Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Moduli spaces on the Kuznetsov component of Fano threefolds of index 2

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For general quartic double solids, an equivalence of Kuznetsov components forces the two threefolds to be isomorphic.

desk verdict Strong moduli-space work that deserves refereeing; the advertised Torelli theorem is conditional on a missing proof of the non-Fourier-Mukai family construction in Lemma 5.8. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10986 v4 pith:EBDQA46A submitted 2019-08-28 math.AG

Matteo Altavilla , Marin Petkovic , Franco Rota This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AG MSC 14F0814J4514D20
keywords derivedcategoriesBridgelandstabilityconditionsFanothreefoldsmodulispacesAbel-JacobimapcategoricalTorellitheoremquarticdoublesolidsKuznetsovcomponent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a general quartic double solid—a double cover of $\mathbb P^3$ branched over a quartic K3 surface—is determined up to isomorphism by its Kuznetsov component, the nontrivial part of a semiorthogonal decomposition of its derived category of coherent sheaves. If two such threefolds have equivalent Kuznetsov components, they are isomorphic as varieties, with no requirement that the equivalence be of Fourier–Mukai type. The proof works by studying the moduli space of stable objects of one numerical class $w$ in the Kuznetsov component, showing it has two three-dimensional irreducible components: one copy of the threefold itself and one component whose points correspond to roots on hyperplane sections. An Abel–Jacobi map distinguishes the two components geometrically, and an arbitrary equivalence is shown to respect this geometry. If correct, this is a categorical Torelli theorem of the strongest expected form for these threefolds.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moduli space $\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ of semistable objects of numerical class $w$ in the Kuznetsov component $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$, where $\sigma$ is the Bridgeland stability condition on $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ induced from weak stability conditions on $D^b(Y)$ by the general criterion of [BLMS17]. The class $w$ is the vector $w=H-\tfrac12H^2+(\tfrac16-\tfrac1d)H^3$ in the numerical Grothendieck group, and the objects $E_p$ of that class form the subvariety $\mathcal Y\simeq Y$. Three mechanisms carry the argument: (1) wall-crossing in the $(\alpha,\beta)$-plane identifies $\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ with a moduli space of $\sigma_{\alpha,-1/2}$-semistable complexes below the unique wall and compares it with the Gieseker moduli space $\mathcal M_G(w)$; (2) the Abel–Jacobi map $F\mapsto\Phi(c_2(F))$ to the intermediate Jacobian $J(Y)$ separates the two components for $d\le 2$; (3) for the Torelli theorem, a convolution construction assembles a universal family for the objects $u(E'_s)$ without assuming $u$ is a Fourier–Mukai functor.

