42]

    Crossed products of UHF a lgebras

    J. Rosenberg, Appendix to O. Bratteli’s paper on “Crossed products of UHF a lgebras”, Duke Math. J. 46(1979), 25–26. 48 M. ALI ASADI-V ASFI, NASSER GOLESTANI, AND N. CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS

    1979

  35. [43]

    Sato, Trace spaces of simple nuclear C*-algebras with finite-dime nsional extreme bound- ary, preprint (arXiv: 1209.3000v1 [math.OA])

    Y. Sato, Trace spaces of simple nuclear C*-algebras with finite-dime nsional extreme bound- ary, preprint (arXiv: 1209.3000v1 [math.OA])

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. S. Toms, Flat dimension growth for C*-algebras , J. Funct. Anal. 238(2006), 678–708

    2006

  37. [45]

    A. S. Toms, S. White, and W. Winter, Z-stability and finite-dimensional tracial boundaries , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 292(2015), 2707–2727

    2015

  38. [46]

    Villadsen, On the stable rank of simple C*-algebras , J

    J. Villadsen, On the stable rank of simple C*-algebras , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12(1999), 1091– 1102

    1999

  39. [47]

    N. E. W egge-Olsen, K-Theory and C*-Algebras , Oxford University Press, Oxford etc., 1993. Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene OR 9 7403-1222, USA. E-mail address : Aliasadi@uoregon.edu Current address : School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Scienc...

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.