Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

High angular resolution gravitational wave astronomy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This white paper claims that two space-based gravitational wave detectors separated by an astronomical unit could achieve arcminute astrometric precision, turning source localization into host-galaxy identification.

desk verdict A transparent, well-structured ESA white paper making a big but under-derived claim about arcminute GW localization; worth engaging, not as a research result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11410 v1 pith:K7TRJ6RS submitted 2019-08-29 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMgr-qc

John Baker , Tessa Baker , Carmelita Carbone , Giuseppe Congedo , Carlo Contaldi , Irina Dvorkin , Jonathan Gair , Zoltan Haiman
show 14 more authors
David F. Mota Arianna Renzini Ernst-Jan Buis Giulia Cusin Jose Maria Ezquiaga Guido Mueller Mauro Pieroni John Quenby Angelo Ricciardone Ippocratis D. Saltas Lijing Shao Nicola Tamanini Gianmassimo Tasinato Miguel Zumalacárregui
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.COastro-ph.IMgr-qc
keywords gravitationalwavesangularresolutionastrometrymulti-messengerastronomystandardsirensstochasticwavebackgroundcosmologymodifiedgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Gravitational wave astronomy today has a blind spot: a typical event is localized to tens or hundreds of square degrees, so finding the host galaxy or an electromagnetic counterpart is a matter of luck. This white paper argues that the angular resolution is not a physical limit but an engineering choice, and that two space-based interferometers separated by roughly an astronomical unit could reach arcminute precision. At that level, most events would be pinned to a single host galaxy, turning essentially every binary neutron star into a standard siren with a known redshift. The paper works through the consequences: a Hubble diagram of hundreds of thousands of sources, resolved anisotropies of the stochastic gravitational wave background, pre-merger views of accretion onto massive black holes, and tests of gravity that currently require lucky counterparts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the astrometric resolution relation $\Delta\theta \sim \lambda/(D\rho)$ applied to a synthesised aperture. A single space detector builds an aperture up to about an astronomical unit only for signals that last long enough for the detector's orbital motion to sweep the sky; short-lived events such as massive black hole mergers need a second detector to supply a large baseline. The paper compares configurations using an angular response function $A_\ell = \int w(f)\, j_\ell(2\pi f b / c)\, df$, which measures how well a cross-correlation baseline $b$ resolves spherical multipoles. The sensitivity target comes from ALIA, a decihertz-band interferometer concept with acceleration noise a factor of ten below current requirements and position noise a factor of one hundred better; two ALIA-class detectors with separations of 0.7 to 2 astronomical units are what the paper uses to reach arcminute astrometry and about a degree of stochastic-background resolution.

What would settle it

Take the two-detector ALIA-like configuration at 0.7 AU and 2 AU separation and simulate realistic localization error boxes for representative binary neutron star, stellar-mass black hole, and massive black hole signals, including full detector response, noise curves, and sky coverage. If the resulting $1\sigma$ sky areas are tens to hundreds of square degrees for most sources rather than about a square arcminute, the paper's core resolution claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that an observatory with arcminute astrometric precision or better is realizable in the coming decades by flying a second space-based gravitational wave interferometer roughly an astronomical unit from the first. The resolution argument is a Rayleigh-type scaling, $\Delta\theta \sim \lambda/(D\rho)$, with baseline $D$ supplied by the detector separation for short-lived sources and by the orbital motion for long-lived ones; the paper's sensitivity model, the ALIA concept, assumes acceleration noise ten times lower than current requirements and position noise one hundred times better. With such a network, typical sources would be localized to arcminute precision—about two orders of magnitude better than the planned single space detector—and the paper argues this changes the nature of the field: host galaxy identification becomes routine, standard sirens number in the hundreds of thousands, the stochastic background's angular structure becomes observable, and massive black hole mergers can be pointed at months in advance. The paper is explicit that this is a science case, not a detailed mission design, and that the two-detector requirement would almost certainly involve international collaboration.

Load-bearing premise

The arcminute localization claim rests on the assumption that space-based interferometers can reach the assumed sensitivity (acceleration noise about ten times lower and position noise about one hundred times better than current requirements) and that a second comparable detector flies at the same time, almost certainly through international collaboration; if either the technology or the partner mission fails to materialize, the arcminute numbers lose their support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Almost every binary neutron star merger would yield a bright standard siren, enabling a Hubble diagram of $10^5$–$10^6$ events and sub-percent constraints on the Hubble constant.
  • The scatter in gravitational wave distances becomes a weak lensing measurement, accessing nonlinear scales and improving all cosmological parameter constraints to roughly the 0.1% level.
  • A two-detector network with an astronomical-unit baseline can resolve the angular structure of the stochastic gravitational wave background to about a degree, separating galactic and extragalactic components and enabling cross-correlation with large-scale structure.
  • Massive black hole binaries would be localized months before merger, letting electromagnetic telescopes observe a phase-locked electromagnetic chirp and probe active-galactic-nucleus accretion disks beneath the photosphere.
  • Gravity tests sharpen qualitatively: host identification enables measurement of gravitational wave speed, dispersion, luminosity distance, polarization, and dipole radiation in regimes where counterpart confusion would otherwise dominate the error.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the largest practical risk is not the detector but the follow-up fleet; arcminute error boxes only pay off if wide-field galaxy catalogs and fast-slewing telescopes cover the same sky, so the science case implicitly demands coordinated investment on the electromagnetic side.
  • Editorial inference: the angular response function suggests a resource-allocation strategy—when aiming at background anisotropies, adding a second, moderately sensitive detector with a large separation may buy more resolution than spending the same money on making a single detector quieter.
  • Editorial inference: a conceivable near-term demonstration would be a single decihertz detector using its orbital motion to localize long-lived inspirals to arcminute level, validating the astrometric scaling before the more expensive second detector is committed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This white paper, submitted to the ESA Voyage 2050 call, argues that a space-based gravitational-wave interferometer network with an astronomical-unit baseline, operating in the millihertz to decihertz band with ALIA-like sensitivity, can achieve arcminute astrometric precision. The authors motivate this number with a Rayleigh-type scaling relation and then develop four science cases: standard-siren cosmology with host-galaxy identification, detection and characterization of the stochastic background and its anisotropies, multi-messenger studies of massive black hole binaries including AGN accretion and neutrinos, and tests of general relativity through propagation speed, dispersion, luminosity distance, polarizations, and modified waveforms. The paper explicitly disclaims a detailed mission concept and notes that the envisaged network would almost certainly rely on an international partner.

