Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 50 references

A2J: Anchor-to-Joint Regression Network for 3D Articulated Pose Estimation from a Single Depth Image

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes A2J, which estimates 3D hand and body joint positions from a single depth image by letting densely placed anchor points vote for each joint, and reports leading hand-pose accuracy at roughly 100 FPS.

desk verdict A2J is a genuinely new anchor-to-joint architecture with solid experiments and public code, but the abstract overstates superiority and the online speed claim assumes a perfect crop. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09999 v1 pith:VPLNKQPP submitted 2019-08-27 cs.CV

Fu Xiong , Boshen Zhang , Yang Xiao , Zhiguo Cao , Taidong Yu , Joey Tianyi Zhou , Junsong Yuan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords 3Dhandposeestimationbodydepthimageanchor-basedregressionanchorproposalensemblelearningResNet-50real-time
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes A2J, an anchor-to-joint regression network that estimates 3D hand and body joint positions from a single depth image. Instead of producing heatmaps or voxel grids, the network lays down a dense grid of anchor points on the depth image and lets every anchor predict an in-plane offset and a depth value for every joint; a learned softmax weight aggregates these votes into the final joint position. The central claim is that this anchor ensemble, driven by a plain 2D ResNet-50 backbone without deconvolutional or 3D layers, reaches state-of-the-art accuracy on hand pose benchmarks while running at about 100 FPS on a single 1080Ti GPU. The authors also claim that the learned weight distribution is adaptive: different joints recruit different informative anchors, which improves generalization to unseen subjects. A sympathetic reader would care because the method offers a substantially cheaper and faster alternative to 3D-CNN and point-cloud pose estimators, with accuracy that is competitive or better on most of the five datasets tested.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the anchor point: a point on a dense grid over the depth image, set with stride 4 pixels, that acts as a local regressor for every joint. Each anchor produces an in-plane offset, a depth estimate, and a proposal score per joint; the softmax-normalized scores $\tilde P_j(a)$ turn the set of anchors into a joint-specific weighted ensemble. The second load-bearing mechanism is the informative-anchor surrounding loss, which pulls anchors with high weight toward positions around the target joint, so the ensemble observes the joint from several directions instead of one biased viewpoint. Together these let a plain 2D CNN carry the 3D task: the anchors supply local-global context, and the learned weights supply adaptivity.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be a controlled re-implementation on HANDS2017 and NYU where the same ResNet-50 backbone and training data are used but the softmax anchor weights are replaced by uniform weights; if mean 3D error does not rise substantially, then the paper's claim that learned informative-anchor weighting drives its accuracy is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A2J's central proposal is that a joint's 3D position can be written as a weighted ensemble over many local predictors. A dense set of anchor points $a$ on the depth image, spaced 4 pixels apart, each outputs an in-plane offset $O_j(a)$ and a depth value $D_j(a)$ for every joint $j$. An anchor-proposal branch produces a score $P_j(a)$, normalized by softmax to $\tilde P_j(a)$, that controls how much anchor $a$ votes for joint $j$. The in-plane estimate is $\hat S_j = \sum_a \tilde P_j(a)(S(a) + O_j(a))$, where $S(a)$ is the anchor's own image position, and the depth estimate is $\hat D_j = \sum_a \tilde P_j(a) D_j(a)$. Two losses supervise training: a joint-position loss on the aggregated output, and an informative-anchor surrounding loss that encourages high-weight anchors to lie around the joint, countering viewpoint bias. The paper reports that this mechanism, run on a 2D ResNet-50 backbone without deconvolutional layers, achieves the lowest average 3D error on HANDS2017 and NYU, competitive results on ICVL, and large improvements on the K2HPD body benchmark, at roughly 100 FPS.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes a reliable crop of the hand or body region is available at test time; all benchmark evaluations use dataset-provided crops, and the paper provides no evidence about accuracy when the crop is missing or imperfect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If A2J's reported accuracy holds, real-time 3D hand and body tracking can be built from a single 2D CNN at 93–105 FPS, without the memory cost of voxelization or the preprocessing cost of point sampling.
  • The method's large margin on the HANDS2017 'UNSEEN' split suggests the anchor ensemble transfers to new subjects better than heatmap or point-set baselines, which matters for consumer devices shared across users.
  • Because the depth branch can be removed, the same anchor-voting machinery applies to 2D pose estimation from depth or RGB, as demonstrated by the K2HPD experiments.
  • The adaptive anchor distribution—few informative anchors for visible fingertips, many for flat or occluded regions—offers a way to allocate computation and context where a joint most needs it.
  • The 192 FPS result with ResNet-18 indicates the accuracy-speed trade-off can be tuned by backbone depth while keeping the method in the real-time regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper does not test is to feed A2J with crops produced by an actual detection network; the current benchmarks assume clean hand/body regions, so a detection-plus-A2J pipeline may require joint training or a robustness study.
  • The anchor-voting head is a generic 3D-regression head: it could be attached to other 2D backbones or applied to object pose, face alignment, or human shape estimation, since it only requires per-pixel features and a set of 3D landmarks.
  • The surrounding loss behaves like an attention regularization; comparing it with explicit attention or transformer-style queries might reveal whether the spatial-layout constraint or the weighted aggregation is doing the work.
  • Untested in the paper: because anchors are local, A2J may degrade gracefully under partial occlusion, where global regression often fails; a synthetic occlusion benchmark would quantify this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes A2J, an anchor-to-joint regression network for 3D hand and body pose estimation from a single depth image. Dense anchor points on the input depth image act as local regressors; a softmax-weighted aggregation combines their predicted in-plane offsets and depth values to localize each joint. An anchor proposal branch learns per-joint anchor weights, and an informative-anchor surrounding loss encourages informative anchors to lie near the joint. The network is built on a ResNet-50 backbone with three functional branches, avoiding 3D convolutions, voxelization, and point-cloud preprocessing. Experiments are reported on HANDS2017, NYU, ICVL, ITOP, and K2HPD, with ablation studies and running-time measurements.

