Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Probing non-Hermitian Skin Effect and non-Bloch Phase Transitions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single Lyapunov exponent extracted from bulk wave-packet dynamics reveals both the non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch phase transitions.

desk verdict A clean steepest-descent result with an honest conjecture at the hinge; the numerics are good, but the abstract's 'rather generally' is stronger than what is proven. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07712 v1 pith:BVMTOHLT submitted 2019-08-21 quant-ph physics.optics

Stefano Longhi This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords non-Hermitianskineffectnon-BlochbandtheoryLyapunovexponentSSHmodelgeneralizedBrillouinzonephasetransitionbulkwave-packetdynamicssaddlepointcriterion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether two boundary-sensitive features of non-Hermitian crystals—the skin effect, which pushes bulk eigenstates to an edge, and non-Bloch symmetry-breaking transitions, which alter the open-boundary spectrum—can be read from wave motion far inside the crystal, where ordinary Bloch bands are supposed to control everything. The author's answer is yes: the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda(v)$, which measures the long-time growth of a wave packet moving along the ray $n=vt$, carries an imprint of the non-Bloch bands. A peak of $\lambda(v)$ at a nonzero drift velocity $v$ signals the skin effect, and the zero-drift value $\lambda(0)$ jumps from zero to a positive value across the non-Bloch parity-time transition of model III. This matters because bulk wave-packet experiments could detect edge-related physics without ever approaching the edges.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lyapunov exponent $\lambda(v)$ of bulk propagation along the space-time ray $n=vt$. It is evaluated by steepest descent after analytically continuing the Bloch bands $E_\pm(k)$ to complex $k$; the dominant saddle $k_s$ satisfies $dE_\pm/dk=v$ and $\lambda(v)=\mathrm{Im}(E_\pm(k_s))-v\,\mathrm{Im}(k_s)$. The same saddle points, written as $\beta_s=\exp(ik_s)$, are saddle points of $Q(\beta)=E^2$, and the paper argues, conjecturally in general, that they lie on the generalized Brillouin zone and are precisely the turning points of the open-boundary spectrum. The coalescence of such saddles marks a non-Bloch phase transition.