Significance. If the arcminute localization claim can be supported, the paper's central thesis is important: it would move gravitational-wave astronomy from error boxes of tens of square degrees to unique host galaxies, enabling a qualitatively different multi-messenger and cosmological science program. The white paper is transparent about its assumptions and clearly separates astrometric resolution for coherent sources from angular resolution for stochastic backgrounds, with Fig. 2 explicitly labeled as an idealized figure of merit. It is also well-referenced and covers a broad range of science cases in a concise way. The main weakness is that the central quantitative input, the arcminute localization figure, is asserted rather than derived; the science cases in Sections 3.1, 3.3, and 3.4 are forward-modeling extrapolations that depend on that number.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, paragraph beginning 'A network of two detectors with the sensitivity of ALIA'] The central quantitative claim of the paper, that such a network 'would typically localise sources to arcminute precision,' is not supported by any astrometric estimation. The preceding heuristic Δθ∼λ/(Dρ) is a Rayleigh-criterion estimate for a filled aperture; it does not incorporate the Fisher-matrix structure of a network, which depends on antenna patterns, detector orientations, source sky location, signal duration, frequency evolution, and noise correlations. No Fisher-matrix calculation, covariance analysis, or end-to-end simulation is provided, and the paper explicitly declines to specify a mission concept. Because the arcminute figure is the input on which the host-galaxy identification in §3.1, the precursor observations in §3.3, and the gravity tests in §3.4 all depend, this is a load-bearing missing derivation. Please add a localization forecast using a standard Fisher/covariance pipeline for the proposed two-detector ALIA-like configuration, or clearly label the arcminute number as an assumption and temper the associated science claims accordingly.
  2. [§2, ALIA noise assumptions] The statement 'Such improvements would require research and development but are certainly achievable within the Voyage 2050 timeframe' is an unsupported feasibility claim. The assumed acceleration-noise reduction (10× below LISA's requirement) and positional-noise improvement (100× better) are the sensitivity inputs that produce the arcminute localization, yet no noise budget, no subsystem analysis, and no reference beyond the original ALIA concept [42] is given. In a white paper, a graded statement with a technology roadmap or at least references to detailed engineering studies would be needed for the central claim to be credible. Please replace 'certainly achievable' with a more cautious formulation and cite the relevant studies or identify the dominant technical risks.
  3. [§3.1, standard-siren yield] The projection of 'a Hubble diagram with more than ∼10^5 events out to redshift ∼3' is transferred from DECIGO/BBO studies [47,110] without demonstrating that the proposed ALIA-like two-detector network reaches the required detection rates and distance precision. Similarly, the 'factor of 50 improvement in number density' that feeds the forecast in Fig. 1 is an extrapolation from a different instrument concept. The cosmological forecasts (sub-percent H0, 0.1% cosmological parameters) are only as strong as this rate estimate. Please derive the expected event counts from a detection-rate calculation for the proposed sensitivity, or state explicitly that these are optimistic targets rather than projections.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4.1, after Eq. (2)] The text says 'with the case of GR corresponding to ν(t), α(t), µ2, Γ(t) = 0'; the propagation-speed parameter should be written α_T(t) to match the notation introduced earlier in the same section, and to avoid confusion with the PPE amplitude α used later in Eq. (7).
  2. [Reference [104]] The arXiv identifier for the McKernan et al. paper is given as '1907.0435'; this appears to be missing final digits.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption uses '2 x DEciHz', which has inconsistent capitalization; also, the axis label 'Angular multipole' would benefit from a subscript ℓ for clarity.
  4. [Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'O(100)s of square degrees' is awkward; suggest 'hundreds of square degrees'.
  5. [§3.2.1, synthesised aperture] The sentence describing the synthesised aperture of a single space-based detector as 'as large as ~AU for sources that are long-lived' could be clarified, since a single detector's synthesised aperture and its astrometric precision depend on the signal model and observation time; a footnote explaining the usual LISA localization formula would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: arcminute resolution is a forward Rayleigh-scaling estimate and the science cases are conditional forecasts.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that a two-detector, ~AU-baseline space interferometer could reach arcminute astrometric precision—is presented in Section 2 via the standard scaling Δθ ∼ λ/(Dρ). This is an estimate from an external, parameter-free heuristic, not a parameter fitted to the arcminute target, and no equation in the paper takes the science outcomes as inputs to derive the resolution. The ALIA noise assumptions (10× lower acceleration noise, 100× better positional noise) are explicitly imported from the independent prior work of Crowder & Cornish [42] and are stated as assumptions, not derived results; the paper further disclaims any detailed mission concept ('we do not make detailed reference to a mission concept'), so there is no hidden fit-to-prediction loop. The science cases in Sections 3.1–3.4 are conditional forecasts ('if arcminute resolution is achieved, then...'), which is forward modeling. Several cited results come from co-authors (e.g., Congedo & Taylor [37], Cusin et al. [43–46], Contaldi [38], Ezquiaga & Zumalacárregui [62], Tamanini et al. [135]), but these support specific science-case forecasts and do not carry the central resolution claim; they are independent published benchmarks, not a self-citation chain that forces the conclusion. The skeptical concern that the arcminute figure would need a Fisher-matrix or end-to-end simulation is a completeness/correctness risk, not circularity: a missing derivation is not an equivalence between input and output. No specific reduction can be exhibited, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are assumed detector performance characteristics and survey properties borrowed from prior mission concepts and forecasts. The central feasibility claim depends on these assumptions, which are stated but not independently verified.