What would settle it

Take a general quartic double solid, choose the resolution (15) used in Section 5.2 for some $m$, and compute whether the complex $F_m^\bullet$ admits a unique split right convolution $G_m\simeq H_m\oplus E_m$ with the cohomological support stated in Lemma 5.8. If for any $m$ two non-isomorphic right convolutions exist, or if the required vanishing fails, the family $\widetilde E$ used to produce the morphism $Y'\to\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ is not well defined and the proof of the categorical Torelli theorem collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that for a general quartic double solid $Y$, the Kuznetsov component $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ is a complete categorical invariant: given another general quartic double solid $Y'$, any equivalence of triangulated categories $\operatorname{Ku}(Y')\simeq\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ forces an isomorphism $Y'\simeq Y$. The engine is the moduli space $\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ of $\sigma$-stable objects of class $w$ in $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$, where $w=H-\tfrac12H^2+(\tfrac16-\tfrac1d)H^3$; for $d=2$ this moduli space has two three-dimensional irreducible components, one isomorphic to $Y$ and parametrizing objects $E_p$ defined by the triangle $\mathcal O(-1)[1]\to E_p\to I_p\to \mathcal O(-1)[2]$, the other parametrizing roots of hyperplane sections. The components meet exactly along the ramification locus $R$, and the Abel–Jacobi map $\Psi(F)=\Phi(c_2(F))$ contracts the $Y$-component to a point while being a generic embedding on the other component. The proof of the Torelli statement shows that any equivalence sends the stable objects of class $w$ to stable objects of class $w$ up to shift, uses a convolution construction to turn the induced bijection on closed points into a morphism $Y'\to\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$, and then uses rational connectedness to force the image into the component isomorphic to $Y$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that the constructed family of objects really gives a morphism between the two threefolds depends on an unproved technical claim about decomposing a certain complex in a canonical way; without that claim, the equivalence is only known to induce a bijection between sets of closed points, which is not enough to conclude the two threefolds are isomorphic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For general quartic double solids, $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ is a complete categorical invariant: $Y'\simeq Y$ if and only if $\operatorname{Ku}(Y')\simeq\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$, with no Fourier–Mukai hypothesis on the equivalence.
  • Consequently any equivalence $\operatorname{Ku}(Y')\simeq\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ of general quartic double solids implies a Fourier–Mukai equivalence between the two categories, by combining Theorem 5.1 with the earlier result [BT16, Prop. 3.5].
  • The moduli space $\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ for a general quartic double solid has exactly two irreducible components, $\mathcal Y\simeq Y$ and $\mathcal C$, smooth outside their intersection at the ramification locus $R$; the Abel–Jacobi map contracts $\mathcal Y$ to a point and embeds $\mathcal C$ generically.
  • For degree $d\le 2$ the same two-component description holds, while for $d\ge 3$ the moduli space is irreducible and projective; in degree $1$ the second component is the Fano surface of lines, meeting $\mathcal Y$ along the curve $C$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test whether the convolution lemma used in the proof can be proved in general; if so, the same strategy should give a categorical Torelli theorem for the degree-1 case (the double Veronese cone) once the homological-dimension obstruction (the heart has homological dimension 3 there) is handled.
  • Because the intersection $\mathcal Y\cap\mathcal C$ is the ramification K3 surface, the abstract moduli space $\mathcal M_\sigma(w)$ may encode enough information to reconstruct the branch quartic, making the Torelli statement constructive rather than existence-only.
  • The numerical observation that an equivalence may send class $w$ to $2v-w$, corrected by a rotation functor, suggests a closer relation between autoequivalences of $\operatorname{Ku}(Y)$ and the wall-crossing group of the moduli space; testing whether the rotation matches the reflection across the wall could yield a shorter proof of the shift-invariance step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies moduli spaces of stable objects of a fixed numerical class w in the Kuznetsov component Ku(Y) of a Fano threefold Y of index 2 and Picard rank 1. Using the stability condition of Bayer–Lahoz–Macrì–Stellari and wall-crossing in tilt-stability, the authors describe the moduli space M_σ(w) for all degrees d = 1,...,5: it contains a component isomorphic to Y, and for d ≤ 2 a second component parametrizing roots on hyperplane sections. For d = 2 (quartic double solids) and d = 1 (double Veronese cones) they study the Abel–Jacobi map to the intermediate Jacobian. The main application is a categorical Torelli theorem (Theorem 5.1): for two general quartic double solids Y and Y', any equivalence Ku(Y') ≅ Ku(Y) implies Y' ≅ Y, without the Fourier–Mukai assumption that was needed in [BT16]. The proof constructs, from such an equivalence, a morphism Y' → M_σ(w) via a universal family built by convolutions, and identifies its image with the component Y.