What would settle it

Measure $\lambda(v)$ from bulk dynamics in the cusp model at the special parameters where all saddle points lie on the unit circle: the paper predicts the maximum at $v=0$ despite the skin effect. If a nonzero $v_m$ appears there, the claimed exception and the criterion's domain are wrong; more broadly, finding a non-Hermitian two-band chain with a saddle point off the unit circle but no skin effect would refute the sufficient criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that long-time bulk wave-packet dynamics, although built from ordinary extended Bloch states, is asymptotically controlled by the saddle points of the analytically continued band dispersion, and those saddle points coincide with the turning points of the open-boundary (non-Bloch) spectrum. For a path $n=vt$, the Lyapunov exponent is $\lambda(v)=\mathrm{Im}(E(k_s))-v\,\mathrm{Im}(k_s)$, where $k_s$ solves $dE/dk=v$ at the dominant saddle; its maximum occurs at drift velocity $v_m$. If $v_m\neq 0$, the system exhibits the non-Hermitian skin effect; in model III the zero-drift exponent is $\lambda(0)=0$ below $\delta=t$ and $\lambda(0)=\sqrt{\delta^2-t^2}$ above it, revealing the non-Bloch parity-time transition. The author states the saddle-point criterion as sufficient and rather general: a saddle point of $Q(\beta)=E^2$ off the unit circle implies the skin effect, while noting the criterion is not strictly necessary because exceptional cusp models can place all saddles on the unit circle yet still show the effect.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is a conjecture: at the complex wave numbers where the band derivative vanishes, the open-boundary spectrum always bends around, and those points always lie on the generalized Brillouin zone. The paper admits it cannot prove this generally and records exceptional cusp cases where the saddle points stay on the unit circle while the skin effect still exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The drift velocity at which $\lambda(v)$ is maximal provides a boundary-free diagnostic: $v_m=0$ means no skin effect in the generic case, while $v_m\neq 0$ means the open-boundary spectrum deviates from the Bloch bands.
  • The zero-drift Lyapunov exponent gives an order parameter for non-Bloch symmetry-breaking transitions; in model III it is $0$ in the unbroken phase and $\sqrt{\delta^2-t^2}$ in the broken phase, so a single bulk measurement locates $\delta=t$.
  • The saddle-point criterion reduces the existence of the skin effect to a property of the periodic-boundary dispersion $Q(\beta)$: a saddle point off the unit circle is sufficient, independent of boundary details.
  • Because the prediction is insensitive to the initial excitation and matches direct numerical integration, the same protocol transfers to experimental platforms where these non-Hermitian SSH models are already realized.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the saddle-point connection to the generalized Brillouin zone holds in higher-dimensional or synthetic-dimensional lattices, the same $\lambda(v)$ protocol could probe non-Bloch transitions there; the paper raises this as an open problem, not a proven result.
  • The exceptional cusp cases imply that $v_m=0$ is not proof of the absence of the skin effect; a null result from the bulk probe should be interpreted alongside the known spectrum shape, not as a standalone verdict.
  • One testable extension is to tune deliberately into the cusp condition of the appendix model and monitor $\log|\psi(t)|$: the predicted $\lambda(v)$ curve with its peak at $v=0$ would directly test the boundary of the method's validity.
  • A practical extension is to replace the asymptotic fit by transient-time measurements over a propagation time of roughly five to ten hopping units, which the numerics show is already enough to extract $\lambda$ with good accuracy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies one-dimensional non-Hermitian two-band tight-binding models and proposes that the long-time Lyapunov exponent lambda(v) of bulk real-space wave-packet dynamics along the space-time ray n=vt can probe non-Bloch (OBC) spectral features, namely the non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE) and non-Bloch symmetry-breaking phase transitions. For a dominant saddle point k_s of E(k)-vk, the steepest-descent result lambda(v)=Im(E(k_s))-v Im(k_s) is derived (Eq. (25)) and verified numerically for four non-Hermitian SSH-type models. The paper further claims that lambda(v) peaks at nonzero drift velocity v_m iff the model displays the NHSE (property (iii)), and that a non-Bloch PT transition in model III is visible as lambda(0)=0 below the threshold and lambda(0)=sqrt(delta^2-t^2) above it (Eq. (36)), with numerical agreement.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers an experimentally relevant bulk-dynamics probe of OBC spectra and non-Bloch phase transitions in non-Hermitian lattices, without requiring access to edge states. The analytical steepest-descent derivation is standard, and the concrete predictions for models I-III, especially the parameter-free formula Eq. (36), are confirmed by direct numerical simulation with no fitting parameters. These are genuine strengths. However, the claimed 'rather general' link between the Lyapunov exponent and OBC spectra depends on an unproved conjecture about saddle points and the generalized Brillouin zone, and one step in the proof of property (iii) is asserted rather than demonstrated. The paper's concrete model results are valuable, but the universality claim needs substantial qualification or proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B and Sec. III] The statement that every saddle point beta_s of Q(beta) belongs to the generalized Brillouin zone, and that OBC spectral arcs turn at such saddle points, is explicitly conjectural ('We conjecture that such properties... are rather general ones'). The supporting argument around Eqs. (B1)-(B4) only shows that near a saddle point one can find pairs of beta branches with equal modulus and equal Q; it does not prove that these branches are the adjacent ordered roots |beta_M|=|beta_{M+1}| required by the GBZ construction, and the text itself says such pairs are 'likely' to belong to C_tilde_beta. Because property (iii) and the interpretation of lambda(0) as an OBC-spectral probe rely on this bridge, the central universality claim is not established. The authors should either provide a proof of the saddle-point/GBZ correspondence or explicitly restrict the claims to the verified model classes.