free parameters (5)
  • ALIA acceleration noise = factor of 10 lower than LISA requirement
    Assumed technology improvement central to achieving arcminute resolution (Section 2).
  • ALIA positional noise = factor of 100 better than LISA
    Assumed technology improvement central to achieving arcminute resolution (Section 2).
  • Detector baseline separation = 0.7 AU or 2 AU
    Design choice used in Fig. 2 for angular resolution comparisons.
  • Source number density for cosmology forecasts = 5-50 deg^-2
    Taken from Ref. [37] and used to claim 0.1% cosmological parameter constraints (Section 3.1).
  • Number of standard sirens = 10^5-10^6
    Assumed detection rate for BNSs, based on DECIGO-like projections (Section 3.1).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Astrometric precision scales as Δθ ~ λ/(D ρ)
    Introduced in Section 2 as an intuitive estimate from the Rayleigh criterion scaled by SNR. Not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Spherical Bessel expansion and weighting function w(f) in Eq. (1)
    The idealized angular response assumes plane waves expanded in spherical Bessel functions and a noise weighting function. The specific form of w(f) is not given.
  • standard math Modified GW propagation equation (2)
    The parametrized propagation equation is taken from prior literature [121, 108, 63, 29] and used as a framework for GR tests.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High angular resolution gravitational wave astronomy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7TRJ6RS

@misc{pith2026190811410,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High angular resolution gravitational wave astronomy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7TRJ6RS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11410}
}
read the original abstract

Since the very beginning of astronomy the location of objects on the sky has been a fundamental observational quantity that has been taken for granted. While precise two dimensional positional information is easy to obtain for observations in the electromagnetic spectrum, the positional accuracy of current and near future gravitational wave detectors is limited to between tens and hundreds of square degrees, which makes it extremely challenging to identify the host galaxies of gravitational wave events or to confidently detect any electromagnetic counterparts. Gravitational wave observations provide information on source properties and distances that is complementary to the information in any associated electromagnetic emission and that is very hard to obtain in any other way. Observing systems with multiple messengers thus has scientific potential much greater than the sum of its parts. A gravitational wave detector with higher angular resolution would significantly increase the prospects for finding the hosts of gravitational wave sources and triggering a multi-messenger follow-up campaign. An observatory with arcminute precision or better could be realised within the Voyage 2050 programme by creating a large baseline interferometer array in space and would have transformative scientific potential. Precise positional information of standard sirens would enable precision measurements of cosmological parameters and offer new insights on structure formation; a high angular resolution gravitational wave observatory would allow the detection of a stochastic background and resolution of the anisotropies within it; it would also allow the study of accretion processes around black holes; and it would have tremendous potential for tests of modified gravity and the discovery of physics beyond the Standard Model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.11410 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adapted from Fig. 1 of Ref. [37], cosmological fore [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Idealised angular resolution for different detector configurations (see text). The relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Missing Link in Gravitational-Wave Astronomy: Discoveries waiting in the decihertz range

    gr-qc 2019-08 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A Decihertz Observatory would fill the gap between LISA and ground detectors, enabling early-warning multimessenger astronomy and measurements of intermediate-mass black hole populations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [42]

    Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions

    J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish. “Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions”. In: Phys. Rev. D72.8, 083005 (2005), p. 083005

    2005

  2. [1]

    Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert

    M. Aartsen et al. “Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert”. In:Science 361.6398 (2018), pp. 147–151

    2018

  3. [2]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

    B. P. Abbott et al. “A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant”. In: Nature 551.7678 (2017), pp. 85–88

    2017

  4. [3]

    BinaryBlackHolePopulationPropertiesInferredfromtheFirstandSecond Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

    B.P.Abbottetal.“BinaryBlackHolePopulationPropertiesInferredfromtheFirstandSecond Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo”. In:arXiv e-prints1811.12940 (2018)

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Directional limits on persistent gravitational waves using data from Ad- vanced LIGO’s first two observing runs

    B. P. Abbott et al. “Directional limits on persistent gravitational waves using data from Ad- vanced LIGO’s first two observing runs”. In:arXiv e-prints1903.08844 (2019)

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Gravitational Wavesand Gamma-Raysfroma BinaryNeutronStar Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    B. P.Abbottetal. “Gravitational Wavesand Gamma-Raysfroma BinaryNeutronStar Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.848.2, L13 (2017), p. L13

    2017

  7. [6]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    B. P. Abbott et al. “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (16 2017), p. 161101

    2017

  8. [7]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    B. P. Abbott et al. “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs”. In:arXiv e-prints 1811.12907 (2018)

    arXiv 2018

Show all 147 references
  1. [8]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    B. P. Abbott et al. “Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger”. In:The Astrophysical Journal848.2 (2017), p. L12

    2017

  2. [9]

    Tests of General Relativity with GW170817

    B. P. Abbott et al. “Tests of General Relativity with GW170817”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.123.1 (2019), p. 011102

    2019

  3. [10]

    Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    B. P. Abbott et al. “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1”. In:arXiv e-prints1903.04467 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background in the presence of a galactic foreground and instrument noise

    Matthew R. Adams and Neil J. Cornish. “Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background in the presence of a galactic foreground and instrument noise”. In:Phys. Rev. D89.2, 022001 (2014), p. 022001

    2014

  5. [12]

    High-energy neutrino follow-up search of gravitational wave event GW150914 with ANTARES and IceCube

    S. Adrián-Martínez et al. “High-energy neutrino follow-up search of gravitational wave event GW150914 with ANTARES and IceCube”. In:Phys. Rev. D93 (2016), p. 122010

    2016

  6. [13]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters”. In:arXiv e-prints 1807.06209 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna”. In:arXiv e-prints 1702.00786 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Relativity: Special treatment

    G. Amelino-Camelia. “Relativity: Special treatment”. In:Nature 418.6893 (2002), pp. 34–35

    2002

  9. [16]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on Horndeski theory

    S. Arai and A. Nishizawa. “Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on Horndeski theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D97 (10 2018), p. 104038

    2018

  10. [17]

    Dynamics of binary-disk interaction. 1: Resonances and disk gap sizes

    P. Artymowicz and S. H. Lubow. “Dynamics of binary-disk interaction. 1: Resonances and disk gap sizes”. In:Astrophys. J.421 (1994), pp. 651–667

    1994

  11. [18]

    New Physical Insights about Tidal Disrup- tion Events from a Comprehensive Observational Inventory at X-Ray Wavelengths

