Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 55 references

A Wearable Tactile Sensor Array for Large Area Remote Vibration Sensing in the Hand

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports a wearable 126-channel sensor array that captures and reconstructs whole-hand vibration patterns during ordinary manual activities, using sparse sampling justified by the long wavelengths of touch waves in skin.

desk verdict A useful wearable tactile array with a genuine hardware contribution, but the spatial sampling argument is arithmetically wrong and the accuracy claim is not supported by the validation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08199 v1 pith:6DYYKOAO submitted 2019-08-22 cs.RO

Yitian Shao , Hui Hu , Yon Visell This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords wearabletactilesensingremotevibrationaccelerometerarraywhole-handhapticsskinwavepropagationflexiblePCBFPGAdataacquisitionsignalreconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the mechanical signatures of touch can be captured across the whole hand by a wearable array of 42 three-axis accelerometers, rather than only at the site of contact. The argument is that a tap on one finger sends elastic waves through the soft tissues of the hand, and these waves are long enough — wavelengths above one centimetre below 1000 Hz — that 42 well-placed sensors can sample the field without aliasing. The authors build the device, validate individual sensor readings against laser Doppler vibrometry, and reconstruct whole-hand vibration maps during tapping, grasping, and writing. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that this sparse, anatomy-matched wearable scheme can turn the hand into a quantitative instrument for remote vibration sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing idea is the wavelength argument: with shear wave speed $v_s = \sqrt{E/(2\rho(1+\mu))}$ in the range 4.4–17.5 m/s and $f<1000$ Hz, the wavelength $\lambda = v_s/f$ stays above 1 cm, so a nominal spacing of a couple of centimetres across the hand is enough to reconstruct propagating skin motion. The reconstruction itself is a distance-weighted interpolation, Eqs. (7)–(9), in which the weight $\varphi(p,p_i) = 17/(d(p,p_i)+\alpha) - C$ decays with geodesic distance over the hand surface and is half-wave rectified; the constants $\alpha = 25.5$ mm and $C = 8.7\times10^{-2}$ are taken from physiological measurements of propagating tactile waves. Because each accelerometer's orientation on the skin is not known during motion, the system projects each three-axis signal onto its instantaneous principal component (Eq. 5), yielding an orientation-invariant scalar acceleration that preserves phase. The FPGA-driven 23-bus I$^2$C sampling at 1310 Hz provides the temporal resolution needed to follow waves in the tactile band.

What would settle it

Measure in vivo shear and surface wave speed at multiple hand locations and frequencies with a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer during a standardized tap; if any propagating component below 1000 Hz has wavelength under about 1 cm, or if the 42-sensor reconstruction differs from dense LDV-derived skin acceleration by more than the sensor noise floor at comparable locations, the spatial-sampling assumption and the reconstructed whole-hand maps would be called into question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a sparse, anatomy-matched array of 126 acceleration channels, worn on the back of the hand and coupled to skin through soft tissue, accurately captures remotely produced whole-hand tactile signals during natural manual interactions. Because skin displacements at tactile frequencies propagate as shear and surface waves with speeds around 4.4–17.5 m/s, their wavelengths exceed one centimetre below 1000 Hz, so the 42 sensor locations satisfy a spatial Nyquist criterion. The paper demonstrates that single-digit taps produce vibration patterns that spread along the digit and into the rest of the hand, that grasping and lifting excite time-varying whole-hand fields, and that different gestures produce measurably distinct tactile signatures. It also validates the accelerometer readings against an independent laser Doppler vibrometer for a single sensor oscillating at 100 Hz.