  2. [Sec. IV, proof of property (iii)] In the paragraph after Eq. (32), the non-NHSE case is handled by asserting that at the real Bloch wave number k0 maximizing Im(E(k)), the Bloch energy has a dominant saddle point with Re(E'(k0))=0. This assertion is not proved and is not an immediate consequence of PBC and OBC spectra coinciding. The implication 'no NHSE implies v_m=0' is load-bearing for the diagnostic claim, so the proof is incomplete as written. A derivation or an explicit condition under which Re(E'(k0))=0 holds is needed.
  3. [Appendix C and Sec. IV, property (iii)] Appendix C provides an explicit model with NHSE in which all saddle points lie on the unit circle and the Lyapunov exponent takes its maximum at v_m=0. Thus property (iii) is only a sufficient condition and is not a universal signature of the NHSE. The paper's phrasing in Sec. IV that v_m is a 'clear signature of the existence of the NHSE' overstates the result. The authors should state precisely the generic conditions (e.g., absence of cusp singularities and Bloch-point-saddle coincidences) under which the diagnostic applies, and clearly separate the sufficient criterion from the universal claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V] There is a typo in the first paragraph: 'Lypaunov exponent' should be 'Lyapunov exponent'.
  2. [Introduction] The acronym 'NSHE' is used once in the Introduction and should be 'NHSE' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  3. [Sec. IV, Eq. (31)] The steepest-descent result assumes that the spectral amplitude G_+(k_s) is nonzero at the dominant saddle point. The claim that the measured lambda(v) is insensitive to the initial condition should be qualified, since a specially chosen initial wave packet with G_+(k_s)=0 could remove the dominant saddle contribution and change the asymptotic exponent.
  4. [Appendix A, model II/III] The statement that models II and III are 'basically equivalent' is explained only briefly; a one-sentence clarification of the unitary transformation connecting them would help readers who want to compare Eqs. (A4) with the real-space models in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Lyapunov-exponent prediction is computed directly from the Bloch dispersion by steepest descent, and the only load-bearing link to the open-boundary spectrum is an explicitly labeled conjecture, not a restatement of the inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The Lyapunov exponent λ(v) is defined directly from real-space wave-packet dynamics, Eq. (23), and the steepest-descent formula λ(v)=Im(E(ks))−vIm(ks), Eq. (25), follows from the PBC Bloch integral Eq. (26) alone; no OBC spectrum or fitted parameter enters this step. For model III, the predicted λ(0)=0 below and sqrt(δ²−t²) above the transition is obtained by solving the saddle-point equation for Q(β) in closed form, Eq. (36), and is compared with independent Runge-Kutta simulations in Fig. 4, with no parameter adjustment. The paper's self-citations (e.g., Refs. [14,15,22,38,59,61]) are contextual and do not carry the derivation; the non-Bloch/GBZ input comes from external works by Yao-Wang, Yokomizo-Murakami, and Song-Yao-Wang. The only potentially load-bearing bridge from λ(0) to the OBC bulk spectrum is the claim that saddle points of Q(β) lie on the generalized Brillouin zone. The paper explicitly flags this as an unproved conjecture: 'We conjecture that such properties, checked for the four specific models, are rather general ones, in particular any saddle point βs of Q(β) belongs to ˜Cβ' (Appendix B). It even provides a counterexample in Appendix C where all saddle points lie on the unit circle yet the NHSE persists and vm=0. This is an acknowledged rigor/generality gap, not a circular reduction: the prediction is not defined in terms of the OBC spectrum, nor is any fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. Therefore no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters; the model parameters t, t', delta are inputs. The central derivation leans on standard steepest descent asymptotics, the cited generalized Brillouin zone formalism, and two additional assumptions that are not proved in the paper: the saddle-point/generalized-Brillouin-zone correspondence and the vanishing of the real group velocity at the maximum-gain point in non-NHSE systems.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Steepest descent / saddle-point asymptotics determines the long-time limit of the Fourier integral (Eq. 26).
    Invoked in Sec. IV to derive λ(v)=Im(E(k_s))−v Im(k_s); assumes a single dominant saddle point and analytic continuation of E(k).
  • domain assumption Q(β) is a finite Laurent polynomial with Q≠0 on the unit circle (no exceptional points in the PBC band structure).
    Stated in Sec. II as a physically reasonable condition on finite-range hopping; used for separability of bands and analytic continuation.
  • domain assumption The bulk OBC spectrum is obtained from Q(β) with β on the generalized Brillouin zone C̃β, following Refs. [26,27].
    Adopted in Secs. II-III from the cited non-Bloch band theory literature; not re-derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Every saddle point of Q(β) lies on the generalized Brillouin zone, and OBC spectral arcs turn at those saddles.
    Stated as an empirical finding and conjecture in Sec. III and Appendix B; load-bearing for the Lyapunov-exponent bridge to non-Bloch spectra and unproved.
  • ad hoc to paper In a system without NHSE, the maximum-gain Bloch wave number k0 has Re(E'(k0))=0.
    Used in the proof of property (iii) in Sec. IV; asserted without derivation and known to fail in exceptional NHSE cases (App. C).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing non-Hermitian Skin Effect and non-Bloch Phase Transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVMTOHLT

