Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Low temperature growth and optical properties of {\alpha}-Ga2O3 deposited on sapphire by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition grows α-Ga2O3 films on sapphire at 250–350 °C without annealing.

desk verdict A solid, narrow extension of the authors' own earlier growth study, with a well-supported phase window and one genuinely load-bearing but fixable soft spot in the bandgap analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06914 v1 pith:BTNKG2W4 submitted 2019-08-19 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

J.W. Roberts , P.R. Chalker , B. Ding , R.A. Oliver , J.T. Gibbon , L.A.H. Jones , V.R. Dhanak , L.J. Phillips
show 2 more authors
J.D. Major F.C-P. Massabuau
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 81.15.-z78.20.-e68.55.-a
keywords plasmaenhancedatomiclayerdepositionalphagalliumoxidesapphiresubstratecorundumstructureopticalbandgapTaucplotstrainrelaxationpolymorphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) using triethylgallium and an oxygen plasma can deposit metastable α-Ga2O3 directly onto c-plane sapphire at substrate temperatures between 250 and 350 °C, with no post-deposition annealing. This matters because α-Ga2O3 has the widest bandgap among gallium oxide polymorphs, but established growth routes require temperatures above about 430 °C or high pressures, limiting their use in temperature-sensitive processes and devices. The paper maps the growth window: amorphous films below 200 °C, predominantly α-Ga2O3 from 250 to 350 °C, and mixed α/ε phases above 350 °C. It also reports that the α films reach optical bandgaps up to 5.2 eV, the highest in the study, and that oxygen flow and plasma power tune strain relaxation without changing the phase.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is heteroepitaxial templating: α-Ga2O3 has the corundum crystal structure of α-Al2O3, so the c-plane sapphire substrate provides a structural template that nucleates the metastable α phase at temperatures far below those needed for bulk or other growth routes. The PEALD surface chemistry, with 0.1 s triethylgallium doses and 5 s O2 plasma exposures repeated for 500 cycles, delivers gallium and oxygen in a self-limiting way. Phase identity and strain are read out through X-ray diffraction reciprocal space maps around the symmetric 0006 and asymmetric 10-10 reflections, and the bandgap is extracted from Tauc plots of UV-visible transmittance.

What would settle it

Measure the absorption edge of a strain-relaxed α-Ga2O3 film on sapphire at low temperature and fit the absorption coefficient with both direct and indirect Tauc forms: if the indirect form fits better and reveals a gap near 4.7 eV, the 5.2 eV direct-gap value overstates the fundamental gap. A photoluminescence or absorption measurement on a thicker single-crystal α-Ga2O3 sample would settle the discrepancy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that PEALD can stabilize corundum-structured α-Ga2O3 on c-plane sapphire at low temperature without annealing, with a phase-pure growth window of 250–350 °C. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron diffraction, and cross-sectional TEM show that the films grow as (0001)-oriented α-Ga2O3 columns, matching the orientation of the sapphire substrate. At 250 °C the films are nearly fully relaxed in strain, and ultraviolet transmittance analyzed with direct-gap Tauc plots gives an optical bandgap of about 5.2 eV for α-Ga2O3, above the roughly 5.05 eV of amorphous films and the mixed-phase films grown at higher temperature. Varying the O2 plasma flow and plasma power at 250 °C leaves the α phase intact but changes the strain relaxation state from about 50 to near 100 percent, with lower O2 flows giving denser, more relaxed films.

Load-bearing premise

The reported bandgaps assume a direct optical transition in the Tauc analysis, while the paper itself cites calculations that place the fundamental α-Ga2O3 gap as indirect at 4.70 eV, with the nearest direct gap at 4.91 eV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • α-Ga2O3 can be integrated into devices built on temperature-sensitive substrates, because the growth window ends at 350 °C with no anneal.
  • The α phase shows the largest optical bandgap among the deposited phases, up to 5.2 eV, supporting its use for deep-ultraviolet transparent and detector applications.
  • O2 flow and plasma power provide separate knobs for strain relaxation, suggesting a route to strain-engineered α-Ga2O3 epilayers.
  • Above 350 °C the coexistence of α and ε phases offers a way to study polymorph competition in the same film.
  • The phase-pure window gives a reproducible baseline for doping studies aimed at bandgap tuning with In or Al.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the true fundamental gap is indirect near 4.7 eV, the 5.2 eV Tauc value is a direct-transition estimate rather than the band edge; a proper indirect analysis would lower the reported gap while keeping the phase ordering intact.
  • The same low-temperature plasma route may work on other corundum-structure substrates or buffer layers, potentially enabling α-(Al,Ga)2O3 heterostructures without high-temperature steps.
  • Strain tuning via plasma parameters could shift the optical gap or affect carrier transport in power devices, a connection the paper does not measure.
  • Since amorphous films grown at 150 °C have bandgaps near 5.05 eV, the amorphous-to-α transition at 200–250 °C could be monitored in situ to identify the nucleation threshold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) of Ga2O3 on c-plane sapphire using triethylgallium and O2 plasma, and investigates the effects of substrate temperature, O2 flow, and plasma power on film crystallinity, strain, and optical properties. The authors identify a growth window between 250°C and 350°C in which the films are predominantly α-Ga2O3, with amorphous films below 200°C and mixed α/ε phases above 350°C, as supported by XRD, TEM, AFM, and SED. They also report optical bandgaps of 5.0–5.2 eV from UV-vis transmittance, with the largest bandgap of 5.2 eV assigned to the α-Ga2O3 film grown at 250°C, and show that O2 flow and plasma power can tune strain relaxation without changing the phase.

