Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

On the geometry of asymptotically flat manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Controlled asymptotically flat ends are torus bundles over ALE spaces, and Ricci-flat 4-manifolds homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$ are Euclidean or Taub-NUT outside one tangent-cone case.

desk verdict Structurally important paper with a genuine gap in the ALF Hitchin-Thorpe proof; worth refereeing, not ready to cite as is for the inequality. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07248 v3 pith:I7YONT7Z submitted 2019-08-20 math.DG

Xiuxiong Chen , Yu Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C2053C2153C2553C2958J28
keywords asymptoticallyflatmanifoldsstrongholonomycontroltorusfibrationatinfinityALEendsHitchin-ThorpeinequalityRicci-flat4-manifoldsgravitationalinstantonsTaub-NUTmetric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a complete Riemannian manifold whose curvature decays like $K(r)/r^2$ (with $\int^\infty K(s)/s\,ds<\infty$) and whose holonomy around short geodesic loops is uniformly small has a rigid asymptotic structure. The main structural claim, Theorem 1.2, is that each end is quantitatively a torus fibration over an ALE (asymptotically locally Euclidean) end, with errors controlled by $K(r/2)$. For oriented Ricci-flat TALE 4-manifolds, the paper proves a Hitchin-Thorpe inequality $2(\chi(M)-\lambda)\ge 3|\tau(M)+\eta|$, where the correction $\eta$ depends only on the topology of the asymptotic torus fibration. The payoff is a four-dimensional rigidity statement: any complete Ricci-flat asymptotically flat metric on a manifold homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$, outside the $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}_+$ tangent-cone case, is Euclidean or Taub-NUT.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the fundamental pseudo-group $\Gamma(q,\rho)$ at each far-away point $q$: the collection of local isometries of $T_qM$ corresponding to short geodesic loops, each written as a rotation $r(\gamma)$ plus translation $t(\gamma)$. Under (SHC) the rotation is smaller than any prescribed $\epsilon(r)$, so every element is nearly a translation. The paper chooses a short basis among these translations, slides it continuously along a geodesic ray, proves the pseudo-group becomes abelian, and shows the limiting lengths and angles define a flat torus $T^m_\infty$ with finite automorphism group $G_\infty$. This short-basis data is what converts a rough nilmanifold fibration into a genuine torus fibration with quantitative estimates; the invariant metric is obtained by averaging over the torus action, and the ALE structure of the base follows from Euclidean-volume-growth coordinate theory applied to the orbit space.

What would settle it

Compute the adiabatic eta limit $\lim_{t\to\infty}\eta(\bar g|_{\partial D_t})$ from the asymptotic circle fibration data of a Ricci-flat TALE ALF 4-manifold not among the standard cyclic or dihedral models; if the result is not $-e/3+\operatorname{sgn}e$ (cyclic) or $-e/3$ (dihedral), the ALF case of Theorem 1.5 fails. A second decisive test is to find two Ricci-flat TALE ALF metrics with the same asymptotic fibration but different adiabatic eta limits; that would refute the universality of the calibration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.2. A complete Riemannian manifold $(M^n,g)$ satisfying (AF) and (SHC) has a compact set $K$, an integer $0\le m\le n-1$, a flat torus $T^m_\infty$, and an $m$-dimensional torus fibration $f\colon M^n\setminus K\to Y$ over an ALE end $Y$. The local trivializations $T_i\colon\Omega_i\to U_i\times T^m_\infty$ are $O(K(r/2))$-almost isometries, the torus actions are almost isometric and differ by automorphisms on overlaps, and there is an invariant nearby metric $\bar g$ with $g=\bar g+O(r^{-1}K(r/2))$ and curvature $O(r^{-2}K(r/2))$; the structure group lies in $T^m\rtimes G_\infty$. Consequently the tangent cone at infinity is the flat cone $\mathbb{R}^{n-m}/\Gamma$, and the boundary $X$ is a $T^m$-bundle over $S^{n-m-1}/\Gamma$. The paper also improves curvature decay for Ricci-flat TALE manifolds: polynomial $O(r^{-(l-2)(n-1)/(n-3)})$ when the tangent cone dimension $l\ge4$ (or $l=3,n=4$) and exponential $O(e^{-\delta r})$ when $l=1$. For oriented Ricci-flat TALE 4-manifolds the paper adds Theorem 1.5: $2(\chi(M)-\lambda)\ge 3|\tau(M)+\eta|$, with equality exactly when the manifold or its opposite orientation is a quotient of a hyperkähler 4-manifold; here $\lambda=1/|\Gamma|$ for ALE ends and $\lambda=0$ otherwise, and $\eta$ is an explicit topological invariant of the asymptotic torus fibration. The application, Theorem 1.6, is that any complete Ricci-flat AF metric on a manifold homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$ is Euclidean or Taub-NUT provided the tangent cone is not $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}_+$.