@misc{pith2026190807712,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing non-Hermitian Skin Effect and non-Bloch Phase Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVMTOHLT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07712}
}
read the original abstract

In non-Hermitian crystals showing the non-Hermitian skin effect, ordinary Bloch band theory and Bloch topological invariants fail to correctly predict energy spectra, topological boundary states, and symmetry breaking phase transitions in systems with open boundaries. Recently, it has been shown that a correct description requires to extend Bloch band theory into complex plane. A still open question is whether non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch symmetry-breaking phase transitions can be probed by real-space wave dynamics far from edges, which is entirely governed by ordinary Bloch bands. Here it is shown that the Lyapunov exponent in the long-time behavior of bulk wave dynamics can reveal rather generally non-Bloch symmetry breaking phase transitions and the existence of the non-Hermitian skin effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07712 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (color online) (a,b) Four examples of non-Hermitian SSH lattices, where non-Hermiticity is introduced by either onsite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Numerically-computed behavior of the temporal evolution of log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Behavior of the Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Behavior of energy spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) Loci in complex plane (solid circles) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Behavior of the energy spectra ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (Color online) (a) Energy spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Bansil, H

    A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, Colloquium: Topological band theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021004 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators , Lecture Notes in Physics (2016), Vol. 919

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    T. E. Lee, Anomalous Edge State in a Non-Hermitian Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 133903 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge Modes, Degeneracies, and Topological Num- bers in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological Band Theory for Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological Phases of Non- 13 Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilber- berg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Ghatak and T

    A. Ghatak and T. Das, New topological invariants in non-Hermitian systems, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 31, 263001 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, arXiv:1812.09133v1 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Zhou and J.Y

    H. Zhou and J.Y. Lee, Periodic Table for Topological Bands with Non-Hermitian Bernard-LeClair Symmetries, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235112 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Kawabata, S

    K. Kawabata, S. Higashikawa, Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, and M. Ueda, Topological unification of time-reversal and particle-hole symmetries in non-Hermitian physics, Nat. Commun. 10, 297 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    C.-H. Liu, H. Jiang, and S. Chen, Topological classifica- tion of non-Hermitian systems with reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 99, 125103 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys

    S. Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-Hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 237601 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Longhi,Tight-binding lattices with an oscillating imag- inary gauge field, Phys

    S. Longhi,Tight-binding lattices with an oscillating imag- inary gauge field, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022102 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Xiong, Why Does Bulk Boundary Correspondence Fail in Some Non-Hermitian Topological Models, J

    Y. Xiong, Why Does Bulk Boundary Correspondence Fail in Some Non-Hermitian Topological Models, J. Phys. Commun. 2, 035043 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Kunst, E

    F.K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J.C. Budich, and E.J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal Bulk-Boundary Correspondence in Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge States and Topological Invari- ants of Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Longhi, Loschmidt Echo and Fidelity Decay Near an Exceptional Point, Ann

    S. Longhi, Loschmidt Echo and Fidelity Decay Near an Exceptional Point, Ann. Phys. 1900054 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121401(R) (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Lee and R

    C.H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103(R) (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Longhi, Nonadiabatic robust excitation transfer as- sisted by an imaginary gauge field, Phys

    S. Longhi, Nonadiabatic robust excitation transfer as- sisted by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062122 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian skin effect and chiral damping in open quantum systems, arXiv:1904.08432v1 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Hofmann, T

    T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, F. Schindler, N. Salgo, M. Brzezinska, M. Greiter, T. Kiessling, D. Wolf, A. Voll- hardt, A. Kabasi, C.H. Lee, A. Bilusic, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Reciprocal skin effect and its realization in a topolectrical circuit, arXiv:1908.02759v1 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z.Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Bloch Band Theory for Non-Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    separating bulk modes localized either at the left (|β| < 1) or right (|β| > 1) edges of the system (see as an example model IV in Fig.1). A rather interesting property, that can be directly proven in the specific examples of Fig.1 and that we conjecture to be valid in rather g...

  20. [28]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Topologi- cal Invariants in Real Space, arXiv:1905.02211v1 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tao Liu, Yu-Ran Zhang, Qing Ai, Zongping Gong, Ko- hei Kawabata, Masahito Ueda, and Franco Nori, Second- order topological phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076801 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Xiaosen Yang, Yang Cao, and Yunjia Zhai, Non- Hermitian Weyl semimetals: Non-Hermitian skin ef- fect and non-Bloch bulk-boundary correspondence, arXiv:1904.02492 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Herviou, J.H

    L. Herviou, J.H. Bardarson, and N. Regnault, Restor- ing the bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, arXiv:1901.00010v1 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Borgnia, A.J

    D.S. Borgnia, A.J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- Hermitian Boundary Modes, arXiv:1902.07217v2 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zirnstein, G

    H.-G. Zirnstein, G. Refael, and B. Rosenow, Bulk- boundary correspondence for non-Hermitian Hamiltoni- ans via Green functions, arXiv:1901.11241v1 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Bulk-Boundary Correspondence in Non-Hermitian Systems in one dimension with chiral in- version symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 99, 081103(R) (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kunst and V

    F.K. Kunst and V. Dwivedi, Non-Hermitian sys- tems and topology: A transfer matrix perspective, arXiv:1812.02186v2

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Deng and W

    T.S. Deng and W. Yi, Non-Bloch topological in- variants in a non-Hermitian domain-wall system, arXiv:1903.03811v2