Load-bearing premise

The design assumes that every touch-elicited wave below 1000 Hz has wavelength longer than roughly one centimetre, so 42 sensors can sample the hand's vibration field without missing or aliasing shorter waves.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • During everyday hand actions, the device can deliver quantitative whole-hand vibration data without immobilizing the hand, which non-contact vibrometry and camera methods cannot do.
  • Reconstructed maps for single-digit taps show that energy propagates along the tapped digit and into the rest of the hand, so local contact events can be sensed remotely across the whole hand.
  • The gesture-similarity measure distinguishes different manual actions, with the most confusable pairs being actions that engage similar digits in similar postures; this supports use of the array for interaction recognition.
  • Because each of the five branches of the flexible PCB can be trimmed off independently, the same instrument can be reconfigured for single-digit or partial-hand measurements without redesign.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sparse-sampling logic transfers to any soft medium with similar shear-wave speeds: a robotic finger covered by an elastic skin could, in principle, use a few remote accelerometers rather than a dense contact array to infer contact location and events, provided the skin's wave speed is characterized.
  • The PCA projection collapses each sensor's vector motion to a scalar, so the reconstruction is a map of dominant vibration amplitude rather than full 3D skin motion; if sensor orientation were tracked during motion, the same array could likely reconstruct vector wave fields and preserve inter-axis phase.
  • A direct test of the reconstruction would be to compare the distance-weighted whole-hand maps against dense simultaneous measurements, such as a scanning laser vibrometer or multiple high-speed cameras, for the same taps; the published experiments validate individual sensors and show reconstructed patterns, but do not yet quantify pointwise reconstruction error across the hand.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a wearable tactile sensing array composed of 42 tri-axial accelerometers (126 channels) mounted on flexible printed-circuit branches that follow the anatomy of the hand. Data are acquired in real time via an FPGA-based DAQ through an I2C network at an effective sampling rate of 1310 Hz. The authors validate individual sensors against a laser Doppler vibrometer on a rigid probe, record a 100 Hz sinusoidal stimulus applied to one subject's fingertip, and reconstruct whole-hand skin acceleration fields during gestures such as tapping, grasping, and writing using a distance-weighted interpolation formula (Eqs. 7–9). The central claim is that the system accurately captures remotely produced whole-hand tactile signals during natural manual interactions.