    K. Auchettl, J. Guillochon, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz. “New Physical Insights about Tidal Disrup- tion Events from a Comprehensive Observational Inventory at X-Ray Wavelengths”. In:The Astrophysical Journal838.2 (2017), p. 149

    2017

  12. [19]

    An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism

    E. Babichev and C. Deffayet. “An introduction to the Vainshtein mechanism”. In:Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013), p. 184001

    2013

  13. [20]

    Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    T.Bakeretal.“ Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.119.25 (2017), p. 251301

    2017

  14. [21]

    Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole DipoleRadiationwithMultibandGravitational-WaveAstrophysics

    E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain. “Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole DipoleRadiationwithMultibandGravitational-WaveAstrophysics”.In: Phys. Rev. Lett.116.24, 241104 (2016), p. 241104

    2016

  15. [22]

    Neutron-star mergers in scalar-tensor theories of gravity

    E. Barausse et al. “Neutron-star mergers in scalar-tensor theories of gravity”. In:Phys. Rev. D 87.8, 081506 (2013), p. 081506

    2013

  16. [23]

    Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories

    E. Belgacem et al. “Gravitational-wave luminosity distance in modified gravity theories”. In: Phys. Rev.D97 (2018), p. 104066

    2018

  17. [24]

    Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens

    E. Belgacem et al. “Modified gravitational-wave propagation and standard sirens”. In:Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), p. 023510. 20

    2018

  18. [25]

    Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens

    E. Belgacem et al. “Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens”. In:J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2019 (2019), pp. 024–024

    2019

  19. [26]

    Evading the Vainshtein Mechanism with Anoma- lous Gravitational Wave Speed: Constraints on Modified Gravity from Binary Pulsars

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, F. Piazza, and H. Velten. “Evading the Vainshtein Mechanism with Anoma- lous Gravitational Wave Speed: Constraints on Modified Gravity from Binary Pulsars”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.116.6, 061101 (2016), p. 061101

    2016

  20. [27]

    Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order

    J. Ben Achour et al. “Degenerate higher order scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski up to cubic order”. In:JHEP 12 (2016), p. 100

    2016

  21. [28]

    Cosmological perturbation effects on gravitational-wave luminosity distance estimates

    D. Bertacca et al. “Cosmological perturbation effects on gravitational-wave luminosity distance estimates”. In:Physics of the Dark Universe20, 32 (2018), p. 32

    2018

  22. [29]

    Speed of Gravitational Waves and the Fate of Scalar-Tensor Gravity

    D. Bettoni et al. “Speed of Gravitational Waves and the Fate of Scalar-Tensor Gravity”. In: Phys. Rev.D95.8 (2017), p. 084029

    2017

  23. [30]

    Relativistic Dynamics and Mass Exchange in Binary Black Hole Mini- disks

    D. B. Bowen et al. “Relativistic Dynamics and Mass Exchange in Binary Black Hole Mini- disks”. In:Astrophys. J.838, 42 (2017), p. 42

    2017

  24. [31]

    Tests of Chameleon Gravity

    C. Burrage and J. Sakstein. “Tests of Chameleon Gravity”. In:Living Rev. Rel.21.1 (2018), p. 1

    2018

  25. [32]

    Reconstructing the dark sector interaction with LISA

    R.-G. Cai, N. Tamanini, and T. Yang. “Reconstructing the dark sector interaction with LISA”. In: JCAP 1705.05 (2017), p. 031

    2017

  26. [33]

    BeyondConcordanceCosmologywithMagnificationofGravitational- Wave Standard Sirens

    S.CameraandA.Nishizawa.“BeyondConcordanceCosmologywithMagnificationofGravitational- Wave Standard Sirens”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013), p. 151103

    2013

  27. [34]

    Constraining early and interacting dark energy with gravitational wave standard sirens: the potential of the eLISA mission

    C. Caprini and N. Tamanini. “Constraining early and interacting dark energy with gravitational wave standard sirens: the potential of the eLISA mission”. In:JCAP 1610.10 (2016), p. 006

    2016

  28. [35]

    Theoretical physics implications of gravitational wave obser- vation with future detectors

    K. Chamberlain and N. Yunes. “Theoretical physics implications of gravitational wave obser- vation with future detectors”. In:Phys. Rev. D96.8, 084039 (2017), p. 084039

    2017

  29. [36]

    A two per cent Hubble constant measure- ment from standard sirens within five years

    Hsin-Yu Chen, Maya Fishbach, and Daniel E. Holz. “A two per cent Hubble constant measure- ment from standard sirens within five years”. In:Nature 562.7728 (2018), pp. 545–547

    2018

  30. [37]

    Joint cosmological inference of standard sirens and gravitational wave weak lensing

    G. Congedo and A. Taylor. “Joint cosmological inference of standard sirens and gravitational wave weak lensing”. In:Phys. Rev. D99 (2019), p. 083526

    2019

  31. [38]

    Anisotropies of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: A Line Of Sight Approach

    C. R. Contaldi. “Anisotropies of Gravitational Wave Backgrounds: A Line Of Sight Approach”. In: Phys. Lett.B771 (2017), pp. 9–12

    2017

  32. [39]

    Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized post- Einsteinian framework

    N. Cornish et al. “Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized post- Einsteinian framework”. In:Phys. Rev. D84.6, 062003 (2011), p. 062003

    2011

  33. [40]

    Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A

    P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi. “Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.119.25, 251302 (2017), p. 251302

    2017

  34. [41]

    Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity

    M. Crisostomi, K. Koyama, and G. Tasinato. “Extended Scalar-Tensor Theories of Gravity”. In: JCAP 1604.04 (2016), p. 044

    2016

  35. [43]

    Anisotropy of the astrophysical gravitational wave back- ground: Analytic expression of the angular power spectrum and correlation with cosmological observations

    G. Cusin, C. Pitrou, and J.-P. Uzan. “Anisotropy of the astrophysical gravitational wave back- ground: Analytic expression of the angular power spectrum and correlation with cosmological observations”. In:Phys. Rev.D96.10 (2017), p. 103019

    2017

  36. [44]

    First predictions of the angular power spectrum of the astrophysical gravita- tional wave background