Significance. If the phase-window claim holds, the work has clear practical significance: it demonstrates a low-temperature, annealing-free route to α-Ga2O3 on sapphire, a metastable polymorph that is otherwise difficult to access at such low temperatures. The structural characterization is a genuine strength: the phase assignments are supported by converging XRD, ADF-STEM, AFM, and SED evidence, and the complementary use of virtual dark-field imaging to identify α and ε crystallites at the 400°C growth condition is particularly convincing. The optical bandgap claim, however, is less secure because the Tauc analysis assumes a direct gap even though the authors themselves cite calculations indicating an indirect gap for α-Ga2O3; this issue, plus the absence of quantitative uncertainties on the reported bandgaps, leaves the headline 5.2 eV value insufficiently supported. The strain-tuning results for O2 flow and plasma power are interesting but would benefit from error analysis. Overall, the central structural claim is well supported, while the optical portion needs additional work before the abstract's conclusions can be fully accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Figure 5; Analysis Methods] The bandgap extraction uses the direct-gap Tauc relation (αhν)^2 ∝ (hν − Eg), and the authors acknowledge in the text that Choi et al. (ref. 14) calculated α-Ga2O3 to have an indirect gap of 4.70 eV and a direct gap of 4.91 eV. Because the direct-gap assumption is not verified, the reported 5.2 eV for α-Ga2O3 may overestimate the fundamental gap by approximately the indirect-to-direct separation (0.21 eV) or more, and the measured 5.2 eV already lies 0.29 eV above the cited direct-gap value. This is load-bearing because the abstract and conclusions feature the 5.2 eV value. The authors should test the assumption by also presenting the indirect Tauc plot (αhν)^1/2 versus hν, or by extracting the absorption onset from the ellipsometric data, and should discuss which value represents the fundamental gap.
  2. [Figure 5(B) and Conclusions] The optical bandgap values are reported without confidence intervals, fit ranges, or details of the linear region used in the Tauc extrapolation. The claim that α-Ga2O3 films exhibit the 'highest' bandgap rests on differences of order 0.1–0.2 eV (5.05 eV for amorphous, 5.15–5.20 eV for α-phase, and slightly lower for mixed-phase films), and without error bars or multiple-sample statistics this comparison is not demonstrated to be meaningful. The authors should provide uncertainties for each extracted bandgap, state the fitting range, and ideally show the Tauc plots for all samples or an equivalent quantitative summary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure captions (Figures 6 and 7)] The figure captions contain a typo: 'ellipsometry model results add (B)' should read 'ellipsometry model results and (B)'.
  2. [Figure 5(A) inset] The Tauc plot inset in Figure 5(A) lacks axis labels; adding (αhν)^2 and hν with units would improve readability.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'the bandgaps ranges from 5.0 eV to 5.2 eV' should be corrected to 'the bandgaps range from 5.0 eV to 5.2 eV'.
  4. [Results and Discussion, Figures 1(B), 6(B), 7(B) insets] The strain relaxation values are reported as percentages without uncertainties or a description of how errors from reciprocal space map peak fitting are propagated; adding error bars would strengthen the strain-tuning conclusions.
  5. [Results and Discussion, Figure 1(B) and Figure 4] For the 350°C and 450°C samples, the mixed α/ε phase assignment rests on XRD alone, whereas SED phase identification is presented only for the 400°C sample; a brief statement that the lower-temperature mixed-phase samples were not subjected to SED would clarify the scope of the evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the phase, strain, and bandgap results are measured quantities supported by independent XRD, TEM, SED, AFM, and UV-vis data.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental measurements rather than derived predictions. The α-Ga2O3 growth window (250–350 °C) is supported directly by XRD 2θ-ω scans, cross-sectional ADF-STEM, SED phase mapping, and AFM, all of which are independent probes of crystallinity and morphology. The strain values are obtained from reciprocal space maps of specific α-Ga2O3 reflections, not from the deposition parameters that are said to tune relaxation. The optical bandgaps are extracted from UV-vis transmittance using an explicit Tauc direct-gap assumption that is acknowledged and justified by reference to existing literature; the 5.2 eV value is not fitted to any model that already encodes the conclusion. The only self-citation (ref. 33, the authors' prior SED study of thicker Ga2O3 films) is used to interpret the columnar appearance of the film, but the present paper independently identifies the α phase via XRD and SED, so the self-citation is contextual rather than load-bearing. The direct-gap assumption in the Tauc analysis is a possible accuracy limitation, but it is not circular: the authors state the assumption, cite the calculated indirect (4.70 eV) and direct (4.91 eV) gaps for α-Ga2O3, and choose the direct-gap convention to match prior literature. This choice affects interpretation of the measured spectra but does not reduce the reported bandgap to an input of the analysis. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The paper is self-contained as an empirical characterization study.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted parameters. It relies on standard materials-science assumptions: direct-gap Tauc analysis, literature Cauchy optical constants, bulk lattice parameters for strain relaxation, and phase identification from diffraction. The direct-gap assumption is the most consequential because it directly affects the headline bandgap values.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The optical bandgap is extracted using the direct bandgap assumption in Tauc analysis.
    The authors state: 'To conform with the existing literature, in the present work, we also use the direct bandgap assumption.' This affects the reported 5.0-5.2 eV values because alpha-Ga2O3 is cited as having an indirect gap near 4.70 eV.
  • domain assumption The Cauchy ellipsometry model based on Rebien et al. reliably describes Ga2O3 film thickness and refractive index.
    Thickness and refractive index are derived from psi/delta using optical values from ref. 34; the authors estimate thickness accuracy of about 10 percent and note possible model breakdown for rough, mixed-phase films above 350°C.
  • domain assumption Strain relaxation is computed from measured RSM peak positions relative to literature bulk lattice parameters.
    The strain state of alpha-Ga2O3 is obtained from RSMs around the 0006 and 10-10 reflections; the relaxation percentages assume the bulk relaxed lattice constants are known.
  • domain assumption Phase assignment via XRD 0006 peak and SED patterns correctly distinguishes alpha, epsilon, and beta phases.
    The paper assigns phases using XRD peak positions and scanning electron diffraction; above 350°C the XRD peaks are weak and the paper initially cannot discern the phase with certainty, later resolving alpha and epsilon via SED.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low temperature growth and optical properties of {\alpha}-Ga2O3 deposited on sapphire by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BTNKG2W4