Load-bearing premise

The ALF eta correction in Theorem 1.5 is fixed by checking equality on standard ALF-$A_k$ and ALF-$D_k$ models, so the ALF Hitchin-Thorpe inequality assumes that this single value is the adiabatic eta invariant of every Ricci-flat TALE ALF metric with the same asymptotic circle fibration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An end of an (AF)+(SHC) manifold is diffeomorphic to a $T^m$-bundle over $S^{n-m-1}/\Gamma$; in particular, the boundary is a torus bundle over a spherical space form, and collapsing at infinity is torus collapse rather than general nilpotent collapse.
  • The tangent cone at infinity is isometric to a flat cone $\mathbb{R}^{n-m}/\Gamma$, so the smooth limit space at infinity cannot have nontrivial curvature.
  • For oriented Ricci-flat TALE 4-manifolds, the Hitchin-Thorpe inequality holds with explicit eta constants for ALE, ALF, ALG, and ALH ends, and equality characterizes hyperkähler quotients.
  • A complete Ricci-flat AF metric on a manifold homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$ must be Euclidean or Taub-NUT when the tangent cone is $\mathbb{R}^4$ or $\mathbb{R}^3$; in either case the underlying manifold is diffeomorphic to the standard $\mathbb{R}^4$.
  • Ricci-flat TALE manifolds have improved curvature decay: polynomial decay $O(r^{-(l-2)(n-1)/(n-3)})$ when $l\ge4$ (or $l=3,n=4$) and exponential decay when $l=1$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the flat torus $T^m_\infty$ and the finite group $G_\infty$ arise purely from limiting short-basis data, so they can be viewed as asymptotic invariants of any AF+SHC manifold, not only Ricci-flat ones; they could be used to organize a classification of asymptotically flat ends by their torus monodromy.
  • Editorial extension: because the proof produces an invariant metric $\bar g$ with controlled curvature, one can hope to define geometric charges or adiabatic invariants directly from the fibration data; in particular, the ALF eta constant could in principle be computed from the asymptotic circle bundle rather than calibrated on standard models.
  • Editorial extension: Theorem 1.6 leaves open the $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}_+$ tangent-cone case for Ricci-flat metrics on $\mathbb{R}^4$; ruling that case out, or constructing an example, would remove the caveat and settle the rigidity question completely.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies complete Riemannian manifolds satisfying an asymptotic flatness condition (AF) with a curvature function K of integrable logarithmic type, together with a strong holonomy control condition (SHC). Its main structural result, Theorem 1.2, asserts that each end of such a manifold admits a quantitative m-dimensional torus fibration over an ALE end, with local bundle diffeomorphisms that are O(K(r/2))-almost isometries, an almost isometric torus action, an invariant nearby metric with controlled curvature, and structure group in T^m ⋊ G_∞. For Ricci-flat TALE 4-manifolds the paper proves curvature decay estimates (Theorem 1.4), a Hitchin-Thorpe inequality with explicit eta corrections for the ALE, ALF, ALG, and ALH cases (Theorem 1.5), and applications culminating in the rigidity statement that any complete asymptotically flat Ricci-flat metric on a manifold homeomorphic to R^4 is flat or Taub-NUT unless the tangent cone at infinity is R × R_+ (Theorem 1.6). The abstract matches the body, and the paper explicitly flags the open l=2,3 decay cases in Remark 6.2.