Significance. If the stated results hold, A2J is a simple, efficient, and competitive alternative to voxel-based and point-set-based 3D pose estimators, and the public code is a useful contribution. The ablation study supports the importance of the anchor proposal branch and the surrounding loss, and the speed advantage over V2V-style methods is substantial. However, the abstract's unqualified superiority claim is contradicted by the ICVL and ITOP tables, and the reported FPS figures exclude the region-proposal stage that the method requires. The central claims are therefore defensible only in a qualified, conditional form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §4.2 (Tables 4 and 5)] The abstract and conclusion claim that the experiments "verify A2J's superiority," but Tables 4 and 5 do not support an unqualified superiority claim. On ICVL (Table 4), A2J's mean error is 6.461 mm, which is worse than V2V* (6.286 mm) and P2P (6.328 mm). On ITOP (Table 5), A2J's mean mAP is 88.0 (front-view) and 80.5 (top-view), compared with V2V*'s 88.74 and 83.44. The body text acknowledges these exceptions, but the abstract and Section 5 should be revised to state that A2J is competitive and often superior, with the specific datasets quantified; for the close ICVL and ITOP margins, the absence of error bars or multi-seed results makes the comparison inconclusive.
  2. [§3.2 and §4.5] The "single depth image" and "around 100 FPS" claims in the abstract describe the regressor applied to pre-cropped regions, not a complete system. Section 3.2 states that hand regions are cropped using center points following [26] and body regions using bounding boxes following [11], and all evaluations use these provided regions. Section 4.5 reports 105.06 FPS for hand as 1.5 ms for reading/warping plus 8.0 ms for forward propagation and post-processing, and 93.78 FPS for body, with no detection or region-proposal cost included. Since a shifted or mistuned crop can place joints near the boundary of the anchor grid and degrade accuracy, the paper should either include experiments that perturb the center/bounding-box inputs or explicitly state that the reported accuracy and speed assume perfect region proposals.
  3. [§3.2.2, Eq. (6)] The informative-anchor surrounding loss in Eq. (6) penalizes the distance between the weighted average anchor position and the joint position, but it contains no spread, variance, or uniformity term. The claim that informative anchor points are encouraged to "uniformly surround" the joint is therefore not directly enforced by this loss; the qualitative layouts in Fig. 6 may be an indirect effect of the weighted-mean constraint. The authors should clarify this limitation, and if uniform surrounding is the intended behavior, either add an explicit spread term or temper the wording in Section 3.2.2.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.2] The word "warpped" should be "warped".
  2. [§4.1.3] The phrase "on this 2 datasets" should be "on these two datasets."
  3. [§1] The phrase "lie in 3 folders" appears to be a typo; it should likely read "lie in three aspects" or "threefold."
  4. [§3.1.3 and §4.1.3] The paper does not specify how the single-channel depth image is converted for input to the ImageNet-pretrained ResNet-50, which expects three-channel input. The input encoding (e.g., repeating the depth channel three times) should be stated for reproducibility.
  5. [§3.1.1] The output channel ordering for the "16×K×2" and "16×K×1" output layers and the "column-wise" arrangement of the 16 anchors are not defined precisely; a short sentence specifying the anchor-to-channel mapping would improve reproducibility.
  6. [§3.2 (threshold)] The threshold β̃P_j(a) > 0.02 that defines informative anchors appears to be used only for visualization; the training losses in Eqs. (4) and (6) do not involve this threshold. The role of the threshold should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: A2J is an empirical supervised-learning paper; its accuracy claims are measured on held-out test sets, and no central prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a neural-network architecture: anchor points densely placed on the depth image predict in-plane offsets and depth values, and Eq. (1) aggregates these predictions with softmax weights. This aggregation is the network's forward model, not a renaming of the training targets; the same equation appears in the training loss, which is standard supervised end-to-end learning rather than circularity. The 'anchor proposal branch' is learned from data and ablated in Table 7, so the informative-anchor behavior is an empirical finding, not an assumed input. Comparisons are made against external published baselines on standard benchmarks with held-out test splits (HANDS 2017, NYU, ICVL, ITOP, K2HPD), and the reported advantages are therefore empirical evidence rather than consequences of a fitted parameter being called a prediction. Some baselines, such as HandPointNet and P2P, share co-authors with the present paper, but they are independent published methods and are not invoked to justify A2J's correctness. The crop-dependence and FPS-without-detection caveats noted by the reader are legitimate deployment concerns, but they are issues of experimental scope and robustness, not circular derivation. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input, so the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim depends on standard deep-learning hyperparameters and domain assumptions about depth images and transfer learning. No new physical entities are introduced; anchor points are a computational construct for regression aggregation.