    G. Cusin et al. “First predictions of the angular power spectrum of the astrophysical gravita- tional wave background”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018), p. 231101

    2018

  37. [45]

    Properties of the stochastic astrophysical gravitational wave background: as- trophysical sources dependencies

    G. Cusin et al. “Properties of the stochastic astrophysical gravitational wave background: as- trophysical sources dependencies”. In:arXiv e-prints1904.07797 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Stochastic gravitational wave background anisotropies: astrophysical depen- dencies in the LIGO/Virgo and LISA bands

    G. Cusin et al. “Stochastic gravitational wave background anisotropies: astrophysical depen- dencies in the LIGO/Virgo and LISA bands”. In:arXiv e-prints1904.07757 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ultrahigh precision cosmology from gravitational waves

    C. Cutler and D. E. Holz. “Ultrahigh precision cosmology from gravitational waves”. In:Phys. Rev. D80 (2009), p. 104009

    2009

  40. [48]

    Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar the- ories of gravitation

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese. “Nonperturbative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar the- ories of gravitation”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.70.15 (1993), pp. 2220–2223

    1993

  41. [49]

    Gravitational Wave Bursts from Cosmic Strings

    T. Damour and A. Vilenkin. “Gravitational Wave Bursts from Cosmic Strings”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 85.18 (2000), pp. 3761–3764. 21

    2000

  42. [50]

    Scalar Gravitational Radiation from Binaries: Vainshtein Mechanism in Time- dependent Systems

    F. Dar et al. “Scalar Gravitational Radiation from Binaries: Vainshtein Mechanism in Time- dependent Systems”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.36.2 (2019), p. 025008

    2019

  43. [51]

    Massive Gravity

    C. de Rham. “Massive Gravity”. In:Living Reviews in Relativity17.1, 7 (2014), p. 7

    2014

  44. [52]

    Probing Gravity with Spacetime Sirens

    C. Deffayet and K. Menou. “Probing Gravity with Spacetime Sirens”. In:Astrophys. J. 668 (2007), pp. L143–L146

    2007

  45. [53]

    Fromk-essencetogeneralisedGalileons

    C.Deffayetetal.“Fromk-essencetogeneralisedGalileons”.In: Phys. Rev.D84(2011),p.064039

    2011

  46. [54]

    Inference of the cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: application to second generation interferometers

    W. Del Pozzo. “Inference of the cosmological parameters from gravitational waves: application to second generation interferometers”. In:Phys. Rev.D86 (2012), p. 043011

    2012

  47. [55]

    Cosmological inference using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron stars

    W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, and C. Messenger. “Cosmological inference using only gravitational wave observations of binary neutron stars”. In:Phys. Rev.D95.4 (2017), p. 043502

    2017

  48. [56]

    Probing gas disc physics with LISA: simulations of an intermediate mass ratio inspiral in an accretion disc

    A M Derdzinski et al. “Probing gas disc physics with LISA: simulations of an intermediate mass ratio inspiral in an accretion disc”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486.2 (2019), pp. 2754–2765

    2019

  49. [57]

    Periodic self-lensing from accreting massive black hole binaries

    D. J. D’Orazio and R. Di Stefano. “Periodic self-lensing from accreting massive black hole binaries”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.474 (2018), pp. 2975–2986

    2018

  50. [58]

    Accretion into the central cavity of a cir- cumbinary disc

    D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen. “Accretion into the central cavity of a cir- cumbinary disc”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.436 (2013), pp. 2997–3020

    2013

  51. [59]

    Metallicity-constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave background

    I. Dvorkin et al. “Metallicity-constrained merger rates of binary black holes and the stochastic gravitational wave background”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461.4 (2016), pp. 3877–3885

    2016

  52. [60]

    Synthetic model of the gravitational wave background from evolving binary compact objects

    I. Dvorkin et al. “Synthetic model of the gravitational wave background from evolving binary compact objects”. In:Phys. Rev.D94.10 (2016), p. 103011

    2016

  53. [61]

    TheGravitationalWaveBackgroundfromCoalescing Compact Binaries: A New Method

    E.F.D.EvangelistaandJ.C.N.Araujo.“TheGravitationalWaveBackgroundfromCoalescing Compact Binaries: A New Method”. In:Braz. J. Phys.44.6 (2014), pp. 824–831

    2014

  54. [62]

    Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalacárregui. “Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (25 2017), p. 251304

    2017

  55. [63]

    DarkEnergyinlightofMulti-MessengerGravitational- Wave astronomy

    J.M.EzquiagaandM.Zumalacárregui.“DarkEnergyinlightofMulti-MessengerGravitational- Wave astronomy”. In:Front. Astron. Space Sci.5 (2018), p. 44

    2018

  56. [64]

    Binary black hole accretion during inspiral and merger

    B. D. Farris et al. “Binary black hole accretion during inspiral and merger”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.447 (2015), pp. L80–L84

    2015

  57. [65]

    Binary Black Hole Accretion from a Circumbinary Disk: Gas Dynamics inside the Central Cavity

    B. D. Farris et al. “Binary Black Hole Accretion from a Circumbinary Disk: Gas Dynamics inside the Central Cavity”. In:Astrophys. J.783, 134 (2014), p. 134

    2014

  58. [66]

    A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant from GW170817 without the Electromagnetic Counterpart

    M. Fishbach et al. “A Standard Siren Measurement of the Hubble Constant from GW170817 without the Electromagnetic Counterpart”. In:Astrophys. J.871.1 (2019), p. L13

    2019

  59. [67]

    LIGO tells us LINERs are not optically thick RIAFs

    K. E. S. Ford and B. McKernan. “LIGO tells us LINERs are not optically thick RIAFs”. In: arXiv e-prints1907.04871 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent De- termination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch

    W. L. Freedman et al. “The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent De- termination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch”. In:arXiv e-prints 1907.05922 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational- Wave Detectors

    J. R. Gair et al. “Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational- Wave Detectors”. In:Living Rev. Rel.16 (2013), p. 7

    2013

  62. [70]

    Healthy theories beyond Horndeski

    J. Gleyzes et al. “Healthy theories beyond Horndeski”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 114.21 (2015), p. 211101

