Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 70 references

Six-dimensional gauge theories and (twisted) generalized cohomology

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In six-dimensional N=(1,0) theory with a tensor multiplet, the abelianized Yang-Mills field and its Hodge dual combine into a single total field that defines a class in twisted K-theory, with the B-field supplying the twist.

desk verdict A suggestive but not fully proven proposal to put 6D (1,0) abelianized gauge fields in twisted K-theory; the main integrality/torsion gap is real and fixable. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08517 v1 pith:EEB5S5PY submitted 2019-08-22 hep-th math.ATmath.KT

Hisham Sati This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.ATmath.KT MSC 81T1381T6055N2055N2255T25
keywords six-dimensionalgaugetheoryN=(10)supergravitytwistedK-theorydifferentialcohomologyHodgedualitytopologicalmodularformsMoravaAtiyah-Hirzebruchspectralsequence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the global structure of certain six-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories is captured not by ordinary cohomology but by twisted generalized cohomology. In the N=(1,0) theory, after the Yang-Mills group is broken to an abelian subgroup, the gauge field strength $F_2$ and its Hodge dual $\ast F_2$ satisfy equations of motion that combine into a single total field $F = u^{-1}F_2 + u^{-2}\ast F_2$. The paper argues that this total field is closed under a twisted differential whose twist is the tensor-multiplet three-form $H_3$ (or its Hodge dual, or the sum), so it defines a class in twisted de Rham cohomology, then lifts to twisted K-theory, and under integrality conditions to twisted differential K-theory. It further proposes that $H_3$ itself can be read not as a twist but as an invertible element in untwisted chromatic-level-two theories such as topological modular forms and Morava K-theory. If right, the paper gives a topological home for the electric and magnetic parts of the field together, and connects six-dimensional anomaly cancellation to the same structures already used in type II string theory.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the total field $F = u^{-1}F_2 + u^{-2}\ast F_2$, assembled from the abelian gauge curvature and its Hodge dual using the Bott periodicity generator $u$ of degree two; twisted K-theory is the cohomology theory whose classes are vector bundles glued with a twist by a gerbe. The argument runs on the twisted differential $d - u^{-1}H_3$ (or versions with $\ast H_3$ or $H_3 + \ast H_3$), whose square vanishes once $dH_3 = 0$, making $F$ a twisted cocycle. The lift to twisted K-theory is carried by the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, whose first nontrivial differential is $\mathrm{Sq}^3$ plus cup product with the twist; the paper shows these vanish on $[F_2]$ and $[F_4]$. For the untwisted description, the equivalent machinery is the map $K(\mathbb{Z},3) \to E$ given by viewing a degree-three class as an invertible element in a chromatic-level-two spectrum $E$, obtained by looping the universal twist map $K(\mathbb{Z},4) \to B\mathrm{GL}_1(E)$.