    1903 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C.H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Hybrid higher-order skin- topological modes in non-reciprocal systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016805 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L.W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Observation of bulk bound- ary correspondence breakdown in topolectrical circuits, arXiv:1907.11562v1 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. Della Valle, Non-Hermitian transparency and one-way transport in low-dimensional lattices by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev B 92, 094204 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    W. P. Su, J.R. Schrieffer, and A.J. Heeger, Soliton ex- citations in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  33. [41]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    13. T. Kitagawa, M.A. Broome, A. Fedrizzi, M.S. Rud- ner, E. Berg, I. Kassal, A. Aspuru-Guzik, E. Demler, and A.G. White, Observation of topologically protected bound states in photonic quantum walks, Nat. Commun. 3, 882 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J.T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measurement of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nat. Phys. 9, 795 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    W. Hu, J.C. Pillay, K. Wu, M. Pasek, P.P. Shum, and Y.D. Chong, Measurement of a Topological Edge Invari- ant in a Microwave Network, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011012 (2015)

    2015

  37. [45]

    Zeuner, M.C

    J.M. Zeuner, M.C. Rechtsman, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, M.S. Rudner, M. Segev, and A. Szameit, Obser- vation of a topological transition in the bulk of a non- Hermitian system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 040402 (2015)

    2015

  38. [46]

    V. V. Ramasesh, E. Flurin, M. Rudner, I. Siddiqi, and N.Y. Yao, Direct Probe of Topological Invariants Using Bloch Oscillating Quantum Walks, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 130501 (2017). 14

    2017

  39. [47]

    X. Han, L. Xiao, Z. Bian, K. Wang, X. Qiu, B.C. Sanders, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Detecting Topological Invariants in Nonunitary Discrete-Time Quantum Walks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 130501 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Cardano, A

    F. Cardano, A. D’Errico, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, B. Pic- cirillo, C. de Lisio, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, E. San- tamato, L. Marrucci, M. Lewenstein, and P. Massignan, Detection of Zak phases and topological invariants in a chiral quantum walk of twisted photons, Nat. Commun...

    2017

  41. [49]

    Flurin, V.V

    E. Flurin, V.V. Ramasesh, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, L.S. Mar- tin, N.Y. Yao, and I. Siddiqi, Observing Topological In- variants Using Quantum Walks in Superconducting Cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031023 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Meier, F

    E.J. Meier, F. A. An, A. Dauphin, M. Maffei, P. Massig- nan, T.L. Hughes, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires, Science 362, 929 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt

    H. Schomerus, Topologically protected midgap states in complex photonic lattices, Opt. Lett. 38, 1912 (2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    C. Poli, M. Bellec, U. Kuhl, F. Mortessagne, and H. Schomerus, Selective enhancement of topologically in- duced interface states in a dielectric resonator chain, Nat. Commun. 6, 6710 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    H. Zhao, S. Longhi, and K. Feng, Robust Light State by Quantum Phase Transition in Non-Hermitian Optical Materials, Sci. Rep. 5, 17022 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    H. Zhao, P. Miao, M. H. Teimourpour, S. Malzard, R. El- Ganainy, H. Schomerus, and L. Feng, Topological Hybrid Silicon Microlasers, Nat. Commun. 9, 981 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Parto, S

    M. Parto, S. Wittek, H. Hodaei, G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, J. Ren, M. C. Rechtsman, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Edge-mode lasing in 1D topological active arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113901 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    M. Pan, H. Zhao, P. Miao, S. Longhi, and L. Feng, Pho- tonic zero mode in a non-Hermitian photonic lattice, Nat. Commun. 9, 1308 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    Longhi, Non-Hermitian Gauged Topological Laser Ar- rays, Ann

    S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian Gauged Topological Laser Ar- rays, Ann. Phys. 530, 1800023 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    C.H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L.W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Comm. Phys. 1, 39 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Dee and J

    G. Dee and J. S. Langer, Propagating Pattern Selection, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 383 (1983)

    1983

  52. [60]

    Longhi, Convective and absolutePT symmetry break- ing in tight-binding lattices, Phys

    S. Longhi, Convective and absolutePT symmetry break- ing in tight-binding lattices, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052102 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    Effective asymmetric hopping rates are found in models II,III and IV looking at the Fourier coefficients of Q(β), given by Eqs.(A4) and (A14) of Appendix A

  54. [62]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. Della Valle, Robust light transport in non- Hermitian photonic lattices, Sci. Rep. 5, 13376 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    Copson, Asymptotic Expansions (Cambridge Univ

    E.T. Copson, Asymptotic Expansions (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1965)

    1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.