Significance. If fully established, Theorem 5.1 is a substantial result: it would make the Kuznetsov component a complete categorical invariant for general quartic double solids, removing the Fourier–Mukai hypothesis from the earlier Bernardara–Tabuada result. The paper also gives a fairly complete description of M_σ(w) in all degrees, with explicit calculations of Ext spaces, Chern classes, and wall-crossing behavior. The low-degree descriptions (d = 1, 2) are supported by concrete geometric arguments, and the Abel–Jacobi analysis for quartic double solids contains interesting new information about the intersection of the two components. The paper is well structured and careful in most of its technical sections. However, the main Torelli theorem depends on Lemma 5.8, which is asserted by citation to [BMMS12] rather than proved; this is a load-bearing gap for the non-Fourier–Mukai case, and without it the claimed improvement over [BT16] is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Lemma 5.8] Lemma 5.8 is the crucial step that allows the construction of the family E~ for an equivalence u that is not of Fourier–Mukai type. The lemma asserts that the complex F•_m of (17) admits a unique split right convolution Gm ≅ Hm ⊕ Em with specific cohomological amplitude, but its proof is only a citation to [BMMS12, Lemma 5.2]. This is not a routine adaptation: in the present setting the terms F(O_Y'(-N_i)) ⊠ L^{⊗-r_i} are objects of D^b(Y×Y') and are generally complexes, not sheaves, and the uniqueness of the right convolution requires explicit Hom-vanishing and amplitude checks that depend on the geometry of quartic double solids. Because Proposition 5.7 supplies only a bijection on closed points, and Lemma 5.9 and the morphism α in §5.3 rely on this same uniqueness, the proof of Theorem 5.1 for arbitrary equivalences is incomplete. The authors should either provide a full proof of Lemma 5.8 or a precise reduction to the cubic-threefold argument that verifies each hypothesis needed from [BMMS12].
  2. [§5.3, Lemma 5.9] Lemma 5.9 asserts that i_s^*(E~) ≅ F((i'_s)_*E'_s) for every closed point s ∈ Y', arguing that the two sides are both right convolutions of the restricted complex i_s^*(F•_m) and that this convolution is unique 'by the same argument as in Lemma 5.8'. Since Lemma 5.8 is not proved, the uniqueness of the restricted convolution is also unsupported. This is not an independent technicality: without Lemma 5.9 the family E~ cannot be shown to have the correct fiberwise objects, and hence α cannot be identified with the pointwise assignment u(E'_s). The dependence of Lemma 5.9 on Lemma 5.8 should be made explicit and the missing argument supplied.
  3. [§5.3, proof of Theorem 5.1] The conclusion that the morphism α: Y' → M factors through the component Y and is an isomorphism uses the claim that 'α is, in particular, a morphism dominating one of the components of M and α is birational onto its image.' This claim is not justified in the text. The bijection on closed points from Proposition 5.7, together with the construction of α, may imply surjectivity onto a component, but birationality and the eventual isomorphism require a separate argument (for instance, that the family E~ is generically an isomorphism or that the induced map on tangent spaces is an isomorphism at a general point). Since the preceding lemmas are the only place where the fiberwise identifications are established, this step also inherits the gap in Lemma 5.8. The authors should spell out the birationality argument or replace it with a direct verification that α is an isomorphism using the bijection on closed points and smoothness.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, first paragraph] The text 'In this section, . We start with a series of lemmas' contains a dangling period and an incomplete sentence; it should be revised.
  2. [§2.2, Proposition 2.9] The symbol Y is used both for the Fano threefold and for the locus in M_σ(w) isomorphic to Y. This is a common but potentially confusing overload; a different notation (e.g., Y_M or Y_0) for the moduli component would improve readability.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (15)] In the resolution (15), the notation O_{Y'}(-N_i) ⊠ (L^{⊗-r_i}) should specify that L is an ample line bundle on Y' (presumably O_{Y'}(1)) and justify the existence of such a resolution with the stated properties; currently the choice of L and the vanishing conditions are left implicit.
  4. [§5.1, Lemma 5.2] The computation of χ(u(E),u(E)) = -(a+b)^2 - b^2 for [u(E)] = av + bw is correct but the sign convention for the Euler form should be stated explicitly, since the intersection matrix in §1 has the opposite sign convention in some places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Torelli proof relies on previously proven moduli-space results and on an external lemma from BMMS12, not on its own conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. The moduli-space description of M_sigma(w), including the component Y isomorphic to Y, is established independently in Sections 2 and 4 via Gieseker moduli, wall-crossing, and the BLMS17 stability condition; it does not assume the categorical Torelli theorem it is later used to prove. The Torelli argument in Theorem 5.1 uses the equivalence u only to transfer objects of class w between Kuznetsov components, and the identification of the induced map with a morphism of moduli spaces is supplied by a universal-family construction. The one load-bearing imported tool is Lemma 5.8, whose proof is explicitly deferred: the text says 'The following lemma follows from the same argument given in [BMMS12]' and 'Proof. See [BMMS12, Lemma 5.2].' This is an external citation to a paper by different authors, not a self-citation, and it is a technical statement about existence and uniqueness of a convolution, not an assumption of the target isomorphism Y' ≃ Y. The omission of a full adaptation from the cubic-threefold setting to quartic double solids is a possible correctness gap, but it is not circular: no object, class, or moduli space is defined in terms of the theorem's conclusion, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Reliance on BLMS17, BMT14, Wel81, and Tih82 is standard external support, and the paper's original contribution, the description of M_sigma(w) and its use for the refined Torelli theorem, retains independent mathematical content. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants: the degrees d = 1,...,5 are labels in the classification, and the stability parameters are fixed by the construction rather than tuned to data. The central claims rest on a large body of imported theorems (BLMS17, BMT14, Kuz11, Kuz15, Wel81, Tih82, BMMS12), which are standard tools in this field. The only item that is effectively assumed ad hoc is Lemma 5.8, the adaptation of the BMMS12 convolution construction to the non-Fourier-Mumford equivalence setting, which is not proved in the text.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The pair σ = (A, Z) constructed in [BLMS17, Thm 1.1] is a Bridgeland stability condition on Ku(Y) for Fano threefolds of index 2 and Picard rank 1 (Prop 1.13).
    All moduli spaces Mσ(w) and wall-crossing statements in Sections 2-5 are defined relative to this stability condition; the paper cites it as a black box.
  • domain assumption The Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality from [BMT14, Lemma 7.2.2] applies to tilt-stable objects on these Fano threefolds.
    Used in Lemma 2.6 and Prop 2.7 to classify all tilt-semistable objects of class w and to show that there is a single wall.
  • domain assumption Base-change for semiorthogonal decompositions and projections in [Kuz11] holds for the families used in Prop 2.9 and Lemma 2.8.
    Used to construct universal families on MG(w) and to prove the wall-crossing morphism; the paper relies on [Kuz11, Sec. 5] without reproving.
  • ad hoc to paper The split right convolution uniqueness of [BMMS12, Lemma 5.2] adapts to the complex F_m* of Eq. (17) over Y x Y' (Lemma 5.8).
    The proof of Theorem 5.1 in the non-Fourier-Mumford case depends on this unproved adaptation; the paper says it follows from the same argument.
  • domain assumption The Serre functor of Ku(Y) is tau[2] for quartic double solids (from [Kuz15]), giving homological dimension 2 of the heart A (Lemma 4.2).
    Needed for Lemmas 5.3-5.5, which control the image of stable objects under an equivalence; cited from [Kuz15].
  • domain assumption General position assumptions hold: for d = 2 the branch quartic R is smooth and line-free, and for d = 1 the branch curve C is smooth and general in moduli.
    These assumptions, stated in Section 1.1.5, control the singularities of hyperplane sections and are needed for Lemma 1.16 and for the Torelli theorem.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Moduli spaces on the Kuznetsov component of Fano threefolds of index 2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBDQA46A