Significance. If the results are correct, Theorem 1.2 gives a sharp and quantitative description of ends of asymptotically flat manifolds with strong holonomy control, extending Minerbe's circle-bundle theorem to general torus fibrations with explicit error estimates. The Hitchin-Thorpe inequalities for non-ALE Ricci-flat TALE 4-manifolds and the rigidity theorem for R^4 are substantial applications that would be of interest to the geometric analysis community. The paper is well organized, makes the dependence on the decay function K explicit, and is honest about open cases. On the other hand, as detailed below, the proof of the ALF eta-correction is calibrated rather than derived, and an analogous adiabatic-limit identification is missing in the ALG case, so the current text does not yet prove all of Theorem 1.5 as stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.2, Eqs. (6.24)–(6.26); Theorem 1.5(ii)] The ALF case of the Hitchin-Thorpe inequality is not fully proved because the adiabatic eta limit η_ad is not shown to be a topological invariant of the asymptotic circle fibration. Equation (6.24) gives η_ad = -(2χ(M)+3τ(M))/3 + (1/12π²)∫|W_+|², and the L² norm of W_+ is not shown to be topologically determined. The computation of η_ad from the standard ALF-A_k and ALF-D_k models, which all satisfy W_+ ≡ 0, calibrates the constant only on hyperkähler examples. For a general Ricci-flat TALE ALF metric, the same equation determines η_ad only once the L² norm of W_+ is known, so the inequalities (6.17)–(6.18) and the applications in Corollaries 6.12–6.13 and Theorem 6.18 depend on an unproved premise. The sentence in Theorem 1.5 that η depends only on the topology of the asymptotic torus fibration needs a derivation, for instance via an adiabatic-limit computation for the boundary metrics produced by Theorem 5.16.
  2. [§6.2, Theorem 6.14 (ALG case)] The ALG case has a similar missing step. Theorem 6.14 is asserted to follow by the same argument as Theorem 6.10, but the proof of Theorem 6.10 relies on computing the adiabatic eta limit for the specific boundary metrics in the standard models. For l=2, the eta invariant of the flat 3-manifold X quoted from [55] is not shown to equal lim_{t→∞} η(g|_{∂D_t}) for the boundary metrics of an arbitrary Ricci-flat TALE ALG manifold. The family ∂D_t has a base circle whose length tends to infinity while the T² fibers collapse, so an adiabatic-limit computation is required; citing the eta invariant of a fixed flat metric does not by itself provide that identification.
  3. [§5.2, Theorem 5.16 and Proposition 5.14] The global gluing argument is presented as a sketch following the standard strategy of [14] and Minerbe [42], but several key compatibility statements are only asserted. In particular, after all stages of modification the proof states that the local fibrations f_i and torus actions μ_i become compatible and that the transition maps have image in T^m ⋊ G(A_∞), relying on Proposition 5.14(iv); however, the text does not give the required induction or uniformity estimates that ensure the modifications at later stages do not destroy the estimates already achieved at earlier stages. Since Theorem 1.2 is the main structural claim, this part should be written in enough detail to be checked independently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 4.14] Theorem 4.14 states that there exists an integer 1 ≤ m < n, whereas Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 5.16 allow m = 0. The non-collapsed Euclidean-volume case should be explicitly included or excluded in the statement and proof of Theorem 4.14.
  2. [§6.2, proof of Theorem 6.10] The sentence 'χ = k+1, τ = −k if k ≥ 0 and χ = τ = 0 if k = 0' is internally inconsistent; for k = 0 the first clause gives χ = 1, τ = 0. The second clause should presumably refer to the flat model k = −1, and should be corrected.
  3. [Proposition 5.13] In the proof of Proposition 5.13 the text refers to equation (5.72), but the equation with that number appears later, as the O'Neill formula in Proposition 5.18. The cross-reference should be corrected or renumbered.
  4. [Theorem 1.2(i) and Proposition 5.7] There are typographical errors such as 'diffeomorphim' for 'diffeomorphism' and 'nequal∅' for '≠ ∅'. These should be corrected in a final pass.
  5. [Lemma 5.15] In the statement of Lemma 5.15, the expression f_z(B(x,σ r(x)) ∩ B(y,σ r(z)) ∩ B(z,σ r(z))) mixes variables inconsistently; the intended radii should be r(x), r(y), and r(z) respectively, and the notation should be fixed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No constructional circularity found; the main derivation is self-contained, and the Section 6.2 eta calibration is an extrapolation gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Theorem 1.2 is proved constructively from the hypotheses (AF) and (SHC): short bases are built by sliding geodesic loops along a ray and then extended over the end (Theorem 4.14), local torus fibrations are produced by smoothing a projection (Theorem 5.6), local charts are glued by transition maps and cutoff constructions (Propositions 5.13–5.14, Theorem 5.16), and the base is identified as an ALE end (Proposition 5.18). None of these steps takes Theorem 1.2 or its conclusion as an input; the flat torus at infinity and the finite holonomy group G_infty are defined from limits of quantities already constructed on the given manifold, not from the desired fibration. The Hitchin-Thorpe part is also not circular in the constructional sense: the ALE case is cited to Nakajima, and the ALF/ALG/ALH cases start from the Gauss-Bonnet-Chern and signature formulas, with eta terms that are limits on the actual boundary metrics. The one soft point is Section 6.2, equations (6.24)–(6.26): the numerical values of eta_ad are obtained by evaluating the identity on hyperkähler ALF-A_k and ALF-D_k models, where W_+ vanishes, and are then asserted for all Ricci-flat TALE ALF manifolds. This is a genuine support or completeness gap concerning whether eta_ad is a topological invariant of the asymptotic circle fibration, but it is not a self-definitional or fitted-input circularity: equation (6.24) is derived for each manifold and does not define eta_ad to be the model value. Self-citations to Chen-Chen [10]–[12] appear, but Appendix B re-proves the needed (SHC) statement for hyperkähler AF manifolds, and the classification citations are used for examples and context rather than as the chain justifying the main torus-fibration theorem. Thus no circular step meeting the hard-rule standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorems introduce no free parameters that are fitted to data; the only calibration step is the ALF eta constant in Theorem 1.5, listed above. The axioms are the standard machinery of collapsing theory and the external classifications on which the equality cases depend. No new geometric entity (particles, forces, dimensions) is postulated; the TALE class and the flat torus at infinity are definitions derived from the geometry, not invented entities.