    2015

  63. [71]

    Electromagnetic chirp of a compact binary black hole: A phase template for the gravitational wave inspiral

    Z. Haiman. “Electromagnetic chirp of a compact binary black hole: A phase template for the gravitational wave inspiral”. In:Phys. Rev. D96.2, 023004 (2017), p. 023004

    2017

  64. [72]

    Bimetric Gravity from Ghost-free Massive Gravity

    S. F. Hassan and Rachel A. Rosen. “Bimetric Gravity from Ghost-free Massive Gravity”. In: JHEP 1202 (2012), p. 126

    2012

  65. [73]

    Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space

    G. W. Horndeski. “Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space”. In: Int.J.Theor.Phys. 10 (1974), pp. 363–384

    1974

  66. [74]

    Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point

    P. Hořava. “Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point”. In:Phys. Rev. D 79.8, 084008 (2009), p. 084008

    2009

  67. [75]

    Probing stellar binary black hole formation in galactic nuclei via the imprint of their center of mass acceleration on their gravitational wave signal

    K. Inayoshi et al. “Probing stellar binary black hole formation in galactic nuclei via the imprint of their center of mass acceleration on their gravitational wave signal”. In:Phys. Rev.D96.6 (2017), p. 063014. 22

    2017

  68. [76]

    Estimating the angular power spectrum of the gravitational-wave background in the presence of shot noise

    A. C. Jenkins, J. D. Romano, and M. Sakellariadou. “Estimating the angular power spectrum of the gravitational-wave background in the presence of shot noise”. In:arXiv e-prints1907.06642 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave back- ground: Formalism and the cosmic string case

    A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou. “Anisotropies in the stochastic gravitational-wave back- ground: Formalism and the cosmic string case”. In:Phys. Rev.D98.6 (2018), p. 063509

    2018

  70. [78]

    Shot noise in the astrophysical gravitational-wave back- ground

    A. C. Jenkins and M. Sakellariadou. “Shot noise in the astrophysical gravitational-wave back- ground”. In:arXiv e-prints1902.07719 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Anisotropies in the astrophysical gravitational-wave background: Predic- tions for the detection of compact binaries by LIGO and Virgo

    A. C. Jenkins et al. “Anisotropies in the astrophysical gravitational-wave background: Predic- tions for the detection of compact binaries by LIGO and Virgo”. In:Phys. Rev. D98.6, 063501 (2018), p. 063501

    2018

  72. [80]

    KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear

    S. Joudaki et al. “KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Cosmology with cosmic shear”. In: arXiv e-prints1906.09262 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama. “Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations”. In:Prog. Theor. Phys.126 (2011), pp. 511–529

    2011

  74. [82]

    Premerger Localization of Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens with LISA: Triggered Search for an Electromagnetic Counterpart

    B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and K. Menou. “Premerger Localization of Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens with LISA: Triggered Search for an Electromagnetic Counterpart”. In:Astrophys. J. 684.2 (2008), pp. 870–887

    2008

  75. [83]

    Observable signatures of extreme mass-ratio inspiral black holebinariesembeddedinthinaccretiondisks

    B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb. “Observable signatures of extreme mass-ratio inspiral black holebinariesembeddedinthinaccretiondisks”.In: Phys. Rev. D84.2,024032(2011),p.024032

    2011

  76. [84]

    Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations

    S. Komossa. “Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations”. In: Journal of High Energy Astrophysics7 (2015), pp. 148 –157

    2015

  77. [85]

    Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho. “Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies”. In:ARA&A 51 (2013), pp. 511–653

    2013

  78. [86]

    TANAMI blazars in the IceCube PeV-neutrino fields

    F. Krauß et al. “TANAMI blazars in the IceCube PeV-neutrino fields”. In:A&A 566 (2014), p. L7

    2014

  79. [87]

    Localizing Coalescing Massive Black Hole Binaries with Grav- itational Waves

    R. N. Lang and S. A. Hughes. “Localizing Coalescing Massive Black Hole Binaries with Grav- itational Waves”. In:Astrophys. J.677.2 (2008), pp. 1184–1200

    2008

  80. [88]

    Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability

    D. Langlois and K. Noui. “Degenerate higher derivative theories beyond Horndeski: evading the Ostrogradski instability”. In:JCAP 1602.02 (2016), p. 034

    2016

  81. [89]

    Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor Theories

    D. Langlois et al. “Effective Description of Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor Theories”. In:JCAP 1705.05 (2017), p. 033

    2017

  82. [90]

    Euclid Definition Study Report

    R. Laureijs et al. “Euclid Definition Study Report”. In:arXiv e-prints1110.3193 (2011)

    2011 arXiv

  83. [91]

    On the rate of black hole binary mergers in galactic nuclei due to dynamical hardening

    N. W. C. Leigh et al. “On the rate of black hole binary mergers in galactic nuclei due to dynamical hardening”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.474 (2018), pp. 5672–5683

    2018

  84. [92]

    Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves

    L. Lombriser and A. Taylor. “Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves”. In: JCAP 1603 (2016), p. 031

    2016

  85. [93]

    LSST Science Book, Version 2.0

    LSST Science Collaboration. “LSST Science Book, Version 2.0”. In:arXiv e-prints 0912.0201 (2009)

    2009 arXiv

  86. [94]

    High energy neutrinos from the tidal disruption of stars

    C. Lunardini and W. Winter. “High energy neutrinos from the tidal disruption of stars”. In: Phys. Rev. D95 (12 2017), p. 123001

    2017

  87. [95]

    TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

    J. Luo et al. “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector”. In:Class. Quantum Grav. 33.3, 035010 (2016), p. 035010

    2016

  88. [96]

    Theastrophysicalsciencecaseforadecihertzgravitational- wave detector

    I.Mandel,A.Sesana,andA.Vecchio.“Theastrophysicalsciencecaseforadecihertzgravitational- wave detector”. In:Class. Quantum Grav.35.5, 054004 (2018), p. 054004

    2018

  89. [97]