@misc{pith2026190810986,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Moduli spaces on the Kuznetsov component of Fano threefolds of index 2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBDQA46A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10986}
}
abstract

General hyperplane sections of a Fano threefold $Y$ of index 2 and Picard rank 1 are del Pezzo surfaces, and their Picard group is related to a root system. To the corresponding roots, we associate objects in the Kuznetsov component of $Y$ and investigate their moduli spaces, using the stability condition constructed by Bayer, Lahoz, Macr\`i, and Stellari, and the Abel--Jacobi map. We identify a subvariety of the moduli space isomorphic to $Y$ itself, and as an application we prove a (refined) categorical Torelli theorem for general quartic double solids.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arcara and A

    D. Arcara and A. Bertram, Bridgeland-stable moduli spaces for K -trivial surfaces , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 15 (2013), no. 1, 1--38, With an appendix by Max Lieblich

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Daniele Arcara, Aaron Bertram, Izzet Coskun, and Jack Huizenga, The minimal model program for the H ilbert scheme of points on P ^2 and B ridgeland stability , Adv. Math. 235 (2013), 580--626. 3010070

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Abramovich and A

    D. Abramovich and A. Polishchuk, Sheaves of t -structures and valuative criteria for stable complexes , J. Reine Angew. Math. 590 (2006), 89--130

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Arend Bayer and Tom Bridgeland, Derived automorphism groups of K 3 surfaces of P icard rank 1 , Duke Math. J. 166 (2017), no. 1, 75--124. 3592689

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Arend Bayer , Sjoerd Beentjes , Soheyla Feyzbakhsh , Georg Hein , Diletta Martinelli , Fatemeh Rezaee , and Benjamin Schmidt , The desingularization of the theta divisor of a cubic threefold as a moduli space , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2011.12240

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Aaron Bertram and Izzet Coskun, The birational geometry of the H ilbert scheme of points on surfaces , Birational geometry, rational curves, and arithmetic, Simons Symp., Springer, Cham, 2013, pp. 15--55. 3114922

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Barth, Klaus Hulek, Chris A

    Wolf P. Barth, Klaus Hulek, Chris A. M. Peters, and Antonius Van de Ven, Compact complex surfaces, second ed., Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 4, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. 2030225

