Current operators in Bethe Ansatz and Generalized Hydrodynamics: An exact quantum/classical correspondence

Bal\'azs Pozsgay; Levente Pristy\'ak; M\'arton Borsi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Current operators in Bethe Ansatz and Generalized Hydrodynamics: An exact quantum/classical correspondence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bethe ansatz makes the GHD current formula exact at finite volume

desk verdict Proves the finite-volume current formula for XXZ/XXX, but the generalization to other models is cited, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07320 v1 pith:OXNDYQ53 submitted 2019-08-20 cond-mat.stat-mech nlin.SI

Márton Borsi , Balázs Pozsgay , Levente Pristyák This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.SI MSC 81R1282B23

keywords BetheansatzGeneralizedHydrodynamicscurrentoperatorsGaudinmatrixformfactorseffectivevelocityXXZspinchainLieb-Linigermodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Generalized Hydrodynamics predicts that ballistic currents in integrable systems are obtained by replacing each particle's bare group velocity with an effective velocity that encodes scattering time delays. That prediction, the current formula, had been conjectured but not proven for interacting lattice models and non-relativistic gases. This paper derives it exactly from the Bethe ansatz at finite volume: the current mean value in any eigenstate is a contraction of single-particle charge eigenvalues with the inverse Gaudin matrix. The same formula admits the semi-classical effective-velocity reading, so the quantum result and the classical time-delay picture coincide for any finite particle number. Because the formula is proven from a finite-volume form-factor expansion, it supplies the missing foundation for the ballistic part of generalized hydrodynamics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Gaudin matrix $G$, whose determinant gives the norm and rapidity-space density of Bethe states; the proof runs through a finite-volume form-factor expansion (Theorem 1, Eq. (IV.8)) that expresses mean values of any local operator as a sum over bipartitions of the rapidities of symmetric diagonal form factors times Gaudin determinants. For charge densities the form factors are extracted recursively, and the matrix-tree theorem turns their expansions into sums over directed spanning forests of the rapidity graph. Summing the expansion for currents then reproduces the inverse Gaudin matrix, giving the result. The algebraic proof of the expansion for the XXZ and XXX chains rests on singularity properties of Bethe-ansatz matrix elements, where the apparent pole as two rapidities coincide has a known residue.

What would settle it

Evaluate the singularity identity (VI.7) explicitly for a three-particle matrix element in the XXZ chain using the listed commutation relations; if any term does not match, the induction proving Theorem 1 breaks and the current formula is unproved for that model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for any normalized finite-volume Bethe eigenstate $|\{\lambda\}_N\rangle$, the mean value of the current operator $J_\alpha(x)$ is exactly $\langle\{\lambda\}_N|J_\alpha(x)|\{\lambda\}_N\rangle = e'\cdot G^{-1}\cdot q_\alpha$, where $(e')_j=\partial e(\lambda_j)/\partial\lambda$, $(q_\alpha)_j=q_\alpha(\lambda_j)$, and $G$ is the Gaudin matrix of Eq. (II.16). An equivalent form is $\langle J_\alpha(x)\rangle = \frac{1}{L}\sum_{j=1}^N v_{\mathrm{eff}}(\lambda_j) q_\alpha(\lambda_j)$ with $v_{\mathrm{eff}}(\lambda_j) = (L/2\pi)\,\partial E/\partial I_j$. This is the generalized hydrodynamics current conjecture evaluated at finite volume, and the paper argues that its thermodynamic limit reproduces the dressed-velocity formula. The same proof gives the generalized current formula $\langle J^\beta_\alpha(x)\rangle = q'_{\beta}\cdot G^{-1}\cdot q_\alpha$. The derivation is model-independent once a finite-volume form-factor expansion theorem is available; the expansion is proved in detail for the XXZ and XXX chains and, as the paper states, follows for other models from earlier work.