Significance. If the accuracy claim were supported, this would be a valuable contribution: the array's coverage, bandwidth, and wearability exceed those of prior wearable tactile arrays, and whole-hand wave-propagation data could inform biomechanical models, prosthetics, and haptic interface design. The hardware design—42 sensors on ergonomic flexible PCBs with a custom FPGA DAQ—is novel and appears to function as described. However, the paper's central quantitative claims are undermined by an arithmetic error in the wavelength estimate that justifies sparse sampling, by a reconstruction formula that cannot preserve traveling-wave phase, and by validation that is limited to a single frequency, a single subject, and a rigid-probe LDV comparison rather than skin-mounted measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II (spatial sampling justification)] The text states that for frequencies below 1000 Hz the wavelength λ exceeds 1 cm, using the shear wave speed range v_s ≈ 4.4–17.5 m/s from [21]. This is arithmetically false: with the lower bound v_s = 4.4 m/s, λ = v_s/f = 4.4 mm at 1000 Hz and 5.5 mm at 800 Hz. Even using the paper's own elastic parameters (E = 0.13 MPa, ρ = 1.02 g/cm³, μ = 0.5) gives v_s ≈ 6.5 m/s and λ ≈ 6.5 mm at 1000 Hz. Since the inter-sensor spacings implied by Fig. 2 and Table II are on the order of 20 mm, the spatial Nyquist criterion is violated across most of the claimed 0–800/1000 Hz band, so the sparse 42-sensor array cannot sample the propagating wave field without aliasing. This error directly undermines the premise of the sparse-sampling reconstruction and the fidelity of the reconstructed fields in Figs. 10–11.
  2. [Section III-C, Eqs. (7)–(9)] The reconstruction formula is a distance-weighted instantaneous average: a(p,t) = Σ_i f(φ(p,p_i)) a_i(t) / Σ_i f(φ(p,p_i)), where the weights depend only on geodesic distance and a damped-distance factor. For a traveling wave of the form a_i(t) = A cos(ωt − k·p_i), this weighted average does not reproduce the phase-evolved field A cos(ωt − k·p) at an arbitrary point p; there is no time-delay or phase term in the interpolation. Consequently the method cannot recover traveling-wave phase, and the propagating patterns in Figs. 10–11 are likely interpolation artifacts of the amplitude envelope rather than evidence of accurately captured wave propagation. If whole-hand wave propagation is a central contribution, this formula needs to be replaced or supplemented with a wave-aware interpolation (e.g., delay-and-sum or a model-based inverse method) and validated against a ground-truth spatial field.
  3. [Section III-A, Fig. 7 and Fig. 6] The LDV comparison in Fig. 7 is performed with a single accelerometer mounted on the rigid probe of the exciter, not on skin. This verifies the sensor and DAQ chain on a rigid body but does not validate the measurement of skin motion through the prosthetic adhesive and soft-tissue coupling that constitute the intended use. The only on-skin test (Fig. 6) uses a 100 Hz sinusoidal stimulus, a single subject, and no ground-truth comparison such as scanning LDV, high-speed imaging, or an independent second measurement. The abstract's claim that the system accurately captures remotely produced whole-hand tactile signals during manual interactions therefore goes beyond what the presented experiments demonstrate; the claims need to be narrowed to the tested conditions and supported by multi-subject, multi-frequency, and skin-mounted validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several grammatical errors, including "Tactile sensing is a essential", "Little engineering attention has been given to important sensory system", and "Recent research has elucidates". These should be corrected throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Sections I, II, and II-B] The bandwidth is stated inconsistently: the Introduction mentions both "0 to 1000 Hz" and "20 to 800 Hz", Section II says "less than 1000 Hz", and Section II-B says "up to 800 Hz". The effective sampling rate is 1310 Hz, so the supported bandwidth and any anti-aliasing policy should be specified clearly and used consistently.
  3. [Eq. (6)] The similarity measure S(A,Ā) is not symmetric: the numerator uses the maximum absolute cross-correlation normalized by the standard deviations, while the denominator uses the energy of the reference signal Ā. This makes the score dependent on which gesture is treated as the reference; a symmetric measure should be defined or the asymmetry justified.
  4. [Section III-C] The text mentions a scale parameter γ that could accommodate hand size, but γ is never defined or used. Either introduce the parameter explicitly in Eq. (7)–(9) or remove the statement.
  5. [Fig. 6(c)] The caption describes a "location-dependent frequency response", but the figure appears to show amplitude ratios at a single frequency (100 Hz). The caption and axis labels should be clarified to avoid implying a frequency sweep was performed.
  6. [Fig. 8] The figure lacks a clear time axis and axis labels, making the 42-row waveform display difficult to interpret. Adding a common time scale and labeled axes would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: reconstruction parameters come from independent published measurements, and the central validation is an external LDV comparison.

