Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Instantons from Blow-up

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a large class of 4d and 5d gauge theories, the full instanton partition function follows from the perturbative partition function through blowup equations.

desk verdict A strong, honest paper that computes many new instanton partition functions via generalized blowup equations, with the main caveat being the explicitly conjectural 5d validity bound. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11276 v2 pith:3EYERNVF submitted 2019-08-29 hep-th math.AG

Joonho Kim , Sung-Soo Kim , Ki-Hong Lee , Kimyeong Lee , Jaewon Song This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath.AG
keywords blowupequationsNekrasovpartitionfunctioninstantoncounting5dN=1gaugetheory4dN=2exceptionalgroupsspinormatterrank-3antisymmetrictensor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for any 4d $\mathcal{N}=2$ or 5d $\mathcal{N}=1$ gauge theory whose matter content is not too large, the full instanton partition function is recovered from the perturbative (one-loop) data alone. The mechanism is a set of blowup equations: localizing the theory on $\mathbb{C}^2$ blown up at a point produces relations between shifted partition functions, and when enough independent relations exist, each $n$-instanton term is determined recursively. This removes the need to construct the instanton moduli space explicitly, which was previously an obstacle for exceptional gauge groups and exotic matter representations. If correct, instanton counting becomes a group-theoretic exercise for a wide class of theories, including cases where no ADHM construction exists.

What carries the argument

The central object is the one-point blowup equation. On the blowup $\widehat{\mathbb{C}}^2$, localization expresses the full partition function as a flux sum over products of two flat-space partition functions with shifted Coulomb, mass, and fugacity parameters. Inserting powers of a topological operator associated with the blown-up two-cycle produces a family of identities labelled by an integer $d$; when the matter content leaves at least three allowed values of $d$, the equations become linear relations that determine the unknown $n$-instanton term. The universal one-instanton formula is a sum over long roots $\Delta_{\ell}$ with weight-vector contributions from each hypermultiplet, so the output is built entirely from group-theoretic data.

What would settle it

Compare the three-instanton term from the recursion (2.33) for $SO(10)$ with two spinor hypermultiplets against a topological vertex computation from the 5-brane web; a mismatch at generic Coulomb VEV would falsify the conjectured validity range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Nekrasov partition function obeys a blowup identity $Z = \sum_k Z^{(N),d}(k) Z^{(S),d}(k)$ for $0 \le d \le d_{\max}$ whenever the matter representation is not too large, and that three independent such equations suffice to solve recursively for every instanton term. In particular, the one-instanton partition function has the universal closed form given in equation (2.39), expressed in terms of the long roots, weights, and Dynkin indices of the gauge group and matter representations; higher instanton orders follow from the recursion (2.33). The paper's stated conclusion is that the instanton partition function is completely determined by the perturbative part. The precise validity range for 5d theories is partly conjectural, based on an empirical exponent pattern rather than a proof.

Load-bearing premise

The whole recursion rests on the conjecture that the blowup equations hold for the full range of $d$ in (2.47), which is inferred from a one-instanton exponent pattern rather than proved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Instanton partition functions for exceptional gauge groups and exotic matter representations become computable without an ADHM construction, directly from perturbative one-loop data.
  • The recursion determines all higher-instanton terms once the one-instanton term is known, so instanton counting reduces to evaluating group-theoretic sums.
  • For theories with a spurious extra factor, the blowup equations select a particular string theory embedding, explaining discrepancies between different UV completions at the level of the partition function.
  • The same logic applies to 4d theories, where the selection rule is rigid, giving a general route to 4d instanton partition functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An unresolved but natural next step is to derive the 5d validity range (2.47) from a first-principles selection rule analogous to the 4d R-charge argument; if found, it would place the conjectural range on the same footing as the 4d case.
  • The empirical pattern that $s=s'=h^\vee-\frac12\sum I_2(R_l)$ for all non-SU(N) groups suggests a universal bound in the absence of Chern-Simons and theta terms; testing it on additional representations would be a direct check.
  • The existence of such recursion suggests that similar blowup identities may hold for other equivariant partition functions, such as indices on orbifolds or elliptic genera, potentially yielding new constraints on 6d theories.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a generalisation of the Nakajima-Yoshioka blowup equations to arbitrary gauge groups and hypermultiplet representations, and uses these equations to derive a recursion relation (2.33) for the instanton partition function together with a closed one-instanton formula (2.39). The formalism is applied to a large class of 4d N=2 and 5d N=1 theories, including exceptional gauge groups, SO(N) theories with spinor matter, and SU(6) with a rank-3 antisymmetric hypermultiplet, and it is tested against ADHM localisation, topological vertex computations, and superconformal index results. The central claim, stated in the abstract and in Section 2.2, is that the instanton partition function is completely determined by the perturbative part.