Load-bearing premise

Everything collapses if the finite-volume form-factor expansion (Theorem 1, Eq. (IV.8)) fails for one of the claimed models, since the paper proves it only for the Heisenberg chains and elsewhere relies on earlier results it does not re-derive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The GHD current formula (I.5) follows from the finite-volume result in the thermodynamic limit, so ballistic transport equations in integrable models no longer depend on an unproved conjecture.
The finite-volume formula provides exact current mean values for small particle numbers, enabling direct checks against exact diagonalization or other small-system methods at finite $L$.
The generalized current formula (II.26) determines how every conserved charge flows under unitary evolution generated by any other charge, completing the hierarchy of continuity equations used in GHD.
The equality between the quantum formula and the finite-$N$ semi-classical time-delay calculation makes the flea-gas simulation exact at finite particle number, not just asymptotically.
For integrable quantum field theories, the paper obtains the formula up to exponentially small finite-volume corrections inherited from the form-factor expansion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: If the same expansion theorem is proved for the Lieb-Liniger gas, the paper's model-independent Section IV transfers automatically; the only missing piece is a model-specific proof of Theorem 1, which this paper does not supply.
Inference: The matrix-tree combinatorics in the summation suggests that the current mean value formula might be provable directly from the Gaudin matrix and the continuity relation, bypassing the full form-factor expansion.
Inference: For nested Bethe ansatz models without $U(1)$ symmetry, an analogous Gaudin-like matrix would have to be identified; if it exists, the same algebraic structure would likely yield a similar current formula.
Inference: A numerical evaluation of both sides of (II.18) for small $N$ in the XXX chain, using the explicit current operators given in Appendix B, would isolate the validity of the expansion theorem from the rest of the argument.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: this paper proves, for the XXZ and XXX Heisenberg chains, the long-standing conjecture that current mean values in Bethe ansatz eigenstates take the semi-classical form e' G^{-1} q (Eq. II.18). That is a genuinely new result, and the derivation is a real first-principles computation, not a curve fit. The main soft spot is scope: the model-independent proof relies on the finite-volume form factor expansion (Theorem 1, Eq. IV.8), which is proven in Section VI only for these spin chains. The extension to Lieb-Liniger and to integrable QFT is asserted by citation. For Lieb-Liniger, the cited work covers only certain local operators, not the currents; for iQFT the expansion was proven earlier and the Bethe ansatz itself is only approximate. Thus the abstract's 'large class of integrable models' overstates what is actually demonstrated in this paper.

What the paper does well: the core mechanism is elegant. The authors derive the symmetric form factors of charge densities using the matrix-tree theorem, then sum the form factor expansion for the currents. The summation in Appendix C is a nontrivial combinatorial identity, and the connection to the factorized correlation functions of the Heisenberg chain in Section VII is a nice observation. The semi-classical interpretation in Section III, with the effective velocities emerging from scattering time delays, is illuminating and is shown to match the exact quantum result for finite N. The paper is also honest: the conclusions state that the thermodynamic limit was not treated directly, and the current operators for the XXZ chain are not written explicitly.

The flaws, in proportion: the missing thermodynamic limit is a minor mismatch, because the functional form (II.21) makes the limit extremely plausible and the infinite-volume formula was already the known conjecture. The reliance on citations for other models is the more substantive issue. If Theorem 1 were false for a given model, the derivation of (II.18) in that model would collapse. I would not call this a fatal flaw for the spin-chain result, but the paper's title and abstract should be adjusted. Also, the singularity property (VI.7) sits behind the whole proof and is established by a long algebraic calculation that has not been independently checked; that is within the norm for Algebraic Bethe Ansatz papers, but a referee should verify a few of the steps.

Who is this for: the GHD community and anyone working on exact finite-volume matrix elements in integrable systems. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review with a request to tone down the thermodynamic-limit claim and to explicitly state which parts rely on prior work.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves an exact finite-volume formula, Eq. (II.18), for the normalized mean value of a current operator in Bethe-ansatz-solvable integrable models: ⟨J_α(x)⟩ = e′·G^{-1}·q_α, where e′ and q_α are single-particle energy and charge derivatives and G is the Gaudin matrix. An equivalent effective-velocity form is given in Eq. (II.21). The proof is built on a finite-volume form-factor expansion, Theorem 1 (Eq. (IV.8)), which is proven for the XXZ and XXX spin chains in Section VI using the Algebraic Bethe Ansatz. The paper also derives the generalized current formula (II.26), gives a semi-classical derivation in Section III, and connects the results to the theory of factorized correlation functions in Section VII. The authors claim that the finite-volume formula reproduces the GHD current conjecture (I.5) in the thermodynamic limit.

Significance. If the result stands, this is a significant contribution to GHD: it provides a first-principles, parameter-free derivation of the current formula for interacting lattice models, a central ingredient of GHD that was previously conjectural. The paper contains an explicit finite-volume proof for the XXZ/XXX chains, an exact generalized-current formula, a semi-classical interpretation with no fitting parameters, and a new connection to factorized correlation functions. These are substantial strengths. However, the abstract and introductory statements claim more than is proven: the form-factor expansion theorem is demonstrated only for XXZ/XXX, the thermodynamic limit is not rigorously taken, and for integrable QFT the formula is admitted to hold only up to exponentially small corrections. These gaps do not undermine the XXZ/XXX result, but they need to be addressed before the broad claims can be accepted as stated.

major comments (3)