@misc{pith2026190806914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low temperature growth and optical properties of \alpha-Ga2O3 deposited on sapphire by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BTNKG2W4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06914}
}
read the original abstract

Plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition was used to deposit thin films of Ga2O3 on to c-plane sapphire substrates using triethylgallium and O2 plasma. The influence of substrate temperature and plasma processing parameters on the resultant crystallinity and optical properties of the Ga2O3 films were investigated. The deposition temperature was found to have a significant effect on the film crystallinity. At temperatures below 200{\deg}C amorphous Ga2O3 films were deposited. Between 250{\deg}C and 350{\deg}C the films became predominantly {\alpha}-Ga2O3. Above 350{\deg}C the deposited films showed a mixture of {\alpha}-Ga2O3 and {\epsilon}-Ga2O3 phases. Plasma power and O2 flow rate were observed to have less influence over the resultant phases present in the films. However, both parameters could be tuned to alter the strain of the film. Ultraviolet transmittance measurements on the Ga2O3 films showed that the bandgaps ranges from 5.0 eV to 5.2 eV with the largest bandgap of 5.2 eV occurring for the {\alpha}-Ga2O3 phase deposited at 250{\deg}C.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ghose, S. et al. Growth and characterization of β-Ga2O3thin films by molecular beam epitaxy for deep- UV photodetectors. J. Appl. Phys. (2017). doi:10.1063/1.4985855

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4985855 2017

  2. [2]

    Alema, F. et al. Fast growth rate of epitaxial β–Ga2O3by close coupled showerhead MOCVD. J. Cryst. Growth (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.06.001 2017

  3. [3]

    Wakabayashi, R. et al. Oxygen-radical- assisted pulsed-laser deposition of β- Ga2O3and β-(AlxGa1-x)2O3films. J. Cryst. Growth (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.05.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.05.005 2015