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Arend Bayer , Mart \' Lahoz , Emanuele Macr \` , and Paolo Stellari , Stability conditions on Kuznetsov components , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1703.10839

    arXiv 2017

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Arend Bayer and Emanuele Macr\`i, M MP for moduli of sheaves on K 3s via wall-crossing: nef and movable cones, L agrangian fibrations , Invent. Math. 198 (2014), no. 3, 505--590. 3279532

    2014

  2. [10]

    Arend Bayer and Emanuele Macr\` , Projectivity and birational geometry of B ridgeland moduli spaces , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 27 (2014), no. 3, 707--752. 3194493

    2014

  3. [11]

    Marcello Bernardara, Emanuele Macr\` , Sukhendu Mehrotra, and Paolo Stellari, A categorical invariant for cubic threefolds, Adv. Math. 229 (2012), no. 2, 770--803. 2855078

    2012

  4. [12]

    Arend Bayer, Emanuele Macr\` , and Paolo Stellari, The space of stability conditions on abelian threefolds, and on some C alabi- Y au threefolds , Invent. Math. 206 (2016), no. 3, 869--933. 3573975

    2016

  5. [13]

    Alg\' e brique 1 (2017), Art

    Marcello Bernardara, Emanuele Macr\` , Benjamin Schmidt, and Xiaolei Zhao, Bridgeland stability conditions on F ano threefolds , \' E pijournal G\' e om. Alg\' e brique 1 (2017), Art. 2, 24. 3743105

    2017

  6. [14]

    Algebraic Geom

    Arend Bayer, Emanuele Macr\` , and Yukinobu Toda, Bridgeland stability conditions on threefolds I : B ogomolov- G ieseker type inequalities , J. Algebraic Geom. 23 (2014), no. 1, 117--163. 3121850

    2014

  7. [15]

    Bertram, S

    A. Bertram, S. Marcus, and J. Wang, The stability manifolds of p1 and local p1, Hodge Theory and Classical Algebraic Geometry 647 (2015), 1

    2015

  8. [16]

    Bondal and D

    A. Bondal and D. Orlov, Semiorthogonal decomposition for algebraic varieties, arXiv preprint alg-geom/9506012 (1995)

    1995 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bridgeland, Stability conditions on triangulated categories, Ann

    T. Bridgeland, Stability conditions on triangulated categories, Ann. of Math. (2) 166 (2007), no. 2, 317--345

    2007

  10. [18]

    , Stability conditions on K3 surfaces , Duke Math. J. 141 (2008), no. 2, 241--291

    2008

  11. [19]

    Marcello Bernardara and Gon c alo Tabuada, From semi-orthogonal decompositions to polarized intermediate J acobians via J acobians of noncommutative motives , Mosc. Math. J. 16 (2016), no. 2, 205--235. 3480702

    2016

  12. [20]

    Clemens and P

    H. Clemens and P. Griffiths, The I ntermediate J acobian of the C ubic T hreefold , Ann. of Math. 95 (1972), 281--356

    1972

  13. [21]

    I. V. Dolgachev, Classical A lgebraic eometry: A M odern V iew , Cambridge U niversity P ress, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Drezet, Cohomologie des vari\' e t\' e s de modules de hauteur nulle , Math

    J.-M. Drezet, Cohomologie des vari\' e t\' e s de modules de hauteur nulle , Math. Ann. 281 (1988), no. 1, 43--85. 944602

    1988

  15. [23]

    Algebra 33 (2005), no

    Daniele Faenzi, Bundles over the F ano threefold V_5 , Comm. Algebra 33 (2005), no. 9, 3061--3080. 2175380

    2005

  16. [24]

    Huybrechts and M

    D. Huybrechts and M. Lehn, The geometry of moduli spaces of sheaves, second ed., Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    Daniel Huybrechts, Emanuele Macr\`i, and Paolo Stellari, Stability conditions for generic K3 categories , Compos. Math. 144 (2008), no. 1, 134--162. 2388559

    2008

  18. [26]

    Happel, I

    D. Happel, I. Reiten, and S. O. Smal , Tilting in abelian categories and quasitilted algebras, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1996), no. 575, viii+ 88

    1996

  19. [27]

    Hidaka and K

    F. Hidaka and K. Watanabe, Normal G orenstein surfaces with ample anti-canonical divisor , Tokyo J. Math. 04 (1981), no. 2, 319--330

    1981

  20. [28]