[§IV, §VI, §VIII] The model-independent proof of the main result (II.18) rests entirely on Theorem 1 (Eq. (IV.8)), but that theorem is proven in Section VI only for the XXZ and XXX Heisenberg chains. For the Lieb-Liniger gas and integrable QFT the paper cites refs. [62], [64], and [65], and Section VIII explicitly states that the Lieb-Liniger case was not treated here. The abstract's claim of applicability to 'a large class of quantum integrable models' is therefore not supported by the proofs in this manuscript. The authors should either supply the missing proofs, state the precise class of models for which Theorem 1 is proven, or restrict the abstract and Section IV claims accordingly.
[Abstract and §VIII] The abstract states that the result 'remains exact ... in the thermodynamic limit', but Section VIII says 'We did not treat the direct thermodynamic limit of these results'. The passage from the finite-volume formula (II.21) and effective velocity (II.22) to the GHD formula (I.5) is only argued informally through the correspondence (II.24). A rigorous thermodynamic limit, with explicit assumptions on the root densities and convergence of the Gaudin-matrix inverse, is needed to support the abstract's claim; alternatively, the wording should be changed to say that the thermodynamic limit is expected but not proven.
[§II.B and Abstract] There is an inconsistency about exactness in integrable QFT. The abstract describes an 'exact result ... valid in arbitrary finite volume', while Section II.B states that in iQFT 'the Bethe wave function is only an approximation, and in iQFT (II.18) holds up to exponentially small corrections in the volume'. This should be reconciled, for example by stating in the abstract that the exact statement applies to models with exact Bethe wave functions and that iQFT is covered up to exponentially small corrections.

minor comments (5)

[Title page] The title contains a typographical error: 'Hydrodyn amics' should read 'Hydrodynamics'.
[§IV (Eqs. (IV.8), (IV.21))] The notation for the empty or non-empty rapidity subset is inconsistent: Eq. (IV.8) writes ρ({λ−}) while Eq. (IV.21) writes ρ(λ−). Please use a single notation throughout.
[§III (Eqs. (III.9)-(III.13))] The semi-classical derivation assumes that the ordering of bare velocities agrees with the ordering of effective velocities; the discussion after Eq. (III.13) mentions this, but the assumption should be stated more prominently before Eq. (III.9) because it is essential for the classical derivation.
[§II.B (Eq. (II.22))] In the definition of veff(λj) = (L/2π)∂E/∂I_j, it should be stated explicitly that the derivative is taken at fixed values of the other quantum numbers I_k; otherwise the notation is ambiguous.
[Reference list, [86]] Reference [86] is described only as 'a short unpublished proof'; it would be better to label it as a private communication or to remove it from the formal reference list, since it is not publicly available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the finite-volume current formula is derived from a self-contained form-factor proof for the Heisenberg chains.

full rationale

The central result (II.18) is not circular. It is obtained by combining the off-diagonal continuity equation (IV.1), the finite-volume form-factor expansion theorem (IV.8), and an explicit matrix-tree summation (Appendix C). Theorem 1 is proved in Section VI for the XXZ/XXX chains via the ABA singularity property (VI.7) (proved in Appendix D) and the induction in Theorem 5; no step in that proof assumes the target current formula. The charge form factors are extracted from the independent Bethe-ansatz input (II.13), and the Gaudin matrix G is defined from the Bethe equations, not fitted to currents. The semi-classical section III is an interpretation that reproduces (II.18) rather than an input to it. The only scope caveat is that the expansion theorem for Lieb-Liniger and iQFT is imported from earlier work ([62], [64], [65]) rather than proved here; the text itself notes this for Lieb-Liniger ('the expansion was proven for certain local operators in the Lieb-Liniger models in [65]'). That is a limitation of model coverage, not a circular reduction, because the central spin-chain proof is self-contained and the cited results are independent, even when authored by one of the present authors. Hence no circular step; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses no free parameters and postulates no new entities. The main non-trivial input is the finite-volume form factor expansion theorem (IV.8), proven in Section VI for the XXZ/XXX spin chains but only cited from earlier work for the Lieb-Liniger gas and integrable QFT. The proof also relies on standard Bethe ansatz facts: exactness of Bethe wave functions, Gaudin norm formula (V.29), and the commutation relations of the algebraic Bethe ansatz.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Bethe ansatz wave functions are exact eigenstates for the considered lattice models and the 1D Bose gas
Used throughout the derivation; stated in Section II.A, and explicitly relaxed for iQFT in Section II.B where Eq. (II.18) holds up to exponentially small corrections.
domain assumption The finite-volume form factor expansion theorem (IV.8)
This is the basis of the model-independent proof in Section IV. It is proven for XXZ/XXX chains in Section VI, but for Lieb-Liniger and iQFT it is cited from [62], [64], [65] rather than proven here.
standard math Gaudin determinant equals the norm of Bethe states (V.29)
Needed for normalization; cited to Korepin [48] and used in Eq. (VI.29) in the proof of the expansion theorem.
domain assumption Continuity equation (II.5) defines local short-range current operators
Assumed to hold with periodic boundary conditions; the gauge freedom is discussed in Section V.
standard math The singularity property (VI.7) of algebraic Bethe ansatz matrix elements
Proven in Appendix D using commutation relations and the known scalar product singularity; it is the key technical lemma for the expansion theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Current operators in Bethe Ansatz and Generalized Hydrodynamics: An exact quantum/classical correspondence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OXNDYQ53