Significance. If the underlying 5d conjecture is correct, the result is significant: it bypasses the need for an explicit instanton moduli space construction, produces previously unknown partition functions for exceptional and exotic matter theories, and gives a strikingly strong relation between perturbative and non-perturbative data. The paper's strengths include the clean 4d derivation from the U(1)_R selection rule, the detailed and extensive comparisons with independent methods, the explicit character expansions given in Appendix A, and the nontrivial Higgsing check for the SU(6)+TAS theory. The significance is conditional, however, because the 5d blowup equation is not derived and the determinacy claim is also qualified by the appearance of spurious Z_extra factors in several classes of examples.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1 and §2.3, Eqs. (2.17), (2.46)-(2.47)] The 5d blowup equation (2.17) is the load-bearing input of the recursion (2.33), but it is not derived. The 4d selection-rule argument of Section 2.1 has no analogue in 5d, and the text states: "We conjecture that the bound on d we obtain is actually sufficient to obtain the blowup equation (2.17). While we do not attempt to prove this sufficiency." The allowed range (2.47) is obtained as a necessary condition by expanding the one-instanton equation (2.42) and requiring consistency at leading order, which yields (2.45); the empirical (s,s') pattern (2.46) is then extrapolated to all instanton orders. A necessary condition at one-instanton order does not establish (2.17) at arbitrary instanton number. If for some theory fewer than three d-values satisfy (2.17), for example a theory with d_max=2 or a representation outside the tested list, the system (2.34)-(2.36) is underdetermined and the central claim that Z_inst is completely determined by Z_pert fails. The paper should either prove the sufficiency of the conjectured range or explicitly present the determinacy statement as a conjecture supported by the listed examples, and adjust the abstract accordingly.
  2. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.1)-(3.2)] For several classes, the recursion reproduces an ADHM partition function that contains an extra factor Z_extra. As the authors explain, this factor is independent of the Coulomb VEV and is spurious from the 5d QFT perspective; it appears when N_f+2|κ|=2N for SU(N), when N_f+2|κ|=N+4 for SU(N)+AS, and when N_v=N-4 for SO(N). Removing Z_extra requires outside information, namely a choice of string-theory embedding. This directly qualifies the abstract claim: the perturbative part alone does not determine the QFT observable Z_inst; it determines a string-embedded partition function only up to a VEV-independent factor. The paper should state this qualification wherever the determinacy claim is made, rather than only in the comparison sections.
  3. [§2.2 and §2.3, Eq. (2.39)] The one-instanton formula (2.39) is claimed to be independent of the choice of d_0 and to hold universally for any gauge theory with d_max>2. This independence is not proved, and Section 3.1 shows that for SU(2)+N_fF with N_f≥5 the formula disagrees with the correct Witten index of the D0-D4-D8-O8 system, agreeing instead with a colliding-brane web partition function. Thus the word "universal" is too strong as stated. The formula should be presented as valid under the conjectural blowup-equation range, with the SU(2), N_f≥5 exception stated explicitly at the point where (2.39) is introduced.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.36)] The recursion formula (2.36) divides by (1-p_1^n)(1-p_2^n); please clarify the precise sense in which the identity holds at resonant values p_1^n=1 or p_2^n=1, given that the Nekrasov partition function is meromorphic and the recursion is used as a formal series identity.
  2. [§3.2, text after Eq. (3.10)] The comparisons with [71] are reported as agreements 'up to t^20 order' or 'up to t^280 order' without specifying the computational method or the truncation used for the character reductions. A brief statement of the verification procedure would make these tests more reproducible.
  3. [§3.4, Eqs. (3.34)-(3.47)] The topological vertex computation in Section 3.4 is performed in the unrefined limit 2ϵ_+=0, while the blowup recursion is formulated in the refined case. Please state explicitly whether the refined comparison was also checked for Z_1 and Z_2, or whether only the unrefined limit was verified.
  4. [Notation throughout] The symbols N_f, N_s, N_c, N_v are used both as counts of hypermultiplets and as subscripts on characters in Appendix A; a short glossary of this notation near Table 1 would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the blowup recursion derives from a physical identity and is checked against independent methods.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The blowup equation (2.17) is a physics identity equating the flat-space partition function to a sum of localized partition functions on the blowup, and the recursion formula (2.33) is obtained by algebraically rewriting this identity using the explicit perturbative expressions (2.22)-(2.24). The unknown instanton pieces Z_n appear on both sides only through the same function Z, and the solution (2.36) expresses Z_n in terms of strictly lower instanton-order data plus perturbatively determined coefficients f_d(k); no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The 1-instanton formula (2.39) is derived from this recursion, not imposed as an input. The paper's admitted conjecture about the 5d d-range (2.47), inferred from a one-instanton necessary condition and from empirical (s,s') patterns, is a domain-of-validity assumption rather than a circular reduction: extrapolating a necessary condition to all instanton orders is a correctness risk, but the paper flags it explicitly ("We conjecture that the bound on d we obtain is actually sufficient... While we do not attempt to prove this sufficiency"). The extensive checks against ADHM localization, topological vertex computations, and results of Del Zotto-Lockhart are independent of the blowup derivation, and the self-citations to prior work by overlapping authors (e.g., [28], [66]) are used as comparative data or prior evidence, not as an unverified uniqueness theorem that forces the conclusion. Accordingly, no step reduces by construction to its own inputs, and the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the physical blowup identity and on a conjectured validity range for the 5d equation. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are conventions or empirically inferred domain boundaries, not fitted outputs.