What would settle it

Compute a concrete example where the paper's constraints hold, say $M_6 = T^3 \times T^3$ with an abelian field configuration satisfying $dH_3 = 0$ and $dF_4 = H_3 \wedge F_2$ as forms, and check whether $[H_3] \cup [F_2]$ is zero in integral cohomology $H^5(M;\mathbb{Z})$; if a torsion cup product is nonzero, the claimed lift to twisted K-theory fails while the differential-form equations still hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.2: in the six-dimensional N=(1,0) theory with a tensor multiplet, after abelianizing the Yang-Mills fields and imposing the constraints of Section 2 (in particular arranging the anomaly terms so that $dH_3 = 0$), the total field $F = u^{-1}F_2 + u^{-2}\ast F_2$ is a closed element of the twisted de Rham complex with twist $H_3$, $\ast H_3$, or $H_3 + \ast H_3$, so $[F]$ lies in twisted 2-periodic de Rham cohomology. The paper then argues that the class lifts to twisted K-theory $K(M_6;[H])$ because the relevant Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence differentials vanish: $\mathrm{Sq}^3[F_2] = 0$ by degree reasons and $[H_3] \cup [F_2] = 0$ follows from the equation of motion $dF_4 - H_3 \wedge F_2 = 0$. Under the further conditions given in Remark 3.1, in particular condition (18) when $F_4$ is not integral, the lift refines to twisted differential K-theory. In the second half, Proposition 4.1 claims that the B-field class $[H]$ is an invertible element in untwisted topological modular forms, Morava K-theory $K(2)$, Morava E-theory $E(2)$, and algebraic K-theory of the topological complex K-theory spectrum, via the map $K(\mathbb{Z},3) \to E$, applying to both the N=(1,0) and N=(2,0) theories.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the differential-form equation $dF_4 - H_3 \wedge F_2 = 0$ implies the integral cohomology condition $[H_3] \cup [F_2] = 0$ in $H^5(M;\mathbb{Z})$; this is needed for the lift to twisted K-theory, but a form being exact does not by itself rule out torsion classes in the integral cup product.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Electric and magnetic parts of the 6D gauge field are tied into one object, so charge quantization on 2-cycles and 4-cycles is governed by one twisted K-theory class rather than two independent cohomology classes.
  • The twist is not unique: $H_3$, its Hodge dual $\ast H_3$, and the duality-symmetric combination $H_3 + \ast H_3$ all produce valid twisted cohomology, so the formalism is compatible with electric-magnetic duality.
  • When $F_4$ has integral periods, the class refines to twisted differential K-theory, meaning the fields carry not just topological charges but differential data: connections, gerbes, and holonomy.
  • Because the obstruction is $\mathrm{Sq}^3[F_2] + [H_3] \cup [F_2]$ in the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, anomaly cancellation acquires a spectral-sequence meaning: it is the vanishing of this differential.
  • The B-field class also lives as an invertible element in topological modular forms, Morava K-theory, Morava E-theory, and algebraic K-theory of the topological K-theory spectrum, linking the six-dimensional theories to modular forms and elliptic cohomology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The lift argument uses the de Rham equation, so the behavior of torsion classes in $H^5(M;\mathbb{Z})$ is the place where the integral K-theory statement could differ from the differential-form statement; the paper leaves that distinction implicit.
  • If the total-field description is right, electromagnetic duality should act on the twist as well: exchanging $F_2$ and $\ast F_2$ should exchange the roles of $H_3$ and $\ast H_3$, making $H_3 + \ast H_3$ the duality-invariant twist; checking that transformation law is a natural next step.
  • The same field pattern (a degree-two field paired with its Hodge dual under a three-form twist) occurs for Ramond-Ramond fields in ten dimensions, so the six-dimensional theorem may serve as a simpler laboratory for the twisted differential K-theory of string theory.
  • Viewing $H_3$ as an invertible element predicts a modular or elliptic refinement of the six-dimensional partition function; looking for a topological-modular-forms-valued index on the tensor-multiplet worldvolume would test that interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a global/topological description of the abelianized Yang-Mills field and its Hodge dual in six-dimensional N=(1,0) supergravity coupled to a tensor multiplet. Starting from a pseudo-action with a Chapline-Manton-type coupling, the author combines F2 and F4 = *F2 into a total field F and observes that the equations of motion can be written as a twisted-closedness condition (d − *H3)F = 0. After assuming appropriate anomaly cancellation conditions so that H3 is closed, the paper promotes this to statements in twisted de Rham cohomology, twisted K-theory, and twisted differential K-theory, with twist given by H3, *H3, or their sum. The second half of the paper argues that the B-field class [H3] can alternatively be viewed as an invertible element in untwisted chromatic level two cohomology theories, namely topological modular forms, Morava K(2)-theory, Morava E(2)-theory, and algebraic K-theory of topological K-theory. The main result is Theorem 3.2, which asserts the existence of the twisted de Rham, twisted K-theory, and twisted differential K-theory classes.