@misc{pith2026190807320,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Current operators in Bethe Ansatz and Generalized Hydrodynamics: An exact quantum/classical correspondence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OXNDYQ53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07320}
}

read the original abstract

Generalized Hydrodynamics is a recent theory that describes large scale transport properties of one dimensional integrable models. It is built on the (typically infinitely many) local conservation laws present in these systems, and leads to a generalized Euler type hydrodynamic equation. Despite the successes of the theory, one of its cornerstones, namely a conjectured expression for the currents of the conserved charges in local equilibrium has not yet been proven for interacting lattice models. Here we fill this gap, and compute an exact result for the mean values of current operators in Bethe Ansatz solvable systems, valid in arbitrary finite volume. Our exact formula has a simple semi-classical interpretation: the currents can be computed by summing over the charge eigenvalues carried by the individual bare particles, multiplied with an effective velocity describing their propagation in the presence of the other particles. Remarkably, the semi-classical formula remains exact in the interacting quantum theory, for any finite number of particles and also in the thermodynamic limit. Our proof is built on a form factor expansion and it is applicable to a large class of quantum integrable models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07320 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Full counting statistics in the sine-Gordon model
cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Full counting statistics for energy, momentum, and topological charge in the sine-Gordon model, computed via TBA, show fractal coupling dependence for topological charge but smooth behavior for energy and momentum.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[62]

Pozsgay and G

B. Pozsgay and G. Takacs, Form factors in ﬁnite volume II:disconnected terms and ﬁnite temperature correlators, Nucl. Phys. B788, 209 (2008) , arXiv:0706.3605 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008
[64]

LeClair-Mussardo series for two-point functions in Integrable QFT

B. Pozsgay and I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, LeClair-Mussardo se- ries for two-point functions in Integrable QFT, Journal of High Energy Physics 5, 170 (2018) , arXiv:1802.05890 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[65]

Bajnok and C

Z. Bajnok and C. Wu, Diagonal form factors from non-diagonal ones, in 2017 MATRIX Annals , edited by J. de Gier, C. E. Praeger, and T. Tao (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019) pp. 141–151, arXiv:1707.08027 [hep-th]

arXiv 2017
[1]

Spohn, Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Parti- cles, Texts and monographs in physics (Springer-Verlag, 1991)

H. Spohn, Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Parti- cles, Texts and monographs in physics (Springer-Verlag, 1991)

1991
[2]

Esposito, J

R. Esposito, J. L. Lebowitz, and R. Marra, On the deriva- tion of hydrodynamics from the boltzmann equation, Physics of Fluids 11, 2354 (1999)

1999
[3]

of [ 23]) ⟨0| N∏ j=1 C(λC j ) N∏ j=1 B(λB j )|0⟩ λC N →λB N − − − − − →i sinh(η) λC N − λB N ( lC N − lB N ) N −1∏ k=1 f C N kf B N k⟨0| N −1∏ j=1 C(λC j ) N −1∏ j=1 B(λB j )|0⟩mod. (D.2) Here the elements of the sets {λC} and {λB} not necessarily satisfy the Bethe equations, and the ⟨ ⟩mod notation means, that the scalar product is calculated with the mo...
[4]

L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringar, Bose-Einstein Conden- sation (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

2003
[5]

D. A. Teaney, Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma, in Quark-Gluon Plasma , Vol. 4 (World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2010) pp. 207–266, arXiv:0905.2433 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2010

Show all 88 references

[6]

Grimm, Low-temperature physics: A quantum revo- lution, Nature 435, 1035 (2005)

R. Grimm, Low-temperature physics: A quantum revo- lution, Nature 435, 1035 (2005)

2005
[7]

Rigol, V

M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, V. Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Relaxation in a completely integrable many-body quan- tum system: An ab initio study of the dynamics of the highly excited states of 1d lattice hard-core bosons, Physical Review Letters 98, 050405 (2007) , arXiv:cond- mat/0604476

2007
[8]

Vidmar and M

L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized Gibbs ensem- ble in integrable lattice models, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 6, 064007 (2016) , arXiv:1604.03990 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2016 arXiv
[9]

Kinoshita, T

T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum newton’s cradle, Nature 440, 900 (2006)

2006
[10]

Zotos, Ballistic transport in classical and quantum integrable systems, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 126, 1185 (2002)

X. Zotos, Ballistic transport in classical and quantum integrable systems, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 126, 1185 (2002)

2002
[11]

O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Emergent Hydrodynamics in Integrable Quantum Sys- tems Out of Equilibrium, Physical Review X 6, 041065 24 (2016), arXiv:1605.07331 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2016 arXiv
[12]