free parameters (2)
  • d0 = 0 (most cases), half-integer for Sp(N)θ=π
    Reference value of d in the one-instanton formula (2.39). The final Z1 is claimed to be independent of d0, so this is a computational convention rather than a fitted parameter.
  • s and s' = h∨ − 1/2 Σ I2(Rl) with SU(N)/Sp(N) refinements (2.46)
    Exponents that determine the allowed d-range (2.45). They are read off from known ADHM results and conjectured to be universal in (2.46). They are not fitted to the new predictions, but they set the domain where the recursion applies.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Z_blowup = Z_flat (partition function is unchanged under blowup and blowdown)
    Used in (2.6); standard localization result cited to Nakajima-Yoshioka [5,20-24] and earlier references.
  • domain assumption Selection rule: the generating function of the operator O_P1 deviates from Z only at order t^{2h∨−Σ I2(Rl)}
    Used for the 4d blowup equation (2.11). Derived from U(1)R discrete symmetry and ghost number. The 5d analog relies on the same structure but is less rigorously justified.
  • ad hoc to paper The 5d blowup equation holds for d in the conjectured range (2.47), with s and s' given by (2.46)
    The paper states this as a conjecture (Section 2.3). It is validated by many examples but not proven from first principles. This is the main load-bearing assumption for the 5d results.
  • domain assumption The perturbative partition function takes the explicit form (2.23),(2.24)
    These are standard Nekrasov one-loop and classical expressions, used to build the recursion kernel f_d(k). They are accepted from the literature.
  • domain assumption UV-complete matter representations are restricted to the list from the classifications [53,54]
    The paper's coverage is limited to these representations (fundamental, antisymmetric, spinor, rank-3 antisymmetric, symmetric). Adjoint and half-hypermultiplets are explicitly excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Instantons from Blow-up." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3EYERNVF