free parameters (1)
  • eta_ad (adiabatic eta invariant, ALF case) = -e/3 + sign(e) (cyclic type), -e/3 (dihedral type)
    Section 6.2, equations (6.24) to (6.26): the value is fixed by requiring equality on the standard ALF-A_k and ALF-D_k models, rather than computed spectrally for the class of Ricci-flat TALE ALF metrics.
assumptions (8)
  • standard math Bishop-Gromov comparison gives at most Euclidean volume growth under (AF)
    Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 5.18 rely on it; a textbook result.
  • standard math Buser-Karcher short basis theory applies to the fundamental pseudo-group
    Section 4.1 imports Definition 4.1.1, Proposition 3.5, Theorem 4.5 and Section 4.3 from [7] to construct short bases.
  • standard math Cheeger-Fukaya-Gromov nilpotent structures and Fukaya fibration theorems apply
    Theorems 3.19, 3.21 and 3.23 are direct applications of [14], [21], [22] and [23].
  • standard math Kasue's tangent cone at infinity exists and is unique under (AF)
    Section 3.3 follows [31] and [44, Corollary 0.4].
  • domain assumption Petrunin-Tuschmann trichotomy: simply connected at infinity implies C(S(infinity)) is R^4, R^3 or R x R_+
    Theorem 1.6 uses [52, Theorem A (ii)] to reduce the tangent cone to R^4 or R^3 once R x R_+ is excluded.
  • domain assumption The strong holonomy control condition (SHC) holds for the metrics under study
    It is the hypothesis of Theorem 1.2 and Definition 1.3; for Theorem 1.6 it is recovered in the circle case via Theorem 5.20, itself proved from (AF) plus smoothness of S(infinity).
  • standard math Minerbe's weighted Sobolev decay theorem applies to TALE ends
    Theorem 1.4(i) follows essentially from Minerbe's work [41, Theorem 4.12] with volume growth r^l and the integrability of K as the only inputs.
  • domain assumption External classification results are correct: Kronheimer [34,35], Minerbe [43], Chen-Chen [10,11,12]
    The equality cases of Theorem 1.5 and Corollaries 6.9, 6.12, 6.13 and 6.17 convert inequality to isometry using these classifications; references [10,11,12] share the current paper's first author.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the geometry of asymptotically flat manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I7YONT7Z

@misc{pith2026190807248,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the geometry of asymptotically flat manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I7YONT7Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07248}
}
abstract