Significance. If established, the proposed interpretation would give a new and mathematically rich way to think about global aspects of six-dimensional gauge theories, connecting them to twisted generalized cohomology and chromatic homotopy theory. The paper is clearly written and provides a concrete theorem (Theorem 3.2) that can serve as a precise target for verification. It also correctly draws on a substantial body of prior work by the author and collaborators on twisted differential cohomology, AHSS obstructions, and Morava K-theory. However, the significance is conditional: the central lift to twisted K-theory rests on a step that conflates de Rham exactness with integral cup-product vanishing, and the closure of the twist H3 depends on an unverified existence assumption about anomaly coefficients. These are not merely presentation issues; they affect the truth of the theorem as stated. The paper does not include machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, relying instead on published references for the technical background.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Lift to twisted K-theory, Eq. (14)] The vanishing of [H3]∪[F2] in H^5(M;Z) is not established. The argument infers this from the form-level exactness of H3∧F2 via dF4 = H3∧F2, but exactness as a differential form only implies vanishing of the class in H^5(M;R). A nonzero torsion class in H^5(M;Z) can have vanishing image in real cohomology and would survive as an obstruction in the integral AHSS. The manuscript's own remark that "torsion classes do arise in global anomaly cancellation... but we have obtained a lift without having to explicitly deal with them here" concedes precisely the unproved point. Theorem 3.2(ii) therefore requires either an additional hypothesis, such as [H3]∪[F2] = 0 in integral cohomology, or a separate argument that the relevant torsion vanishes for the configurations considered. The same issue affects the twists [*H3] and [H3 + *H3].
  2. [§2, Case 3, Eq. (10)] The construction requires dH3 = 0 as a differential form, which is arranged by setting Y4 = 0. However, the paper explicitly declines to specify the abelian anomaly coefficients (a, b_II) satisfying the constraints (9) with Y4 = 0, stating only that "we will be content that this is possible to arrange." This is an unverified existence assumption that is load-bearing: if Y4 does not vanish, then H3 is not closed, so there is no cohomology class [H3] to serve as a twist. The paper should either provide a concrete example of such coefficients or cite a source that establishes their existence.
  3. [§2, Eq. (7) and §3, 'Duality-symmetric twists'] The equation of motion derived from the action is (d − ∗H3∧)F = 0, i.e., dF4 = ∗H3 ∧ F2 (up to sign). The obstruction analysis for the twist H3, however, uses dF4 − H3 ∧ F2 = 0. The paper does not justify this replacement except through a self-duality assumption on H3; if H3 is not self-dual, the two equations are different. Similarly, the duality-symmetric differential d + H3∧ + ∗H3∧ is proposed on the basis of a separate variation "imposing the Chapline-Manton condition H3 = F ∧ A," whose consistency with the earlier equations of motion is not shown. Consequently, the three cases in Theorem 3.2(i) are not all derived from the same field equations, and the statement should either restrict to the self-dual case or provide separate derivations for each twist.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (11) and (12)] In Eqs. (11) and (12), the square of (d − H) is −dH∧, not +dH∧; the missing sign does not affect the subsequent closedness condition but should be corrected for mathematical accuracy.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: "Y a ng-Mills" should read "Yang-Mills", "nasmely" should read "namely", "also also" should read "also", and "On the one had" should read "On the one hand".
  3. [§3, Eq. (13) and surrounding text] The ring denoted R[[u,u^{-1}]] is a Laurent series ring; if the intended object is the ring of Laurent polynomials, the notation should be R[u,u^{-1}].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; the derivation is a reformulation of the equations of motion via twisted cohomology, with the main defect being a proof gap in the integral lift rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Section 2 defines the combined field F = u^{-1}F2 + u^{-2}*F2 and obtains (d - H3∧)F = 0 from the abelianized equations of motion; Section 3 then identifies this as a twisted de Rham differential and checks the AHSS obstruction for twisted K-theory. This is a reformulation of the input field equations, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and not a conclusion that is equivalent to its own definition. The lift to twisted differential K-theory invokes the Grady–Sati AHSS framework as mathematical machinery; these are published prior results used as tools, not self-citations that secretly define the target class. Section 4's proposal to view H3 as an invertible element in tmf, Morava K-theory/E-theory, and Kalg(KU) is supported by known maps such as the String orientation and existing twist constructions, and is explicitly presented as an interpretational identification rather than a forced uniqueness result. The paper's genuine weakness is in 'Lift to twisted K-theory': it infers [H3] ∪ [F2] = 0 in integral H^5(M;Z) from the exactness of H3 ∧ F2 as a differential form, but exactness only kills the rational class, leaving possible torsion obstructions. The paper itself acknowledges this by saying 'torsion classes do arise in global anomaly cancellation (see [MM18]), but we have obtained a lift without having to explicitly deal with them here.' That is a mathematical gap in Theorem 3.2(ii)-(iii), not a circularity: the conclusion is not made equivalent to the input by construction, and the gap is fixable by imposing the integral condition [H3] ∪ [F2] = 0 or restricting to torsion-free H^5(M;Z). No circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central construction depends on several assumptions imported from the literature or imposed by hand: the pseudo-action and EOMs from [KKP16] and [Sa09]; abelianization by Wilson lines; vanishing of F2 wedge F2 or Y4 to make the twist closed; and the AHSS machinery for twisted (differential) K-theory from Grady and Sati. No numerical free parameters are fitted; the constant c is part of the input theory. No new entities are invented.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The six-dimensional N=(1,0) vector-tensor system is described by the pseudo-action (2) with Chapline-Manton coupling, after abelianization and setting phi = -1/(2*sqrt(c)).
    Adopted from [KKP16] and [Sa09]; the equations of motion (5) and (7) used throughout derive from this action, and the central twisted complex is built from these EOMs.
  • ad hoc to paper The gauge group can be broken to an abelian subgroup via Wilson lines on M6, and (in Case 2) the tangent bundle reduces to a rank-3 sub-bundle so that F2 wedge F2 = 0 as a form.
    The abelianization and the low-rank restriction are imposed to make the anomaly term vanish and the twisted differential square to zero; the paper assumes such M6 exist but does not characterize them.
  • ad hoc to paper There exist abelian anomaly coefficients a, b_II satisfying the constraints (9) such that Y4 vanishes as a differential form on M6.
    The paper states 'we will be content that this is possible to arrange' without proof; dH3 = 0 and the twist being a cohomology class depend on this.
  • standard math The Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence machinery for twisted (differential) K-theory from [GS19b] and [GS19c] applies to the classes [F2], [F4], and [H3].
    The obstruction checks in (14)-(17) and the differential refinements cite Grady and Sati's published results; these are external, peer-reviewed references.
  • domain assumption The field strengths F2 and, under condition (18), F4 satisfy the integrality conditions required for differential cohomology refinements.
    The paper notes F4 integrality is not automatic; the twisted differential AHSS is invoked to control it, and condition (18) is stated as required in the non-integral case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Six-dimensional gauge theories and (twisted) generalized cohomology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EEB5S5PY