  4. [4]

    & Zhu, Z

    Kong, L., Ma, J., Luan, C. & Zhu, Z. Structural and optical properties of Ga2O3:In films deposited on MgO (1 0

    work page

  5. [5]

    substrates by MOCVD. J. Solid State Chem. (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2011.05.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2011.05.048 2011

  6. [6]

    & Fujita, S

    Shinohara, D. & Fujita, S. Heteroepitaxy of corundum-structured α-Ga2O3thin films on α- Al2O3substrates by ultrasonic mist chemical vapor deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (2008). doi:10.1143/JJAP.47.7311

    doi:10.1143/jjap.47.7311 2008

  7. [7]

    Pearton, S. J. et al. A review of Ga2O3materials, processing, and devices. Applied Physics Reviews (2018). doi:10.1063/1.5006941

    doi:10.1063/1.5006941 2018

  8. [8]

    & Wagner, G

    Baldini, M., Galazka, Z. & Wagner, G. Recent progress in the growth of β- Ga2O3for power electronics applications. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing (2018). doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.040 2018

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, X. et al. Solar-Blind Photodetector with High Avalanche Gains and Bias-Tunable Detecting Functionality Based on Metastable Phase α-Ga2O3/ZnO Isotype Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2017). doi:10.1021/acsami.7b09812

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    Roy, R., Hill, V. G. & Osborn, E. F. Polymorphism of Ga2O3and the System Ga2O3−H2O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. (1952). doi:10.1021/ja01123a039

    1952 doi

  3. [11]

    & Kuwabara, A

    Yoshioka, S., Hayashi, H. & Kuwabara, A. Structures and energetics of Ga2O3 polymorphs - Abstract - Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter - IOPscience. J. Phys. … (2007)

    2007

  4. [12]

    Y., Hannon, A

    Playford, H. Y., Hannon, A. C., Barney, E. R. & Walton, R. I. Structures of uncharacterised polymorphs of gallium oxide from total neutron diffraction. Chem. - A Eur. J. (2013). doi:10.1002/chem.201203359

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    & Kaneko, K

    Fujita, S. & Kaneko, K. Epitaxial growth of corundum-structured wide band gap III-oxide semiconductor thin films. J. Cryst. Growth (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.02.032

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    French, R. H. Electronic Band Structure of Al2O3, with Comparison to Alon and AIN. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (1990). doi:10.1111/j.1151- 2916.1990.tb06541.x

    1990

  7. [15]

    & Son, J

    Choi, M. & Son, J. Doping-induced bandgap tuning of α-Ga2O3for ultraviolet lighting. Curr. Appl. Phys. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.cap.2017.02.019

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    & Yagi, M

    Terasako, T., Ichinotani, H. & Yagi, M. Growth of β-gallium oxide films and nanostructures by atmospheric- pressure CVD using gallium and water as source materials. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. (2015). doi:10.1002/pssc.201510012

    2015 doi

  9. [17]

    Zhong, M., Wei, Z., Meng, X., Wu, F. & Li, J. High-performance single crystalline UV photodetectors of β- Ga2O3. J. Alloys Compd. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.070

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    & Hosono, H

    Orita, M., Hiramatsu, H., Ohta, H., Hirano, M. & Hosono, H. Preparation of highly conductive, deep ultraviolet transparent β-Ga2O3 thin film at low deposition temperatures. in Thin Solid Films (2002). doi:10.1016/S0040- 6090(02)00202-X

    2002 doi

  11. [19]

    Chen, Y. et al. Effect of growth pressure on the characteristics of β- Ga2O3films grown on GaAs (100) substrates by MOCVD method. Appl. Surf. Sci. (2015). doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.074

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Sun, H. et al. HCl Flow-Induced Phase Change of α-, β-, and ε-Ga 2 O 3 Films Grown by MOCVD. Cryst. Growth Des. (2018). doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01791

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    F., Xu, B

    Machon, D., McMillan, P. F., Xu, B. & Dong, J. High-pressure study of the beta-to-alpha transition in Ga2O3. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094125

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    D., Akaiwa, K

    Lee, S. D., Akaiwa, K. & Fujita, S. Thermal stability of single crystalline alpha gallium oxide films on sapphire substrates. Phys. Status Solidi Curr. Top. Solid State Phys. (2013). doi:10.1002/pssc.201300259

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    & Fujita, S

    Kaneko, K., Suzuki, K., Ito, Y. & Fujita, S. Growth characteristics of corundum- structured α-(AlxGa1- x)2O3/Ga2O3heterostructures on sapphire substrates. J. Cryst. Growth (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.12.013