full rationale

No circular derivation chain is present. The reconstruction in Eqs. 7-9 uses distance-weighting parameters alpha = 25.5 mm and C = 8.7e-2 selected from previously published measurements [21] (Manfredi et al.), not from the data recorded by this paper's array, so the interpolation kernel is not fitted to the outputs it is used to produce. The PCA projection in Eq. 5 is a descriptive orientation-invariant scalarization and does not encode any target result. The authors' earlier work [12] is cited for background motivation and for the physiologically informed weighting form, but the load-bearing validation is external: an accelerometer-vs-laser-Doppler-vibrometer comparison, multi-sensor 100 Hz stimulation experiments, and whole-hand gesture recordings. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force a choice, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation as the sole support for the central claim. The Section II sampling-density argument is arithmetically questionable, since the paper's own lower shear-wave speed bound of 4.4 m/s gives lambda = 4.4 mm at 1 kHz, not the claimed lambda > 1 cm; however, that is a correctness or bandwidth risk, not a circularity, because the claim does not reduce by construction to the paper's inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reconstruction method depends on empirical constants alpha, C, and the scale factor 17 taken from an independent study of vibration attenuation on glabrous skin [21]. They are not fitted to this paper's data, but they are selected constants that determine the output wave fields, so they are accounted here. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • alpha (reconstruction offset) = 25.5 mm (from [21])
    Selected from published measurements; shifts the distance weighting in Eq. (8) and materially affects reconstructed amplitudes near each sensor.
  • C (reconstruction threshold) = 8.7e-2 (from [21])
    Selected from published measurements; half-wave rectification threshold in Eq. (8); sets the distance at which the weighting function goes to zero.
  • Scale factor in Eq. (8) = 17 (from [21])
    Multiplicative constant in the distance weighting; adopted from the literature fit without revalidation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Tactile vibrations in the hand propagate as shear or surface elastic waves with lambda = vs/f, where vs is between 4.4 and 17.5 m/s, yielding lambda greater than 1 cm below 1000 Hz.
    Section II; cited to [21] and tissue properties; load-bearing for the sparse-sampling argument.
  • domain assumption The attenuation constants alpha and C measured in [21] for glabrous skin apply to the dorsal hand skin of the tested subjects.
    Section III-C, Eq. (8); no revalidation on dorsal skin.
  • domain assumption Sparse sampling at 42 points satisfies the spatial Nyquist criterion for the frequency range of interest.
    Section II; based on the wavelength estimate; no experimental verification of spatial aliasing.
  • domain assumption PCA projection of each sensor's 3D acceleration onto its principal axis preserves the salient signal in an orientation-invariant way.
    Section III-A, Eq. (5); assumes the dominant variance direction corresponds to the wave signal; not validated against known orientations.
  • domain assumption The 3D hand model and geodesic distances approximate the actual tissue propagation paths.
    Section III-C; uses a scan of a single hand.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Wearable Tactile Sensor Array for Large Area Remote Vibration Sensing in the Hand." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6DYYKOAO

@misc{pith2026190808199,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Wearable Tactile Sensor Array for Large Area Remote Vibration Sensing in the Hand},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6DYYKOAO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08199}
}
abstract

Tactile sensing is a essential for skilled manipulation and object perception, but existing devices are unable to capture mechanical signals in the full gamut of regimes that are important for human touch sensing, and are unable to emulate the sensing abilities of the human hand. Recent research reveals that human touch sensing relies on the transmission of mechanical waves throughout tissues of the hand. This provides the hand with remarkable abilities to remotely capture distributed vibration signatures of touch contact. Little engineering attention has been given to important sensory system. Here, we present a wearable device inspired by the anatomy and function of the hand and by human sensory abilities. The device is based on a 126 channel sensor array capable of capturing high resolution tactile signals during natural manual activities. It employs a network of miniature three-axis sensors mounted on a flexible circuit whose geometry and topology were designed match the anatomy of the hand, permitting data capture during natural interactions, while minimizing artifacts. Each sensor possesses a frequency bandwidth matching the human tactile frequency range. Data is acquired in real time via a custom FPGA and an I$^2$C network. We also present physiologically informed signal processing methods for reconstructing whole hand tactile signals using data from this system. We report experiments that demonstrate the ability of this system to accurately capture remotely produced whole hand tactile signals during manual interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08199 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure of the wearable sensor and overview of the instrument [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Design of the sensor array was based on hand anthropometry (mm). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the wearable sensing system. N is the number of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: I2C communication diagram between the FPGA (master) and accelerometers (slaves). Each I2C bus is shared by one pair of accelerometers that communicate with the FPGA alternatively. SCL: Serial clock line. FPGA outputs a clock of 1.6 MHz (maximum) to each pair of sensors…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Data sampling protocol of the wearable sensor array through 23 I [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Skin frequency response at sensor locations. (a) A 100 Hz sinusoidal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A signal waveform of one accelerometer mounted on the tip of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: X, Y and Z axis signal waveforms for all 42 accelerometers (one per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Similarity computed from sum of maximum correlation between tactile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Capturing tactile signals when performing natural hand gestures. There were no contact between cables and the skin. (a) Gripping handle. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) From physiological data in the literature [21], we fit the local relationship between the amplitude of propagating tactile signals, or waves, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    The effect of surface wave propagation on neural responses to vibration in primate glabrous skin,