@misc{pith2026190808517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Six-dimensional gauge theories and (twisted) generalized cohomology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EEB5S5PY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08517}
}
abstract

We consider the global aspects of the 6-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=(1, 0)$ theory arising from the coupling of the vector multiplet to the tensor multiplet. We show that the Yang-Mills field and its dual, when both are abelianized, combine to define a class in twisted cohomology with the twist arising from the class of the $B$-field, in a duality-symmetric manner. We then show that this lifts naturally to a class in twisted (differential) K-theory. Alternatively, viewing the B-field in both $\mathcal{N}=(1,0)$ and $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ theories, not as a twist but as an invertible element, leads to a description within untwisted chromatic level two generalized cohomology theories, including forms of elliptic cohomology and Morava K-theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. Ando, A. J. Blumberg, and D. J. Gepner, Twists of K-theory and TMF , Superstrings, geometry, topology, and C^ -algebras, 27--63, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 81, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010, [ arXiv:1002.3004 https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3004] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    M. Ando, M. J. Hopkins, and N. P. Strickland, http://web.math.rochester.edu/people/faculty/doug/otherpapers/musix.pdf Elliptic spectra, the Witten genus and the theorem of the cube , Invent. Math. 146 (2001), 595-687. -2mm

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    N. A. Baas, B. I. Dundas, and J. Rognes, Two-vector bundles and forms of elliptic cohomology , Topology, geometry and quantum field theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004, [ arXiv:math/0306027 https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.3004] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Bhardwaj, Classification of 6d N = (1, 0) gauge theories , J

    L. Bhardwaj, Classification of 6d N = (1, 0) gauge theories , J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2015) 002, [ arXiv:1502.06594 https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.06594][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Bergshoeff, M

    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, B. de Wit, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Ten-dimensional Maxwell-Einstein supergravity, its currents, and the issue of its auxiliary fields , Nucl. Phys. B 195 (1982), 97-136. -2mm

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    G. F. Chapline and N. S. Manton, Unification of Yang-Mills theory and supergravity in ten-dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 105-109. -2mm

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Q. Chen, F. Han, and W. Zhang, Generalized Witten Genus and Vanishing Theorems , J. Diff. Geom. 88 (2011), 1-39, [ arXiv:1003.2325 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1003.2325] [ math.DG ]. -2mm

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Douglas, On the twisted K -homology of simple Lie groups , Topology 45 (2006), 955-988, [ arXiv:math.AT/0402082 https://arxiv.org/abs/math.AT/0402082]