    V. A. Iskovskih, Fano threefolds. I , Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 41 (1977), no. 3, 516--562, 717. 463151

    1977

  21. [29]

    Kollar, Rational curves on algebraic varieties, Springer-Verlag, 1996

    J. Kollar, Rational curves on algebraic varieties, Springer-Verlag, 1996

    1996

  22. [30]

    200, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, With a collaboration of S\' a ndor Kov\' a cs

    J\' a nos Koll\' a r, Singularities of the minimal model program, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 200, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, With a collaboration of S\' a ndor Kov\' a cs. 3057950

    2013

  23. [31]

    Naoki Koseki , On the Bogomolov-Gieseker inequality in positive characteristic , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2008.09800

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kuznetsov, Yuri G

    Alexander G. Kuznetsov, Yuri G. Prokhorov, and Constantin A. Shramov, Hilbert schemes of lines and conics and automorphism groups of F ano threefolds , Jpn. J. Math. 13 (2018), no. 1, 109--185. 3776469

    2018

  25. [33]

    1, 157--220

    Alexander Kuznetsov, Homological projective duality, Publications math \'e matiques 105 (2007), no. 1, 157--220

    2007

  26. [34]

    Kuznetsov, Derived categories of F ano threefolds , Tr

    Alexander G. Kuznetsov, Derived categories of F ano threefolds , Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 264 (2009), no. Mnogomernaya Algebraicheskaya Geometriya, 116--128. 2590842

    2009

  27. [35]

    Alexander Kuznetsov, Base change for semiorthogonal decompositions, Compos. Math. 147 (2011), no. 3, 852--876. 2801403

    2011

  28. [36]

    Kuznetsov, Semiorthogonal decompositions in algebraic geometry, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians--- S eoul 2014

    A. Kuznetsov, Semiorthogonal decompositions in algebraic geometry, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians--- S eoul 2014. V ol. II , Kyung Moon Sa, Seoul, 2014, pp. 635--660

    2014

  29. [37]

    , Calabi-- Y au and fractional C alabi-- Y au categories , https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.07657.pdf, September 2015

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Adrian Langer, Chern classes of reflexive sheaves on normal surfaces, Math. Z. 235 (2000), no. 3, 591--614. 1800214

    2000

  31. [39]

    I , Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete

    Robert Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry. I , Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 48, Springer-V...

    2004

  32. [40]

    Chunyi Li , Stability conditions on Fano threefolds of Picard number one , arXiv e-prints (2015), arXiv:1510.04089

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Chunyi Li, On stability conditions for the quintic threefold, Invent. Math. 218 (2019), no. 1, 301--340. 3994590

    2019

  34. [42]

    , Stability conditions on F ano threefolds of P icard number 1 , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 21 (2019), no. 3, 709--726. 3908763

    2019

  35. [43]

    Lieblich, Moduli of complexes on a proper morphism, J

    M. Lieblich, Moduli of complexes on a proper morphism, J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), no. 1, 175--206

    2006

  36. [44]

    Chunyi Li , Howard Nuer , Paolo Stellari , and Xiaolei Zhao , A refined Derived Torelli Theorem for Enriques surfaces , arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1912.04332

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Chunyi Li , Laura Pertusi , and Xiaolei Zhao , Twisted cubics on cubic fourfolds and stability conditions , arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1802.01134

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bronson Lim and Franco Rota , Characteristic classes and stability conditions for projective Kleinian orbisurfaces , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2001.09139

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Macr\`i, Stability conditions on curves, Math

    E. Macr\`i, Stability conditions on curves, Math. Res. Lett. 14 (2007), no. 4, 657--672

    2007

  40. [48]

    1, 173--190

    Emanuele Macr\` , A generalized B ogomolov- G ieseker inequality for the three-dimensional projective space , Algebra Number Theory 8 (2014), no. 1, 173--190. 3207582

    2014

  41. [49]

    Antony Maciocia and Dulip Piyaratne, Fourier- M ukai transforms and B ridgeland stability conditions on abelian threefolds , Algebr. Geom. 2 (2015), no. 3, 270--297. 3370123

    2015

  42. [50]

    , Fourier- M ukai transforms and B ridgeland stability conditions on abelian threefolds II , Internat. J. Math. 27 (2016), no. 1, 1650007, 27. 3454685

    2016

  43. [51]

    Shigeru Mukai, Fano 3 -folds , Complex projective geometry ( T rieste, 1989/ B ergen, 1989), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 179, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992, pp. 255--263. 1201387