@misc{pith2026190811276,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Instantons from Blow-up},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3EYERNVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11276}
}
read the original abstract

We generalize Nakajima-Yoshioka blowup equations to arbitrary gauge group with hypermultiplets in arbitrary representations. Using our blowup equations, we compute the instanton partition functions for 4d N=2 and 5d N=1 gauge theories for arbitrary gauge theory with a large class of matter representations, without knowing explicit construction of the instanton moduli space. Our examples include exceptional gauge theories with fundamentals, SO(N) gauge theories with spinors, and SU(6) gauge theories with rank-3 antisymmetric hypers. Remarkably, the instanton partition function is completely determined by the perturbative part.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generalised global symmetries in 5d $\mathcal{N}=1$ theories from the blow-up equations

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Fractional exponents of the blow-up prefactor exp(-V_n) on 1-form backgrounds encode cubic and mixed anomalies of 5d N=1 SCFTs, deciding 2-groups versus mixed anomalies once the faithful UV symmetry is known from the index.

  2. More on 5d Wilson Loops in Higher-Rank Theories and Blowup Equations

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For 5d N=1 pure gauge theories, Wilson-loop blowup equations can be fixed using one-form symmetry and low-instanton data, and one-instanton free energies admit a universal v=sqrt(q1q2) expansion resembling Hilbert series.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric–magnetic Duality, Monopole Condensation, and Confinement inN = 2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Nucl. Phys. B426 (1994) 19–52, [hep-th/9407087]

    arXiv 1994

  2. [2]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Monopoles, Duality and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in N = 2 Supersymmetric QCD, Nucl. Phys. B431 (1994) 484–550, [ hep-th/9408099]

    arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    N. A. Nekrasov, Seiberg-Witten Prepotential from Instanton Counting , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7 (2003) 831–864, [ hep-th/0206161]

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, Seiberg-Witten Theory and Random Partitions , Prog. Math. 244 (2006) 525–596, [ hep-th/0306238]. – 45 –

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Instanton counting on blowup. 1. , Invent. Math. 162 (2005) 313–355, [math/0306198]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Braverman and P

    A. Braverman and P. Etingof, Instanton Counting via Affine Lie Algebras Ii: from Whittaker Vectors to the Seiberg-Witten Prepotential, math/0409441

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, V. G. Drinfeld and Yu. I. Manin, Construction of Instantons , Phys. Lett. A65 (1978) 185–187

    1978

  8. [8]

    G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov and S. Shatashvili, Integrating over Higgs Branches , Commun. Math. Phys. 209 (2000) 97–121, [ hep-th/9712241]

    arXiv 2000

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Bruzzo, F

    U. Bruzzo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and A. Tanzini, Multiinstanton Calculus and Equivariant Cohomology, JHEP 05 (2003) 054, [ hep-th/0211108]

    2003 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Nekrasov and S

    N. Nekrasov and S. Shadchin, ABCD of Instantons , Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 359–391, [hep-th/0404225]

    2004 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mari˜ no and N

    M. Mari˜ no and N. Wyllard,A Note on Instanton Counting for N = 2 Gauge Theories with Classical Gauge Groups, JHEP 05 (2004) 021, [ hep-th/0404125]

    2004 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fucito, J

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian, Instantons on Quivers and Orientifolds , JHEP 10 (2004) 037, [ hep-th/0408090]