In this paper, we investigate the geometry of asymptotically flat manifolds with controlled holonomy. We show that any end of such manifold admits a torus fibration over an ALE end. In addition, we prove a Hitchin-Thorpe inequality for oriented Ricci-flat $4$-manifolds with curvature decay and controlled holonomy. As an application, we show that any complete asymptotically flat Ricci-flat metric on a $4$-manifold which is homeomorphic to $\mathbb R^4$ must be isometric to the Euclidean or the Taub-NUT metric, provided that the tangent cone at infinity is not $\mathbb R \times \mathbb R_+$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [55]

    Szczepanski, Eta invariants for flat manifolds , Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry 41 (2012),125-138

    A. Szczepanski, Eta invariants for flat manifolds , Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry 41 (2012),125-138

    work page 2012

  2. [14]

    Cheeger, K

    J. Cheeger, K. Fukaya, M. Gromov, Nilpotent Structures and Invariant Metrics on Collapsed Manifolds, Journal of the American Mathematical Society V ol. 5, No. 2 ( Apr., 1992), pp. 327-372

    1992

  3. [42]

    Minerbe, On the asymptotic geometry of gravitational instantons , Annales scientifiques de l’cole Normale Suprieure, Srie 4 : V olume 43 (2010) no

    V . Minerbe, On the asymptotic geometry of gravitational instantons , Annales scientifiques de l’cole Normale Suprieure, Srie 4 : V olume 43 (2010) no. 6 , p. 8 83-924

    work page 2010

  4. [1]

    Abresch, Lower curvature bounds, Toponogov’s theorem, and bounded topology, Ann

    U. Abresch, Lower curvature bounds, Toponogov’s theorem, and bounded topology, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 18 (1985), no. 4, 651670

    work page 1985

  5. [2]

    Atiyah, N

    M. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, The geometry and dynamics of magnetic monopoles , M. B. Porter Lectures, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988 . viii+134 pp

    work page 1988

  6. [3]

    Atiyah, V

    M. Atiyah, V . Patodi, I. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and riemannian geometry I , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc, 77 (1975), 43-69

    work page 1975

  7. [4]

    Atiyah, V

    M. Atiyah, V . Patodi, I. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and riemannian geometry II , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc, 78 (1975), 405-432

    work page 1975

  8. [5]

    Burago, Y

    D. Burago, Y . Burago, S. Ivanov, A course in metric geometry, Graduate Studies in Mathemat- ics, vol. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R I, 2001. 90

    work page 2001

Show all 60 references
  1. [6]

    Biquard, V

    O. Biquard, V . Minerbe, A Kummer Construction for Gravitational Instantons , Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, December 2011, V olume 308, Issue 3, pp 773-794

    2011

  2. [7]

    Buser, H

    P . Buser, H. Karcher, Gromov’s almost flat manifolds , Asterisque 81 (1981), 1-148

    1981

  3. [8]

    Bando, A

    S. Bando, A. Kasue, H. Nakajima, On a construction of coordinates at infinity on manifolds with fast curvature decay and maximal volume growth , Inventiones mathematicae, June 1989, V olume 97, Issue 2, pp 313-349

    1989

  4. [9]

    Fa` a di Bruno, Note sur une nouvelle formule de calcul di ff´ erentiel, Quarterly J

    F. Fa` a di Bruno, Note sur une nouvelle formule de calcul di ff´ erentiel, Quarterly J. Pure Appl. Math. 1 (1857) 359-360

  5. [10]

    G. Chen, X. X. Chen, Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curva ture decay (I), preprint, http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.01790

    arXiv

  6. [11]

    G. Chen, X. X. Chen, Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curvature decay (II), J. reine angew. Math., 2019(756), 259-284. DOI 10.1515 /crelle-2017-0026

    2019

  7. [12]

    G. Chen, X. X. Chen, Gravitational instantons with faster than quadratic curva ture decay (III), Math. Ann. (2020). https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00208-020-01984-9

    2020 doi

  8. [13]

    Cherkis, N

    S. Cherkis, N. Hitchin, Gravitational instantons of type D k, Commun. Math. Phys. 260(2), 299317 (2005)

    2005

  9. [15]

    Cheeger, M

    J. Cheeger, M. Gromov, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while keeping their curva ture bounded. part II, J. Di fferential Geom. 32 (1990), 269-298

    1990

  10. [16]

    Cherkis, A

    S. Cherkis, A. Kapustin, Singular monopoles and gravitational instantons , Commun. Math. Phys. 203(3), 713728 (1999)

    1999

  11. [17]