    1989

  44. [52]

    Newstead, Stable bundles of rank 2 and odd degree over a curve of genus 2, Topology 7 (1968), no

    Peter E. Newstead, Stable bundles of rank 2 and odd degree over a curve of genus 2, Topology 7 (1968), no. 3, 205--215

    1968

  45. [53]

    Okada, Stability manifold of P ^1 , J

    S. Okada, Stability manifold of P ^1 , J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), no. 3, 487--505

    2006

  46. [54]

    Dmitri O Orlov, Exceptional set of vector bundles on the variety v5, Vestnik Moskov. Univ. Ser. I Mat. Mekh 5 (1991), no. 69-71, 23

    1991

  47. [55]

    D. O. Orlov, Equivalences of derived categories and K3 surfaces , vol. 84, 1997, Algebraic geometry, 7, pp. 1361--1381. 1465519

    1997

  48. [56]

    1, 301--316

    Giorgio Ottaviani, Spinor bundles on quadrics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 307 (1988), no. 1, 301--316

    1988

  49. [57]

    Dulip Piyaratne , Stability conditions, Bogomolov-Gieseker type inequalities and Fano 3-folds , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1705.04011

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Alexander Perry , Laura Pertusi , and Xiaolei Zhao , Stability conditions and moduli spaces for Kuznetsov components of Gushel-Mukai varieties , arXiv e-prints (2019), arXiv:1912.06935

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Marin Petkovic and Franco Rota , A note on the Kuznetsov component of the Veronese double cone , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2007.05555

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Laura Pertusi and Song Yang , Some remarks on Fano threefolds of index two and stability conditions , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2004.02798

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    M. A. Reid, The complete intersection of two or more quadrics, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge Cambridge, 1972

    1972

  54. [62]

    Reid, Young person's guide to canonical singularities, Proceedings of S ymposia in P ure M athematics, vol

    M. Reid, Young person's guide to canonical singularities, Proceedings of S ymposia in P ure M athematics, vol. 46, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 345--414

    1987

  55. [63]

    Karl Schwede, Generalized divisors and reflexive sheaves, Notes available online at www. math. utah. edu/schwede/Notes/GeneralizedDivisors. pdf (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    I. R. Shafarevich (ed.), Algebraic geometry. V , Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 47, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999, Fano varieties, A translation of t Algebraic geometry. 5 (Russian), Ross. Akad. Nauk, Vseross. Inst. Nauchn. i Tekhn. Inform., Moscow, Translation e...

    1999

  57. [65]

    4, 376--393; mr1802958] , vol

    Tatsuo Suwa, Characteristic classes of singular varieties [translation of S \= u gaku 52 (2000), no. 4, 376--393; mr1802958] , vol. 16, 2003, Sugaku Expositions, pp. 153--175. 2019168

    2000

  58. [66]

    2, 377--443

    A S Tihomirov, The F ano surface of the V eronese double cone , Mathematics of the USSR -Izvestiya 19 (1982), no. 2, 377--443

    1982

  59. [67]

    Tikhomirov and D

    A. Tikhomirov and D. Markushevich, A P arametrization of the T heta D ivisor of the Q uartic double solid , International Mathematics Research Notices 51 (2003), 2747--2778

    2003

  60. [68]

    Yukinobu Toda, Bogomolov-- G ieseker-type inequality and counting invariants , J. Topol. 6 (2013), no. 1, 217--250. 3029426

    2013

  61. [69]

    , Stability conditions and extremal contractions, Math. Ann. 357 (2013), no. 2, 631--685. 3096520

    2013

  62. [70]

    Toda and D

    Y. Toda and D. Piyaratne, Moduli of B ridgeland semistable objects on 3-folds and D onaldson- T homas invariants , arXiv:1504.01177 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Tramel and B

    R. Tramel and B. Xia , Bridgeland stability conditions on surfaces with curves of negative self-intersection , ArXiv e-prints (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    Voisin, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry, vol

    C. Voisin, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry, vol. i, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003

    2003

  65. [73]

    G. E. Welters, Abel-- J acobi isogenies for certain types of F ano threefolds , Mathematical Centre Tracts, vol. 141, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, 1981. 633157

    1981

  66. [74]

    Shizhuo Zhang , Bridgeland Moduli spaces and Kuznetsov's Fano threefold conjecture , arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv:2012.12193

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.