Bertini, M

B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Transport in Out-of-Equilibrium X X Z Chains: Ex- act Proﬁles of Charges and Currents, Physical Review Letters 117, 207201 (2016) , arXiv:1605.09790 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

2016 arXiv
[13]

Doyon and T

B. Doyon and T. Yoshimura, A note on generalized hy- drodynamics: inhomogeneous ﬁelds and other concepts, SciPost Physics 2, 014 (2017) , arXiv:1611.08225 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv
[14]

Doyon, Exact large-scale correlations in integrable sys - tems out of equilibrium, SciPost Physics 5, 054 (2018) , arXiv:1711.04568 [math-ph]

B. Doyon, Exact large-scale correlations in integrable sys - tems out of equilibrium, SciPost Physics 5, 054 (2018) , arXiv:1711.04568 [math-ph]

2018 arXiv
[15]

V. B. Bulchandani, R. Vasseur, C. Karrasch, and J. E. Moore, Bethe-Boltzmann hydrodynamics and spin trans- port in the XXZ chain, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045407 (2018) , arXiv:1702.06146 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2018 arXiv
[16]

V. B. Bulchandani, R. Vasseur, C. Karrasch, and J. E. Moore, Solvable Hydrodynamics of Quantum In- tegrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 220604 (2017) , arXiv:1704.03466 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv
[17]

Doyon and H

B. Doyon and H. Spohn, Drude Weight for the Lieb- Liniger Bose Gas, SciPost Physics 3, 039 (2017) , arXiv:1705.08141 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv
[18]

Ilievski and J

E. Ilievski and J. De Nardis, Microscopic Origin of Ideal Conductivity in Integrable Quantum Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 020602 (2017) , arXiv:1702.02930 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv
[19]

De Nardis, D

J. De Nardis, D. Bernard, and B. Doyon, Hydrodynamic Diﬀusion in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 160603 (2018) , 1807.02414 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2018 arXiv
[20]

J. D. Nardis, D. Bernard, and B. Doyon, Diﬀusion in generalized hydrodynamics and quasiparticle scatter- ing, SciPost Phys. 6, 49 (2019) , arXiv:1812.00767 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

2019 arXiv
[21]

Schemmer, I

M. Schemmer, I. Bouchoule, B. Doyon, and J. Dubail, Generalized HydroDynamics on an Atom Chip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090601 (2019) , arXiv:1810.07170 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

2019 arXiv
[22]

Vu and T

D.-L. Vu and T. Yoshimura, Equations of state in gen- eralized hydrodynamics, SciPost Phys. 6, 23 (2019) , arXiv:1809.03197 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2019 arXiv
[23]

Urichuk, Y

A. Urichuk, Y. Oez, A. Kl¨ umper, and J. Sirker, The spin Drude weight of the XXZ chain and generalized hydro- dynamics, SciPost Phys. 6, 5 (2019) , arXiv:1808.09033

2019 arXiv
[24]

Korepin, N

V. Korepin, N. Bogoliubov, and A. Izergin, Quantum in- verse scattering method and correlation functions (Cam- bridge University Press, 1993)

1993
[25]

Jimbo, T

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and C. B. of the Mathematical Sci- ences, Algebraic analysis of solvable lattice models , Re- gional conference series in mathematics (Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences by the American Mathematcal Society, 1995)

1995
[26]

Kitanine, J

N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, and V. Terras, Correlation functions of the xxz heisenberg spin-1/2 chain in a mag- netic ﬁeld, Nucl. Phys. B 567, 554 (2000) , arXiv:math- ph/9907019

2000
[27]

G¨ ohmann, A

F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and A. Seel, Integral repre- sentations for correlation functions of the XXZ chain at ﬁnite temperature, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 37, 7625 (2004) , arXiv:hep-th/0405089

2004 arXiv
[28]

Kitanine, J

N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov, and V. Ter- ras, Master equation for spin spin correlation functions of the XXZ chain, Nuclear Physics B 712, 600 (2005) , arXiv:hep-th/0406190 [hep-th]

2005 arXiv
[29]

Kitanine, J

N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov, and V. Ter- ras, Dynamical correlation functions of the XXZ spin- 1/2 chain, Nuclear Physics B 729, 558 (2005) , arXiv:hep- th/0407108 [hep-th]

2005
[30]

H. Boos, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, F. Smirnov, and Y. Takeyama, Algebraic representation of correlation functions in integrable spin chains, Annales Henri Poincar´ e7, 1395 (2006) , hep-th/0601132

2006 arXiv
[31]

Kitanine, K

N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov, and V. Terras, Algebraic Bethe ansatz approach to the asymptotic behavior of correlation functions, J. Stat. Mech. 4, 04003 (2009) , arXiv:0808.0227 [math-ph]

2009 arXiv
[32]