    X. Dai, G. Wei, Hitchin-Thorpe inequality for noncompact Einstein 4-manifolds, Advances in Mathematics, V olume 214, Issue 2, 1 October 2007, Pages 551-570

    2007

  12. [18]

    A. S. Dancer, Dihedral singularities and gravitational instantons , J. Geom. Phys. 12(2), 7791 (1993)

    1993

  13. [19]

    de Rham, Complexes ` a automorphismes et hom´ eomorphie diff´ erentiable, Ann

    G. de Rham, Complexes ` a automorphismes et hom´ eomorphie diff´ erentiable, Ann. Inst. Fourier Grenoble 2 (1950), 5167 (1951)

    1950

  14. [20]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P . B. Gilkey, A. J. Hanson, Gravitation, gauge theories and di fferential geometry, Physics Reports, 66 (1980) 213-393

    1980

  15. [21]

    Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension s, J

    K. Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension s, J. Di fferential Geom. V olume 25, Number 1 (1987), 139-156

    1987

  16. [22]

    Fukaya, A boundary of the set of the Riemannian manifolds with bounde d curvatures and diameters, J

    K. Fukaya, A boundary of the set of the Riemannian manifolds with bounde d curvatures and diameters, J. Di fferential Geom. V olume 28, Number 1 (1988), 1-21. 91

    1988

  17. [23]

    Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension II, J

    K. Fukaya, Collapsing Riemannian manifolds to ones of lower dimension II, J. Math. Soc. Japan 41 (1989), 333-356

    1989

  18. [24]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, Classification of gravitational instanton symmetries , Comm. Math. Phys. 66 (1979), 291-310

    1979

  19. [25]

    Gromov, Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Space s, Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Birkh¨ auser

    M. Gromov, Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Space s, Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Birkh¨ auser

  20. [26]

    Gilbarg and N.S

    D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, Springer

  21. [27]

    H. J. Hein, Gravitational instantons from rational elliptic surfaces , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), no.2, 355-393

    2012

  22. [28]

    Hitchin, Compact four-dimensional Einstein manifolds , J

    N. Hitchin, Compact four-dimensional Einstein manifolds , J. Di fferential Geometry 9 (1974), 435-441

    1974

  23. [29]

    Hitchin, Twistor construction of Einstein metrics , Global Riemannian geometry (Durham, 1983), 115-125, Ellis Horwood Ser

    N. Hitchin, Twistor construction of Einstein metrics , Global Riemannian geometry (Durham, 1983), 115-125, Ellis Horwood Ser. Math. Appl., Horwood, Ch ichester, 1984

    1983

  24. [30]

    Jost, harmonic mappings between riemannian manifolds , Proc

    J. Jost, harmonic mappings between riemannian manifolds , Proc. Centre for Math. Analysis, Australian Nat. Univ., 4 (1983)

    1983

  25. [31]

    A. Kasue, A compactification of a manifold with asymptotically nonneg ative curvature, An- nales scientifiques de l’ ´Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure, S´ erie 4 (1988) V olume: 21, Issue: 4, page 593-622

    1988

  26. [32]

    Kasue, A Convergence Theorem for Riemannian Manifolds and Some Applications, Nagoya Math

    A. Kasue, A Convergence Theorem for Riemannian Manifolds and Some Applications, Nagoya Math. J. 114, p. 21-51 (1989)

    1989

  27. [33]

    R. C. Kirby, The topology of 4-manifolds , Lecture Notes in Mathematics. 1374. Berlin: Springer-V erlag. ISBN 3-540-51148-2, (1989)

    1989

  28. [34]

    P . B. Kronheimer, The construction of ALE spaces as hyperk¨ ahler quotients , J. Di fferential Geom. 29 (1989), no.3, 665-683. MR0992334

    1989

  29. [35]

    P . B. Kronheimer, A Torelli-type theorem for gravitational instantons, J. Differential Geom. 29 (1989), no.3, 685-697. MR0992335

    1989

  30. [36]

    Li, Geometric Analysis, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Book 134), Cam - bridge University Press

    P . Li, Geometric Analysis, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics (Book 134), Cam - bridge University Press

  31. [37]

    J. Lott, Z. Shen, Manifolds with quadratic curvature decay and slow volume growth, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 33:2 (2000), 275290