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Formation of various phases of gallium oxide films depending on substrate planes and deposition gases

    Akazawa, H. Formation of various phases of gallium oxide films depending on substrate planes and deposition gases. Vacuum (2016). doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.10.009

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    Sakata, Y. et al. Photocatalytic properties of gallium oxides prepared by precipitation methods toward the overall splitting of H2O. J. Catal. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.06.025

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    Yao, Y. et al. Growth and characterization of α-, β-, and ϵ-phases of Ga2O3 using MOCVD and HVPE techniques. Mater. Res. Lett. (2018). doi:10.1080/21663831.2018.1443978

    2018

  19. [27]

    Comstock, D. J. & Elam, J. W. Atomic layer deposition of Ga 2O 3 films using trimethylgallium and ozone. Chem. Mater. (2012). doi:10.1021/cm300712x

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    & Biyikli, N

    Donmez, I., Ozgit-Akgun, C. & Biyikli, N. Low temperature deposition of Ga 2 O 3 thin films using trimethylgallium and oxygen plasma. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. (2013). doi:10.1116/1.4758782

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    W., Chung, K

    Choi, D. W., Chung, K. B. & Park, J. S. Low temperature Ga2O3atomic layer deposition using gallium tri- isopropoxide and water. in Thin Solid Films (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.03.066

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    & Biyikli, N

    Altuntas, H., Donmez, I., Ozgit-Akgun, C. & Biyikli, N. Effect of postdeposition annealing on the electrical properties of β-Ga 2 O 3 thin films grown on p- Si by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum, Surfaces, Film. (2014). doi:10.1116/1.4875935

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    O’Donoghue, R. et al. Low temperature growth of gallium oxide thin films via plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition. Dalt. Trans. (2017). doi:10.1039/c7dt03427j

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    Shih, H. Y. et al. Atomic Layer Deposition of Gallium Oxide Films as Gate Dielectrics in AlGaN/GaN Metal– Oxide–Semiconductor High-Electron- Mobility Transistors. Nanoscale Res. Lett. (2016). doi:10.1186/s11671-016- 1448-z

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    Ramachandran, R. K. et al. Plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition of Ga2O3thin films. J. Mater. Chem. A (2014). doi:10.1039/c4ta05007j

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Roberts, J. W. et al. α-Ga2O3grown by low temperature atomic layer deposition on sapphire. J. Cryst. Growth (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.02.014

    2018 doi

  27. [35]

    Rebien, M., Henrion, W., Hong, M., Mannaerts, J. P. & Fleischer, M. Optical properties of gallium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2002). doi:10.1063/1.1491613

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    Deslattes, R. D. et al. X-rays. in International Tables for Crystallography (2006) (ed. Prince, E.) 200–212 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Moeck, P. et al. High spatial resolution semi-automatic crystallite orientation and phase mapping of nanocrystals in transmission electron microscopes. in Crystal Research and Technology (2011). doi:10.1002/crat.201000676

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    Pyxem, version 0.7, www.github.com/pyxem/pyxem

  31. [39]

    de la et al

    Peña, F. de la et al. Hyperspy/Hyperspy: Hyperspy 1.3. hyperspy/hyperspy: HyperSpy 1.3 (2017). doi:10.5281/ZENODO.583693

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Mu, W. et al. High quality crystal growth and anisotropic physical characterization of β-Ga2O3single crystals grown by EFG method. J. Alloys Compd. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.185

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Choi, K. H. & Kang, H. C. Structural and optical evolution of Ga2O3/glass thin films deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Mater. Lett. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.03.038

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    He, H. et al. First-principles study of the structural, electronic, and optical properties of Ga2 O3 in its monoclinic and hexagonal phases. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.195123

    2006 doi

  35. [43]

    & Van de Walle, C

    Peelaers, H. & Van de Walle, C. G. Brillouin zone and band structure of β- Ga2O3. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. (2015). doi:10.1002/pssb.201451551

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    Mohamed, M. et al. The electronic structure of β-Ga2O3. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2010). doi:10.1063/1.3521255

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    Chen, C. et al. Experimental electronic structure of In2O3 and Ga2O3. Sensors (2014). doi:10.1063/1.1427137

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Kumar, S. S. et al. Structure, morphology, and optical properties of amorphous and nanocrystalline gallium oxide thin films. J. Phys. Chem. C (2013). doi:10.1021/jp311300e

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    Ghose, S. et al. Structural and optical properties of β-Ga 2 O 3 thin films grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, Nanotechnol. Microelectron. Mater. Process. Meas. Phenom. (2016). doi:10.1116/1.4942045

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.