free parameters (4)
  • Anchor stride St = 4 pixels
    Density of anchor points on the depth image; chosen by design, affects the resolution of local context information.
  • Informative anchor threshold = 0.02
    Used to define 'informative' anchors for visualization and analysis; arbitrary cutoff, not part of the loss function.
  • Loss weights and smooth-L1 parameters = alpha=0.5, lambda=3, tau1=1, tau2=3
    Hyperparameters balancing in-plain and depth regression and the surrounding loss; chosen by hand.
  • Depth transformation parameters mu and theta = hand: mu=1, theta=center depth; body: mu=50, theta=0
    Scale and shift to make depth and in-plain targets comparable; dataset-specific.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption A depth image's pixel values, together with in-plain coordinates, determine 3D joint positions up to the camera intrinsic parameters.
    Underpins the decision to regress in-plain offsets plus a single depth value per joint; standard for depth-based pose estimation.
  • domain assumption ImageNet-pretrained weights on RGB images transfer useful features to depth images.
    Used in Section 3.1.3; Table 9 shows pretraining helps, so this is empirical rather than guaranteed.
  • standard math Softmax over anchor weights yields a differentiable, well-behaved aggregation.
    Used in Eq. 2; standard softmax function enables end-to-end training.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A2J: Anchor-to-Joint Regression Network for 3D Articulated Pose Estimation from a Single Depth Image." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VPLNKQPP

@misc{pith2026190809999,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A2J: Anchor-to-Joint Regression Network for 3D Articulated Pose Estimation from a Single Depth Image},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VPLNKQPP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09999}
}
read the original abstract

For 3D hand and body pose estimation task in depth image, a novel anchor-based approach termed Anchor-to-Joint regression network (A2J) with the end-to-end learning ability is proposed. Within A2J, anchor points able to capture global-local spatial context information are densely set on depth image as local regressors for the joints. They contribute to predict the positions of the joints in ensemble way to enhance generalization ability. The proposed 3D articulated pose estimation paradigm is different from the state-of-the-art encoder-decoder based FCN, 3D CNN and point-set based manners. To discover informative anchor points towards certain joint, anchor proposal procedure is also proposed for A2J. Meanwhile 2D CNN (i.e., ResNet-50) is used as backbone network to drive A2J, without using time-consuming 3D convolutional or deconvolutional layers. The experiments on 3 hand datasets and 2 body datasets verify A2J's superiority. Meanwhile, A2J is of high running speed around 100 FPS on single NVIDIA 1080Ti GPU.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09999 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The main idea of anchor-based 3D pose estimation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The main technical pipeline of A2J. A2J consists of backbone network and 3 functional branches. The backbone network is built [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The densely set anchor points on depth image. They will [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In-plain offset and depth estimation branches. They both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Anchor proposal branch with 4 intermediate convolu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effectiveness of anchor point surrounding loss. Grey dot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of A2J with state-of-the-art methods. Left: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative results of A2J. Ground-truth is shown in red, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    V2v-posenet: V oxel-to-voxel prediction network for accu- rate 3d hand and human pose estimation from a single depth map