    L. R. Manfredi, A. T. Baker, D. O. Elias, J. F. Dammann III, M. C. Zielinski, V . S. Polashock, and S. J. Bensmaia, “The effect of surface wave propagation on neural responses to vibration in primate glabrous skin,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 2, p. e31203, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [1]

    L. A. Jones and S. J. Lederman, Human hand function . Oxford University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Natural scenes in tactile texture,

    L. R. Manfredi, H. P. Saal, K. J. Brown, M. C. Zielinski, J. F. Dammann III, V . S. Polashock, and S. J. Bensmaia, “Natural scenes in tactile texture,” Journal of neurophysiology , vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 1792– 1802, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [3]

    Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks,

    R. S. Johansson and J. R. Flanagan, “Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 345, 2009

    work page 2009

  5. [4]

    Hand-arm vibration measurement by a laser scanning vibrometer,

    G. Rossi and E. Tomasini, “Hand-arm vibration measurement by a laser scanning vibrometer,” Measurement, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 113–124, 1995

    work page 1995

  6. [5]

    Estimating dynamic skin tension lines in vivo using 3d scans,

    H. Seo, S.-j. Kim, F. Cordier, J. Choi, and K. Hong, “Estimating dynamic skin tension lines in vivo using 3d scans,” Computer-Aided Design , vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 551–555, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    In vivo evaluation of human skin anisotropy by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,

    S. Sakai, M. Yamanari, Y . Lim, N. Nakagawa, and Y . Yasuno, “In vivo evaluation of human skin anisotropy by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Biomedical optics express , vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 2623–2631, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Noncontact active sensing for viscoelastic parameters of tissue with coupling effect,

    N. Tanaka, M. Higashimori, M. Kaneko, and I. Kao, “Noncontact active sensing for viscoelastic parameters of tissue with coupling effect,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 509–520, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    A novel method for visualising and quanti- fying through-plane skin layer deformations,

    L.-C. Gerhardt, J. Schmidt, J. Sanz-Herrera, F. Baaijens, T. Ansari, G. Peters, and C. Oomens, “A novel method for visualising and quanti- fying through-plane skin layer deformations,” Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials , vol. 14, pp. 199–207, 2012

    2012

  2. [9]

    Airborne ultrasound surface motion camera: application to seismocardiography,

    P. Shirkovskiy, A. Laurin, N. Jeger-Madiot, D. Chapelle, M. Fink, and R. Ing, “Airborne ultrasound surface motion camera: application to seismocardiography,” Applied Physics Letters , vol. 112, no. 21, p. 213702, 2018

    2018

  3. [10]

    Ultrasonic doppler vibrometry: Novel method for detection of left ventricular wall vibrations caused by poststenotic coronary flow,

    S. Sikdar, J. C. Lee, J. Remington, X.-Q. Zhao, S. L. Goldberg, K. W. Beach, and Y . Kim, “Ultrasonic doppler vibrometry: Novel method for detection of left ventricular wall vibrations caused by poststenotic coronary flow,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , ...