    Quasar Clustering and the Lifetime of Quasars

    P. Martini and D. H. Weinberg. “Quasar Clustering and the Lifetime of Quasars”. In:Astrophys. J. 547 (2001), pp. 12–26

    2001

  90. [98]

    Decoherence of Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity

    K. Max, M. Platscher, and J. Smirnov. “Decoherence of Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity”. In:Phys. Rev.D97.6 (2018), p. 064009

    2018

  91. [99]

    Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity

    K. Max, M. Platscher, and J. Smirnov. “Gravitational Wave Oscillations in Bigravity”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.119.11 (2017), p. 111101

    2017

  92. [100]

    Detection of radial velocity shifts due to black hole binaries near merger

    B. McKernan and K. E. S. Ford. “Detection of radial velocity shifts due to black hole binaries near merger”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.452 (2015), pp. L1–L5. 23

    2015

  93. [101]

    Hill sphere contraction at light-speed: Prompt electromagnetic emission from the merger of stellar mass black holes in an AGN accretion disk

    B. McKernan et al. “Hill sphere contraction at light-speed: Prompt electromagnetic emission from the merger of stellar mass black holes in an AGN accretion disk”. In:arXiv e-prints 1907.03746 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Intermediate mass black holes in AGN discs - I. Production and growth

    B. McKernan et al. “Intermediate mass black holes in AGN discs - I. Production and growth”. In: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.425 (2012), pp. 460–469

    2012

  95. [103]

    Intermediate-mass black holes in AGN discs - II. Model predictions and observational constraints

    B. McKernan et al. “Intermediate-mass black holes in AGN discs - II. Model predictions and observational constraints”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.441 (2014), pp. 900–909

    2014

  96. [104]

    Monte-Carlo simulations of black hole mergers in AGN disks: Lowχ_eff mergers and predictions for LIGO

    B. McKernan et al. “Monte-Carlo simulations of black hole mergers in AGN disks: Lowχ_eff mergers and predictions for LIGO”. In:arXiv e-prints1907.0435 (2019)

    2019

  97. [105]

    Ripple effects and oscillations in the broad Fe Kαline as a probe of massive black hole mergers

    B. McKernan et al. “Ripple effects and oscillations in the broad Fe Kαline as a probe of massive black hole mergers”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.432 (2013), pp. 1468–1482

    2013

  98. [106]

    Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from gravi- tational Cherenkov radiation

    G. D. Moore and A. E. Nelson. “Lower bound on the propagation speed of gravity from gravi- tational Cherenkov radiation”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2001.9, 023 (2001), p. 023

    2001

  99. [107]

    Gravitational-Wave Background from Binary Mergers and Metallicity Evolution of Galaxies

    K. Nakazato, Y. Niino, and N. Sago. “Gravitational-Wave Background from Binary Mergers and Metallicity Evolution of Galaxies”. In:Astrophys. J.832.2 (2016), p. 146

    2016

  100. [108]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation

    A. Nishizawa. “Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. I. Formulation”. In:Phys. Rev.D97 (2018), p. 104037

    2018

  101. [109]

    Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. III. Future prospect

    A. Nishizawa and S. Arai. “Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. III. Future prospect”. In:Phys. Rev. D99 (10 2019), p. 104038

    2019

  102. [110]

    Tracing the redshift evolution of Hubble parameter with gravitational-wave standard sirens

    A. Nishizawa, A. Taruya, and S. Saito. “Tracing the redshift evolution of Hubble parameter with gravitational-wave standard sirens”. In:Phys. Rev.D83 (2011), p. 084045

    2011

  103. [111]

    Probing non-tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave back- grounds with ground-based laser interferometers

    A. Nishizawa et al. “Probing non-tensorial polarizations of stochastic gravitational-wave back- grounds with ground-based laser interferometers”. In:Phys. Rev.D79 (2009), p. 082002

    2009

  104. [112]

    Circumbinary Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion into Inspiraling Binary Black Holes

    S. C. Noble et al. “Circumbinary Magnetohydrodynamic Accretion into Inspiraling Binary Black Holes”. In:Astrophys. J.755, 51 (2012), p. 51

    2012

  105. [113]

    Cosmological constraints from the convergence 1-point probability distribu- tion

    K. Patton et al. “Cosmological constraints from the convergence 1-point probability distribu- tion”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.472 (2017), p. 439

    2017

  106. [114]

    The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach

    M. Punturo et al. “The third generation of gravitational wave observatories and their science reach”. In:Class. Quantum Grav.27 (2010), p. 084007

    2010

  107. [115]

    Digging Deeper: Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves below the Binary-Black-Hole-ProducedStochasticBackground

    T. Regimbau et al. “Digging Deeper: Observing Primordial Gravitational Waves below the Binary-Black-Hole-ProducedStochasticBackground”.In: Phys. Rev. Lett.118(152017),p.151105

  108. [116]

    Gravitational Rainbows: LIGO and Dark Energy at its Cutoff

    C. de Rham and S. Melville. “Gravitational Rainbows: LIGO and Dark Energy at its Cutoff”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.121.22 (2018), p. 221101

    2018

  109. [117]

    Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyondΛCDM

    A. G. Riess et al. “Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyondΛCDM”. In: The Astrophysical Journal876 (2019), p. 85

    2019

  110. [118]

    Observational Signatures of Binary Supermassive Black Holes

    C. Roedig, J. H. Krolik, and M. C. Miller. “Observational Signatures of Binary Supermassive Black Holes”. In:Astrophys. J.785, 115 (2014), p. 115

    2014

  111. [119]

    Limiting eccentricity of subparsec massive black hole binaries surrounded by self-gravitating gas discs

    C. Roedig et al. “Limiting eccentricity of subparsec massive black hole binaries surrounded by self-gravitating gas discs”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.415 (2011), pp. 3033–3041

    2011

  112. [120]

    Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories

    J. Sakstein and B. Jain. “Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.119.25 (2017), p. 251303

    2017

  113. [121]

    Anisotropic Stress as a Signature of Nonstandard Propagation of Gravita- tional Waves

    I. D. Saltas et al. “Anisotropic Stress as a Signature of Nonstandard Propagation of Gravita- tional Waves”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.113.19 (2014), p. 191101

    2014

  114. [122]