    Gyeongsik Moon, Ju Yong Chang, and Kyoung Mu Lee. V2v-posenet: V oxel-to-voxel prediction network for accu- rate 3d hand and human pose estimation from a single depth map. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5079–5088, 2018. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7

    work page 2018

  2. [11]

    Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation

    Hao-Shu Fang, Shuqin Xie, Yu-Wing Tai, and Cewu Lu. Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 2334–2343, 2017. 4

    work page 2017

  3. [1]

    Disco nets: Dissimilarity coefficients networks

    Diane Bouchacourt, Pawan K Mudigonda, and Sebastian Nowozin. Disco nets: Dissimilarity coefficients networks. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 352–360, 2016. 6

    work page 2016

  4. [2]

    Human pose es- timation via convolutional part heatmap regression

    Adrian Bulat and Georgios Tzimiropoulos. Human pose es- timation via convolutional part heatmap regression. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 717–732, 2016. 1, 7

    work page 2016

  5. [3]

    Exploit- ing spatial-temporal relationships for 3d pose estimation via graph convolutional networks

    Yujun Cai, Liuhao Ge, Jun Liu, Jianfei Cai, Tat-Jen Cham, Junsong Yuan, and Nadia Magnenat Thalmann. Exploit- ing spatial-temporal relationships for 3d pose estimation via graph convolutional networks. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019. 1

    work page 2019

  6. [4]

    Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields

    Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 7291–7299, 2017. 1, 2

    work page 2017

  7. [5]

    Human pose estimation with iterative error feedback

    Joao Carreira, Pulkit Agrawal, Katerina Fragkiadaki, and Ji- tendra Malik. Human pose estimation with iterative error feedback. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 4733–4742, 2016. 6, 7

    work page 2016

  8. [6]

    Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation

    R Qi Charles, Hao Su, Mo Kaichun, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 77–85, 2017. 3

    work page 2017

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Pose guided structured region ensemble net- work for cascaded hand pose estimation

    Xinghao Chen, Guijin Wang, Hengkai Guo, and Cairong Zhang. Pose guided structured region ensemble net- work for cascaded hand pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.03416, 2017. 6

    2017 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 248–255, 2009. 2

    2009

  3. [10]

    Hand3d: Hand pose estimation using 3d neural network

    Xiaoming Deng, Shuo Yang, Yinda Zhang, Ping Tan, Liang Chang, and Hongan Wang. Hand3d: Hand pose estimation using 3d neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.02224,

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Multi-task, multi-domain learning: application to se- mantic segmentation and pose regression

    Damien Fourure, Rémi Emonet, Elisa Fromont, Damien Muselet, Natalia Neverova, Alain Trémeau, and Christian Wolf. Multi-task, multi-domain learning: application to se- mantic segmentation and pose regression. Neurocomputing, 251:68–80, 2017. 6

    2017

  5. [13]

    Real-time human pose tracking from range data

    Varun Ganapathi, Christian Plagemann, Daphne Koller, and Sebastian Thrun. Real-time human pose tracking from range data. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 738–751, 2012. 2

    2012

  6. [14]

    Hand pointnet: 3d hand pose estimation using point sets

    Liuhao Ge, Yujun Cai, Junwu Weng, and Junsong Yuan. Hand pointnet: 3d hand pose estimation using point sets. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8417–8426, 2018. 1, 6

    2018

  7. [15]

    Robust 3d hand pose estimation in single depth images: from single-view cnn to multi-view cnns

    Liuhao Ge, Hui Liang, Junsong Yuan, and Daniel Thalmann. Robust 3d hand pose estimation in single depth images: from single-view cnn to multi-view cnns. In Proc. IEEE Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 3593–3601, 2016. 2

    2016

  8. [16]

    3d convolutional neural networks for efficient and robust hand pose estimation from single depth images

    Liuhao Ge, Hui Liang, Junsong Yuan, and Daniel Thalmann. 3d convolutional neural networks for efficient and robust hand pose estimation from single depth images. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), volume 1, page 5, 2017. 1, 2

