Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PubLayNet: largest dataset ever for document layout analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1908.07836 v1 pith:7HRRZJLM submitted 2019-08-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords documentlayoutdatasetpublaynetvisionanalysiscomputerdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recognizing the layout of unstructured digital documents is an important step when parsing the documents into structured machine-readable format for downstream applications. Deep neural networks that are developed for computer vision have been proven to be an effective method to analyze layout of document images. However, document layout datasets that are currently publicly available are several magnitudes smaller than established computing vision datasets. Models have to be trained by transfer learning from a base model that is pre-trained on a traditional computer vision dataset. In this paper, we develop the PubLayNet dataset for document layout analysis by automatically matching the XML representations and the content of over 1 million PDF articles that are publicly available on PubMed Central. The size of the dataset is comparable to established computer vision datasets, containing over 360 thousand document images, where typical document layout elements are annotated. The experiments demonstrate that deep neural networks trained on PubLayNet accurately recognize the layout of scientific articles. The pre-trained models are also a more effective base mode for transfer learning on a different document domain. We release the dataset (https://github.com/ibm-aur-nlp/PubLayNet) to support development and evaluation of more advanced models for document layout analysis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 40 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Open CaptchaWorld: A Comprehensive Web-based Platform for Testing and Benchmarking Multimodal LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new CAPTCHA benchmark with a reasoning-depth metric shows multimodal LLM agents solve at most 40% of interactive puzzles, far short of the 93% human success rate.

  2. PosterHarness: Turning Scientific Poster Generation into an Auditable Instruction-Following Benchmark

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A placeholder-first harness separates visual poster design from scientific figure grounding, turning poster generation into measurable instruction-following with a 12-paper pilot and failure taxonomy.

  3. Benchmarking Table Extraction from Heterogeneous Scientific PDF Documents

    cs.DB 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark with two new datasets and end-to-end metrics shows that table extraction from PDFs is still unreliable across heterogeneous layouts.

  4. TableMoE: Neuro-Symbolic Routing for Structured Expert Reasoning in Multimodal Table Understanding

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TableMoE is a multimodal table model whose role-aware router sends table tokens to HTML, JSON, and code experts and reports state-of-the-art results on its own WildStruct benchmarks and MMMU-Table.

Pith tools