    C. Douglas, On the twisted K -homology of simple Lie groups , Topology 45 (2006), 955-988, [ arXiv:math.AT/0402082 https://arxiv.org/abs/math.AT/0402082]. -2mm

    work page arXiv 2006

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Ferrara, F

    S. Ferrara, F. Riccioni and A. Sagnotti, Tensor and vector multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 519 (1998) 115-140, [ arXiv:hep-th/9711059 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711059]. -2mm

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Extended higher cup-product Chern-Simons theory , J. Geom. Phys. 74 (2013), 130--163, [ arXiv:1207.5449 https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5449] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, A Higher stacky perspective on Chern-Simons theory , Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories (D. Calaque and T. Strobl eds.), Springer, Berlin (2015), [ arXiv:1301.2580 https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.2580] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, The E_8 moduli 3-stack of the C -field , Commun. Math. Phys. 333 (2015), 117-151, [ arXiv:1202.2455 https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2455][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, The rational higher structure of M-theory , Proc. LMS-EPSRC Durham Symposium Higher Structures in M-Theory , August 2018, Fortsch. der Phys., 2019, [ doi:10.1002/prop.201910017 https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201910017] [ arXiv:1903.02834 h...

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Super-exceptional geometry: origin of heterotic M-theory and super-exceptional embedding construction of M5 , [ arXiv:1908.00042 https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00042] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    1908 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Fiorenza, U

    D. Fiorenza, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, C ech cocycles for differential characteristic classes -- An infinity-Lie theoretic construction , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 16 (2012), 149--250, [ arXiv:1011.4735 https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4735] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2012 arXiv

  8. [16]

    D. S. Freed, Dirac charge quantization and generalized differential cohomology , with an Appendix with M. Hopkins, Surv. Differ. Geom. 7 , pp. 129-194, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2000, [ arXiv:hep-th/0011220 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011220]. -2mm

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Spectral sequence in smooth generalized cohomology , Algebr. Geom. Top. 17 (2017), 2357-2412, [ arXiv:1605.03444 https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.03444] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Primary operations in differential cohomology , Adv. Math. 335 (2018), 519-562, [ arXiv:1604.05988 https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05988] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Twisted smooth Deligne cohomology , Ann. Global Analysis Geom. 53 (2018), 445-466, [ arXiv:1706.02742 https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02742] [ math.DG ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Higher-twisted periodic smooth Deligne cohomology , Homology, Homotopy and Appl. 21 (2019) 129-159, [ arXiv:1712.05971 https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05971] [ math.DG ]. -2mm

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Twisted differential generalized cohomology theories and their Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence , Alg. Geom. Topol. (2019), [ arXiv:1711.06650 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06650][ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Grady and H

    D. Grady and H. Sati, Ramond-Ramond fields and twisted differential K-theory , [ arXiv:1903.08843 https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08843] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    1903 arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and P. C. West, Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six-Dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 254 (1985), 327-348. -2mm

    1985

  16. [24]

    Gukov, D

    S. Gukov, D. Pei, P. Putrov, and C. Vafa, 4-manifolds and topological modular forms , [ arXiv:1811.07884 https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07884] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Gunaydin, H

    M. Gunaydin, H. Samtleben and E. Sezgin, On the Magical Supergravities in Six Dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 62-89, [ arXiv:1012.1818 https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1818] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2011 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hanany and A

    A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, Branes and six-dimensional supersymmetric theories , Nucl. Phys. B 529 (1998) 180-206, [ arXiv:hep-th/9712145 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9712145]. -2mm

    1998 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison, and C. Vafa, On the Classification of 6D SCFTs and Generalized ADE Orbifolds , J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2014) 028, [ arXiv:1312.5746 https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5746][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    J. J. Heckman, D. R. Morrison, T. Rudelius, and C. Vafa, Atomic Classification of 6D SCFTs , Fortsch. Phys. 63 (2015) 468-530, [ arXiv:1502.05405 https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05405][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Honecker, Massive U(1)s and heterotic five-branes on K3 , Nucl

    G. Honecker, Massive U(1)s and heterotic five-branes on K3 , Nucl. Phys. B 748 (2006), 126-148, [ arXiv:hep-th/0602101 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0602101]. -2mm

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Intriligator, 6d, N =(1,0) Coulomb Branch Anomaly Matching , J