    2004 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Hollands, C

    L. Hollands, C. A. Keller and J. Song, From SO/Sp Instantons to W-Algebra Blocks , JHEP 03 (2011) 053, [ 1012.4468]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hollands, C

    L. Hollands, C. A. Keller and J. Song, Towards a 4D/2D Correspondence for Sicilian Quivers , JHEP 10 (2011) 100, [ 1107.0973]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Hwang, J

    C. Hwang, J. Kim, S. Kim and J. Park, General Instanton Counting and 5D SCFT , JHEP 07 (2015) 063, [ 1406.6793]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cordova and S.-H

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, An Index Formula for Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics , 1406.7853

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    K. Hori, H. Kim and P. Yi, Witten Index and Wall Crossing , JHEP 01 (2015) 124, [1407.2567]

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Benini, R

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori and Y. Tachikawa, Elliptic Genera of 2d N = 2 Gauge Theories , Commun. Math. Phys. 333 (2015) 1241–1286, [ 1308.4896]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Benini, R

    F. Benini, R. Eager, K. Hori and Y. Tachikawa, Elliptic Genera of Two-Dimensional N = 2 Gauge Theories with Rank-One Gauge Groups , Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014) 465–493, [1305.0533]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Lectures on instanton counting, in CRM Workshop on Algebraic Structures and Moduli Spaces Montreal, Canada, July 14-20, 2003 , 2003. math/0311058

    2003 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Instanton Counting on Blowup. II. K-Theoretic Partition Function, math/0505553

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gottsche, H

    L. Gottsche, H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, K-theoretic Donaldson invariants via instanton counting, Pure Appl. Math. Quart. 5 (2009) 1029–1111, [ math/0611945]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Nakajima and K

    H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Perverse coherent sheaves on blowup, III: Blow-up formula from wall-crossing, Kyoto J. Math. 51 (2011) 263–335, [ 0911.1773]. – 46 –

    2011 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gottsche, H

    L. Gottsche, H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Donaldson = Seiberg-Witten from Mochizuki’s Formula and Instanton Counting , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. Kyoto 47 (2011) 307–359, [1001.5024]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Fintushel and R

    R. Fintushel and R. J. Stern, The blowup formula for donaldson invariants , Annals of Mathematics 143 (1996) 529–546

    1996

  18. [26]

    G. W. Moore and E. Witten, Integration over the U Plane in Donaldson Theory , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 1 (1997) 298–387, [ hep-th/9709193]

    1997 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mari˜ no and G

    M. Mari˜ no and G. W. Moore, The Donaldson-Witten Function for Gauge Groups of Rank Larger Than One, Commun. Math. Phys. 199 (1998) 25–69, [ hep-th/9802185]

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    C. A. Keller and J. Song, Counting Exceptional Instantons , JHEP 07 (2012) 085, [ 1205.4722]

    2012 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gaiotto and S

    D. Gaiotto and S. S. Razamat, Exceptional Indices, JHEP 05 (2012) 145, [ 1203.5517]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Grassi and J

    A. Grassi and J. Gu, BPS Relations from Spectral Problems and Blowup Equations , Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 1271–1302, [ 1609.05914]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gu, M.-x

    J. Gu, M.-x. Huang, A.-K. Kashani-Poor and A. Klemm, Refined BPS invariants of 6d SCFTs from anomalies and modularity , JHEP 05 (2017) 130, [ 1701.00764]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Huang, K

    M.-x. Huang, K. Sun and X. Wang, Blowup Equations for Refined Topological Strings , JHEP 10 (2018) 196, [ 1711.09884]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. Gu, B. Haghighat, K. Sun and X. Wang, Blowup Equations for 6D SCFTs. I , JHEP 03 (2019) 002, [ 1811.02577]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    J. Gu, A. Klemm, K. Sun and X. Wang, Elliptic Blowup Equations for 6D SCFTs. II: Exceptional Cases, 1905.00864