Jimbo, T

M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and F. Smirnov, Hidden grassmann structure in the xxz model iii: introducing the matsubara direction, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical 42, 304018 (2009) , arXiv:0811.0439 [math-ph]

2009 arXiv
[33]

Kitanine, K

N. Kitanine, K. K. Kozlowski, J. M. Maillet, N. A. Slavnov, and V. Terras, A form factor approach to the asymptotic behavior of correlation functions in critical models, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2011, 12010 (2011) , arXiv:1110.0803 [hep- th]

2011 arXiv
[34]

K. K. Kozlowski, Asymptotic analysis and quantum inte- grable models, ArXiv e-prints , arxiv:1508.06085 (2015), arXiv:1508.06085 [math-ph]

2015 arXiv
[35]

J. Sato, B. Aufgebauer, H. Boos, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, M. Takahashi, and C. Trippe, Computa- tion of Static Heisenberg-Chain Correlators: Control over Length and Temperature Dependence, Physical Re- view Letters 106, 257201 (2011) , arXiv:1105.4447 [cond- mat.str-el]

2011 arXiv
[36]

Ilievski, M

E. Ilievski, M. Medenjak, T. Prosen, and L. Zadnik, Quasilocal charges in integrable lattice systems, Jour- nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 6, 064008 (2016) , arXiv:1603.00440 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2016 arXiv
[37]

Ilievski, J

E. Ilievski, J. De Nardis, B. Wouters, J.-S. Caux, F. H. L. Essler, and T. Prosen, Complete Generalized Gibbs En- sembles in an Interacting Theory, Physical Review Let- ters 115, 157201 (2015) , arXiv:1507.02993 [quant-ph]

2015 arXiv
[38]

A. C. Cassidy, C. W. Clark, and M. Rigol, General- ized thermalization in an integrable lattice system, Phys- ical Review Letters 106, 140405 (2011) , arXiv:1008.4794 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2011 arXiv
[39]

Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A71, 205 (1931)

H. Bethe, Zur theorie der metalle, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik A71, 205 (1931)

1931
[40]

Ilievski, E

E. Ilievski, E. Quinn, and J.-S. Caux, From interacting particles to equilibrium statistical ensembles, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115128 (2017) , arXiv:1610.06911 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

2017 arXiv
[41]

B. Pozsgay, The generalized gibbs ensemble for heisen- berg spin chains, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment 2013, 3 (2013) , arXiv:1304.5374 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2013 arXiv
[42]

Fagotti and F

M. Fagotti and F. H. L. Essler, Stationary behaviour of observables after a quantum quench in the spin-1/2 Heisenberg XXZ chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 7, 07012 (2013), arXiv:1305.0468 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2013 arXiv
[43]

Wouters, J

B. Wouters, J. De Nardis, M. Brockmann, D. Fioretto, M. Rigol, and J.-S. Caux, Quenching the Anisotropic Heisenberg Chain: Exact Solution and Generalized Gibbs Ensemble Predictions, Physical Review Letters 113, 117202 (2014) , arXiv:1405.0172 [cond-mat.str-el] . 25

2014 arXiv
[44]

Pozsgay, M

B. Pozsgay, M. Mesty´ an, M. A. Werner, M. Kormos, G. Zar´ and, and G. Tak´ acs, Correlations after Quantum Quenches in the XXZ Spin Chain: Failure of the Gen- eralized Gibbs Ensemble, Physical Review Letters 113, 117203 (2014) , arXiv:1405.2843 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2014 arXiv
[45]

Goldstein and N

G. Goldstein and N. Andrei, Failure of the GGE hypoth- esis for integrable models with bound states, Phys Rev A 90, 043625 (2014) , arXiv:1405.4224 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

2014 arXiv
[46]

B. Pozsgay, Failure of the generalized eigenstate ther- malization hypothesis in integrable models with multiple particle species, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 9, 09026 (2014) , arXiv:1406.4613 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

2014 arXiv
[47]

Doyon, T

B. Doyon, T. Yoshimura, and J.-S. Caux, Soliton Gases and Generalized Hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 045301 (2018) , arXiv:1704.05482 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2018 arXiv
[48]

Gaudin, B

M. Gaudin, B. M. McCoy, and T. T. Wu, Normaliza- tion sum for the bethe’s hypothesis wave functions of the heisenberg-ising chain, Physical Review D 23, 417 (1981)

1981
[49]

V. E. Korepin, Calculation of norms of bethe wave func- tions, Comm. Math. Phys. 86, 391 (1982)

1982
[50]

Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

1999
[51]

A. N. Kirillov and V. E. Korepin, Norms of bound states, Journal of Soviet Mathematics 40, 13 (1988)

1988
[52]

Eisenbud, The formal properties of nuclear collisions (1948), unpublished dissertation

L. Eisenbud, The formal properties of nuclear collisions (1948), unpublished dissertation

1948
[53]