    2017

  9. [17]

    Point-to-point re- gression pointnet for 3d hand pose estimation

    Liuhao Ge, Zhou Ren, and Junsong Yuan. Point-to-point re- gression pointnet for 3d hand pose estimation. In Proc. Eu- ropean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 475– 491, 2018. 1, 6

    2018

  10. [18]

    Towards good practices for deep 3d hand pose es- timation

    Hengkai Guo, Guijin Wang, Xinghao Chen, and Cairong Zhang. Towards good practices for deep 3d hand pose es- timation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07248, 2017. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Region ensemble network: Improving convolutional network for hand pose estimation

    Hengkai Guo, Guijin Wang, Xinghao Chen, Cairong Zhang, Fei Qiao, and Huazhong Yang. Region ensemble network: Improving convolutional network for hand pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Image Process- ing (ICIP), pages 4512–4516, 2017. 1, 2, 5, 6

    2017

  12. [20]

    Towards viewpoint invariant 3d human pose estimation

    Albert Haque, Boya Peng, Zelun Luo, Alexandre Alahi, Ser- ena Yeung, and Li Fei-Fei. Towards viewpoint invariant 3d human pose estimation. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 160–177, 2016. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2016

  13. [21]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 770–778, 2016. 2, 4, 8

    2016

  14. [22]

    Depth-images-based pose estimation using regression forests and graphical models

    Li He, Guijin Wang, Qingmin Liao, and Jing-Hao Xue. Depth-images-based pose estimation using regression forests and graphical models. Neurocomputing, 164:210–219, 2015. 2

    2015

  15. [23]

    End-to-end global to local cnn learn- ing for hand pose recovery in depth data

    Meysam Madadi, Sergio Escalera, Xavier Baró, and Jordi Gonzalez. End-to-end global to local cnn learn- ing for hand pose recovery in depth data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.09606, 2017. 6

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    V oxnet: A 3d con- volutional neural network for real-time object recognition

    Daniel Maturana and Sebastian Scherer. V oxnet: A 3d con- volutional neural network for real-time object recognition. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 922–928. IEEE, 2015. 2

    2015

  17. [25]

    Holistic planimetric prediction to local vol- umetric prediction for 3d human pose estimation

    Gyeongsik Moon, Ju Yong Chang, Yumin Suh, and Ky- oung Mu Lee. Holistic planimetric prediction to local vol- umetric prediction for 3d human pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04758, 2017. 2

    2017 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Stacked hour- glass networks for human pose estimation

    Alejandro Newell, Kaiyu Yang, and Jia Deng. Stacked hour- glass networks for human pose estimation. In Proc. Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 483– 499, 2016. 1, 2, 7

    2016

  19. [28]

    Deepprior++: Im- proving fast and accurate 3d hand pose estimation

    Markus Oberweger and Vincent Lepetit. Deepprior++: Im- proving fast and accurate 3d hand pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Work- shop (ICCVW), volume 840, page 2, 2017. 2, 6

    2017

  20. [29]

    Hands deep in deep learning for hand pose estimation

    Markus Oberweger, Paul Wohlhart, and Vincent Lepetit. Hands deep in deep learning for hand pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.06807, 2015. 2

    2015 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) , pages 5099–5108,

  22. [31]

    Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks

    Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 91–99, 2015. 5

    2015

  23. [32]

    Monocular real-time 3d articulated hand pose estimation

    Javier Romero, Hedvig Kjellström, and Danica Kragic. Monocular real-time 3d articulated hand pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), pages 87–92, 2009. 1

    2009

  24. [33]

    Real-time human pose recognition in parts from sin- gle depth images

    Jamie Shotton, Andrew Fitzgibbon, Mat Cook, Toby Sharp, Mark Finocchio, Richard Moore, Alex Kipman, and Andrew Blake. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from sin- gle depth images. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 1297–1304,

  25. [34]

    Cascaded hand pose regression

    Xiao Sun, Yichen Wei, Shuang Liang, Xiaoou Tang, and Jian Sun. Cascaded hand pose regression. In Proc. IEEE Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 824–832, 2015. 6

    2015

  26. [35]

    Integral human pose regression

    Xiao Sun, Bin Xiao, Fangyin Wei, Shuang Liang, and Yichen Wei. Integral human pose regression. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018. 1

    2018

  27. [36]