    1905 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Honda, Borel Summability of Perturbative Series in 4D N = 2 and 5D N=1 Supersymmetric Theories, Phys

    M. Honda, Borel Summability of Perturbative Series in 4D N = 2 and 5D N=1 Supersymmetric Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 211601, [ 1603.06207]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. D. Edelstein, M. Mari˜ no and J. Mas, Whitham Hierarchies, Instanton Corrections and Soft Supersymmetry Breaking inN = 2 SU (N) Superyang-Mills Theory, Nucl. Phys. B541 (1999) 671–697, [hep-th/9805172]

    1999 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. D. Edelstein, M. G´ omez-Reino, M. Mari˜ no and J. Mas,N = 2 Supersymmetric Gauge Theories with Massive Hypermultiplets and the Whitham Hierarchy , Nucl. Phys. B574 (2000) 587–619, [hep-th/9911115]

    2000 arXiv

  30. [38]

    N. A. Nekrasov, Localizing Gauge Theories, in Mathematical Physics. Proceedings, 14Th International Congress, Icmp 2003, Lisbon, Portugal, July 28-August 2, 2003 , pp. 645–654, 2003

    2003

  31. [39]

    Gottsche, H

    L. Gottsche, H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Instanton Counting and Donaldson Invariants , J. Diff. Geom. 80 (2008) 343–390, [ math/0606180]

    2008 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gasparim and C.-C

    E. Gasparim and C.-C. M. Liu, The Nekrasov Conjecture for Toric Surfaces , Commun. Math. Phys. 293 (2010) 661–700, [ 0808.0884]

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bonelli, K

    G. Bonelli, K. Maruyoshi, A. Tanzini and F. Yagi, N = 2 Gauge Theories on Toric Singularities, Blow-Up Formulae and W-Algebrae , JHEP 01 (2013) 014, [ 1208.0790]. – 47 –

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Sasaki, O(-2) Blow-Up Formula via Instanton Calculus on Affine C 2/Z2 and Weil Conjecture, hep-th/0603162

    T. Sasaki, O(-2) Blow-Up Formula via Instanton Calculus on Affine C 2/Z2 and Weil Conjecture, hep-th/0603162

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Y. Ito, K. Maruyoshi and T. Okuda, Scheme Dependence of Instanton Counting in ALE Spaces , JHEP 05 (2013) 045, [ 1303.5765]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bruzzo, M

    U. Bruzzo, M. Pedrini, F. Sala and R. J. Szabo, Framed Sheaves on Root Stacks and Supersymmetric Gauge Theories on ALE Spaces , Adv. Math. 288 (2016) 1175–1308, [1312.5554]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bruzzo, F

    U. Bruzzo, F. Sala and R. J. Szabo, N = 2 Quiver Gauge Theories on A-type ALE Spaces , Lett. Math. Phys. 105 (2015) 401–445, [ 1410.2742]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Witten, Topological Quantum Field Theory, Commun

    E. Witten, Topological Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353

    1988

  39. [47]

    Bershtein, G

    M. Bershtein, G. Bonelli, M. Ronzani and A. Tanzini, Exact results for N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories on compact toric manifolds and equivariant Donaldson invariants , JHEP 07 (2016) 023, [ 1509.00267]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Baulieu, A

    L. Baulieu, A. Losev and N. Nekrasov, Chern-Simons and Twisted Supersymmetry in Various Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B522 (1998) 82–104, [ hep-th/9707174]

    1998 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Losev, G

    A. Losev, G. W. Moore, N. Nekrasov and S. Shatashvili, Four-Dimensional Avatars of Two-Dimensional RCFT, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 46 (1996) 130–145, [ hep-th/9509151]

    1996 arXiv

  42. [50]

    K. A. Intriligator, D. R. Morrison and N. Seiberg, Five-Dimensional Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Degenerations of Calabi-Yau Spaces , Nucl. Phys. B497 (1997) 56–100, [hep-th/9702198]