    2007

  4. [11]

    Mechanical and psychophysical studies of surface wave propagation during vibrotactile stimulation,

    K. O. Sofia and L. Jones, “Mechanical and psychophysical studies of surface wave propagation during vibrotactile stimulation,” IEEE transactions on haptics , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 320–329, 2013

    2013

  5. [12]

    Spatial patterns of cutaneous vibration during whole-hand haptic interactions,

    Y . Shao, V . Hayward, and Y . Visell, “Spatial patterns of cutaneous vibration during whole-hand haptic interactions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 4188–4193, 2016

    2016

  6. [13]

    Wearable skin vibration sensor using a pvdf film,

    Y . Tanaka, D. P. Nguyen, T. Fukuda, and A. Sano, “Wearable skin vibration sensor using a pvdf film,” inWorld Haptics Conference (WHC), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, 2015, pp. 146–151

    2015

  7. [14]

    Practical utility of a wearable IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL 11 skin vibration sensor using a pvdf film,

    Y . Tanaka, T. Yoshida, and A. Sano, “Practical utility of a wearable IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL 11 skin vibration sensor using a pvdf film,” in World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2017 IEEE . IEEE, 2017, pp. 623–628

    2017

  8. [15]

    Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface,

    C. Harrison, D. Tan, and D. Morris, “Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . ACM, 2010, pp. 453–462

    2010

  9. [16]

    Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling,

    F. McGlone, J. Wessberg, and H. Olausson, “Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling,” Neuron, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 737–755, 2014

    2014

  10. [17]

    Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in hci,

    Y . Visell, “Tactile sensory substitution: Models for enaction in hci,” Interacting with Computers , vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 38–53, 2008

    2008

  11. [18]

    Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility,

    H. P. Saal and S. J. Bensmaia, “Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility,”Trends in neurosciences, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 689–697, 2014

    2014

  12. [19]

    Segregation of tactile input features in neurons of the cuneate nucleus,

    H. J ¨orntell, F. Bengtsson, P. Geborek, A. Spanne, A. V . Terekhov, and V . Hayward, “Segregation of tactile input features in neurons of the cuneate nucleus,” Neuron, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1444–1452, 2014

    2014

  13. [20]

    Texture- induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration,

    B. Delhaye, V . Hayward, P. Lef `evre, and J.-L. Thonnard, “Texture- induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration,” Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience , vol. 6, p. 37, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, D. of Biochemistry, M. B. T. Jessell, S. Siegelbaum, and A. Hudspeth, Principles of neural science . McGraw-hill New York, 2000, vol. 4

    2000

  15. [23]

    Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy,

    F. Khatyr, C. Imberdis, P. Vescovo, D. Varchon, and J.-M. Lagarde, “Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy,” Skin research and technology , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 96–103, 2004

    2004

  16. [24]

    In vivo ultrasonic measurement of tissue vibration at a stenosis: a case study,

    M. I. Plett, K. W. Beach, B. Dunmire, K. G. Brown, J. F. Primozich, and E. Strandness, “In vivo ultrasonic measurement of tissue vibration at a stenosis: a case study,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1049–1058, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    The vibration transmissibility and driving- point biodynamic response of the hand exposed to vibration normal to the palm,

    X. S. Xu, D. E. Welcome, T. W. McDowell, J. Z. Wu, B. Wimer, C. Warren, and R. G. Dong, “The vibration transmissibility and driving- point biodynamic response of the hand exposed to vibration normal to the palm,”International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 5, p...

    2011

  18. [26]

    Non-contact stiffness imager,

    T. Kawahara, S. Tanaka, and M. Kaneko, “Non-contact stiffness imager,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 25, no. 5-6, pp. 537–549, 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    High speed video distribution and manufacturing system,

    R. D. Allen, “High speed video distribution and manufacturing system,” Jun. 1 1999, uS Patent 5,909,638

    1999

  20. [28]

    Transfer properties of touch elicited waves: Effect of posture and contact conditions,

    H. Sch ¨afer, Z. Wells, Y . Shao, and Y . Visell, “Transfer properties of touch elicited waves: Effect of posture and contact conditions,” in World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2017 IEEE . IEEE, 2017, pp. 546–551

    2017

  21. [29]