E. P. Wigner, Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift, Phys. Rev. 98, 145 (1955)

1955
[54]

Vlijm, M

R. Vlijm, M. Ganahl, D. Fioretto, M. Brockmann, M. Haque, H. G. Evertz, and J. S. Caux, Quasi-soliton scattering in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 92, 214427 (2015) , arXiv:1507.08624 [cond-mat.str-el]

2015 arXiv
[55]

Babelon, D

O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon, Introduction to Classical Integrable Systems , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2003)

2003
[56]

Boldrighini, R

C. Boldrighini, R. L. Dobrushin, and Y. M. Sukhov, One- dimensional hard rod caricature of hydrodynamics, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics 31, 577 (1983)

1983
[57]

Mussardo, Oﬀ critical statistical models: Factorized scattering theories and bootstrap program, Phys

G. Mussardo, Oﬀ critical statistical models: Factorized scattering theories and bootstrap program, Phys. Rept. 218, 215 (1992)

1992
[58]

Mesty´ an and V

M. Mesty´ an and V. Alba, Molecular dynamics simulation of entanglement spreading in generalized hydrodynamics, arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1905.03206 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

2019 arXiv
[59]

F. A. Smirnov, Form-factors in completely integrable models of quantum ﬁeld theory, Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. 14, 1 (1992)

1992
[60]

Pozsgay, W.-V

B. Pozsgay, W.-V. van Gerven Oei, and M. Kormos, On form factors in nested Bethe Ansatz systems, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 45, 465007 (2012) , arXiv:1204.4037 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2012 arXiv
[61]

Pozsgay and G

B. Pozsgay and G. Takacs, Form factors in ﬁnite volume I: form factor bootstrap and truncated conformal space, Nucl. Phys. B788, 167 (2008) , arXiv:0706.1445 [hep-th]

2008 arXiv
[63]

Pozsgay, Mean values of local operators in highly ex- cited Bethe states, J

B. Pozsgay, Mean values of local operators in highly ex- cited Bethe states, J. Stat. Mech. 2011, P01011 (2011) , arXiv:1009.4662 [hep-th]

2011 arXiv
[66]

Pozsgay, Local correlations in the 1D Bose gas from a scaling limit of the XXZ chain, J

B. Pozsgay, Local correlations in the 1D Bose gas from a scaling limit of the XXZ chain, J. Stat. Mech. 11, 17 (2011), arXiv:1108.6224 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2011 arXiv
[67]

Kostov, D

I. Kostov, D. Serban, and D.-L. Vu, TBA and tree ex- pansion, in Quantum Theory and Symmetries with Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics Volume 2 , edited by V. Dobrev (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2018) pp. 77–98, arXiv:1805.02591 [hep-th]

2018 arXiv
[68]

Kostov, D

I. Kostov, D. Serban, and D.-L. Vu, Boundary TBA, trees and loops, arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1809.05705 [hep- th]

2018 arXiv
[69]

Chaiken and D

S. Chaiken and D. Kleitman, Matrix tree theorems, Jour- nal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 24, 377 (1978)

1978
[70]

L¨ uscher, Dynamical charges in the quantized renor- malized massive thirring model, Nuclear Physics B 117, 475 (1976)

M. L¨ uscher, Dynamical charges in the quantized renor- malized massive thirring model, Nuclear Physics B 117, 475 (1976)

1976
[71]

M. G. Tetelman, Sovj. Phys. JETP 1981, 306 (55)

1981
[72]

Sogo and M

K. Sogo and M. Wadati, Boost Operator and Its Ap- plication to Quantum Gelfand-Levitan Equation for Heisenberg-Ising Chain with Spin One-Half, Progress of Theoretical Physics 69, 431 (1983)

1983
[73]

H. B. Thacker, Corner transfer matrices and Lorentz in- variance on a lattice, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena 18, 348 (1986)

1986
[74]

Grabowski and P

M. Grabowski and P. Mathieu, Structure of the conser- vation laws in integrable spin chains with short range interactions, Annals Phys. 243, 299 (1995) , arXiv:hep- th/9411045 [hep-th]

1995
[75]

M. P. Grabowski and P. Mathieu, Quantum integrals of motion for the Heisenberg spin chain, Mod.Phys.Lett. A9, 2197 (1994) , arXiv:hep-th/9403149 [hep-th]

1994 arXiv
[76]

Kitanine, J

N. Kitanine, J. M. Maillet, and V. Terras, Form factors of the XXZ Heisenberg spin-1/2 ﬁnite chain, Nucl. Phys. B 554, 647 (1999) , arXiv:math-ph/9807020

1999 arXiv
[77]

G¨ ohmann and V

F. G¨ ohmann and V. E. Korepin, Solution of the quantum inverse problem, J. Phys. A 33, 1199 (2000) , arXiv:hep- th/9910253

2000
[78]