    1997 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Shadchin, On Certain Aspects of String Theory/Gauge Theory Correspondence

    S. Shadchin, On Certain Aspects of String Theory/Gauge Theory Correspondence . PhD thesis, Orsay, LPT, 2005. hep-th/0502180

    2005 arXiv

  44. [52]

    C. A. Keller, N. Mekareeya, J. Song and Y. Tachikawa, The ABCDEFG of Instantons and W-Algebras, JHEP 03 (2012) 045, [ 1111.5624]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bhardwaj and Y

    L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, Classification of 4D N = 2 Gauge Theories, JHEP 12 (2013) 100, [1309.5160]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Jefferson, H.-C

    P. Jefferson, H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, Towards Classification of 5D SCFTs: Single Gauge Node, 1705.05836

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Hayashi, S.-S

    H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, K. Lee and F. Yagi, Rank-3 Antisymmetric Matter on 5-Brane Webs , JHEP 05 (2019) 133, [ 1902.04754]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Aganagic, A

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Mari˜ no and C. Vafa, The Topological Vertex, Commun. Math. Phys. 254 (2005) 425–478, [ hep-th/0305132]

    2005 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Iqbal, C

    A. Iqbal, C. Koz¸ caz and C. Vafa, The Refined Topological Vertex, JHEP 10 (2009) 069, [hep-th/0701156]

    2009 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics , Phys

    N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics , Phys. Lett. B388 (1996) 753–760, [ hep-th/9608111]

    1996 arXiv

  51. [59]

    J. A. Minahan and D. Nemeschansky, AnN = 2 Superconformal Fixed Point with E6 Global Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B482 (1996) 142–152, [ hep-th/9608047]. – 48 –

    1996 arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. A. Minahan and D. Nemeschansky, Superconformal Fixed Points with EN Global Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B489 (1997) 24–46, [ hep-th/9610076]

    1997 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Aharony and A

    O. Aharony and A. Hanany, Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points, Nucl. Phys. B504 (1997) 239–271, [ hep-th/9704170]

    1997 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Diaconescu and R

    D.-E. Diaconescu and R. Entin, Calabi-Yau Spaces and Five-Dimensional Field Theories with Exceptional Gauge Symmetry , Nucl. Phys. B538 (1999) 451–484, [ hep-th/9807170]

    1999 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Jefferson, S

    P. Jefferson, S. Katz, H.-C. Kim and C. Vafa, On Geometric Classification of 5D SCFTs , JHEP 04 (2018) 103, [ 1801.04036]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Bhardwaj and P

    L. Bhardwaj and P. Jefferson, Classifying 5D SCFTs via 6D SCFTs: Rank One , JHEP 07 (2019) 178, [ 1809.01650]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Apruzzi, C

    F. Apruzzi, C. Lawrie, L. Lin, S. Schfer-Nameki and Y.-N. Wang, Fibers add Flavor, Part I: Classification of 5d SCFTs, Flavor Symmetries and BPS States , 1907.05404

    1907 arXiv

  58. [66]

    H.-C. Kim, J. Kim, S. Kim, K.-H. Lee and J. Park, 6D Strings and Exceptional Instantons , 1801.03579

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zafrir, Brane webs and O5-planes, JHEP 03 (2016) 109, [ 1512.08114]

    G. Zafrir, Brane webs and O5-planes, JHEP 03 (2016) 109, [ 1512.08114]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Hayashi, S.-S

    H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, K. Lee and F. Yagi, 5-brane webs for 5d N = 1 G 2 gauge theories, JHEP 03 (2018) 125, [ 1801.03916]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    T. J. Hollowood, A. Iqbal and C. Vafa, Matrix Models, Geometric Engineering and Elliptic Genera, JHEP 03 (2008) 069, [ hep-th/0310272]

    2008 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart, On Exceptional Instanton Strings , JHEP 09 (2017) 081, [1609.00310]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Del Zotto and G