    Sensing skin acceleration for slip and texture perception,

    R. D. Howe and M. R. Cutkosky, “Sensing skin acceleration for slip and texture perception,” in Robotics and Automation, 1989. Proceedings., 1989 IEEE International Conference on . IEEE, 1989, pp. 145–150

    1989

  22. [30]

    The potential of micro-electro-mechanical accelerometers in human vibration measurements,

    M. Tarabini, B. Saggin, D. Scaccabarozzi, and G. Moschioni, “The potential of micro-electro-mechanical accelerometers in human vibration measurements,” Journal of Sound and Vibration , vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 487–499, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    The effects of skin temperature on the psychophysical responses to vibration on glabrous and hairy skin,

    R. T. Verrillo and S. J. Bolanowski Jr, “The effects of skin temperature on the psychophysical responses to vibration on glabrous and hairy skin,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 528–532, 1986

    1986

  24. [32]

    Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array,

    S. Wang, J. Xu, W. Wang, G.-J. N. Wang, R. Rastak, F. Molina-Lopez, J. W. Chung, S. Niu, V . R. Feig, J. Lopez et al. , “Skin electronics from scalable fabrication of an intrinsically stretchable transistor array,” Nature, vol. 555, no. 7694, p. 83, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Skin-inspired highly stretchable and conformable matrix networks for multifunctional sensing,

    Q. Hua, J. Sun, H. Liu, R. Bao, R. Yu, J. Zhai, C. Pan, and Z. L. Wang, “Skin-inspired highly stretchable and conformable matrix networks for multifunctional sensing,” Nature communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 244, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Three-dimensional conformal graphene microstructure for flexible and highly sensitive electronic skin,

    J. Yang, Q. Ran, D. Wei, T. Sun, L. Yu, X. Song, L. Pu, H. Shi, and C. Du, “Three-dimensional conformal graphene microstructure for flexible and highly sensitive electronic skin,” Nanotechnology, vol. 28, no. 11, p. 115501, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Stretchable, twisted conductive microtubules for wearable computing, robotics, electronics, and healthcare,

    T. N. Do and Y . Visell, “Stretchable, twisted conductive microtubules for wearable computing, robotics, electronics, and healthcare,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1753, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Stretchable capacitive sensors of torsion, strain, and touch using double helix liquid metal fibers,

    C. B. Cooper, K. Arutselvan, Y . Liu, D. Armstrong, Y . Lin, M. R. Khan, J. Genzer, and M. D. Dickey, “Stretchable capacitive sensors of torsion, strain, and touch using double helix liquid metal fibers,” Advanced Functional Materials , vol. 27, no. 20, p. 1605630, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Stretchable and soft electronics using liquid metals,

    M. D. Dickey, “Stretchable and soft electronics using liquid metals,” Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 27, p. 1606425, 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Assemblies of microfluidic channels and micropillars facilitate sensitive and compliant tactile sensing,

    B. Li, Y . Shi, H. Hu, A. Fontecchio, and Y . Visell, “Assemblies of microfluidic channels and micropillars facilitate sensitive and compliant tactile sensing,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 24, pp. 8908–8915, 2016

    2016

  31. [39]

    Mutual capacitance of liquid conductors in deformable tactile sensing arrays,

    B. Li, A. K. Fontecchio, and Y . Visell, “Mutual capacitance of liquid conductors in deformable tactile sensing arrays,” Applied Physics Let- ters, vol. 108, no. 1, p. 013502, 2016

    2016

  32. [40]

    Soft capacitive tactile sensing arrays fabricated via direct filament casting,

    B. Li, Y . Gao, A. Fontecchio, and Y . Visell, “Soft capacitive tactile sensing arrays fabricated via direct filament casting,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 075009, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Highly sensitive and skin-like pressure sensor based on asymmetric double- layered structures of reduced graphite oxide,