    2000

  32. [38]

    M. T. Lock, J. A. Viaclovsky, Quotient singularities, eta invariants, and self-dual met rics, Geom. Topol. 20(2016), 17731806

    2016

  33. [39]

    Milnor, Two complexes which are homeomorphic but combinatorially distinct, Ann

    J. Milnor, Two complexes which are homeomorphic but combinatorially distinct, Ann. of Math. (2) 74 (1961). 92

    1961

  34. [40]

    Minerbe, A mass for ALF manifold , Comm

    V . Minerbe, A mass for ALF manifold , Comm. Math. Phys. 289 (2009), no. 3, 925-955

    2009

  35. [41]

    Minerbe, Weighted Sobolev Inequalities and Ricci Flat Manifolds , Geometric and Func- tional Analysis, February 2009, V olume 18, Issue 5, pp 1696-1749

    V . Minerbe, Weighted Sobolev Inequalities and Ricci Flat Manifolds , Geometric and Func- tional Analysis, February 2009, V olume 18, Issue 5, pp 1696-1749

    2009

  36. [43]

    Minerbe, Rigidity for Multi-Taub-NUT metrics, J

    V . Minerbe, Rigidity for Multi-Taub-NUT metrics, J. reine angew. Math. 656 (2011), 47-58

    2011

  37. [44]

    Mashiko, K

    Y . Mashiko, K. Nagano, K. Otsuka, The asymptotic cones of manifolds of roughly non-negative radial curvature, J. Math. Soc. Japan 57(2005), no.1, 5568

    2005

  38. [45]

    J. M. Montesinos, Classical Tessellations and Three-Manifolds , in: Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 1987

    1987

  39. [46]

    Nakajima, Self-duality of ALE Ricci-flat 4-manifolds and positive mass theorem

    H. Nakajima, Self-duality of ALE Ricci-flat 4-manifolds and positive mass theorem. In Recent topics in di fferential and analytic geometry , volume 18 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 385-

  40. [47]

    D. N. Page, A periodic but nonstationary gravitational instanton , Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981), no.4, 313-315

    1981

  41. [48]

    Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric appli cations, arXiv:math/0211159

    G. Perelman, The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric appli cations, arXiv:math/0211159

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , arXiv:math/0303109

    G. Perelman, Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , arXiv:math/0303109

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    Perelman, Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on c ertain three- manifolds, arXiv:math/0307245

    G. Perelman, Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on c ertain three- manifolds, arXiv:math/0307245

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    Petersen, Riemannian Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Book 171), Springer; 2nd edition

    P . Petersen, Riemannian Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Book 171), Springer; 2nd edition

  45. [52]

    Petrunin, W

    A. Petrunin, W. Tuschmann, Asymptotical flatness and cone structure at infinity . Math. Ann. 321(4), 775788 (2001)

    2001

  46. [53]

    Rong, On the Fundamental Groups of Manifolds of Positive Sectiona l Curvature, Ann

    X. Rong, On the Fundamental Groups of Manifolds of Positive Sectiona l Curvature, Ann. of Math.143, p. 397-411 (1996)

    1996

  47. [54]

    W. X. Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds . J. Di ff. Geom., 30:223- 301, 1989

    1989

  48. [56]

    K. I. Tahara, On the finite subgroups of GL (3, Z), Nagoya Math. J., 41:169-209, 1971

    1971

  49. [57]

    J. A. Thorpe, Some remarks on the Gauss-Bonnet integral, J. Math. Mech. 18(1969), 779-786. 93

    1969

  50. [58]

    Turaev,Towards the topological classification of geometric 3-mani folds, in Topology and Geometry-Rohlin Seminar, Lecture Notes in Math

    V .G. Turaev,Towards the topological classification of geometric 3-mani folds, in Topology and Geometry-Rohlin Seminar, Lecture Notes in Math. 1346, Spri nger, Berlin-Heidelberg-New Y ork, 291-323 (1988)

    1988

  51. [59]

    Warner, Extension of the Rauch comparison theorem to submanifolds , Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, (1966), pp

    F. Warner, Extension of the Rauch comparison theorem to submanifolds , Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, (1966), pp. 341356. Xiuxiong Chen, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 1179 4, USA; School of Mathemat- ics, University of Science and Technology of Ch...

    1966

  52. [396]

    Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.