    The status of DECIGO

    S. Sato et al. “The status of DECIGO”. In:Journal of Physics: Conference Series840 (2017), p. 012010

    2017

  115. [123]

    GWxLSS:chasingtheprogenitorsofmergingbinaryblackholes

    G.Scelfoetal.“GWxLSS:chasingtheprogenitorsofmergingbinaryblackholes”.In: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018.9, 039 (2018), p. 039

    2018

  116. [124]

    Electromagnetic Chirps from Neutron Star-Black Hole Mergers

    J. D. Schnittman et al. “Electromagnetic Chirps from Neutron Star-Black Hole Mergers”. In: Astrophys. J.853, 123 (2018), p. 123

    2018

  117. [125]

    Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations

    B. F. Schutz. “Determining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations”. In: Nature 323 (1986), p. 310. 24

    1986

  118. [126]

    Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes

    A. Secunda et al. “Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes”. In:Astrophys. J.878, 85 (2019), p. 85

    2019

  119. [127]

    Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914

    A. Sesana. “Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett.116.23, 231102 (2016), p. 231102

    2016

  120. [128]

    Multimessenger astronomy with pulsar timing and X-ray observations of massive black hole binaries

    A. Sesana et al. “Multimessenger astronomy with pulsar timing and X-ray observations of massive black hole binaries”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.420 (2012), pp. 860–877

    2012

  121. [129]

    Constraining Nonperturbative Strong-Field Effects in Scalar-Tensor Gravity by Combining Pulsar Timing and Laser-Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    L. Shao et al. “Constraining Nonperturbative Strong-Field Effects in Scalar-Tensor Gravity by Combining Pulsar Timing and Laser-Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detectors”. In:Phys- ical Review X7.4, 041025 (2017), p. 041025

    2017

  122. [130]

    Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Circumbinary Ac- cretion Disks: Disk Structures and Angular Momentum Transport

    J.-M. Shi et al. “Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Circumbinary Ac- cretion Disks: Disk Structures and Angular Momentum Transport”. In:Astrophys. J.749, 118 (2012), p. 118

    2012

  123. [131]

    Gravitational-Wave Stochastic Background from Cosmic Strings

    X. Siemens, V. Mandic, and J. Creighton. “Gravitational-Wave Stochastic Background from Cosmic Strings”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.98.11, 111101 (2007), p. 111101

    2007

  124. [132]

    First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from a Dark Standard Siren using the Dark Energy Survey Galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo Binary–Black-hole Merger GW170814

    M. Soares-Santos et al. “First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from a Dark Standard Siren using the Dark Energy Survey Galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo Binary–Black-hole Merger GW170814”. In:Astrophys. J.876.1 (2019), p. L7

    2019

  125. [133]

    Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the uni- verse

    A. A. Starobinskiˇi. “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the uni- verse”. In:Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters30 (1979), p. 682

    1979

  126. [134]

    Late time cosmology with LISA: Probing the cosmic expansion with massive black hole binary mergers as standard sirens

    N. Tamanini. “Late time cosmology with LISA: Probing the cosmic expansion with massive black hole binary mergers as standard sirens”. In:J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.840.1 (2017), p. 012029

    2017

  127. [135]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. III: probing the expan- sion of the universe using gravitational wave standard sirens

    N. Tamanini et al. “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. III: probing the expan- sion of the universe using gravitational wave standard sirens”. In:J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2016.4, 002 (2016), p. 002

    2016

  128. [136]

    The peculiar acceleration of stellar-origin black hole binaries: measurement and biases with LISA

    N. Tamanini et al. “The peculiar acceleration of stellar-origin black hole binaries: measurement and biases with LISA”. In:arXiv e-prints1907.02018 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  129. [137]

    The late inspiral of supermassive black hole binaries with circumbinary gas discs in the LISA band

    Y. Tang, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen. “The late inspiral of supermassive black hole binaries with circumbinary gas discs in the LISA band”. In:Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476 (2018), pp. 2249–2257

    2018

  130. [138]

    HubblewithouttheHubble:Cosmologyusingadvanced gravitational-wave detectors alone

    S.R.Taylor,J.R.Gair,andI.Mandel.“HubblewithouttheHubble:Cosmologyusingadvanced gravitational-wave detectors alone”. In:Phys. Rev.D85 (2012), p. 023535

    2012

  131. [139]

    LISA Sensitivities to Gravitational Waves from Relativistic Metric Theories of Gravity

    M. Tinto and M. E. da Silva Alves. “LISA Sensitivities to Gravitational Waves from Relativistic Metric Theories of Gravity”. In:Phys. Rev.D82 (2010), p. 122003

    2010

  132. [140]

    Detectability of inflation-produced gravitational waves

    M. S. Turner. “Detectability of inflation-produced gravitational waves”. In:Phys. Rev. D55.2 (1997), R435–R439

    1997

  133. [141]

    Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries

    C. M. Will. “Testing scalar-tensor gravity with gravitational-wave observations of inspiralling compact binaries”. In:Phys. Rev. D50.10 (1994), pp. 6058–6067

    1994

  134. [142]

    C. M. Will. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    2018

  135. [143]

    H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement ofH0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes

    K. C. Wong et al. “H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement ofH0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes”. In:arXiv e-prints1907.04869 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Challenging the presence of scalar charge and dipolar radiation in binary pulsars

    K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, and N. Yunes. “Challenging the presence of scalar charge and dipolar radiation in binary pulsars”. In:Phys. Rev. D93.2, 024010 (2016), p. 024010

    2016

  137. [145]

    Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Y. Yang et al. “Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei”. In:arXiv e-prints 1906.09281 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Fundamental theoretical bias in gravitational wave astrophysics and the parametrized post-Einsteinian framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius. “Fundamental theoretical bias in gravitational wave astrophysics and the parametrized post-Einsteinian framework”. In:Phys. Rev. D 80.12, 122003 (2009), p. 122003

    2009

  139. [147]

    Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals

    N. Yunes et al. “Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals”. In:Physical Review Letters107.17, 171103 (2011), p. 171103. 25 Proposing team John Baker (Goddard Space Flight Centre, US) Tessa Baker (Queen Mary University...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.