    K. Intriligator, 6d, N =(1,0) Coulomb Branch Anomaly Matching , J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 162, [ arXiv:1408.6745 https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.6745][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. C. Johnson and W. S. Wilson, BP operations and Morava's extraordinary K-theories , Math. Z. 144 (1975), 55-75. -2mm

    1975

  24. [32]

    H.-C. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Park, 6d strings from new chiral gauge theories , [ arXiv:1608.03919 https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03919] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kriz and H

    I. Kriz and H. Sati, M Theory, type IIA superstrings, and elliptic cohomology , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8 (2004) 345-395, [ arXiv:hep-th/0404013 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0404013]. -2mm

    2004 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kriz and H

    I. Kriz and H. Sati, Type IIB string theory, S-duality and generalized cohomology , Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 639--664, [ arXiv:hep-th/0410293 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410293]. -2mm

    2005 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kriz and H

    I. Kriz and H. Sati, Type II string theory and modularity , J. High Energy Phys. 0508 (2005) 038, [ arXiv:hep-th/0501060 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0501060]. -2mm

    2005 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kumar, D

    V. Kumar, D. R. Morrison, and W. Taylor, Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities , J. High Energy Phys. 1011 (2010) 118, [ arXiv:1008.1062 https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1062][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S.-J. Lee, D. Regalado, and T. Weigand , 6d SCFTs and U(1) Flavour Symmetries , J. High Energy Phys. 1811 (2018) 147, [ arXiv:1803.07998 https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.07998] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    J. A. Lind, H. Sati, and C. Westerland, Twisted iterated algebraic K-theory and topological T-duality for sphere bundles , Ann. K-theory (2019), [ arXiv:1601.06285 https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.06285] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Mathai and H

    V. Mathai and H. Sati, Higher abelian gauge theory associated to gerbes on noncommutative deformed M5-branes and S-duality , J. Geom. Phys. 92 (2015), 240-251, [ arXiv:1404.2257 https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.2257][ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Monnier and G

    S. Monnier and G. W. Moore, Remarks on the Green-Schwarz terms of six-dimensional supergravity theories , [ arXiv:1808.01334 https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01334] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Monnier, G

    S. Monnier, G. W. Moore, and D. S. Park, Quantization of anomaly coefficients in 6D N = (1,0) supergravity , J. High Energy Phys. 1802 (2018) 020, [ arXiv:1711.04777 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04777] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    G. Moore, Applications of the six-dimensional (2,0) theories to Physical Mathematics , Felix Klein lectures, Bonn 2012, [http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/ gmoore/FelixKleinLectureNotes.pdf] -2mm

    2012

  35. [43]

    Nishino and S

    H. Nishino and S. James Gates, Jr., Dual Versions of Higher Dimensional Supergravities and Anomaly Cancellations in Lower Dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986), 532-542. -2mm

    1986

  36. [44]

    Nishino and E

    H. Nishino and E. Sezgin, New couplings of six-dimensional supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 505 (1997) 497-516, [ arXiv:hep-th/9703075 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9703075]. -2mm

    1997 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Ohmori, H

    K. Ohmori, H. Shimizu, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura, Anomaly polynomial of general 6d SCFTs , https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptu140 Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2014 (2014), 103B07 , [ arXiv:1408.5572 https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5572] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2014 arXiv

  38. [46]

    D. S. Park and W. Taylor, Constraints on 6D Supergravity Theories with Abelian Gauge Symmetry , J. High Energy Phys. 1201 (2012) 141, [ arXiv:1110.5916 https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.5916] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Riccioni, Abelian vector multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity , Phys

    F. Riccioni, Abelian vector multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity , Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 79-84, [ arXiv:hep-th/9910246 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9910246]. -2mm

    2000 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Riccioni and A

    F. Riccioni and A. Sagnotti, Some properties of tensor multiplets in six-dimensional supergravity , Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 67 (1998) 68-73, [ arXiv:hep-th/9711077 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711077]. -2mm

    1998 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Sagnotti, A Note on the Green-Schwarz Mechanism in Open-String Theories , Phys

    A. Sagnotti, A Note on the Green-Schwarz Mechanism in Open-String Theories , Phys. Lett. B 294 (1992), 196-203, [ arXiv:hep-th/9210127 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9210127]. -2mm

    1992 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Samtleben, E

    H. Samtleben, E. Sezgin, and R. Wimmer, (1,0) superconformal models in six dimensions , J. High Energy Phys. 1112 (2011) 062, [ arXiv:1108.4060 https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.4060] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2011 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Sati, Duality symmetry and the form fields of M-theory , J