    Y . Zhu, J. Li, H. Cai, Y . Wu, H. Ding, N. Pan, and X. Wang, “Highly sensitive and skin-like pressure sensor based on asymmetric double- layered structures of reduced graphite oxide,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 255, pp. 1262–1267, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    High- performance piezoresistive electronic skin with bionic hierarchical mi- crostructure and microcracks,

    P. Nie, R. Wang, X. Xu, Y . Cheng, X. Wang, L. Shi, and J. Sun, “High- performance piezoresistive electronic skin with bionic hierarchical mi- crostructure and microcracks,” ACS applied materials & interfaces , vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 14 911–14 919, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins,

    J. Park, Y . Lee, J. Hong, M. Ha, Y .-D. Jung, H. Lim, S. Y . Kim, and H. Ko, “Giant tunneling piezoresistance of composite elastomers with interlocked microdome arrays for ultrasensitive and multimodal electronic skins,” ACS nano, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 4689–4697, 2014

    2014

  36. [44]

    A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires,

    S. Gong, W. Schwalb, Y . Wang, Y . Chen, Y . Tang, J. Si, B. Shirinzadeh, and W. Cheng, “A wearable and highly sensitive pressure sensor with ultrathin gold nanowires,”Nature communications, vol. 5, p. 3132, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Ultrastretchable, transparent triboelectric nanogenerator as electronic skin for biomechanical energy harvesting and tactile sensing,

    X. Pu, M. Liu, X. Chen, J. Sun, C. Du, Y . Zhang, J. Zhai, W. Hu, and Z. L. Wang, “Ultrastretchable, transparent triboelectric nanogenerator as electronic skin for biomechanical energy harvesting and tactile sensing,” Science advances, vol. 3, no. 5, p. e1700015, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Flexible and stretchable physical sensor in- tegrated platforms for wearable human-activity monitoringand personal healthcare,

    T. Q. Trung and N.-E. Lee, “Flexible and stretchable physical sensor in- tegrated platforms for wearable human-activity monitoringand personal healthcare,” Advanced materials, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 4338–4372, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin,

    A. Chortos, J. Liu, and Z. Bao, “Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin,” Nature materials, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 937, 2016

    2016

  40. [48]

    Tactile sensing and control of robotic manipulation,

    R. D. Howe, “Tactile sensing and control of robotic manipulation,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 245–261, 1993

    1993

  41. [49]

    Tactile sensing for dexter- ous in-hand manipulation in roboticsa review,

    H. Yousef, M. Boukallel, and K. Althoefer, “Tactile sensing for dexter- ous in-hand manipulation in roboticsa review,” Sensors and Actuators A: physical, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 171–187, 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    A survey of robot tactile sensing technology,

    H. R. Nicholls and M. H. Lee, “A survey of robot tactile sensing technology,” The International Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3–30, 1989

    1989

  43. [51]

    Tactile sensingfrom humans to humanoids,

    R. S. Dahiya, G. Metta, M. Valle, and G. Sandini, “Tactile sensingfrom humans to humanoids,” IEEE transactions on robotics , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2010

    2010

  44. [52]

    Simu- lating tactile signals from the whole hand with millisecond precision,

    H. P. Saal, B. P. Delhaye, B. C. Rayhaun, and S. J. Bensmaia, “Simu- lating tactile signals from the whole hand with millisecond precision,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 114, no. 28, pp. E5693–E5702, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography,

    X. Liang and S. A. Boppart, “Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 953–959, 2010

    2010

  46. [54]

    Dorsal and palmar aspect dimensions of hand anthropometry for designing hand tools and protections,

    M. Vergara, M. Agost, and V . Gracia-Ib ´a˜nez, “Dorsal and palmar aspect dimensions of hand anthropometry for designing hand tools and protections,” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2018

    2018

  47. [55]

    Hand anthropometry in bangladeshis living in america and comparisons with other populations,

    S. N. Imrhan, M. Sarder, and N. Mandahawi, “Hand anthropometry in bangladeshis living in america and comparisons with other populations,” Ergonomics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 987–998, 2009

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.