    M. Del Zotto and G. Lockhart, Universal Features of BPS Strings in Six-Dimensional SCFTs , JHEP 08 (2018) 173, [ 1804.09694]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Benini, S

    F. Benini, S. Benvenuti and Y. Tachikawa, Webs of Five-Branes and N = 2 Superconformal Field Theories, JHEP 09 (2009) 052, [ 0906.0359]

    2009 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Putrov, J

    P. Putrov, J. Song and W. Yan, (0,4) Dualities, JHEP 03 (2016) 185, [ 1505.07110]

    2016 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat and W. Yan, The Superconformal Index of the E6 SCFT, JHEP 08 (2010) 107, [ 1003.4244]

    2010 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Gadde, L

    A. Gadde, L. Rastelli, S. S. Razamat and W. Yan, Gauge Theories and Macdonald Polynomials , Commun. Math. Phys. 319 (2013) 147–193, [ 1110.3740]

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Gadde, S

    A. Gadde, S. S. Razamat and B. Willett, ”Lagrangian” for a Non-Lagrangian Field Theory with N = 2 Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 171604, [ 1505.05834]

    2015 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Agarwal, K

    P. Agarwal, K. Maruyoshi and J. Song, A Lagrangian for the E 7 superconformal theory, JHEP 05 (2018) 193, [ 1802.05268]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [78]

    K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Mirror Symmetry in Three-Dimensional Gauge Theories , Phys. Lett. B387 (1996) 513–519, [ hep-th/9607207]

    1996 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Cremonesi, A

    S. Cremonesi, A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, Monopole operators and Hilbert series of Coulomb branches of 3dN = 4 gauge theories, JHEP 01 (2014) 005, [ 1309.2657]. – 49 –

    2014 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Cremonesi, G

    S. Cremonesi, G. Ferlito, A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, Coulomb Branch and the Moduli Space of Instantons, JHEP 12 (2014) 103, [ 1408.6835]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    H.-C. Kim, S. Kim, E. Koh, K. Lee and S. Lee, On Instantons as Kaluza-Klein Modes of M5-Branes, JHEP 12 (2011) 031, [ 1110.2175]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Hwang, J

    Y. Hwang, J. Kim and S. Kim, M5-Branes, Orientifolds, and S-Duality , JHEP 12 (2016) 148, [1607.08557]

    2016 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Lee and P

    S.-J. Lee and P. Yi, D-Particles on Orientifolds and Rational Invariants , JHEP 07 (2017) 046, [1702.01749]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kim, S.-S

    H.-C. Kim, S.-S. Kim and K. Lee, 5-Dim Superconformal Index with Enhanced En Global Symmetry, JHEP 10 (2012) 142, [ 1206.6781]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    E. B. Vinberg and V. L. Popov, On a class of quasihomogeneous affine varieties , Math. USSR-Izv. 6 (1972) 743

    1972

  78. [86]

    III in D

    quoted in Chap. III in D. Garfinkle, A new construction of the Joseph ideal , 1982

    1982

  79. [87]

    Benvenuti, A

    S. Benvenuti, A. Hanany and N. Mekareeya, The Hilbert Series of the One Instanton Moduli Space, JHEP 06 (2010) 100, [ 1005.3026]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Gaiotto, N = 2 Dualities, JHEP 08 (2012) 034, [ 0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto, N = 2 Dualities, JHEP 08 (2012) 034, [ 0904.2715]

    2012 arXiv

  81. [89]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-Dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167–197, [ 0906.3219]

    2010 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Coman, E

    I. Coman, E. Pomoni and J. Teschner, Trinion Conformal Blocks from Topological Strings, 1906.06351

    1906 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Feger and T

    R. Feger and T. W. Kephart, LieARTA Mathematica application for Lie algebras and representation theory, Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 166–195, [ 1206.6379]. – 50 –

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.