    Latent regression forest: Structured estimation of 3d articulated hand posture

    Danhang Tang, Hyung Jin Chang, Alykhan Tejani, and Tae- Kyun Kim. Latent regression forest: Structured estimation of 3d articulated hand posture. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3786–3793, 2014. 2, 5, 6

    2014

  28. [37]

    Real-time continuous pose recovery of human hands using convolutional networks

    Jonathan Tompson, Murphy Stein, Yann Lecun, and Ken Perlin. Real-time continuous pose recovery of human hands using convolutional networks. ACM Transactions on Graph- ics, 33(5):169, 2014. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2014

  29. [38]

    Deeppose: Hu- man pose estimation via deep neural networks

    Alexander Toshev and Christian Szegedy. Deeppose: Hu- man pose estimation via deep neural networks. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition (CVPR), pages 1653–1660, 2014. 2, 8

    2014

  30. [39]

    Dense 3d regression for hand pose estimation

    Chengde Wan, Thomas Probst, Luc Van Gool, and Angela Yao. Dense 3d regression for hand pose estimation. pages 5147–5156, 2018. 2, 6

    2018

  31. [40]

    Crossing nets: Combining gans and vaes with a shared latent space for hand pose estimation

    Chengde Wan, Thomas Probst, Luc Van Gool, and Angela Yao. Crossing nets: Combining gans and vaes with a shared latent space for hand pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) ,

  32. [41]

    Convolutional memory blocks for depth data representation learning

    Keze Wang, Liang Lin, Chuangjie Ren, Wei Zhang, and Wenxiu Sun. Convolutional memory blocks for depth data representation learning. In Proc. International Joint Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 2790–2797,

  33. [42]

    Human pose estimation from depth images via inference embedded multi-task learning

    Keze Wang, Shengfu Zhai, Hui Cheng, Xiaodan Liang, and Liang Lin. Human pose estimation from depth images via inference embedded multi-task learning. In Proc. ACM on Multimedia Conference (ACM MM) , pages 1227–1236,

  34. [43]

    Convolutional pose machines

    Shih-En Wei, Varun Ramakrishna, Takeo Kanade, and Yaser Sheikh. Convolutional pose machines. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4724–4732, 2016. 1, 2, 7

    2016

  35. [44]

    Simple baselines for human pose estimation and tracking

    Bin Xiao, Haiping Wu, and Yichen Wei. Simple baselines for human pose estimation and tracking. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018. 2, 8

    2018

  36. [45]

    Lie-x: Depth image based articulated object pose estimation, tracking, and action recognition on lie groups

    Chi Xu, Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan, Yu Zhang, and Li Cheng. Lie-x: Depth image based articulated object pose estimation, tracking, and action recognition on lie groups. International Journal of Computer Vision , 123(3):454–478,

  37. [46]

    Accurate 3d pose estimation from a single depth image

    Mao Ye, Xianwang Wang, Ruigang Yang, Liu Ren, and Marc Pollefeys. Accurate 3d pose estimation from a single depth image. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 731–738, 2011. 2

    2011

  38. [47]

    Depth- based 3d hand pose estimation: From current achievements to future goals

    Shanxin Yuan, Guillermo Garcia-Hernando, Björn Stenger, Gyeongsik Moon, Ju Yong Chang, Kyoung Mu Lee, Pavlo Molchanov, Jan Kautz, Sina Honari, Liuhao Ge, et al. Depth- based 3d hand pose estimation: From current achievements to future goals. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Compute...

  39. [48]

    The 2017 hands in the million challenge on 3d hand pose estimation

    Shanxin Yuan, Qi Ye, Guillermo Garcia-Hernando, and Tae- Kyun Kim. The 2017 hands in the million challenge on 3d hand pose estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02237,

    2017 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Bighand2

    Shanxin Yuan, Qi Ye, Bjorn Stenger, Siddhant Jain, and Tae- Kyun Kim. Bighand2. 2m benchmark: Hand pose dataset and state of the art analysis. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4866–4874, 2017. 5

    2017

  41. [50]

    Random tree walk toward instantaneous 3d hu- man pose estimation

    Ho Yub Jung, Soochahn Lee, Yong Seok Heo, and Il Dong Yun. Random tree walk toward instantaneous 3d hu- man pose estimation. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 2467– 2474, 2015. 1, 6, 7

    2015

  42. [51]

    Model-based deep hand pose estimation

    Xingyi Zhou, Qingfu Wan, Wei Zhang, Xiangyang Xue, and Yichen Wei. Model-based deep hand pose estimation. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence (IJCAI), 2016. 6

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.