    H. Sati, Duality symmetry and the form fields of M-theory , J. High Energy Phys. 0606 (2006) 062, [ arXiv:hep-th/0509046 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701232]. -2mm

    2006 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Sati, A Higher Twist in String Theory , J

    H. Sati, A Higher Twist in String Theory , J. Geom. Phys. 59 (2009), 369-373, [ arXiv:hep-th/0701232 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0701232]. -2mm

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Sati, Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes , Superstrings, geometry, topology, and C^* -algebras, 181--236, Proc

    H. Sati, Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes , Superstrings, geometry, topology, and C^* -algebras, 181--236, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 81, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2010, [ arXiv:1001.5020 https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.5020] [ math.DG ]. -2mm

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Sati, Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes II: Twisted String and String ^c structures , J

    H. Sati, Geometric and topological structures related to M-branes II: Twisted String and String ^c structures , J. Australian Math. Soc. 90 (2011), 93-108, [ arXiv:1007.5419 https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.5419] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sati, Anomalies of E_8 gauge theory on string manifolds , Int

    H. Sati, Anomalies of E_8 gauge theory on string manifolds , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011), no. 13, 2177--2197, [ arXiv:0807.4940 https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4940] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2011 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Sati, Twisted topological structures related to M-branes , Int

    H. Sati, Twisted topological structures related to M-branes , Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 8 (2011), no. 5, 1097--1116, [ arXiv:1008.1755 https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1755] [hep-th]. -2mm

    2011 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Sati, Topological aspects of the NS5-brane , [ arXiv:1109.4834 https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4940] [ hep-th ]

    H. Sati, Topological aspects of the NS5-brane , [ arXiv:1109.4834 https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.4940] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Sati, M-theory with framed corners and tertiary index invariants, SIGMA 10 (2014), 024, [ arXiv:1203.4179 https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4179]

    H. Sati, M-theory with framed corners and tertiary index invariants, SIGMA 10 (2014), 024, [ arXiv:1203.4179 https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4179]. -2mm

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Sati and U

    H. Sati and U. Schreiber, Higher T-duality of M-branes via local supersymmetry , Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018), 694--698, [ arXiv:1805.00233 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00233] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, Fivebrane structures , Rev. Math. Phys. 21 (2009) 1-44, arXiv:0805.0564 https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0564] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2009 arXiv

  53. [61]

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, Differential twisted String- and Fivebrane structures , Commun. Math. Phys. 315 (2012), 169--213, [ arXiv:0910.4001 https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4001] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Sati and C

    H. Sati and C. Westerland, Twisted Morava K-theory and E-theory , J. Topol. 8 (2015), no. 4, 887--916, [ arXiv:1109.3867 https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3867] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Sati and M

    H. Sati and M. Wheeler, Variations of higher rational tangential structures , J. Geom. Phy. 130 (2018), 229-248, [ arXiv:1612.06983 https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.06983] [ math.AT ]. -2mm

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Sati and M

    H. Sati and M. Wheeler, Topological actions via gauge variations of higher structures , Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019), 114-118, [ arXiv:1810.05349 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05349] [ hep-th ]. -2mm

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Sati and M

    H. Sati and M. Wheeler, Higher structures and 6-dimensional N =(1,0) theory , preprint. -2mm

  58. [66]

    Seiberg, Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six-dimensions , Phys

    N. Seiberg, Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six-dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 169-171, [ arXiv:hep-th/9609161 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9609161]. -2mm

    1997 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 121-134, [ arXiv:hep-th/9603003 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9603003]. -2mm

    1996 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Strominger, Open p-branes , Phys

    A. Strominger, Open p-branes , Phys. Lett. B383 (1996) 44-47, [ arXiv:hep-th/9512059 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9512059]. -2mm

    1996 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Wang, Geometric cycles, index theory and twisted K-homology , J

    B.-L. Wang, Geometric cycles, index theory and twisted K-homology , J. Noncommut. Geom. 2 (2008), 497-552, [ arXiv:0710.1625 https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.1625][ math.KT ]. -2mm

    2008 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Witten, Some comments on string dynamics , [ arXiv:hep-th/9507121 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9507121]

    E. Witten, Some comments on string dynamics , [ arXiv:hep-th/9507121 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9507121]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.