J. M. Maillet and V. Terras, On the quantum inverse scattering problem, Nuclear Physics B 575, 627 (2000) , hep-th/9911030

2000 arXiv
[79]

Boos and F

H. Boos and F. G¨ ohmann, On the physical part of the factorized correlation functions of the xxz chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 315001 (2009), arXiv:0903.5043 [math-ph]

2009 arXiv
[80]

H. E. Boos, J. Damerau, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, J. Suzuki, and A. Weiße, Short-distance thermal correla- tions in the XXZ chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 8, 10 (2008) , arXiv:0806.3953 [cond-mat.str-el]

2008 arXiv
[81]

Trippe, F

C. Trippe, F. G¨ ohmann, and A. Kl¨ umper, Short-distance thermal correlations in the massive XXZ chain, Euro- pean Physical Journal B 73, 253 (2010) , arXiv:0908.2232 [cond-mat.str-el]

2010 arXiv
[82]

Damerau, F

J. Damerau, F. G¨ ohmann, N. P. Hasenclever, and A. Kl¨ umper, Density matrices for ﬁnite segments 26 of Heisenberg chains of arbitrary length, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General 40, 4439 (2007) , cond- mat/0701463

2007
[83]

Mesty´ an and B

M. Mesty´ an and B. Pozsgay, Short distance correlators in the XXZ spin chain for arbitrary string distributions, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 9, 09020 (2014) , arXiv:1405.0232 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

2014 arXiv
[84]

Pozsgay, Excited state correlations of the ﬁnite Heisen- berg chain, Journal of Physics A Mathematical Gen- eral 50, 074006 (2017) , arXiv:1605.09347 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

B. Pozsgay, Excited state correlations of the ﬁnite Heisen- berg chain, Journal of Physics A Mathematical Gen- eral 50, 074006 (2017) , arXiv:1605.09347 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

2017 arXiv
[85]

H. E. Boos, F. G¨ ohmann, A. Kl¨ umper, and J. Suzuki, Factorization of multiple integrals representing the den- sity matrix of a ﬁnite segment of the heisenberg spin chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment 2006, P04001 (2006) , hep-th/0603064

2006 arXiv
[86]

Davies and V

B. Davies and V. E. Korepin, Higher conservation laws for the quantum non-linear Schroedinger equation, ArXiv e-prints (2011), arXiv:1109.6604 [math-ph]

2011 arXiv
[87]

We developed a short unpublished proof in collaboration with Lorenzo Piroli
[88]

Ilievski and J

E. Ilievski and J. De Nardis, Ballistic transport in the one-dimensional Hubbard model: The hydrody- namic approach, Phys. Rev. B 96, 081118 (2017) , arXiv:1706.05931 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [62]

Pozsgay and G

B. Pozsgay and G. Takacs, Form factors in ﬁnite volume II:disconnected terms and ﬁnite temperature correlators, Nucl. Phys. B788, 209 (2008) , arXiv:0706.3605 [hep-th]

arXiv 2008

[2] [64]

LeClair-Mussardo series for two-point functions in Integrable QFT

B. Pozsgay and I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, LeClair-Mussardo se- ries for two-point functions in Integrable QFT, Journal of High Energy Physics 5, 170 (2018) , arXiv:1802.05890 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[3] [65]

Bajnok and C

Z. Bajnok and C. Wu, Diagonal form factors from non-diagonal ones, in 2017 MATRIX Annals , edited by J. de Gier, C. E. Praeger, and T. Tao (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019) pp. 141–151, arXiv:1707.08027 [hep-th]

arXiv 2017

[4] [1]

Spohn, Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Parti- cles, Texts and monographs in physics (Springer-Verlag, 1991)

H. Spohn, Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Parti- cles, Texts and monographs in physics (Springer-Verlag, 1991)

1991

[5] [2]

Esposito, J

R. Esposito, J. L. Lebowitz, and R. Marra, On the deriva- tion of hydrodynamics from the boltzmann equation, Physics of Fluids 11, 2354 (1999)

1999

[6] [3]

of [ 23]) ⟨0| N∏ j=1 C(λC j ) N∏ j=1 B(λB j )|0⟩ λC N →λB N − − − − − →i sinh(η) λC N − λB N ( lC N − lB N ) N −1∏ k=1 f C N kf B N k⟨0| N −1∏ j=1 C(λC j ) N −1∏ j=1 B(λB j )|0⟩mod. (D.2) Here the elements of the sets {λC} and {λB} not necessarily satisfy the Bethe equations, and the ⟨ ⟩mod notation means, that the scalar product is calculated with the mo...

[7] [4]

L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringar, Bose-Einstein Conden- sation (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

2003

[8] [5]

D. A. Teaney, Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma, in Quark-Gluon Plasma , Vol. 4 (World Scientiﬁc Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2010) pp. 207–266, arXiv:0905.2433 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2010